http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46353
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352
--- Comment #18 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
08:11:43 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Mon Nov 8 08:11:38 2010
New Revision: 166429
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166429
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46353
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46316
--- Comment #16 from davidxl xinliangli at gmail dot com 2010-11-08 08:18:31
UTC ---
The revised patch:
Index: gcc/tree-vrp.c
===
--- gcc/tree-vrp.c(revision 166426)
+++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45505
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46356
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45971
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46344
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08 09:04:03 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Nov 8 09:03:50 2010
New Revision: 166430
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166430
Log:
2010-11-08 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46344
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08 09:20:48 UTC ---
r166430 fixes the test cases in comment #0 and #4 and the one in PR 46345.
However, the problem in comment #5 persists. Reduced test case:
module m
type t1
end type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46358
Summary: i686-pc-linux-gnu bootstrap failure in r166429
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42954
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
09:30:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Last patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-11/msg00052.html
Review comments by Ian Taylor were:
* More macros now refer to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46356
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08 09:32:26 UTC ---
Reduced test case:
IMPLICIT NONE
TYPE :: ParentVector
INTEGER :: a
END TYPE ParentVector
CONTAINS
SUBROUTINE vector_operation(pvec)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46358
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44206
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #21 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
10:16:19 UTC ---
jason at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org writes:
--- Comment #19 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
16:36:01 UTC ---
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46156
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
10:35:27 UTC ---
And apparently went away in
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166167
Guess we just want to add the testcase into the testsuite, unless the r166167
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46358
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46357
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
10:44:31 UTC ---
We always use zero/sign-extending moves to avoid partial register stalls.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46355
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28627
--- Comment #1 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08 10:49:44
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Nov 8 10:49:38 2010
New Revision: 166431
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166431
Log:
2010-11-08 Kai Tietz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46156
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2010-11-08
11:01:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
And apparently went away in
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166167
Guess we just want to add the testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45399
--- Comment #2 from Kay Hayen kayhayen at gmx dot de 2010-11-08 11:03:31 UTC
---
Created attachment 22319
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22319
Warning for \0 in raw strings test case
Well, here it is.
Use like this: g++ -c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46359
Summary: [4.6 Regression] symbol missing from 4.6 libstdc++
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46359
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
11:27:33 UTC ---
As usual this might be as well a type-merging problem in the Frontend.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46359
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
11:37:21 UTC ---
is this Bug 46221 ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46333
--- Comment #19 from Jay jay.krell at cornell dot edu 2010-11-08 11:50:35 UTC
---
Hey, g++ 4.0 doesn't even like all of the code.
You have to try all targets to uncover some of it.
target=alpha-dec-vms:
g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46359
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46358
--- Comment #2 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-08 11:56:09 UTC ---
Created attachment 22320
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22320
List of unexpected failures
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46358
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221
--- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
12:03:23 UTC ---
I will investigate this a bit now.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46360
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE in release_defs, at
tree-ssanames.c:313
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46208
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
12:15:02 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Nov 8 12:14:51 2010
New Revision: 166433
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166433
Log:
PR target/46208
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46360
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46358
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45399
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45399
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
12:26:16 UTC ---
The motivating examples in the original raw strings proposal are for
simplifying regular expressions and HTML markup, there's no mention of binary
blobs.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46361
Summary: bugzilla: mid-air collision message is misleading
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: web
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46362
Summary: [4.6 regression] lto-plugin.c doesn't compile on IRIX
6.5
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46363
Summary: [bugzilla] WAITING state confirms bug
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: web
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46191
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46333
--- Comment #20 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2010-11-08 13:12:11 UTC ---
There really is absolutely no point experimenting with this option
anywhere other than on trunk. Maybe we should just disable it on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46364
Summary: basic_string.h:541:32: internal compiler error:
Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45383
Simon number.cruncher at ntlworld dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46344
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46365
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46365
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221
--- Comment #13 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
14:18:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 22323
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22323
patch
Patch. Testing on x86_64-linux, testing elsewhere is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46366
Summary: gcc.target/i386/pr45352-2.c failed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45894
--- Comment #5 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
14:27:46 UTC ---
I think the example is invalid in c++ 2003 as [temp.param/9] says that
a function template shall not have any default template argument. It's
valid in c++0x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46365
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46358
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221
--- Comment #14 from Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
14:36:32 UTC ---
I'll give it a spin on powerpc64-linux.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46367
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE during cgraph edge cloning
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46367
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46344
--- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08 14:39:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
The error seems to be sensitive to the first letter of the type(t1) variable.
All names starting with 'w'-'z' fail, others seem to work. Also the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
14:39:51 UTC ---
The problem seems to be that on the c.f90:
...
D.1548.i.data = 0B;
atmp.7.dtype = 3113;
atmp.7.dim[0].stride = 1;
atmp.7.dim[0].lbound = 0;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46368
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at
varasm.c:1033
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46368
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46360
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46369
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression
'((unsigned char*)*r)[24]' of kind bit_field_ref
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46369
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46367
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46370
Summary: [OOP] ALLOCATE: Error allocating CLASS coarrays
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46367
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
15:02:02 UTC ---
Created attachment 22326
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22326
preprocessed source
Hm, it seems initial attachment doesn't work.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46367
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46371
Summary: [OOP] SELECT TYPE: scalar coarray variable is rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46372
Summary: format '%f' expects type 'double', but argument 3 has
type 'float'
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
15:21:41 UTC ---
Indeed, for
x:
(mem/s:DI (reg/f:DI 117 [ D.1692 ]) [6 MEM[(struct a[2] *)D.1692_63]+0 S8 A64])
mem:
(mem/s/f/c:DI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 20 frame)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46368
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
15:32:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Indeed, for
x:
(mem/s:DI (reg/f:DI 117 [ D.1692 ]) [6 MEM[(struct a[2] *)D.1692_63]+0 S8
A64])
mem:
(mem/s/f/c:DI (plus:DI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46373
Summary: fflush called when reading from a string
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46374
Summary: Add nooverflow attribute
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
15:38:21 UTC ---
Ah,
if (optimize)
update_alias_info_with_stack_vars ();
explains that. Guess it should be if (optimize || ...).
if (optimize || flag_strict_aliasing)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35649
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||corsepiu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46372
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46374
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
15:41:30 UTC ---
That code is really:
bool
f (uint16_t x, uint16_t y)
{
return ((int)x) + 8 == ((int)y) - 17;
}
--- CUT ---
There should be no zero extends in that code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46374
--- Comment #2 from Luís Fernando Schultz Xavier da Silveira lfsxs0 at gmail
dot com 2010-11-08 15:48:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
That code is really:
bool
f (uint16_t x, uint16_t y)
{
return ((int)x) + 8 == ((int)y) - 17;
}
I am
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45948
Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46375
Summary: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with
-O -fgcse -fno-tree-dominator-opts
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46208
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
16:04:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
* config/sparc/sparc.c (TARGET_PROMOTE_PROTOTYPES): Delete.
I was just looking into the same problem with MIPS too. I almost
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636
Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
=/home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc64 --disable-threads --disable-target-libiberty
--disable-libmudflap --disable-libssp --build=hppa-linux-gnu
--host=hppa-linux-gnu --target=hppa64-linux-gnu --enable-languages=c
--disable-bootstrap
Thread model: single
gcc version 4.6.0 20101108 (experimental) [trunk revision
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
16:39:39 UTC ---
Created attachment 22329
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22329
gcc46-pr43808-2.patch
Another possible fix (also untested).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46376
Summary: LTO, MinGW and virtual base classes don't work
together
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970
--- Comment #95 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-11-08 17:00:41 UTC ---
CC fs/ioctl.o
fs/ioctl.c: In function 'do_vfs_ioctl':
fs/ioctl.c:601:1: internal compiler error: in update_df, at fwprop.c:877
Please submit a full bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46373
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46366
--- Comment #1 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
17:05:38 UTC ---
Sorry, I have checked that the test doesn't ICE but missed the additional
warnings. How about the below patch, do you think it makes sense? I have
=/home/rodrigo/local
--enable-lto --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --enable-multilib=no
--with-system-zlib=yes --enable-threads --disable-nls --with-arch-32=i686
--disable-sjlj-exceptions
Thread model: win32
gcc version 4.6.0 20101108 (experimental) (GCC)
*** File: test.h
#ifndef TEST_H_INCLUDED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46357
--- Comment #2 from Justin Lebar justin.lebar+bug at gmail dot com 2010-11-08
17:08:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
We always use zero/sign-extending moves to avoid partial register stalls.
Sure, but the whole instruction on line 10 is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46366
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-08 17:13:24
UTC ---
The testcase looks invalid to me:
static bitstream_init (picture_t * picture, void *start)
{
picture-bitstream_ptr = start;
}
...
xine_xvmc_t * xvmc =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46364
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970
--- Comment #96 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2010-11-08
17:24:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #88)
I also tested the patch on armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi. The ICE in
function '__popcountsi2' is still there, so this must be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970
--- Comment #97 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-08 17:30:36
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #96)
(In reply to comment #88)
I also tested the patch on armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi. The ICE in
function '__popcountsi2' is still
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45894
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08
17:40:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 22331
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22331
gcc46-pr45894.patch
Ok, I'll bootstrapp/regtest this then.
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo