http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46155
--- Comment #4 from Dr. David Kirkby
2010-10-24 04:24:58 UTC ---
I forgot to say, this is with the latest version of the GNU Scientific library
(gsl-1.14).
The hardware used is
* IBM RS/6000 7025 F50
* 4 x 332 MHz 32-bit PowerPC CPUs
* 3 G
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46155
--- Comment #3 from Dr. David Kirkby
2010-10-24 04:17:44 UTC ---
It looks to me that the GCC header file lacks several definitions that are in
the IBM header file (DEC128_EPSILON is another example). The size of the IBM
header is around twice tha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46155
--- Comment #2 from Dr. David Kirkby
2010-10-24 03:54:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 22139
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22139
Header file created by gcc. Stored at
/opt/pware/lib/gcc/powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0/4.2.4/include/floa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46155
--- Comment #1 from Dr. David Kirkby
2010-10-24 03:51:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 22138
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22138
This is the IBM header file (/usr/include/float.h) from an AIX 5.3 system
Clearly this shows that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46155
Summary: Bug with generation of float.h header file on AIX
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41108
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7098
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46154
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: failed to reclaim unneeded
function with -fipa-cp -fipa-cp-clone
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46140
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46153
Summary: [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at
recog.c:2110 (unrecognizable insn) with -ffloat-store
and __builtin_ia32_movlhps
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23709
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Target Milestone|4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46152
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-23 21:36:43 UTC ---
This may possibly be a regression of r162724, which was the fix for PR44929.
Note that
allocate (integer :: a)
is really only useful once we have unlimited polymorphism (but
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23709
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46152
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl
2010-10-23 20:18:40 UTC ---
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 07:50:55PM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46152
>
> --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2010-10-23
> 19:50
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46151
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46152
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2010-10-23
19:50:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> > implicit none ! << crucial
> > integer, allocatable :: a
>
> It even more crucial that 'a' is a scalar.
Note really, if I comment-out the "allocate(inte
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46152
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl
2010-10-23 19:25:19 UTC ---
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 06:50:21PM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> Compiling the following program:
>
> implicit none ! << crucial
> integer, allocatable :: a
It even mor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46152
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2010-10-23
19:10:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> The error I get with trunk is:
> Error: 'integer' at (1) is not an accessible derived type
OK - the difference is a side effect of a local patch. Try:
al
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46152
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-10-23
19:04:41 UTC ---
The error I get with trunk is:
Error: 'integer' at (1) is not an accessible derived type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46152
Summary: ALLOCATE with type-spec fails for intrinsic types
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804
--- Comment #19 from Thorsten Glaser 2010-10-23 17:43:59
UTC ---
I could build gcc-4.4 on Debian with it, and the patch has been included
into the package since. No testsuite runs with it, though – I will do it
on real hardware whose usage I have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45865
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46151
Summary: namespace versioning holes
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46149
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46150
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46144
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46144
--- Comment #4 from Richard Henderson 2010-10-23
16:42:30 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Sat Oct 23 16:42:24 2010
New Revision: 165885
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165885
Log:
PR target/46144
* config/i386/sse.md (*avx_absneg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44436
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2010-10-23
16:01:45 UTC ---
And now we have n3178 too, great ;-/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46150
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-10-23 15:53:58
UTC ---
Created attachment 22136
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22136
diff native-filter.gk.gkd native-filter.gkd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46144
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2010-10-23 15:47:45
UTC ---
(gdb) bt
#0 fancy_abort (file=0x12683d8 "/export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/regcprop.c",
line=768, function=0x12687b0 "copyprop_hardreg_forward_1")
at /export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/di
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46150
Summary: -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -fPIC -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44436
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tom.prince at ualberta dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46148
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46144
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2010-10-23 15:25:39
UTC ---
This may also break 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2000:
gfortran -c -o postpr.o -DSPEC_CPU2000_LP64 -O3 -funroll-loops
-ffast-math postpr.f
postpr.f: In function 'postpr':
postpr.f:1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46143
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-23
15:14:49 UTC ---
my test in comment 3 passes the assertion on trunk, but fails with 4.5.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46145
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-23
15:02:53 UTC ---
Implicit move constructors are very contentious and the rules are likely to
change
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46149
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-10-23 14:57:10
UTC ---
Created attachment 22134
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22134
hopefully reduced testcase
OK with -O0:
$ g++ -O0 pr46149.C
$ ./a.out && echo $?
0
(no valgrind erro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46149
Summary: [4.6 Regression] 26_numerics/valarray/27867.cc FAILs
with -O2 -fno-tree-sra
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46148
Summary: [C++0x] std::map lacks a template
insert overload
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libst
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46122
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46122
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2010-10-23
13:48:12 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Oct 23 13:48:08 2010
New Revision: 165883
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165883
Log:
2010-10-23 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/46
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46147
Summary: g++ segfault compiling gnat 0.8.8 on mips-linux n32
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199
--- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle 2010-10-23
13:03:08 UTC ---
I got sidetracked by other more serious bugs. I am not even sure I have the
draft patch any more, but I will look for it. Not too sure about 4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46140
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2010-10-23
11:34:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> - load_file (filename, NULL, false);
> + if (load_file (filename, NULL, false) == FAILURE)
> +exit (1);
> +
(In reply to comment #4)
> The above pat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46146
Summary: Bessel and kind=8 integer arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43532
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig 2010-10-23
10:02:46 UTC ---
Hi Jerry,
> An update. I have a patch developing.
> The patch is a bit intrusive, especially in namelist areas, so may be best for
> 4.6 at this stage. (assuming I get it to work
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46143
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
48 matches
Mail list logo
