http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45081
--- Comment #15 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-08
06:01:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/derived_array_intrinisics_1.f90 -O (test for excess
errors)
FAIL:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44150
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-08
09:13:00 UTC ---
Honza made it go latent by defaulting to balanced partitioning.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45656
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|debug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45656
--- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-08
09:18:15 UTC ---
Changing it to debug was wrong too, as it did not just affect debug
information.
Then you need to change the ChangeLog.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45893
--- Comment #18 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2010-10-08
09:26:17 UTC ---
Excellent. Thanks a lot again Jon!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-08
09:44:04 UTC ---
+ if (CONVERT_EXPR_CODE_P (rhs_code)
+ TREE_TYPE (lhs) != TREE_TYPE (first_stmt_lhs))
checking types_compatible_p (TREE_TYPE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45938
Summary: tree tag for CLASSTYPE_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATION spec
is confusing.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45939
Summary: negative location ranges generated
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45939
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-08
10:53:41 UTC ---
The problem could not be reproduced with head. On head the var_location note in
question is never been generated. I was not able to figure out which change
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38340
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45403
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-08
11:32:00 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Oct 8 11:31:56 2010
New Revision: 165163
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165163
Log:
PR libstdc++/45403
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45403
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45403
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-08
12:04:21 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Oct 8 12:04:14 2010
New Revision: 165164
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165164
Log:
PR libstdc++/45403
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45403
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45699
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-08
12:12:34 UTC ---
The problem seems to be the only folding of OBJ_TYPE_REF we do and
which comes from a (copy) constructor. So I assume this is the same
issue as PR 45934.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940
Summary: [trans-mem] Error of unsafe function even if annotated
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45805
belagod at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45805
--- Comment #10 from richard.earnshaw at arm dot com 2010-10-08 12:53:40 UTC ---
I shall be out of the office from Monday 11 October until Monday 1 November; I
will not have email access during most of that time, so I will read your
message when I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40893
Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rearnsha at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45847
belagod at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45941
Summary: Failed compile on Loongson2f
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
Summary: class will not get friends with another class
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45936
--- Comment #3 from gee jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-10-08 14:12:53 UTC ---
gcc without -mno-cygwin also fails to generate target code.. version of
binutils is 2.20.51.20101005
$ gcc -DHAVE_HYPOT -DHAVE_FILE64 -DHAVE_FONTCONFIG -DHAVE_LIBIDN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43725
--- Comment #5 from Siarhei Siamashka siarhei.siamashka at gmail dot com
2010-10-08 14:13:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, siarhei.siamashka at gmail dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43725
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45699
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-08
14:40:41 UTC ---
Please disregard the previous comment, I saw what I wanted to see and
not what was actually there. But it is true that avoiding the only
O_T_R folding
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-08
14:41:28 UTC ---
It's not entirely clear what you're saying is a bug, because your testcase
doesn't give any error.
It's more helpful to provide the source code that you
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
--- Comment #3 from Michiel MichieldeB at aim dot com 2010-10-08 14:51:36 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #1)
It's not entirely clear what you're saying is a bug, because your testcase
doesn't give any error.
It's more helpful to provide the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
Michiel MichieldeB at aim dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-08
15:08:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #2)
This code is not valid, G++ is correct to reject it.
Please explain why the code is invalid, and do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45343
Gideon Amos gideon.amos at canfieldsci dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
--- Comment #7 from Michiel MichieldeB at aim dot com 2010-10-08 15:12:36 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #3)
Apparently you are making the same mistake as the compiler.
Before adjusting the sentence to use a proper
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-08
15:36:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #3)
Apparently you are making the same mistake as the compiler.
Before
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
--- Comment #9 from Michiel MichieldeB at aim dot com 2010-10-08 15:43:13 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #2)
This code is not valid, G++ is correct to reject it.
Please explain why the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45699
--- Comment #8 from bredelin at ucla dot edu 2010-10-08 15:58:49 UTC ---
When you say segfault, I presume you mean abort?
When I use the debugger, the problem appears to be in the call to
new Parameters(*P);
On x86_64, the problem occurs as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-08
15:59:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
I really tried everything, but I have to admit I missed that one. Sorry. But
you have to admit that it is a rather unnatural way
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
--- Comment #11 from Michiel MichieldeB at aim dot com 2010-10-08 16:09:33
UTC ---
C++ is designed to give an error message which is syntactically correct, but
semantically incorrect.
I thought that the template prechecker (preprocessor or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45932
--- Comment #2 from jules at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-08 16:17:58 UTC ---
Could you be more specific about testsuite options, etc. needed to observe this
apparent regression? I haven't been able to reproduce it using default options,
nor by
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35810
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-08
16:28:39 UTC ---
Paul's draft patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-10/msg00100.html
Frédéric Buclin lpso...@netscape.net has used the 'sudo' feature to
access
GCC Bugzilla using your account.
Frédéric Buclin lpso...@netscape.net provided the following reason for
doing this:
Checking email preferences for the mailing-list. Ignore this message.
If you feel that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45699
--- Comment #9 from bredelin at ucla dot edu 2010-10-08 16:37:15 UTC ---
On x86_32, the problem occurs somewhat differently. All I did differently is
add -m32.
It seems that on x86_32, the copy constructor
vectorint::vectorint(const vector
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45922
--- Comment #2 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-10-08
16:47:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I set the email prefs accordingly.
Oops, sorry. That was me, using the gcc-bugs@ user account to check email
prefs. So as I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45699
--- Comment #10 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-08
16:51:19 UTC ---
I think I know what is going on. BINFO_VIRTUALS of the BINFO
describing Probability_Model within Parameters pint to a wring thunk
of the method
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45923
--- Comment #2 from Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at redhat dot com 2010-10-08
17:12:35 UTC ---
It is not valid for real() to be constexpr in a non-literal class
This is a helpful diagnostic. The existing one is not.
-benjamin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40893
--- Comment #4 from paul walmsley paul at pwsan dot com 2010-10-08 17:17:24
UTC ---
The bug also appears without volatile:
/* generates an unnecessary uxth */
void foo(unsigned short a, unsigned short b, unsigned short c,
unsigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45943
Summary: gfortran.dg/streamio_16.f90: Fails under MinGW64 -
probably \r\n vs \n issue
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45699
--- Comment #11 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-08
17:57:11 UTC ---
Created attachment 21998
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21998
proposed patch
But fortunately BINFOs contain the delta and so we can
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45944
Summary: genmddeps segfaults processing mips.md
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45923
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-08
18:37:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
It is not valid for real() to be constexpr in a non-literal class
This is a helpful diagnostic. The existing one is not.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45944
--- Comment #1 from Jeff Moe moe at blagblagblag dot org 2010-10-08 18:51:27
UTC ---
It was requested I post the ./configure and make lines:
+ ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45945
Summary: ICE: verify_ssa failed: error: SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT is
wrong when using inline ASM with -flto/-fwhopr
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45505
Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45943
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45946
Summary: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2127 when using
_Decimal128 with -Os -fno-omit-frame-pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45903
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-08
20:49:24 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 8 20:49:19 2010
New Revision: 165200
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165200
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45903
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-08
20:49:52 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 8 20:49:44 2010
New Revision: 165202
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165202
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45947
Summary: ICE: tree code 'template_decl' is not supported in
gimple streams with -flto/-fwhopr
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45943
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-08
22:28:54 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Oct 8 22:28:49 2010
New Revision: 165208
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165208
Log:
2010-10-08 Jerry
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45943
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45948
Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in find_uses_to_rename_use
(tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:1242) with -O2
-ftree-loop-distribution
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45949
Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in gimple_default_def (tree-dfa.c:538)
with -flto/-fwhopr on invalid code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45950
Summary: [4.6 Regression} ICE segmentation fault compiling
__udivdi3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45656
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|debug
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45950
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45950
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa*-*-* (32-bit) |hppa*-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45950
--- Comment #3 from froydnj at codesourcery dot com froydnj at codesourcery
dot com 2010-10-09 03:34:20 UTC ---
John, could you please confirm whether
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg00761.html
fixes the build errors that you see?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45951
Summary: [4.6 regression] Revision 165133 breaks bootstrap on
Linux/ia32
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45951
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-09
05:06:26 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sat Oct 9 05:06:21 2010
New Revision: 165214
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165214
Log:
Add AC_CANONICAL_SYSTEM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45952
Summary: [4.6 regression] Revision 165178 breaks bootstrap on
Linux/ia32
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45939
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-debug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45913
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-09
05:34:15 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sat Oct 9 05:34:10 2010
New Revision: 165215
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165215
Log:
Support
72 matches
Mail list logo
