[Bug fortran/45629] libgfortran/io/list_read.c:1872:10: warning: variable 'elem' might be clobbered by 'longjmp' or 'vfork' [-Wclobbered]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45629 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/45250] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: tr1/5_numerical_facilities/special_functions/01_assoc_laguerre/check_nan.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45250 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-01 07:58:51 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Nov 1 07:58:46 2010 New Revision: 166126 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166126 Log: PR target/45250 * var-tracking.c (cfa_base

[Bug target/45250] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: tr1/5_numerical_facilities/special_functions/01_assoc_laguerre/check_nan.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45250 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/46248] [4.6 regression] crash+infinite recursion in combine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46248 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot |

[Bug c++/20710] g++ should warn when hiding non-virtual method in base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-01 11:22:26 UTC --- This would also be solved by the "override control" features coming in C++0x c.f. PR 17920, PR 31397, PR 36848

[Bug rtl-optimization/46248] [4.6 regression] crash+infinite recursion in combine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46248 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/46212] [4.6 regression] segfault in reg_nonzero_bits_for_combine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46212 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-01 11:24:12 UTC --- Created attachment 22217 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22217 gcc46-pr46034.patch Untested fix.

[Bug rtl-optimization/46034] [4.6 regression] internal compiler error: segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46034 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-01 11:25:04 UTC --- Created attachment 22218 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22218 gcc46-pr46034.patch Untested fix.

[Bug c++/20710] g++ should warn when hiding non-virtual method in base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710 --- Comment #3 from loose at astron dot nl 2010-11-01 12:29:27 UTC --- As far as I know attributes were removed from the C0x Final Draft. Besides, if GCC were to provide a compiler flag to warn for this, you would also be able to catch potential bu

[Bug c++/20710] g++ should warn when hiding non-virtual method in base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-01 12:36:45 UTC --- Attributes were still in the FCD, and are still in the current draft, but might be removed. Override control may not be done by attributes, but will be present in C++0x in some form

[Bug c++/20710] g++ should warn when hiding non-virtual method in base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-01 12:39:48 UTC --- also, GNU-style attributes are not being removed from GCC, even if C++0x attributes get dropped my point was just that there are several similar bugs and that whatever it looks like

[Bug c++/20710] g++ should warn when hiding non-virtual method in base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710 --- Comment #6 from loose at astron dot nl 2010-11-01 12:54:25 UTC --- OK, fair enough. However, I reported this "bug", because I would like GCC to produce a warning when hiding a non-virtual method in *existing* code; an option similar to -Woverl

[Bug c++/20710] g++ should warn when hiding non-virtual method in base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-01 13:01:43 UTC --- Yup, that's why I haven't closed this as a duplicate. The C++0x override control works for virtual and non-virtual names, so is relevant to this PR *and* the others. Noting and l

[Bug debug/46255] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -fprofile-generate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46255 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug target/45359] poor -march=native choices for VIA C7 Esther processors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45359 --- Comment #3 from Dzianis Kahanovich 2010-11-01 13:21:40 UTC --- Created attachment 0 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=0 native VIA/CentaurHauls (In reply to comment #1) > Why do you think it's a poor choice? This i

[Bug target/44046] Intel Core i5 M520 CPU detected as atom with -march=native

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44046 Dzianis Kahanovich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mahatma at eu dot by --- Comment #12

[Bug c++/46246] [C++0x] Move constructor required when passing a temporary by copy, but not actually used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46246 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] New: [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 Summary: [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 --- Comment #1 from froydnj at codesourcery dot com 2010-11-01 14:40:58 UTC --- A backtrace and/or a reduced testcase would be helpful. I don't have a copy of SPEC 2006.

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-01 14:48:00 UTC --- #0 internal_error (gmsgid=0x12a2830 "tree check: %s, have %s in %s, at %s:%d") at ../../src/gcc/diagnostic.c:825 #1 0x00ccb556 in tree_check_failed (node=0x71190f78, f

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-01 14:49:15 UTC --- (gdb) f 3 #3 0x0076db8b in const_vector_from_tree (exp=0x703f5880) at ../../src/gcc/expr.c:10253 10253RTVEC_ELT (v, i) = immed_double_int_const (tree_to_double_int (

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-01 14:50:25 UTC --- (gdb) f 3 #3 0x0076db8b in const_vector_from_tree (exp=0x703f5880) at ../../src/gcc/expr.c:10253 10253RTVEC_ELT (v, i) = immed_double_int_const (tree_to_double_int (

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 --- Comment #5 from froydnj at codesourcery dot com 2010-11-01 14:57:32 UTC --- If I had to guess, one of these two hunks is probably responsible: --- trunk/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c2010/10/31 01:58:12166101 +++ trunk/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c2

[Bug debug/46252] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O -frerun-cse-after-loop -fno-tree-loop-optimize -funroll-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46252 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug middle-end/46234] [4.6 Regression] ICE in expand_expr_real_2 for va-arg-XXX tescases

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46234 Pat Haugen changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE in expand_expr_real_2 |[4.6 Regression] ICE in |f

[Bug tree-optimization/45875] [4.6 Regression] ice in gimple_fold_obj_type_ref_known_binfo with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug middle-end/46120] [4.6 regression] g++.dg/ipa/ivinline-?.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46120 --- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor 2010-11-01 16:01:19 UTC --- I have submitted a patch for this PR: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg00044.html

[Bug target/46179] Codegen/TLS: invalid assembler syntax

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46179 --- Comment #8 from Thorsten Glaser 2010-11-01 16:08:18 UTC --- I can confirm that attachment 22191 fixes the original problem, namely that one source file from util-linux, for me. No testsuite run, though ☹ Built on Debian/m68k, natively.

[Bug middle-end/37053] [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:395

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37053 Thorsten Glaser changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tg at mirbsd dot org --- Comment #23 fr

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-01 16:21:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > If I had to guess, one of these two hunks is probably responsible: > > > --- trunk/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c2010/10/31 01:58:12166101 > +++ trunk/gcc/tree-ve

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug web/45803] bugzilla: Invalid HTML

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45803 Frédéric Buclin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/37053] [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:395

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37053 --- Comment #24 from Paolo Bonzini 2010-11-01 16:38:53 UTC --- You'd need also the patch for bug 41064.

[Bug middle-end/37053] [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:395

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37053 Paolo Bonzini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nospamname at web dot de --- Comment #25

[Bug target/40414] gcc 4.4.0 error at postreload.c:396

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40414 Paolo Bonzini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug other/46202] Makefile doesn't support install-strip

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46202 Ralf Wildenhues changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/46203] constexpr weirdness w/ default ctors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46203 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug web/45803] bugzilla: Invalid HTML

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45803 Frédéric Buclin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #3 from Frédéric Bu

[Bug middle-end/37053] [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:395

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37053 --- Comment #26 from Thorsten Glaser 2010-11-01 16:53:18 UTC --- Probably, but not on m68k ;-)

[Bug middle-end/37053] [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:395

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37053 --- Comment #27 from Paolo Bonzini 2010-11-01 16:58:20 UTC --- Better: not for this testcase. We found it on CRIS, but the bug could really happen on any target.

[Bug web/46260] New: Upgrade GCC and Sources Bugzilla from 3.6.2 to 3.6.3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46260 Summary: Upgrade GCC and Sources Bugzilla from 3.6.2 to 3.6.3 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: web AssignedT

[Bug web/46260] Upgrade GCC and Sources Bugzilla from 3.6.2 to 3.6.3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46260 Frédéric Buclin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/46261] New: avr-gcc: Segfaults when compiled with the -mint8 option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46261 Summary: avr-gcc: Segfaults when compiled with the -mint8 option Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 --- Comment #8 from Nathan Froyd 2010-11-01 18:58:35 UTC --- Author: froydnj Date: Mon Nov 1 18:58:30 2010 New Revision: 166139 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166139 Log: gcc/ 2010-11-01 Nathan Froyd PR tree-optim

[Bug c++/46221] huge number of c++ testsuite failures, libstdc++.so alias missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/46152] [F03] ALLOCATE with type-spec fails for intrinsic types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46152 --- Comment #18 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01 19:30:01 UTC --- Author: kargl Date: Mon Nov 1 19:29:57 2010 New Revision: 166140 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166140 Log: 2010-10-30 Steven G. Kargl PR for

[Bug fortran/46262] New: [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262 Summary: [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/46262] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #

[Bug fortran/46262] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01 19:45:12 UTC --- The following variant: module integrable_model_module implicit none type :: integrable_model contains procedure :: multiply generic :: operator(*) => multip

[Bug fortran/46262] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-01 19:49:28 UTC --- Created attachment 2 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2 full test case When fixing, one should make sure that the full code from http://portal.acm

[Bug tree-optimization/46259] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166102 failed 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46259 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/45062] [4.6 Regression] Revision 162223 caused ICE at c-decl.c:4064

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45062 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bonzini at gnu dot org --- Comment #4 fro

[Bug c/46243] [4.6 Regression] expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘tree_list’ in start_decl, at c-decl.c:4049

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46243 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/46170] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] g++ wrongly rejects pointer-to-member in template arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170 --- Comment #10 from David Fang 2010-11-01 20:40:17 UTC --- Thanks for working on this, Dodji! Meanwhile, I've been trying to find some source workaround for my example until this is patched and the next release is out. Can you think of any? Ju

[Bug c++/45095] "internal compiler error: Segmentation fault" compiling p7zip

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45095 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Severity|majo

[Bug libgcj/46263] New: without zip in system, gcc with --enable-languages=....,java bootstraps, but no libgcj in result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46263 Summary: without zip in system, gcc with --enable-languages=,java bootstraps, but no libgcj in result Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/46264] New: Trunk [4.6.0 20101028] - An overloaded operator returning rvalue reference invalidates stack.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264 Summary: Trunk [4.6.0 20101028] - An overloaded operator returning rvalue reference invalidates stack. Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug debug/46252] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O -frerun-cse-after-loop -fno-tree-loop-optimize -funroll-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46252 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC|ebotcazou at gcc dot| |gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/46034] [4.6 regression] internal compiler error: segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46034 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|ebotcazou at gcc d

[Bug rtl-optimization/46212] [4.6 regression] segfault in reg_nonzero_bits_for_combine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46212 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|ebotcazou at gcc d

[Bug libstdc++/45999] runtime error in std::vector python pretty printer.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45999 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-01 21:28:48 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Mon Nov 1 21:28:44 2010 New Revision: 166150 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166150 Log: 2010-11-01 Jonathan Wakely PR libstdc++/45

[Bug libstdc++/45999] runtime error in std::vector python pretty printer.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45999 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-01 21:32:05 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Mon Nov 1 21:32:01 2010 New Revision: 166151 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166151 Log: 2010-11-01 Jonathan Wakely PR libstdc++/45

[Bug libstdc++/45999] runtime error in std::vector python pretty printer.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45999 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-01 21:33:44 UTC --- trunk and 4.5.2 should work with python 2.4 now

[Bug c++/46264] Trunk [4.6.0 20101028] - An overloaded operator returning rvalue reference invalidates stack.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-01 21:49:56 UTC --- foo::operator* returns a reference to a local variable which goes out of scope, causing c.data to contain garbage. operator* should return by value instead

[Bug c++/46264] Trunk [4.6.0 20101028] - An overloaded operator returning rvalue reference invalidates stack.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264 Mirza changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/46251] ICE: in expand_expr_real_2, at expr.c:7276 with -funsafe-math-optimizations -mbionic and __builtin_sincosl()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46251 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/45022] No prefetch for the vectorized loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45022 Changpeng Fang changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/41219] libgfortran build warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41219 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug testsuite/46249] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-ccp-32.c: dubious test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46249 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/45629] libgfortran/io/list_read.c:1872:10: warning: variable 'elem' might be clobbered by 'longjmp' or 'vfork' [-Wclobbered]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45629 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p

[Bug libstdc++/12110] ICE building 64-bit strstream.o

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12110 --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra 2010-11-02 00:20:38 UTC --- Author: amodra Date: Tue Nov 2 00:20:35 2010 New Revision: 166162 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166162 Log: PR binutils/12110 * configure.ac: Error when

[Bug rtl-optimization/46265] New: Missing ifcvt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46265 Summary: Missing ifcvt Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug c++/46133] constexpr needed for C99 complex type creation from ctor with two floating point types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46133 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2010-11-02 02:35:33 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Nov 2 02:35:28 2010 New Revision: 166171 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166171 Log: * include/std/chrono: Extend constexpr applicat

[Bug c++/46134] constexpr vs. defaulted ctor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46134 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2010-11-02 02:35:33 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Nov 2 02:35:28 2010 New Revision: 166171 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166171 Log: * include/std/chrono: Extend constexpr applicat

[Bug fortran/46262] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot |

[Bug fortran/46262] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262 --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle 2010-11-02 05:22:42 UTC --- Passes at r162312 and fails at r162313.

[Bug target/46195] r165965 regresses i386 darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195 Dave Korn changed: What|Removed |Added CC||davek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #25 from