[Bug c/46115] Feature request: anonymous functions (complementing anon aggregates)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46115 --- Comment #3 from Rob Staudinger robert.staudinger at gmail dot com 2010-10-25 07:31:59 UTC --- For the record, this is already possible using bracketed expressions, but the syntactical sugar of not having to pick a function name would be

[Bug target/46163] GCC Produces Invalid Assembly Code from Anonymous Function Syntax

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46163 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|Linux x86_64

[Bug target/46163] GCC Produces Invalid Assembly Code from Anonymous Function Syntax

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46163 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug middle-end/46164] New: Local variables in specified registers don't work correctly with inline asm operands

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46164 Summary: Local variables in specified registers don't work correctly with inline asm operands Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/32820] optimizer malfunction when mixed with asm statements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32820 --- Comment #8 from Siarhei Siamashka siarhei.siamashka at gmail dot com 2010-10-25 10:17:47 UTC --- On the second thought, this bug was about global variables. But my problem is related to the use of local variables. So I have submitted a

[Bug middle-end/46164] Local variables in specified registers don't work correctly with inline asm operands

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46164 --- Comment #1 from Siarhei Siamashka siarhei.siamashka at gmail dot com 2010-10-25 10:37:13 UTC --- Created attachment 22144 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22144 proposed testcase for x86_64

[Bug middle-end/46164] Local variables in specified registers don't work correctly with inline asm operands

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46164 Siarhei Siamashka siarhei.siamashka at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #22144|0 |1

[Bug fortran/46010] I/O: Namelist-reading bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46010 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-25 13:12:33 UTC --- The patch in comment #7 works for the original test case but fails for the one in comment #4. I have a revised patch that also works for comment #4 and

[Bug rtl-optimization/45967] [4.5 Regression] gcc-4.5.x optimizes code with side-effects away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45967 Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||krebbel at

[Bug target/46128] There is no mechanism for detecting VFP revisions in ARM GCC.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46128 --- Comment #2 from Siarhei Siamashka siarhei.siamashka at gmail dot com 2010-10-25 14:43:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) Note that there may be problems clobbering D registers. See bug 43440. I don't think Richard Earnshaw's patch

[Bug fortran/46140] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Include not found - but exit status code is zero

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46140 --- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-25 16:07:37 UTC --- Author: kargl Date: Mon Oct 25 16:07:34 2010 New Revision: 165922 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165922 Log: 2010-10-25 Steven G. Kargl

[Bug fortran/46140] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Include not found - but exit status code is zero

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46140 --- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-25 16:09:51 UTC --- Author: kargl Date: Mon Oct 25 16:09:47 2010 New Revision: 165923 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165923 Log: 2010-10-25 Steven G. Kargl

[Bug fortran/46140] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Include not found - but exit status code is zero

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46140 --- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-25 16:12:05 UTC --- Author: kargl Date: Mon Oct 25 16:11:54 2010 New Revision: 165924 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165924 Log: 2010-10-25 Steven G. Kargl

[Bug fortran/46140] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Include not found - but exit status code is zero

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46140 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/42647] [F03] Missed initialization/dealloc of allocatable scalar DT with allocatable component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42647 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/46165] New: ICE: verify_flow_info failed when casting-out attribute noreturn with -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-dce

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46165 Summary: ICE: verify_flow_info failed when casting-out attribute noreturn with -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-dce Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status:

[Bug fortran/46166] New: optimization and/or removing an if(.false.) statement leads to bad results

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46166 Summary: optimization and/or removing an if(.false.) statement leads to bad results Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/46165] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed when casting-out attribute noreturn with -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-dce

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46165 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/46167] New: [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: SEIGSEGV in flow_bb_inside_loop_p (cfgloop.c:776) with -O -ftree-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46167 Summary: [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: SEIGSEGV in flow_bb_inside_loop_p (cfgloop.c:776) with -O -ftree-vectorize Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/46166] optimization and/or removing an if(.false.) statement leads to bad results

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46166 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2010-10-25 18:45:18 UTC --- 1) Remove the Tabs from your source. (2) Compile with -O2 -Wall -Wuninitialized -fcheck=all.

[Bug fortran/46166] optimization and/or removing an if(.false.) statement leads to bad results

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46166 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/46168] New: ICE: verify_ssa failed: definition in block 6 does not dominate use in block 5 with -ftree-loop-linear

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46168 Summary: ICE: verify_ssa failed: definition in block 6 does not dominate use in block 5 with -ftree-loop-linear Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/46163] GCC Produces Invalid Assembly Code from Anonymous Function Syntax

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46163 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.4.6 |---

[Bug c/46169] New: ICE: internal compiler error: in convert_move, at expr.c:371

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46169 Summary: ICE: internal compiler error: in convert_move, at expr.c:371 Product: gcc Version: 4.4.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/46165] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed when casting-out attribute noreturn with -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-dce

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46165 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|hjl.tools at gmail dot com |amacleod at redhat

[Bug c/46169] ICE: internal compiler error: in convert_move, at expr.c:371

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46169 --- Comment #1 from Eric Anholt eric at anholt dot net 2010-10-25 20:20:19 UTC --- Created attachment 22150 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22150 gcc-fail.c

[Bug c++/46170] New: g++ wrongly rejects pointer-to-member in template arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170 Summary: g++ wrongly rejects pointer-to-member in template arguments Product: gcc Version: 4.4.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/46168] ICE: verify_ssa failed: definition in block 6 does not dominate use in block 5 with -ftree-loop-linear

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46168 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2010-10-25 20:50:24 UTC --- 0n x86_64-apple-darwin10, 4.5 revision 154654 crashes, but gcc version 4.5.0 is OK (release checking). On powerpc-apple-darwin9, gcc version 4.3.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/46171] New: [4.6 Regression] ICE: in gen_rtx_SUBREG, at emit-rtl.c:774 with -fno-tree-dce -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46171 Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: in gen_rtx_SUBREG, at emit-rtl.c:774 with -fno-tree-dce -g Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/46171] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in gen_rtx_SUBREG, at emit-rtl.c:774 with -fno-tree-dce -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46171 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|target

[Bug c/46158] Spurious never executed warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46158 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/46158] Spurious never executed warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46158 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |middle-end

[Bug c++/46170] g++ wrongly rejects pointer-to-member in template arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at

[Bug tree-optimization/46172] New: ICE: in expand_widen_pattern_expr, at optabs.c:522 with -ftree-vectorize -fno-tree-dce

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46172 Summary: ICE: in expand_widen_pattern_expr, at optabs.c:522 with -ftree-vectorize -fno-tree-dce Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/46169] ICE: internal compiler error: in convert_move, at expr.c:371

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46169 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot

[Bug lto/45736] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in cgraph_remove_unreachable_nodes, at ipa.c:245 with -flto and attribute((constructor))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45736 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-25 21:31:15 UTC --- Created attachment 22153 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22153 Patch I am testing.

[Bug bootstrap/46173] New: gcc/gencheck.c:30:24: error: all-tree.def: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46173 Summary: gcc/gencheck.c:30:24: error: all-tree.def: No such file or directory Product: gcc Version: 4.4.6 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/46174] New: [OOP] ALLOCATE with SOURCE: Deep copy missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46174 Summary: [OOP] ALLOCATE with SOURCE: Deep copy missing Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/38942] possible integer codegen error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38942 Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian at airs dot com

[Bug middle-end/38942] possible integer codegen error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38942 John Regehr regehr at cs dot utah.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/35810] [TR 15581 / F2003] Automatic reallocation on assignment to allocatable variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35810 --- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-25 22:22:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) Note in Fortran 2008 (cf. PR 41719), polymorphic-variable = expr is allowed iff the variable is allocatable. And note further

[Bug rtl-optimization/46175] New: ICE: in rtl_verify_flow_info_1, at cfgrtl.c:2037: flow control insn inside a basic block with -O -fgcse -fno-guess-branch-probability -freorder-blocks and asm goto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46175 Summary: ICE: in rtl_verify_flow_info_1, at cfgrtl.c:2037: flow control insn inside a basic block with -O -fgcse -fno-guess-branch-probability -freorder-blocks and asm goto

[Bug middle-end/46176] New: profile feedback causes 20% linux kernel binary growth

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46176 Summary: profile feedback causes 20% linux kernel binary growth Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug middle-end/46176] profile feedback causes 20% linux kernel binary growth

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46176 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-25 22:57:50 UTC --- I think this is unrolling. -fprofile-generate/-fprofile-use turns on unrolling.

[Bug tree-optimization/46177] New: [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in prop_phis, at tree-loop-distribution.c:327 with -fno-tree-copy-prop -ftree-loop-distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46177 Summary: [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in prop_phis, at tree-loop-distribution.c:327 with -fno-tree-copy-prop -ftree-loop-distribution Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/46178] New: gcc.target/i386/(u)divmod-[58].c FAIL: ICE: in dec_register_pressure, at ira-lives.c:215 with -fira-algorithm=priority

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46178 Summary: gcc.target/i386/(u)divmod-[58].c FAIL: ICE: in dec_register_pressure, at ira-lives.c:215 with -fira-algorithm=priority Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/46154] [4.6 Regression] ICE: failed to reclaim unneeded function with -fipa-cp -fipa-cp-clone

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46154 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug debug/46150] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -fPIC -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46150 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/46130] [4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in walk_stmt_load_store_addr_ops (gimple.c:4894) with -O2 -fno-tree-dce

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46130 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug debug/46123] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in output_aranges, at dwarf2out.c:11531 with -feliminate-dwarf2-dups -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46123 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug middle-end/46120] [4.6 regression] g++.dg/ipa/ivinline-?.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46120 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug debug/46101] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in build_abbrev_table, at dwarf2out.c:10333 with -feliminate-dwarf2-dups -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46101 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/46099] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in replace_ssa_name, at tree-cfg.c:5643 with -ftree-parallelize-loops -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46099 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/46171] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in gen_rtx_SUBREG, at emit-rtl.c:774 with -fno-tree-dce -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46171 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/46156] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:11370 with -frounding-math

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46156 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug debug/46095] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr, at dwarf2out.c:2341 with -fstack-protector

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46095 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/46036] [4.6 Regression] verify_ssa failed: definition in block 3 follows the use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46036 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/45913] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in insn_default_length, at config/i386/i386.md:584 with -fselective-scheduling2 -fsel-sched-pipelining -fsel-sched-pipelining-outer-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45913 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/45876] [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45876 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug lto/45702] [4.6 Regression] New LTO test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45702 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug fortran/46010] I/O: Namelist-reading bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46010 --- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-26 01:37:04 UTC --- Created attachment 22156 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22156 Patch to fix this. I think my email service is out. I attach the patch

[Bug target/46179] New: Codegen/TLS: invalid assembler syntax

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46179 Summary: Codegen/TLS: invalid assembler syntax Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo:

[Bug tree-optimization/45875] [4.6 Regression] ice in gimple_fold_obj_type_ref_known_binfo with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/45870] [4.5/4.6 Regression] note: non-delegitimized UNSPEC 5 found (-O1 -g)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45870 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug rtl-optimization/45865] [4.6 Regression] ifcvt/crossjump failed to mark return jump

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45865 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/46053] [4.6 Regression] g++.dg/torture/pr45699.C FAILs with -fno-early-inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46053 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/45991] [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: Invalid address operand in in TARGET_MEM_REF. with -fstrict-overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45991 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/45971] [4.6 Regression] ice in vect_update_ivs_after_vectorizer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45971 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/45934] [4.6 Regression] g++.old-deja/g++.other/dtor5.C FAILs with -finline-small-functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45934 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/45837] [4.6 Regression] Global options changes on Sept. 29th, breaks powerpc linux64 build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45837 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/45816] [4.6 Regression] --enable-checking=release causes a comparison failure on powerpc-darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45816 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug fortran/46152] ALLOCATE with type-spec fails for intrinsic types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46152 --- Comment #12 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2010-10-26 04:21:41 UTC --- On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:34:10AM +, sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote: Compiling the following program: implicit none !