http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44362
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45336
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46299
Summary: Diagnose specification expressions involving
host-associated vars with deferred bounds
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid, di
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46238
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel 2010-11-04
08:47:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Please try revision 166259.
Ok. I've started bootstrap. I'm quite sure that reverting the will fix the
problem. Perhaps I missed that on the list but when
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46300
Summary: Calls to internals _ITM_cxa_throw and
_ITM_cxa_allocate_exception are not marked as safe
Product: gcc
Version: trans-mem
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46301
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Missing diagnosis for "len=:"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid, diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46301
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46233
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46233
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-04
10:24:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 22274
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22274
gcc46-pr46233-1.patch
Alternative fix which calls fixup_noreturn_call instead. I don't think it buy
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45702
--- Comment #23 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-04
11:10:25 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 4 11:10:21 2010
New Revision: 166305
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166305
Log:
2010-11-04 Richard Guenther
PR testsu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45702
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42240
Georg Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||avr at gjlay dot de
--- Comment #13 from Geor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45721
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45722
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45733
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45743
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Priority
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45781
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46213
--- Comment #5 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04 11:51:13 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Thu Nov 4 11:51:09 2010
New Revision: 166306
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166306
Log:
PR tree-optimization/46213
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45801
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-04
11:54:36 UTC ---
Alex, please ping your patch, eventually CCing some DF maintainers.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45801
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45816
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45892
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46295
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45936
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45991
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45936
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45991
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-04
12:29:20 UTC ---
The problem is that fold figures sth out that tree-affine doesn't. The
latter doesn't simplify
{
type = long unsigned int
offset = 0
elements = {
[0] = &A[(long unsigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45971
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-04
12:34:43 UTC ---
Reduced testcase:
typedef unsigned long gsize;
typedef int gint;
enum { NUM_LST_DSPOPE = 12 };
struct Preferences {
gint lst_ope_columns[NUM_LST_DSPOPE+1];
};
extern struct Pre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44765
--- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-11-04 12:41:14 UTC ---
Author: amylaar
Date: Thu Nov 4 12:41:07 2010
New Revision: 166307
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166307
Log:
PR middle-end/44765
* emit-rtl.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45733
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-04
12:42:59 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 4 12:42:57 2010
New Revision: 166308
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166308
Log:
2010-11-04 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45733
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46022
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46213
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44765
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46068
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
/arth/local --enable-checking=release
--enable-threads=posix --with-gnu-as --with-as=/export/home/arth/local/bin/as
--with-gnu-ld --with-ld=/export/home/arth/local/bin/ld
--enable-libstdcxx-pch=no --enable-objc-gc --build=i386-pc-solaris2.10
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.6.0 20101104 (experimental
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45743
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46179
--- Comment #9 from Maxim Kuvyrkov 2010-11-04
13:12:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I can confirm that attachment 22191 [details] fixes the original problem,
> namely that
> one source file from util-linux, for me. No testsuite run, though
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46299
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-04
13:15:52 UTC ---
(All references relative to Fortran 2008.) Per
R516 explicit-shape-spec is [ lower-bound : ] upper-bound
and R517/518 the bounds have to be specification expressions (R728, Section
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46302
Summary: Program with virtual public inheritance crashes at O3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46302
--- Comment #1 from bredelin at ucla dot edu 2010-11-04 13:17:47 UTC ---
Created attachment 22275
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22275
source in multiple files
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46077
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46302
--- Comment #2 from bredelin at ucla dot edu 2010-11-04 13:18:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 22276
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22276
source in single c++ file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46302
--- Comment #3 from bredelin at ucla dot edu 2010-11-04 13:19:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 22277
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22277
preprocessed source file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46303
Summary: 'mutex' is not a member of 'std' failures in
30_threads/call_once/constexpr.cc,
30_threads/mutex/cons/constexpr.cc,
30_threads/once_flag/cons/constexpr.cc
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46088
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2010-10-20 03:22:14 |2010-11-04 3:22:14
Component|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45971
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at use dot net
--- Comment #6 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46077
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46303
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2010-11-04
13:27:27 UTC ---
Created attachment 22278
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22278
compressed preprocessed source file for 30_threads/call_once/constexpr.cc at
-m32 on x86_64-apple-darw
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46303
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2010-11-04
13:29:29 UTC ---
Regressions are not present at r166156.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46303
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-04
13:37:13 UTC ---
the preprocessed file shows this condition in is false:
#if defined(_GLIBCXX_HAS_GTHREADS) && defined(_GLIBCXX_USE_C99_STDINT_TR1)
so those new tests need
// { dg-require-cstdin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46303
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-04
13:38:54 UTC ---
Possibly:
// { dg-do compile { target *-*-freebsd* *-*-netbsd* *-*-linux* *-*-solaris*
*-*-cyg
win *-*-darwin* alpha*-*-osf* mips-sgi-irix6* } }
// { dg-options " -std=gnu++0x -pthr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46199
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46303
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-11-04
13:47:44 UTC ---
Also seen on powerpc-apple-darwin9.8.0 between revisions 166170 and 166211
(see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-11/msg00098.html and
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46303
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2010-11-04
13:51:08 UTC ---
Those are dg-do compile testcases, thus adding on top:
// { dg-require-cstdint "" }
// { dg-require-gthreads "" }
consistently with the existing compile-only testcases should fix the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
--- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-11-04 13:54:58 UTC ---
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Joseph, does C really distinguish between
>
> int foo()
> {
> }
>
> and
>
> int foo(void)
> {
> }
>
> ? T
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46154
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-04
13:55:46 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 4 13:55:44 2010
New Revision: 166311
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166311
Log:
2010-11-03 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46154
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46183
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45991
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-04
14:07:54 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 4 14:07:48 2010
New Revision: 166312
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166312
Log:
2010-11-04 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45991
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46199
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22279|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46302
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46269
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Marlier
2010-11-04 14:31:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 22281
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22281
small test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940
--- Comment #1 from Patrick Marlier
2010-11-04 14:36:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 22282
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22282
.ii file
same file as sent by email few time ago.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46234
--- Comment #5 from Pat Haugen 2010-11-04
14:38:18 UTC ---
Bootstrap/regtest went fine on PPC, va-arg-xxx tests now pass.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46297
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46232
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46233
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-04
14:56:57 UTC ---
I think it's fragile to call verify_flow_info from loop_optimizer_finalize
but your patch in comment #5 looks perfectly reasonable and is ok if it
passed bootstrap & regtest.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44756
--- Comment #2 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-11-04 14:58:48 UTC ---
Author: amylaar
Date: Thu Nov 4 14:58:40 2010
New Revision: 166313
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166313
Log:
PR bootstrap/44756
* ifc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46301
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46068
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-04
15:17:29 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 4 15:17:24 2010
New Revision: 166315
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166315
Log:
2010-11-04 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46183
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-04
15:19:24 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 4 15:19:19 2010
New Revision: 166316
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166316
Log:
2010-11-04 Richard Guenther
PR rtl-opt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46068
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46183
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46099
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45102
sledge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sledgeas at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from sl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46234
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46238
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel 2010-11-04
16:05:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Please try revision 166259.
As expected reverting the patch fixes bootstrap on s390x.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46292
--- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04 16:06:51 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Nov 4 16:06:45 2010
New Revision: 166318
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166318
Log:
PR middle-end/46292
* lower-suberg.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46292
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45291
Georg Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||avr at gjlay dot de
--- Comment #2 from Georg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46088
--- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak 2010-11-04 16:19:20
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> We're matching
>
> (define_insn "*ashl3_cconly"
AFAICS, there is nothing wrong with the pattern:
[(set (reg FLAGS_REG)
(compare
(ashift:SWI (ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46179
--- Comment #10 from Thorsten Glaser 2010-11-04 16:27:00
UTC ---
https://www.freewrt.org/~tg/debs68k/dists/sid/main/PS-ok-unrel/gcc-4.4/
I built a Debian source package, which means three-stage bootstrap and then
building the RTL with the just c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46088
--- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak 2010-11-04 16:32:57
UTC ---
The insn that was matched looks like:
(gdb) up
#1 0x00b9da94 in recog_7 (x0=0x71f329d8, insn=0x71f296c0,
pnum_clobbers=0x7fffdc9c)
at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45652
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-04
16:35:55 UTC ---
It looks like scheduling itself adds the instruction that references
(mem/s:DI (reg:DI 4 si) [0 MEM[(struct S * {ref-all})addr.0_2]+0 S8 A64])
making use of 'si' where it was former
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45652
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-04
16:48:49 UTC ---
And indeed --param selsched-insns-to-rename=0 fixes the testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46303
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-04 17:02:35 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Nov 4 17:02:25 2010
New Revision: 166319
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166319
Log:
2010-11-04 Paolo Carlini
PR libs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46297
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law 2010-11-04 17:03:26
UTC ---
Testing a fix...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46304
Summary: g++ crashes with ICE in bitmap_first_set_bit, at
bitmap.c:770
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46298
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2010-11-04
17:16:10 UTC ---
Please provide preprocessed input; I can't configure libstdc++ without an ARM
assembler/linker.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46298
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46305
Summary: [Regression] Bugzilla: PR comment type of
links: Comment links to the wrong bug
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46228
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka 2010-11-04
17:32:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 22284
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22284
Patch I am testing
Hi,
this patch makes size metric more realistic in two ways
1) We assumed that re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44772
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45936
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45685
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46301
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46305
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo