[Bug c++/46188] -fipa-cp removes destructor call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46188 --- Comment #3 from Jens Maurer jens.maurer at gmx dot net 2010-10-27 06:14:31 UTC --- Created attachment 22170 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22170 improved testcase The previous testcase had the problem that the compiler

[Bug c++/46188] -fipa-cp removes destructor call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46188 --- Comment #4 from Jens Maurer jens.maurer at gmx dot net 2010-10-27 07:55:37 UTC --- Created attachment 22171 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22171 two if conditions removed from the testcase Two if conditions increase the

[Bug target/46191] Non-absolute names in libgcc_s.so

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46191 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2010-10-27 08:33:07 UTC --- The parts may not be installed in the same directory and relative names may break in the presence of symbolic links.

[Bug target/46179] Codegen/TLS: invalid assembler syntax

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46179 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2010-10-27 08:41:05 UTC --- The invalid address is generated by output_move_double.

[Bug fortran/46196] New: [OOP] gfortran compiles invalid generic TBP: dummy arguments are type compatible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46196 Summary: [OOP] gfortran compiles invalid generic TBP: dummy arguments are type compatible Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/45827] mio_component_ref(): Component not found when mixing f90 and f03 in large projects

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45827 --- Comment #31 from Hans-Werner Boschmann boschmann at tp1 dot physik.uni-siegen.de 2010-10-27 09:35:07 UTC --- I've posted the generic issue as Bug 46196

[Bug web/45818] Missing message-ids in Bugzilla messages

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45818 Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING ---

[Bug web/45785] Bugzilla search sometimes fails with an internal error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45785 --- Comment #5 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-10-27 09:52:17 UTC --- Could you try: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=ALL+comment%3Alto_symtab_merge_decls_1

[Bug tree-optimization/46194] [4.5/4.6 Regression] gcc.dg/graphite/block-0.c FAILs with -ftree-parallelize-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46194 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/46188] -fipa-cp removes destructor call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46188 --- Comment #5 from Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz 2010-10-27 10:30:35 UTC --- Created attachment 22172 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22172 the second part of testcase I used this file to complete your testcase. It

[Bug web/45785] Bugzilla search sometimes fails with an internal error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45785 --- Comment #6 from Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz 2010-10-27 10:48:13 UTC --- That is indeed much faster

[Bug middle-end/46195] r165965 regresses i386 darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-10-27 10:51:06 UTC --- Created attachment 22173 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22173 A patch Please try this patch.

[Bug target/46195] r165965 regresses i386 darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |target Target

[Bug target/46191] Non-absolute names in libgcc_s.so

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46191 Ian Bolton ibolton at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/46191] Non-absolute names in libgcc_s.so

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46191 Ian Bolton ibolton at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING ---

[Bug target/46195] r165965 regresses i386 darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #22173|0 |1 is

[Bug fortran/46196] [OOP] gfortran compiles invalid generic TBP: dummy arguments are type compatible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46196 --- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-27 11:58:15 UTC --- Yes. Apparently a duplicate of PR 44917/44926.

[Bug target/46191] [4.5/4.6 regression] Non-absolute names in libgcc_s.so

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46191 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-10-27 12:02:35 UTC --- On Wed, 27 Oct 2010, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Using absolute names is undesirable too, because then gcc is not actually

[Bug target/46195] r165965 regresses i386 darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|UNCONFIRMED Ever

[Bug target/46191] [4.5/4.6 regression] Non-absolute names in libgcc_s.so

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46191 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-27 12:44:16 UTC --- Linker does that if -lfoo instead of libfoo.a form is used in the linker script. So perhaps we could just use that. As libgcc_s linker script name is

[Bug target/46128] There is no mechanism for detecting VFP revisions in ARM GCC.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46128 Ian Bolton ibolton at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug target/46197] New: Bad split_stack_return pattern in i386.md

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46197 Summary: Bad split_stack_return pattern in i386.md Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo:

[Bug c++/46188] -fipa-cp removes destructor call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46188 --- Comment #6 from Jens Maurer jens.maurer at gmx dot net 2010-10-27 13:15:19 UTC --- Thanks. Yes, the testcase was reduced from preprocessed files. Unfortunately, you can't remove the #pragma interface without breaking the testcase. But the

[Bug c++/46188] -fipa-cp removes destructor call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46188 --- Comment #6 from Jens Maurer jens.maurer at gmx dot net 2010-10-27 13:15:19 UTC --- Thanks. Yes, the testcase was reduced from preprocessed files. Unfortunately, you can't remove the #pragma interface without breaking the testcase. But the

[Bug target/46197] Bad split_stack_return pattern in i386.md

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46197 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug target/46195] r165965 regresses i386 darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195 --- Comment #8 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2010-10-27 13:22:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) Created attachment 22174 [details] An updated patch Please try this one. A quick manual test of only those test cases

[Bug target/46179] Codegen/TLS: invalid assembler syntax

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46179 --- Comment #5 from Finn Thain fthain at telegraphics dot com.au 2010-10-27 13:28:01 UTC --- The invalid address is generated by output_move_double. I have to say it, the .md files I looked at are hands-down the most complex and baroque code

[Bug target/46195] r165965 regresses i386 darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195 --- Comment #9 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2010-10-27 13:31:18 UTC --- Created attachment 22175 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22175 assembly file for gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c -O0 at -m32 using

[Bug target/46195] r165965 regresses i386 darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195 --- Comment #10 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2010-10-27 13:32:44 UTC --- Created attachment 22176 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22176 assembly file for gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c -O0 at -m32 using

[Bug target/46197] Bad split_stack_return pattern in i386.md

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46197 --- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-27 13:32:58 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Oct 27 13:32:54 2010 New Revision: 166001 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166001 Log: Replace

[Bug target/46195] r165965 regresses i386 darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195 --- Comment #11 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2010-10-27 13:35:26 UTC --- Created attachment 22177 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22177 diff between assembly for gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c at -m32

[Bug target/46197] Bad split_stack_return pattern in i386.md

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46197 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/2288] Variable declared in for-loop-header is in wrong scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2288 Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug target/46198] New: movd xmm, r (xmm - GPR) may hit the stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46198 Summary: movd xmm, r (xmm - GPR) may hit the stack Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo:

[Bug c++/2288] Variable declared in for-loop-header is in wrong scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2288 --- Comment #15 from Janis Johnson janis at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-27 17:38:36 UTC --- Peter, I don't know what address you should use for me; ask on #gcc if you should use the IBM one, otherwise it's janis.marie.john...@gmail.com.

[Bug target/46198] movd xmm, r (xmm - GPR) may hit the stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46198 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/46198] movd xmm, r (xmm - GPR) may hit the stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46198 --- Comment #2 from tbp tbptbp at gmail dot com 2010-10-27 18:10:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) The situation is thus totally under control ;) I concede you may have a point :) Yet, for size builds, it really can't possibly make sense, ever

[Bug target/46195] r165965 regresses i386 darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195 --- Comment #14 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2010-10-27 19:04:25 UTC --- Latest patch still leaves the regressions... FAIL: gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-18 c_compat_x_tst.o compile FAIL: gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-18

[Bug fortran/46196] [OOP] gfortran compiles invalid generic TBP: dummy arguments are type compatible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46196 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/46091] missed optimization: x86 bt/btc/bts instructions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46091 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c++/46170] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] g++ wrongly rejects pointer-to-member in template arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170 Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |dodji at gcc dot

[Bug other/46125] -mcmodel=large doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46125 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ABI |

[Bug c++/46124] ICE: tree check: expected var_decl or function_decl, have error_mark in cp_parser_lambda_declarator_opt, at cp/parser.c:7817 on invalid lambda function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46124 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery

[Bug tree-optimization/46190] [4.6 Regression] ICE in vect_enhance_data_refs_alignment when building fma3d

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46190 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug fortran/46201] New: ICE using procedure pointer...

--prefix=/volumes/dev/gfortran-4.6-trunk --enable-languages=fortran --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 4.6.0 20101027 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug tree-optimization/46194] [4.5/4.6 Regression] gcc.dg/graphite/block-0.c FAILs with -ftree-parallelize-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46194 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.2

[Bug c++/46105] Ordering failure among partial specializations with non-deduced context

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46105 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-27 20:53:14 UTC --- The error message that GCC gives is: t.cc:25:22: error: ambiguous class template instantiation for ‘struct elementconst has_et’ t.cc:12:8: error: candidates

[Bug c/46112] internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46112 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/46159] [4.5/4.6 Regression] Bogus warning about lambdas

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46159 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/46105] Ordering failure among partial specializations with non-deduced context

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46105 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-27 21:03:50 UTC --- I think the point is that the elementT const partial specialization should be preferred, but GCC considers them ambiguous, and uses the primary template.

[Bug other/46202] New: Makefile doesn't support install-strip

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46202 Summary: Makefile doesn't support install-strip Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo:

[Bug middle-end/46164] Local variables in specified registers don't work correctly with inline asm operands

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46164 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra, wrong-code

[Bug debug/46132] ICE: in force_decl_die, at dwarf2out.c:20525 with -fenable-icf-debug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46132 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug debug/46135] ICE: in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:7627 with -g1 -femit-class-debug-always -fenable-icf-debug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46135 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/46203] New: constexpr weirdness w/ default ctors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46203 Summary: constexpr weirdness w/ default ctors Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo:

[Bug c++/46203] constexpr weirdness w/ default ctors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46203 --- Comment #1 from Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-27 21:30:29 UTC --- Created attachment 22182 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22182 pre-processed sources

[Bug c++/42121] g++ should warn or error on internal 0 size array in struct

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42121 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug debug/46136] ICE: in size_of_dcall_table, at dwarf2out.c:12387 with -fenable-icf-debug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46136 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug middle-end/46169] [4.4 Regression] ICE: internal compiler error: in convert_move, at expr.c:371

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46169 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug bootstrap/46173] [4.4 Regression] gcc/gencheck.c:30:24: error: all-tree.def: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46173 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/46161] [OOP] Invalid: Passing non-polymorphic to allocatable polymorphic dummy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46161 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-27 21:41:56 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Wed Oct 27 21:41:52 2010 New Revision: 166018 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166018 Log: 2010-10-27 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug fortran/46161] [OOP] Invalid: Passing non-polymorphic to allocatable polymorphic dummy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46161 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/46175] ICE: in rtl_verify_flow_info_1, at cfgrtl.c:2037: flow control insn inside a basic block with -O -fgcse -fno-guess-branch-probability -freorder-blocks and asm goto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46175 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/46153] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2110 (unrecognizable insn) with -ffloat-store and __builtin_ia32_movlhps

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46153 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug fortran/46201] ICE using procedure pointer...

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46201 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug fortran/46196] [OOP] gfortran compiles invalid generic TBP: dummy arguments are type compatible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46196 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2010-10-27 21:51:23 UTC --- With the patch in comment #2, several of my codelets are rejected: for instance the test in comment #24 of pr42274 is rejected with: [macbook]

[Bug fortran/32049] Support on x86_64 also kind=16

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32049 --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-27 21:53:14 UTC --- Last patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-10/msg00262.html

[Bug c++/46001] [4.6 Regression] diagnostic refers to type '__java_boolean'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46001 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug fortran/46201] [F03] ICE on procedure pointer component call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46201 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/35688] template visibility botch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35688 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/46043] attribute to mark virtual methods that can't be further overriden so they can be devirtualized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46043 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug rtl-optimization/46034] [4.6 regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46034 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug rtl-optimization/46034] [4.6 regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46034 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/46034] [4.6 regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46034 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-27 22:16:55 UTC --- We are going into an infinite loop in if_then_else_cond.

[Bug rtl-optimization/46034] [4.6 regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46034 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-27 22:19:13 UTC --- But that is because we have something like XOR (ASHIFTRT) Where the operand of the ASHIFTRT is the same XOR again.

[Bug rtl-optimization/46034] [4.6 regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46034 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-27 22:34:40 UTC --- The most reduced testcase I could get: intersect_al(int n, int k) { int i; for (i = 0; i n; i++) { k = __builtin_abs(k); set_x_next(k / 2);

[Bug target/46195] r165965 regresses i386 darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195 --- Comment #15 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2010-10-27 22:34:46 UTC --- Created attachment 22183 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22183 assembly for gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-18_x.c at -m32 using

[Bug target/46195] r165965 regresses i386 darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195 --- Comment #16 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2010-10-27 22:36:12 UTC --- Created attachment 22184 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22184 assembly for gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-18_x.c at -m32 using

[Bug target/46195] r165965 regresses i386 darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195 --- Comment #17 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2010-10-27 22:37:36 UTC --- Created attachment 22185 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22185 diff between assembly for gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-18_x.c at -m32

[Bug rtl-optimization/46034] [4.6 regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46034 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-27 22:38:26 UTC --- Fails also with revision 164656.

[Bug c++/46058] [4.5/4.6 Regression] gcc crashes with lvalue error on the following Code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46058 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c++/46001] [4.6 Regression] diagnostic refers to type '__java_boolean'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46001 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/46034] [4.6 regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46034 --- Comment #8 from Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz 2010-10-27 22:59:53 UTC --- Created attachment 22186 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22186 reduced testcase Needs only -O -fexpensive-optimizations to reproduce

[Bug debug/45997] [4.6 Regression] __unknown__ type name for typedef'd int

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45997 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug middle-end/46204] New: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/throw-1.C fails to compile on IA64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46204 Summary: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/throw-1.C fails to compile on IA64 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: link-failure Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/46205] New: Invalid FORALL fails to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46205 Summary: Invalid FORALL fails to compile Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo:

[Bug target/46195] r165965 regresses i386 darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195 --- Comment #18 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2010-10-28 00:43:00 UTC --- Full regression results for patch in comment 12... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-10/msg02196.html show that the four failures in comment

[Bug fortran/46205] Invalid FORALL fails to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46205 Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/46206] New: using typedef-name error with typedef name hiding struct name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46206 Summary: using typedef-name error with typedef name hiding struct name Product: gcc Version: 4.1.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/46206] using typedef-name error with typedef name hiding struct name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46206 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug libstdc++/46207] New: std::atomicconst T *::store(...) fails to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46207 Summary: std::atomicconst T *::store(...) fails to compile Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug target/46195] r165965 regresses i386 darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last