http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46060
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45980
--- Comment #1 from Carrot 2010-10-18 06:24:04 UTC
---
The replacement of constant loading with add operations is occurred at pass
postreload in function reload_cse_move2add. It is straight forward to extend
that to other ALU operations, such as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46062
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45865
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jgu222 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #11 from H.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46062
Summary: TOT gcc: ice in dwarf2out_cfi_begin_epilogue, at
dwarf2out.c:2930
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46060
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46061
Summary: Variadic Template Templates: not expandable into
fixed-size argument list, Implementation Gap.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Rjesava problem slabog wireless signala,
hvata signale cak do 1-2 km udaljenosti!
Te Ima puno bolji i stabilniji signal od drugih!!
Trenutno najjaci Wireless USB Adapter na Trzistu!!
RTL8187L Chipset
2 WATA IZLAZNE SNAGE na b/g standardu!!
Dolazi s Antenom od 10 DBI-a !!
Backtrack 4 DVD i U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46055
--- Comment #6 from Andi Kleen 2010-10-17
22:28:09 UTC ---
Could simply mark the variable volatile?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46055
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2010-10-17 22:17:41
UTC ---
To test if pstat_getstatic exists with a link
test, why not just use
---
int pstat_getstatic ();
int
main ()
{
return pstat_getstatic ();
}
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45954
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46053
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46055
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2010-10-17 21:32:51
UTC ---
I am not sure test:
---
char pstat_getstatic ();
char (*f) () = pstat_getstatic;
int
main ()
{
return f != pstat_getstatic;
}
---
which detects if pstat_getstatic is defined,
is compatib
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46055
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2010-10-17 21:22:02
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I got
>
> [...@gnu-32 prev-gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./ -O2 /tmp/foo.i -fuse-linker-plugin
> -fwhopr=jobserver
> [...@gnu-32 prev-gcc]$ cat /tmp/foo.i
> char pstat_getstat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45987
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45987
--- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-17 21:03:13 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Oct 17 21:03:10 2010
New Revision: 165600
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165600
Log:
PR testsuite/45987
* gcc.target/i386
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169
--- Comment #16 from John David Anglin 2010-10-17
21:01:27 UTC ---
Based on my posted test results for hppa2.0-hp-hpux11.11, this PR was
fixed on the trunk between r163182 and r163254.
Need to find the change.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46055
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2010-10-17 20:55:24
UTC ---
I got
[...@gnu-32 prev-gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./ -O2 /tmp/foo.i -fuse-linker-plugin
-fwhopr=jobserver
[...@gnu-32 prev-gcc]$ cat /tmp/foo.i
char pstat_getstatic ();
char (*f) () = pstat_getstatic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46051
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|http://gcc.gnu.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46051
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-17 20:46:04 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Oct 17 20:46:01 2010
New Revision: 165599
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165599
Log:
PR target/46051
* config/i386/sse.md
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46060
Summary: gfortran crash when referencing procedure pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45801
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46059
--- Comment #1 from Witold Baryluk 2010-10-17
19:42:33 UTC ---
Same version compiled with '-g -O2 -finline-functions', to have debuging
symbols.
(gdb) run
Starting program: /scratch/obiekty/gcc/jc1
/scratch/gcc-4.6-20101009/libjava/classpath/lib
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45801
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson 2010-10-17
19:29:43 UTC ---
Is there a problem with Alexandre Oliva's PR42289 patch that's causing it not
to get applied? I still (3+ weeks) have to apply it to get past the bootstrap
comparison failure with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46057
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2010-10-17
18:19:47 UTC ---
Actually, only test with ALIGNMENT greater than 16 fail.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46059
Summary: internel compiler error when compiling
libjava/gnu/awt/LightweightRedirector.java with
-finline-functions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46046
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46051
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46050
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46058
--- Comment #1 from Niklas Schnelle 2010-10-17
17:07:03 UTC ---
Forgot to mention, it works with gcc 4.3 and clang
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46058
Summary: gcc crashes with lvalue error on the following Code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45925
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46057
Summary: All stackalign tests fail on hppa-hpux
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46056
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46045
--- Comment #4 from Michael Builov 2010-10-17
16:19:37 UTC ---
Just a warning with -Wextra, but no warnings with -Wall -pedantic.
I found a bug with this code:
struct A {
int k;
int m;
};
#define dump(_a_) \
do { \
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46045
--- Comment #3 from Michael Builov 2010-10-17
15:51:16 UTC ---
Just a warning with -Wextra, but no warnings with -Wall -pedantic.
I found a bug with this code:
struct A {
#definer dump(_a_) \
do { \
Struct A *a = _a_; \
printf("%d, %d\n",
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018
--- Comment #6 from Art Haas 2010-10-17 15:45:40 UTC
---
Running 'git bisect' but interpreting a failed build as 'good' and a successful
build as 'bad' leads to this commit which restored the build:
7332acfcfbd1a9c70674c62419096022f72bd201 is th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636
--- Comment #11 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-10-17 15:41:54 UTC ---
In addition, although gcc.c-torture/execute/pr45636.c doesn't fail on
hppa-unknown-linux-gnu, it does fail on hpux:
Executing on host: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43554
--- Comment #12 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-17 14:49:16 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Oct 17 14:49:11 2010
New Revision: 165587
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165587
Log:
2010-10-17 Paolo Carlini
PR lib
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45325
--- Comment #12 from Dave Korn 2010-10-17 14:24:06
UTC ---
This also breaks lto-bootstrap on i686-pc-cygwin:
/gnu/gcc/gcc/libcpp/lex.c: In function ‘search_line_sse2’:
/gnu/gcc/gcc/libcpp/lex.c:370:15: internal compiler error: in convert_mov
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: alser...@inbox.ru
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
The following test crashes once compiled by
g++ (GCC) 4.6.0 20101017 (experimental) on i686-pc-linux-gnu
// Test for range-based for loop inside lambda
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46006
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at il dot ibm.com
--- Comment #1 from Ir
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46050
--- Comment #3 from Witold Baryluk 2010-10-17
12:18:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 22069
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22069
Move initializations patch of incr and cond (against gcc-4.6-20101009)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46050
--- Comment #2 from Witold Baryluk 2010-10-17
12:16:25 UTC ---
Not exactly your patch. In true-branch of if, there is no assigment to incr (so
error is correct).
But moving else assigments, before if, resolves problem. Modified patch agains
snap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43281
Andrey Zholos changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aaz at althenia dot net
--- Comment #5 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46054
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46054
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30745
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rarrum at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43554
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|rus at google dot com |paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30461
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18255
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18255
--- Comment #11 from Nicola Pero 2010-10-17
10:11:25 UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Sun Oct 17 10:11:23 2010
New Revision: 165579
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165579
Log:
In gcc/testsuite/:
2010-10-17 Nicola Pero
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45925
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35891
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42734
--- Comment #39 from Paolo Carlini 2010-10-17
09:56:52 UTC ---
I don't know exactly what we are doing in such headers but for sure if we have
facilities which rely vitally on atomic builtins either should be disabled
*completely* when the builtin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46055
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46055
Summary: [4.6 Regression] LTO failed to bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo: unassig...@
57 matches
Mail list logo
