http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46213
Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46266
Summary: gcov generates data for non-existing file built-in
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-profile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46172
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46134
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
09:48:13 UTC ---
the adjusted static assertion in unique_ptr is wrong, it will now reject any
pointer deleters - it should only assert when no initializer is given for a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46134
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
09:58:26 UTC ---
I was recently playing with the following trick to remove the static_assert
from the body of the constexpr constructors:
struct _Undefined;
typedef typename
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46265
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46230
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46267
Summary: strerror() is not necessarily thread-safe
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46229
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46230
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
11:18:31 UTC ---
*** Bug 46229 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46268
Summary: gengtype warning when GTY(()) markers have no effect
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35877
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46195
--- Comment #26 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-02 12:04:27
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #25)
Hi HJ, I'm getting a ton of failures caused by this same warning message at
r166110 on i686-pc-cygwin:
Should I reopen this bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902
--- Comment #12 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02 12:13:01 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Tue Nov 2 12:12:56 2010
New Revision: 166175
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166175
Log:
PR tree-optimization/45902
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902
Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46134
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
12:33:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
constexpr
unique_ptr() : _M_t(pointer(), __uninitialized_deleter()) { }
IIUC since that tuple constructor is not constexpr, that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46172
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46267
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45606
--- Comment #5 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
12:44:23 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Tue Nov 2 12:44:19 2010
New Revision: 166179
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166179
Log:
Restore canonical type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46130
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45629
--- Comment #6 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02 12:56:44
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Tue Nov 2 12:56:38 2010
New Revision: 166180
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166180
Log:
PR 45629 Remove usage of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #11 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
12:58:51 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Tue Nov 2 12:58:48 2010
New Revision: 166181
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166181
Log:
Fix PR c++/46170,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46162
--- Comment #3 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
12:58:51 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Tue Nov 2 12:58:48 2010
New Revision: 166181
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166181
Log:
Fix PR c++/46170, c++/46162
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46255
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
13:00:43 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Nov 2 13:00:39 2010
New Revision: 166182
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166182
Log:
PR debug/46255
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45606
--- Comment #6 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
13:04:30 UTC ---
This is fixed in 4.6.
For 4.5, I think committing this as is is far too risky so I'd wait to see
how solid it is for 4.6 and see if I can safely backport
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46267
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
13:06:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Can we simply define _GNU_SOURCE to get strerror_r and then just use it?
What about non-glibc systems?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46172
--- Comment #3 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2010-11-02 13:11:48 UTC
---
The vectorizer assumes that DCE will be applied after it, and not only in this
case. I don't see why someone would want to use this combination of flags
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46172
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
13:18:57 UTC ---
Ah, if this is in dead code created by vectorizer that really shouldn't be ever
expanded, then either we need to arrange for DCE to be performed after
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46267
--- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02 13:20:48
UTC ---
Well, if we want to use strerror_r() we'd have to either first undef
_GNU_SOURCE before we include string.h so that we get the POSIX version (but,
might this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46149
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
13:25:12 UTC ---
I have a patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46172
--- Comment #5 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2010-11-02 13:28:14 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #4)
Ah, if this is in dead code created by vectorizer that really shouldn't be
ever
expanded,
Yes, in this case it's dead code created by
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46269
Summary: [trans-mem] internal compiler error in expand_block_tm
of trans-mem.c
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #13 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
13:35:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 4
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4
4_5-patch-0: First patch for 4.5 branch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #14 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
13:36:36 UTC ---
Created attachment 5
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5
4_5-patch-1: Second patch for 4.5 branch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #15 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
13:37:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 6
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6
4_4-patch-0: First patch for 4.4 branch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #16 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
13:38:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 7
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7
4_4-patch-1: Second patch for 4.4 branch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46177
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
13:38:21 UTC ---
I have a patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #17 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
13:38:55 UTC ---
Created attachment 8
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8
4_4-patch-2: Third patch for 4.4 branch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46267
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45568
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46086
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46165
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46183
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45568
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #18 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
14:19:04 UTC ---
fang at csl dot cornell.edu gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org writes:
Meanwhile, I've been trying to find some source workaround for my example
until
this is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46184
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
14:24:25 UTC ---
I have a patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46270
Summary: [trans-mem] internal compiler error: verify_stmts
failed
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46249
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
14:35:00 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 2 14:34:53 2010
New Revision: 166183
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166183
Log:
2010-11-02 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46249
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46183
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44606
--- Comment #10 from David Kühling dvdkhlng at gmx dot de 2010-11-02 14:39:12
UTC ---
I can reproduce this bug with gcc-4_4-branch SVN HEAD, compiling gcc in
cross-compile mode and running the resulting executable with qemu-ppc.
Instructions to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46183
--- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
14:48:28 UTC ---
For the record:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x0057f64c in flow_loops_find (loops=0x772516e0) at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46183
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875
--- Comment #17 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
15:06:28 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue Nov 2 15:06:21 2010
New Revision: 166190
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166190
Log:
2010-11-02 Martin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40462
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|sparc-rtems4.10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46216
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
15:11:16 UTC ---
Reduced testcase:
typedef int Embryo_Cell;
int
embryo_program_run(Embryo_Cell *cip)
{
unsigned char op;
Embryo_Cell offs;
static const void
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46190
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46172
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46255
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46120
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
15:22:55 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue Nov 2 15:22:52 2010
New Revision: 166192
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166192
Log:
2010-11-02 Martin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45875
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46120
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46177
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
15:45:31 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 2 15:45:26 2010
New Revision: 166193
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166193
Log:
2010-11-02 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46184
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
15:46:50 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 2 15:46:46 2010
New Revision: 166194
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166194
Log:
2010-11-02 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46184
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46177
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46183
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46131
--- Comment #7 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02 16:07:11 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Tue Nov 2 16:07:04 2010
New Revision: 166198
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166198
Log:
PR target/46131
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46217
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
16:08:19 UTC ---
I have a patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46131
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
--- Comment #8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45693
--- Comment #10 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02 16:16:30
UTC ---
Author: ro
Date: Tue Nov 2 16:16:22 2010
New Revision: 166199
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166199
Log:
PR target/45693
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46107
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45693
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46131
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46251
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
16:24:12 UTC ---
I have a patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46107
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
16:32:24 UTC ---
verify_loop_structure () passes before loop unswitching, but doesn't pass after
it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46241
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
16:33:48 UTC ---
Reduced testcase:
class btIDebugDraw;
class btCollisionWorld {
virtual btIDebugDraw* getDebugDrawer() { };
static void rayTestSingle();
};
class
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #19 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
16:36:01 UTC ---
I think we can avoid the extra patch for 4.4 by just removing the code that
changes c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings; let's do that.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45908
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46271
Summary: OpenMP default(none) and procedure pointers
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46216
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
16:58:47 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 2 16:58:40 2010
New Revision: 166203
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166203
Log:
2010-11-02 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46149
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
17:00:16 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 2 17:00:09 2010
New Revision: 166204
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166204
Log:
2010-11-02 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46149
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
17:10:05 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Nov 2 17:09:58 2010
New Revision: 166205
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166205
Log:
2010-11-02 Steven G.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46272
Summary: [4.6 Regression]: libstdc++ fails to build due to
atomic-constexpr-changes
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46273
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46272
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
17:21:53 UTC ---
Similar error on powerpc-darwin:
In file included from
/Users/regress/tbox/native/build/powerpc-apple-darwin9.8.0/libstdc++-v3/include/atomic:42:0,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46273
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iant at google dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46204
Alexander Monakov amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46274
Summary: testsuite/gcc.dg: operator precedence
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46249
--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Kaiser nikai at nikai dot net 2010-11-02 17:44:56
UTC ---
I noticed some similar occurrences and filed them as bug 46274.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #20 from David Fang fang at csl dot cornell.edu 2010-11-02
17:50:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
Fantastic explanation, thank you!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46273
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46273
--- Comment #3 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
17:58:52 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Nov 2 17:58:45 2010
New Revision: 166207
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166207
Log:
PR lto/46273
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46269
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46253
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
18:08:49 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Nov 2 18:08:44 2010
New Revision: 166208
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166208
Log:
Emit vzerouppers after
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46253
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46275
Summary: -masm=intel -fPIC causes global offset table issues
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo:
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo