[Bug objc/18255] [GNU runtime] Protocols are not initialized correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18255 --- Comment #13 from Tilo Prütz 2010-10-18 08:21:31 UTC --- Thank you very much!

[Bug middle-end/46019] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] x / (0x200000000ULL << y) miscompilation with 32-bit HWI

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46019 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-10-18 08:26:09 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 18 08:26:06 2010 New Revision: 165610 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165610 Log: PR middle-end/46019 * fold-const.c (fold_bi

[Bug gcov-profile/39669] gcov --preserve-paths causes mangled filenames on windows

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39669 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/43448] gccbug should be removed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43448 --- Comment #1 from ak at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18 09:39:19 UTC --- Author: ak Date: Mon Oct 18 09:39:15 2010 New Revision: 165613 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165613 Log: Remove gccbug gcc/ 2010-10-18 Andi Kleen

[Bug fortran/46060] gfortran crash when referencing procedure pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46060 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug bootstrap/46055] [4.6 Regression] -fwhopr failed configure test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46055 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/46019] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] x / (0x200000000ULL << y) miscompilation with 32-bit HWI

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46019 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-10-18 09:57:05 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 18 09:57:02 2010 New Revision: 165617 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165617 Log: PR middle-end/46019 * fold-const.c (fold_bi

[Bug bootstrap/46055] [4.6 Regression] -fwhopr failed configure test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46055 --- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-18 09:58:41 UTC --- Hmm, does -fuse-linker-plugin have the same side-effects as -fwhole-program? That will break symbol use by dlopened objects and we have to avoid that. Honza?

[Bug middle-end/46019] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] x / (0x200000000ULL << y) miscompilation with 32-bit HWI

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46019 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-10-18 10:08:52 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 18 10:08:47 2010 New Revision: 165621 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165621 Log: PR middle-end/46019 * fold-const.c (fold_bi

[Bug lto/44950] ICE in dwarf2out_finish, at dwarf2out.c:22271

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44950 --- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-18 10:54:21 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Oct 18 10:54:18 2010 New Revision: 165629 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165629 Log: 2010-10-18 Richard Guenther PR lto/44

[Bug lto/44950] ICE in dwarf2out_finish, at dwarf2out.c:22271

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44950 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/45472] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6124 with -fselective-scheduling2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472 --- Comment #6 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-10-18 10:57:23 UTC --- Anybody familiar with the expand/tree level can take a look on this? I can spare some time later this week if folks are busy.

[Bug middle-end/46019] [4.3 Regression] x / (0x200000000ULL << y) miscompilation with 32-bit HWI

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46019 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|jakub at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot |

[Bug c/45834] Redundant inter-loop edges in DDG

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45834 Bingfeng Mei changed: What|Removed |Added CC||richard.guenther at gmail

[Bug c/45834] Redundant inter-loop edges in DDG

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45834 --- Comment #2 from richard.guenther at gmail dot com 2010-10-18 11:38:03 UTC --- On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 1:33 PM, bmei at broadcom dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45834 > > Bingfeng Mei changed: > >           What  

[Bug fortran/46060] [F03] procedure pointer component referenced without argument list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46060 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|gfortran crash when |[F03] procedure pointer

[Bug rtl-optimization/45472] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6124 with -fselective-scheduling2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472 Michael Matz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/46061] [C++0x] Variadic Template Templates: not expandable into fixed-size argument list, Implementation Gap.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46061 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/39653] [C++0x] error referencing a more specialized variadic template from primary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39653 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andreas.milton.m at gmail

[Bug web/46064] New: have to enter a comment to resolve a bug as a duplicate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46064 Summary: have to enter a comment to resolve a bug as a duplicate Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug c/45834] Redundant inter-loop edges in DDG

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45834 --- Comment #3 from Bingfeng Mei 2010-10-18 12:16:59 UTC --- I think that standard specifies that char * may refer to an alias of any object, that's why QImode is different here. But I am not sure whether a restrict qualifier will override that r

[Bug rtl-optimization/45472] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6124 with -fselective-scheduling2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472 --- Comment #8 from Paolo Bonzini 2010-10-18 12:20:39 UTC --- Would it make sense to make the statement volatile even if only some subcomponents (or all subcomponents) are volatile? I like (2); if I understand it correctly, in this case vv1 and

[Bug bootstrap/46055] [4.6 Regression] -fwhopr failed configure test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46055 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu 2010-10-18 12:23:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > Hmm, does -fuse-linker-plugin have the same side-effects as -fwhole-program? > That will break symbol use by dlopened objects and we have to avoid that. > [...@g

[Bug c++/46065] New: [4.6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'tree_list' in poplevel_named_label_1, at cp/decl.c:477

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46065 Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'tree_list' in poplevel_named_label_1, at cp/decl.c:477 Product: gcc Vers

[Bug c/45834] Redundant inter-loop edges in DDG

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45834 --- Comment #4 from richard.guenther at gmail dot com 2010-10-18 13:42:33 UTC --- On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:17 PM, bmei at broadcom dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45834 > > --- Comment #3 from Bingfeng Mei 2010-10-1

[Bug c/45834] Redundant inter-loop edges in DDG

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45834 --- Comment #5 from Bingfeng Mei 2010-10-18 13:53:37 UTC --- > > Sure, but we have other means of dealing with that (MEM_ALIAS_SET == 0). Do you mean this check is redundant here ? I dig out the ancient code (from 1997) /* If both references

[Bug lto/42987] Testcases local1-a.cc and local1.C cause ICE when compiled with -flto -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42987 Zdenek Sojka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz --- Comment #4 fro

[Bug c/45834] Redundant inter-loop edges in DDG

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45834 --- Comment #6 from richard.guenther at gmail dot com 2010-10-18 13:57:19 UTC --- On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 3:53 PM, bmei at broadcom dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45834 > > --- Comment #5 from Bingfeng Mei 2010-10-1

[Bug tree-optimization/46066] New: [4.6 Regression] ICE: in create_parallel_loop, at tree-parloops.c:1455 with -ftree-parallelize-loops -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46066 Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: in create_parallel_loop, at tree-parloops.c:1455 with -ftree-parallelize-loops -g Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug fortran/46067] New: hang or spurious compiler message using procedure pointer with pass

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46067 Summary: hang or spurious compiler message using procedure pointer with pass Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/46068] New: [4.6 Regression] ICE: in consider_split, at ipa-split.c:313 with -flto/-fwhopr and asm goto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46068 Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: in consider_split, at ipa-split.c:313 with -flto/-fwhopr and asm goto Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/46018] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018 --- Comment #7 from Art Haas 2010-10-18 15:03:56 UTC --- My bootstrap build succeeded for the this morning again, so I suggest closing this ticket.

[Bug bootstrap/46055] [4.6 Regression] -fwhopr failed configure test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46055 --- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka 2010-10-18 15:11:52 UTC --- Hi, I found what is causing the problem. I accidentally comitted also the following cleanup of visibility code. The difference is that we now trust linker's LDPR_PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY

[Bug c/46041] __FP_FAST_FMA not defined with -E

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46041 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/45638] No rule to make target `check-lto', needed by `check'. Stop.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45638 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-10-18 15:16:11 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 18 15:16:07 2010 New Revision: 165638 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165638 Log: PR lto/45638 * Make-lang.in (check-lto): Ne

[Bug c/46041] __FP_FAST_FMA not defined with -E

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46041 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2010-10-18 15:11:54 | AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc

[Bug rtl-optimization/45967] [4.5/4.6 Regression] gcc-4.5.x optimizes code with side-effects away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45967 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-18 15:32:03 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Oct 18 15:32:00 2010 New Revision: 165641 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165641 Log: 2010-10-18 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug rtl-optimization/45967] [4.5 Regression] gcc-4.5.x optimizes code with side-effects away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45967 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||alias, wrong-code Known to work|

[Bug bootstrap/46018] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018 --- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-10-18 15:37:04 UTC --- On Sun, 17 Oct 2010, ahaas at airmail dot net wrote: > Running 'git bisect' but interpreting a failed build as 'good' and a > successful > build as 'bad' leads to thi

[Bug c++/46065] [4.6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'tree_list' in poplevel_named_label_1, at cp/decl.c:477

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46065 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/46066] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in create_parallel_loop, at tree-parloops.c:1455 with -ftree-parallelize-loops -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46066 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/46068] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in consider_split, at ipa-split.c:313 with -flto/-fwhopr and asm goto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46068 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/45472] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6124 with -fselective-scheduling2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472 --- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-18 15:42:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > Would it make sense to make the statement volatile even if only some > subcomponents (or all subcomponents) are volatile? > > I like (2); if I understand

[Bug c++/45983] [4.5 Regression] ICE: tree code 'template_parm_index' is not supported in gimple streams with -lto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45983 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: |[4.5 Regression] ICE: tree

[Bug bootstrap/46055] [4.6 Regression] -fwhopr failed configure test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46055 --- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka 2010-10-18 15:47:24 UTC --- Hi, the plugin seems to give bit funny resolutions in side cases, so I will revert the accident commit now, will commit the cleanup part of change incrementally and then we can hopefull

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169 --- Comment #17 from Steve Ellcey 2010-10-18 15:51:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) > Based on my posted test results for hppa2.0-hp-hpux11.11, this PR was > fixed on the trunk between r163182 and r163254. > > Need to find the change. My ni

[Bug web/45785] Bugzilla search sometimes fails with an internal error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45785 --- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-10-18 15:54:45 UTC --- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?cf_known_to_fail_type=allwords&cf_known_to_work_type=allwords&query_format=advanced&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug

[Bug c/46015] [4.6 Regression] -Wunused-but-set-variable warns for arrays used in gotos

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46015 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-10-18 15:55:31 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 18 15:55:25 2010 New Revision: 165643 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165643 Log: PR c/46015 * c-parser.c (c_parser_statement

[Bug web/46064] have to enter a comment to resolve a bug as a duplicate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46064 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2010-10-18 15:56:11 UTC --- I think this is the right thing to do. when bugs are marked as dups the majority of the time, we want an explication. Because if there was none; the reporter might open it back up (

[Bug rtl-optimization/45472] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6124 with -fselective-scheduling2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472 --- Comment #10 from Michael Matz 2010-10-18 15:58:26 UTC --- One idea we had was that this is all frontends business anyway, and hence it should (if it so desires) simply create volatile MEM_REFs for references to half-volatile objects. That al

[Bug web/46064] have to enter a comment to resolve a bug as a duplicate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46064 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/46041] __FP_FAST_FMA not defined with -E

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46041 --- Comment #6 from Richard Henderson 2010-10-18 16:12:21 UTC --- Does anyone honestly expect a pre-processor macro to change due to attributes on a function? I sure don't -- that would seem to be a clear translation phase ordering violation. S

[Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804 Thorsten Glaser changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tg at mirbsd dot org --- Comment #18 fr

[Bug c/46015] [4.6 Regression] -Wunused-but-set-variable warns for arrays used in gotos

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46015 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/46041] __FP_FAST_FMA not defined with -E

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46041 --- Comment #7 from Michael Meissner 2010-10-18 16:21:31 UTC --- Yes, though the issue originally came up in terms of the pragma and not the attribute, because people wanted to include the various include files that had #ifdef's to guard against

[Bug libstdc++/45866] [C++0x] std::ratio_add, ratio_sub, ratio_multiply, ratio_divide do not have num and den members.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45866 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2010-10-18 16:35:45 UTC --- I don't see c++/45114 resolved very soon, thus, for 4.6.0, let's provide anyway those constants, seems simple.

[Bug libstdc++/45866] [C++0x] std::ratio_add, ratio_sub, ratio_multiply, ratio_divide do not have num and den members.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45866 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug rtl-optimization/45472] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6124 with -fselective-scheduling2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472 --- Comment #11 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-10-18 16:41:03 UTC --- On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Also consider memcpy (&vv1, &vv2) and eventually the compiler optimizing > that to vv1 = vv2 (note the lack o

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169 --- Comment #18 from Steve Ellcey 2010-10-18 16:55:32 UTC --- It looks like this was fixed (for hppa at least) in r163190. 2010-08-12 Richard Guenther PR tree-optimization/45232 * tree-ssa-reassoc.c (can_reassociate_p): Disab

[Bug tree-optimization/44776] FAIL: gcc.dg/matrix/transpose-3.c execution, -fprofile-use -fipa-matrix-reorg -fdump-ipa-matrix-reorg -O3 -fwhole-program

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44776 Dave Korn changed: What|Removed |Added CC||davek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10 from

[Bug rtl-optimization/45472] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6124 with -fselective-scheduling2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472 --- Comment #12 from Paolo Bonzini 2010-10-18 17:12:59 UTC --- It would be nice if for struct a { char a,b,c,d; volatile int e; }; struct a v1, v2; ... v1 = v2; the compiler emitted only _two_ memory accesse

[Bug bootstrap/44970] [4.6 regression] Revision 162270 failed to bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970 Paolo Bonzini changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #21699|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169 --- Comment #19 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-10-18 17:27:04 UTC --- > It looks like this was fixed (for hppa at least) in r163190. > > 2010-08-12 Richard Guenther > > PR tree-optimization/45232 > * tree-ssa-reassoc.

[Bug libstdc++/45866] [C++0x] std::ratio_add, ratio_sub, ratio_multiply, ratio_divide do not have num and den members.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45866 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18 17:28:21 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Oct 18 17:28:15 2010 New Revision: 165649 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165649 Log: 2010-10-18 Paolo Carlini PR libs

[Bug libstdc++/45866] [C++0x] std::ratio_add, ratio_sub, ratio_multiply, ratio_divide do not have num and den members.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45866 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/46067] hang or spurious compiler message using procedure pointer with pass

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46067 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169 --- Comment #20 from Steve Ellcey 2010-10-18 17:54:42 UTC --- Not really, there are about 300 lines of new code (mostly in a new routine). It might be that only the change in can_reassociate_p is needed to fix this bug. That would be a pretty eas

[Bug c++/46071] New: ill-formed use of decltype and auto (c++0x) causes segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46071 Summary: ill-formed use of decltype and auto (c++0x) causes segfault Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug c++/46071] [C++0x] ill-formed use of decltype and auto causes segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46071 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Status|

[Bug target/46040] crtstuff.c:308:26: error: '__DTOR_LIST__' undeclared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46040 --- Comment #3 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-10-18 18:28:07 UTC --- On Fri, 15 Oct 2010, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46040 > > --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2010-10-15 > 22:07:3

[Bug tree-optimization/46068] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in consider_split, at ipa-split.c:313 with asm goto and __builtin_unreachable ()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46068 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|lto | Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/46072] New: AIX linker chokes on debug info for uninitialized static variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072 Summary: AIX linker chokes on debug info for uninitialized static variables Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 C

[Bug tree-optimization/46068] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in consider_split, at ipa-split.c:313 with asm goto and __builtin_unreachable ()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46068 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c/46073] New: __builtin_choose_expr outputs warnings for unused expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46073 Summary: __builtin_choose_expr outputs warnings for unused expression Product: gcc Version: 4.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug c/46073] __builtin_choose_expr outputs warnings for unused expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46073 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2010-10-18 19:00:51 UTC --- I think this is correct as __builtin_choose_expr still does semantically checking on the two arguments. Not to mention __builtin_choose_expr was added only to support Altivec intrin

[Bug libstdc++/45999] runtime error in std::vector python pretty printer.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45999 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c/46073] __builtin_choose_expr outputs warnings for unused expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46073 --- Comment #2 from kevin.waugh at gmail dot com 2010-10-18 19:17:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > I think this is correct as __builtin_choose_expr still does semantically > checking on the two arguments. Not to mention __builtin_choose_exp

[Bug bootstrap/44970] [4.6 regression] Revision 162270 failed to bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970 --- Comment #86 from Steve Ellcey 2010-10-18 19:52:39 UTC --- I was able to bootstrap the 32 bit PA compiler using the latest patch. I haven't done a full test run yet but I will do that overnight.

[Bug c/46073] __builtin_choose_expr outputs warnings for unused expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46073 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-10-18 19:55:25 UTC --- On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > checking on the two arguments. Not to mention __builtin_choose_expr was > added > only to support Altivec i

[Bug c/46041] __FP_FAST_FMA not defined with -E

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46041 --- Comment #8 from Michael Meissner 2010-10-18 20:01:24 UTC --- Created attachment 22083 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22083 Patch that redefines mode_has_fma so that it works with -save-temps

[Bug fortran/46067] [F03] invalid procedure pointer assignment not detected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46067 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid Summ

[Bug c++/46075] New: g++ wrongly lookups builtin types in ADL (compiles wrong code)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46075 Summary: g++ wrongly lookups builtin types in ADL (compiles wrong code) Product: gcc Version: 4.4.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug c++/46075] g++ wrongly lookups builtin types in ADL (compiles wrong code)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46075 --- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich 2010-10-18 20:23:10 UTC --- Created attachment 22084 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22084 test example. compilation should fail

[Bug c++/46075] g++ wrongly lookups builtin types in ADL (compiles wrong code)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46075 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2010-10-18 20:24:25 UTC --- Actually there is an open question if clang or gcc is correct according to the C++ standards committee. There is a defect report about foundational types.

[Bug c++/46075] g++ wrongly lookups builtin types in ADL (compiles wrong code)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46075 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/29131] [DR 225] Bad name lookup for templates due to fundamental types namespace for ADL.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29131 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||slyfox at inbox dot ru --- Comment #14 fr

[Bug c++/225] using declaration doesn't take into account member overloading

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225 --- Comment #4 from Antony King 2010-10-18 20:29:01 UTC --- I am out of the office until 25th October 2010 and am unable to respond to your email until then. If you have any enquiries concerning the ST40 Micro Toolset then please send them to st40.

[Bug c++/46075] g++ wrongly lookups builtin types in ADL (compiles wrong code)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46075 --- Comment #4 from Sergei Trofimovich 2010-10-18 20:43:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Actually there is an open question if clang or gcc is correct according to the > C++ standards committee. There is a defect report about foundational t

[Bug lto/45375] [meta-bug] Issues with building Mozilla with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[meta-bug] Mozilla does not |[meta-bug] Issues with |b

[Bug fortran/46060] [F03] procedure pointer component referenced without argument list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46060 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|una

[Bug c++/46075] g++ wrongly lookups builtin types in ADL (compiles wrong code)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46075 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2010-10-18 20:49:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > You mean "standard is buggy and gcc refuses to implement ill behaviour", > right? > Or behaviour is not specified by standard in

[Bug middle-end/46076] New: [4.6 regression] constant propogation and compile-time math no longer happening versus 4.4 and 4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076 Summary: [4.6 regression] constant propogation and compile-time math no longer happening versus 4.4 and 4.5 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/46076] [4.6 regression] constant propogation and compile-time math no longer happening versus 4.4 and 4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2010-10-18 21:15:16 UTC --- This is a micro benchmark really; we would inline it as far as I can tell if we have other things going on.

[Bug bootstrap/46018] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018 --- Comment #9 from Art Haas 2010-10-18 21:27:59 UTC --- Once the patch discussed in the following mail was applied: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg01538.html I can confirm that the bootstrap failure I've been seeing has returned:

[Bug fortran/46067] [F03] invalid procedure pointer assignment not detected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46067 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18 21:29:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > > potential problem 2: if the error message is correct and if the type of the > > passed-object dummy argument in the sample code is changed from a

[Bug fortran/46067] [F03] invalid procedure pointer assignment not detected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46067 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-10-18 21:31:54 UTC --- Beware the INVALID recursive IOs: they hang on darwin!-(see pr 30617).

[Bug middle-end/43760] [4.6 regression] New test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43760 --- Comment #8 from Steve Ellcey 2010-10-18 21:34:51 UTC --- Author: sje Date: Mon Oct 18 21:34:46 2010 New Revision: 165664 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165664 Log: 2010-10-18 Steve Ellcey PR target/36898 PR

[Bug target/36898] Insufficient qp-mutex declarations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36898 --- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey 2010-10-18 21:34:51 UTC --- Author: sje Date: Mon Oct 18 21:34:46 2010 New Revision: 165664 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165664 Log: 2010-10-18 Steve Ellcey PR target/36898 PR

[Bug middle-end/46076] [4.6 regression] constant propogation and compile-time math no longer happening versus 4.4 and 4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076 --- Comment #2 from Matt Hargett 2010-10-18 21:36:23 UTC --- This is a reduction from proprietary (and complex) code, and the optimization has regressed there as well. Any diagnosis on why it would have regressed and not triggered a testsuite fai

[Bug middle-end/43760] [4.6 regression] New test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43760 Steve Ellcey changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

  1   2   >