[Bug fortran/40569] F2008: Support COMPILER_OPTIONS() / COMPILER_VERSION()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40569 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2010-09-27 06:34:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > Basic implementation works. Remains to do: > ... > (c) CLASS_INQUIRY instead of CLASS_IMPURE? (d) Documentation in intrinsic.te

[Bug fortran/45636] Failed to fold simple Fortran string

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/45806] New: gcc build failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45806 Summary: gcc build failure Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org R

[Bug target/45805] New: VFP/Neon double precision register expected -- `vmovl.s16 q2,s8

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45805 Summary: VFP/Neon double precision register expected -- `vmovl.s16 q2,s8 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Com

[Bug c/45804] New: ARM: unnecessary sign extension

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45804 Summary: ARM: unnecessary sign extension Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.o

[Bug c/44803] LIBRARY_PATH should work on cross-compilers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44803 --- Comment #3 from Felipe Contreras 2010-09-27 01:28:24 UTC --- Is this not clear? It would be useful to cross-compile like this: export C_INCLUDE_PATH=/opt/arm/ffmpeg/include export LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/arm/ffmpeg/lib But LIBRARY_PATH is ignore

[Bug middle-end/45388] [4.6 Regression] Global constructor not found

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45388 --- Comment #7 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-09-26 23:21:44 UTC --- Hi Steve, > I have a patch I am testing. It worked on the test case but I haven't fully > bootstrapped it. Keep plugging away on this. I have the sense that the brea

[Bug fortran/42954] [4.5/4.6 regression] TARGET_*_CPP_BUILDINS issues with gfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42954 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0 Summary|[4.5 regression]

[Bug fortran/40569] F2008: Support COMPILER_OPTIONS() / COMPILER_VERSION()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40569 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2010-09-26 22:46:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Basic implementation works. Remains to do: ... (c) CLASS_INQUIRY instead of CLASS_IMPURE?

[Bug fortran/40569] F2008: Support COMPILER_OPTIONS() / COMPILER_VERSION()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40569 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2010-09-26 22:40:26 UTC --- Basic implementation works. Remains to do: (a) COMPILER_OPTIONS(): Return a more useful string than "" (b) "-Wall" gives a bogus warning: Warning: Type specified for intrinsic func

[Bug fortran/40568] F2008: rejected as initialization expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40568 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|F2008: C_SIZEOF is in the |F2008: rejected as |wro

[Bug fortran/40568] F2008: C_SIZEOF is in the wrong scope, rejected as initialization expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40568 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2010-09-26 22:30:52 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sun Sep 26 22:30:48 2010 New Revision: 164639 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164639 Log: 2010-09-27 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/40

[Bug fortran/40569] F2008: Support COMPILER_OPTIONS() / COMPILER_VERSION()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40569 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2010-09-26 22:30:52 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sun Sep 26 22:30:48 2010 New Revision: 164639 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164639 Log: 2010-09-27 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/40

[Bug c++/43601] Enormous increase in DLL object files size in 4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601 --- Comment #29 from Vadim Zeitlin 2010-09-26 22:09:16 UTC --- Thanks Cesar for your analysis, I was doing the same thing but you beat me to it. Anyhow, I can confirm your results, i.e. that the increase in size is first and foremost due to the i

[Bug bootstrap/35855] build locale not properly handled with awk scripts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35855 --- Comment #3 from Mike Frysinger 2010-09-26 20:16:07 UTC --- the same locale that breaks every time: et_EE example build failure: http://bugs.gentoo.org/215828

[Bug bootstrap/45248] Stage 3 bootstrap comparison failure (powerpc-darwin8)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45248 Vincent Lefèvre changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vincent at vinc17 dot org --- Comment #

[Bug c++/45770] global access allowance exceeds that of derived class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45770 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/45795] [OOP] ICE in in gfc_add_component_ref plus bogus error message

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45795 Daniel Kraft changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/45783] [4.6 Regression] ICE in gfc_add_component_ref, at fortran/class.c:77

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45783 Daniel Kraft changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/45795] [OOP] ICE in in gfc_add_component_ref plus bogus error message

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45795 --- Comment #7 from Daniel Kraft 2010-09-26 19:25:55 UTC --- Author: domob Date: Sun Sep 26 19:25:52 2010 New Revision: 164638 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164638 Log: 2010-09-26 Daniel Kraft PR fortran/45783

[Bug fortran/45783] [4.6 Regression] ICE in gfc_add_component_ref, at fortran/class.c:77

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45783 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Kraft 2010-09-26 19:25:55 UTC --- Author: domob Date: Sun Sep 26 19:25:52 2010 New Revision: 164638 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164638 Log: 2010-09-26 Daniel Kraft PR fortran/45783

[Bug web/45798] bugzilla: line-wrapping issues with description and comments.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45798 Frédéric Buclin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug web/45802] [bugzilla] "driver" component description needs updating

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45802 Frédéric Buclin changed: What|Removed |Added Component|other |web Severity|normal

[Bug web/45798] bugzilla: line-wrapping issues with description and comments.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45798 --- Comment #4 from Ralf Wildenhues 2010-09-26 18:31:50 UTC --- Hmm, that's not what I meant though. I see e.g., in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37888#c1 the word "as" being wrapped to a line of its own. Hmm, larger or smaller te

[Bug other/45802] New: [bugzilla] "driver" component description needs updating

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45802 Summary: [bugzilla] "driver" component description needs updating Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/45770] global access allowance exceeds that of derived class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45770 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot

[Bug web/45798] bugzilla: line-wrapping issues with description and comments.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45798 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-26 18:15:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Surely possible, but I'd wonder if I'm the only one seeing that then. Running > Debian's iceweasel 3.0.6, Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.

[Bug c++/45770] global access allowance exceeds that of derived class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45770 MichieldeB at aim dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution

[Bug web/45798] bugzilla: line-wrapping issues with description and comments.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45798 --- Comment #2 from Ralf Wildenhues 2010-09-26 17:59:13 UTC --- Surely possible, but I'd wonder if I'm the only one seeing that then. Running Debian's iceweasel 3.0.6, Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.0.19) Gecko/2010091807 Iceweasel/3

[Bug bootstrap/45801] New: [4.6 regression] powerpc64-linux bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45801 Summary: [4.6 regression] powerpc64-linux bootstrap comparison failure Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug web/45798] bugzilla: line-wrapping issues with description and comments.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45798 --- Comment #1 from Frédéric Buclin 2010-09-26 17:47:19 UTC --- This is not supposed to happen. Maybe a bug in your browser?

[Bug bootstrap/25672] [4.3/4.4?/4.5 regression] cross build's libgcc picks up CFLAGS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25672 Pawel Sikora changed: What|Removed |Added Target|ppc64-pld-linux |x86_64-pc-mingw32 Known to work|

[Bug objc/25361] vectors are not encoded

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25361 Nicola Pero changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 CC|

[Bug objc/25464] objc_sizeof_type vs zero sized arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25464 Nicola Pero changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug objc/25450] Enums are encoded incorrectly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25450 Nicola Pero changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug objc/45763] incorrect @encode(BOOL *)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45763 Nicola Pero changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/45800] New: [M32C] compile error on increment volatile long var

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45800 Summary: [M32C] compile error on increment volatile long var Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Co

[Bug target/45787] r164531 breaks plugin support on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45787 --- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth 2010-09-26 15:12:36 UTC --- Revised patch with corrected changelog at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg02054.html.

[Bug c++/45799] New: ICE + segfault when compiling Qt's WebKit JavaScriptCore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45799 Summary: ICE + segfault when compiling Qt's WebKit JavaScriptCore Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug plugins/45787] r164531 breaks plugin support on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45787 --- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth 2010-09-26 14:11:34 UTC --- Patch posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg02037.html and test results at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-09/msg02343.html.

[Bug bootstrap/45248] Stage 3 bootstrap comparison failure (powerpc-darwin8)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45248 --- Comment #9 from margali at imapmail dot org 2010-09-26 14:04:21 UTC --- So in the end I did the following and it finally compiled: - uninstall binutils - apply cumulative fink patch to source directory - hack configure to include the --with-dwa

[Bug other/37210] Prohibit Default Builds in the GCC Source Tree

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37210 --- Comment #5 from Ralf Wildenhues 2010-09-26 13:44:43 UTC --- status update: .

[Bug fortran/42954] [4.5 regression] TARGET_*_CPP_BUILDINS issues with gfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42954 --- Comment #7 from Francois-Xavier Coudert 2010-09-26 13:44:10 UTC --- After some auditing: TARGET_OBJFMT_CPP_BUILTINS is safe (it's only called in config/elfos.h and config/alpha/elf.h, and contains a single, unconditionnal call to builtin_defi

[Bug bootstrap/37888] make install fails attempting to build gcc/intl.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37888 Ralf Wildenhues changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug web/45798] New: bugzilla: line-wrapping issues with description and comments.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45798 Summary: bugzilla: line-wrapping issues with description and comments. Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Com

[Bug fortran/42954] [4.5 regression] TARGET_*_CPP_BUILDINS issues with gfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42954 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/44621] syntax error in gcc-4.5.0/configure for ksh

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44621 Ralf Wildenhues changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/45793] [4.6 Regressions] Numerous test-suite failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45793 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Version|unknown

[Bug fortran/45793] [4.6 Regressions] Numerous test-suite failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45793 --- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle 2010-09-26 12:30:57 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sun Sep 26 12:30:54 2010 New Revision: 164631 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164631 Log: 2010-09-26 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/457

[Bug fortran/45797] New: ICE (segfault) with gfortran.dg/derived_constr_func_1.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45797 Summary: ICE (segfault) with gfortran.dg/derived_constr_func_1.f90 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug fortran/45795] [OOP] ICE in in gfc_add_component_ref plus bogus error message

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45795 --- Comment #6 from Salvatore Filippone 2010-09-26 10:27:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Confirmed. I do not yet see how this is related to my commit, but will look > into it of course. Thanks for the report! Well, considering how many ti

[Bug fortran/45081] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:4208

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45081 --- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas 2010-09-26 09:04:38 UTC --- I'll do 4.4 and 4.3 when I get back to Barcelona on Tuesday night. Paul

[Bug fortran/45783] [4.6 Regression] ICE in gfc_add_component_ref, at fortran/class.c:77

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45783 Daniel Kraft changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/45795] [OOP] ICE in in gfc_add_component_ref plus bogus error message

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45795 Daniel Kraft changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/45793] [4.6 Regressions] Numerous test-suite failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45793 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug fortran/45795] [OOP] ICE in in gfc_add_component_ref plus bogus error message

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45795 --- Comment #4 from Salvatore Filippone 2010-09-26 07:43:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > It is very likely a duplicate of pr45783. > > The code compiles at r164549 and fails at r164550

[Bug fortran/45793] [4.6 Regressions] Numerous test-suite failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45793 --- Comment #7 from Kazumoto Kojima 2010-09-26 07:41:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > does this patch fix the problem for you? Yes. I've confirmed that all fortran regressions on sh4-unknown-linux-gnu go away with your patch in #5.

[Bug fortran/45795] [OOP] ICE in in gfc_add_component_ref plus bogus error message

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45795 --- Comment #3 from Salvatore Filippone 2010-09-26 07:33:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > It is very likely a duplicate of pr45783. The code compiles at r164549