[Bug fortran/46638] New: Wrong result with TRANSFER from string to DT

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46638 Summary: Wrong result with TRANSFER from string to DT Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/46638] Wrong result with TRANSFER from string to DT

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46638 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 08:41:15 UTC --- More details: The run-time folding works; the issue is the compile time. The call to gfc_target_encode_expr (source, buffer, buffer_size); looks OK (buffer

[Bug fortran/46638] Wrong result with TRANSFER from string to DT

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46638 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 08:50:24 UTC --- I wonder whether it should be bit_offset (DECL_FIELD_BIT_OFFSET) instead of offset (DECL_FIELD_OFFSET). Reading the comment in tree.h (see below), one

[Bug middle-end/46629] [4.6 Regression] Failed to build 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2000

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46629 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 08:57:41 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 24 08:57:37 2010 New Revision: 167108 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167108 Log: PR middle-end/46629

[Bug tree-optimization/46639] New: [4.6 Regression] Missing optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46639 Summary: [4.6 Regression] Missing optimization Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo:

[Bug tree-optimization/46621] gimple.h includes tm.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46621 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||46495

[Bug fortran/46638] Wrong result with TRANSFER from string to DT

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46638 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 09:56:26 UTC --- Patch: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/target-memory.c b/gcc/fortran/target-memory.c index 93e1c8c..1bca1dd 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/target-memory.c +++

[Bug middle-end/46629] [4.6 Regression] Failed to build 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2000

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46629 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 10:18:20 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 24 10:18:15 2010 New Revision: 167110 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167110 Log: PR middle-end/46629

[Bug middle-end/46637] [4.6 Regression] SIGSEGV in if_then_else_cond - too deep recursion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46637 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug c/46636] attribute aligned is documented as using bytes, uses addressable units instead.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46636 --- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 10:34:40 UTC --- Alignof also uses units at the moment, anthough the documentation suggests it should be bytes.

[Bug middle-end/46629] [4.6 Regression] Failed to build 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2000

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46629 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213 --- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 11:44:22 UTC --- Backtrace with Rainer's testcase on SPARC/Solaris 32-bit: Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. 0xff3201cc in _libc_kill () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1

[Bug c++/46626] [4.6 Regression] simple use of virtual methods causes pure virtual method call in c++0x mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46626 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug middle-end/46628] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/tree-prof/partition1.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46628 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug c++/46630] Front end issue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46630 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/46631] Change operands order so we can use 16bit and instead of 32bit in thumb2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46631 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug c/46636] attribute aligned is documented as using bytes, uses addressable units instead.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46636 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 12:08:54 UTC --- Well, on these targets bytes really are larger I suppose (for example each character in a C string constant consumes BITS_PER_UNIT).

[Bug middle-end/46637] [4.6 Regression] SIGSEGV in if_then_else_cond - too deep recursion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46637 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug c/36750] -Wmissing-field-initializers relaxation request

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36750 --- Comment #1 from Pádraig Brady P at draigBrady dot com 2010-11-24 12:09:33 UTC --- A related thread: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/1998-07/msg00031.html

[Bug tree-optimization/46639] [4.6 Regression] Missing optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46639 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/46590] [4.5/4.6 Regression] long compile time with -O2 and many loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46590 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tromey at

[Bug middle-end/46637] [4.6 Regression] SIGSEGV in if_then_else_cond - too deep recursion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46637 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 12:38:20 UTC --- Reduced testcase, fails on x86_64-linux with -m32 and -O{2,s} {,-fno-strict-aliasing}. Looking into it... struct S { unsigned s[5]; } *p; void foo (int x) {

[Bug tree-optimization/46562] CCP currently needs iteration for a[i]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46562 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #22498|0 |1 is

[Bug target/46640] New: ICE: in insn_default_length, at config/i386/i386.md:588 (unrecognizable insn) with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46640 Summary: ICE: in insn_default_length, at config/i386/i386.md:588 (unrecognizable insn) with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0

[Bug c++/45940] [trans-mem] Error of unsafe function even if annotated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/46637] [4.6 Regression] SIGSEGV in if_then_else_cond - too deep recursion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46637 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug tree-optimization/46590] [4.5/4.6 Regression] long compile time with -O2 and many loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46590 --- Comment #13 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 13:50:21 UTC --- The I/O parts of the FRE cost are due to value-numbering stores in visit_reference_op_store. They can be drastically cut by an equivalent of (not

[Bug lto/46606] ICE in input_gimple_stmt in lto1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46606 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 14:01:27 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Nov 24 14:00:43 2010 New Revision: 167115 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167115 Log: 2010-11-24 Richard

[Bug c/36750] -Wmissing-field-initializers relaxation request

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36750 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug rtl-optimization/46585] [4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in vinsn_create (sel-sched-ir.c:1189) with -fno-dce -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46585 --- Comment #4 from Alexander Monakov amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 14:19:09 UTC --- sel-sched doesn't expect to see nops in the function, and uses them internally as markers in place of recently removed insns; luckily, we can easily

[Bug c/46636] attribute aligned is documented as using bytes, uses addressable units instead.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46636 --- Comment #3 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 14:26:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Well, on these targets bytes really are larger I suppose (for example each character in a C string constant consumes

[Bug rtl-optimization/46585] [4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in vinsn_create (sel-sched-ir.c:1189) with -fno-dce -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46585 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 14:29:07 UTC --- + nop_pattern = gen_rtx_CONST_INT (VOIDmode, -1); You could just use nop_pattern = constm1_rtx; or just #define nop_pattern constm1_rtx But, when you

[Bug middle-end/45819] [4.5 Regression] unexpected unaligned access to volatile int

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45819 --- Comment #5 from Atsushi Nemoto anemo at mba dot ocn.ne.jp 2010-11-24 14:34:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) Can someone check if 4.6 is really not affected? arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.6.0-20101124 works fine (generates ldr instruction

[Bug fortran/46641] New: Specification-expr checks and results with C_SIZEOF and SIZEOF

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46641 Summary: Specification-expr checks and results with C_SIZEOF and SIZEOF Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/46585] [4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in vinsn_create (sel-sched-ir.c:1189) with -fno-dce -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46585 --- Comment #6 from Alexander Monakov amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 14:38:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) + nop_pattern = gen_rtx_CONST_INT (VOIDmode, -1); You could just use nop_pattern = constm1_rtx; or just #define

[Bug lto/46606] ICE in input_gimple_stmt in lto1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46606 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug other/46567] [trans-mem] ipa_tm_decrement_clone_counts ICE at -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46567 --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 14:43:53 UTC --- ipa_tm_decrement_clone_counts() is dying because we are decrementing the clone count for a caller that was not marked as being in a transaction in the first

[Bug fortran/46641] Specification-expr checks and results with C_SIZEOF and SIZEOF

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46641 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||36437, 45824

[Bug driver/42690] Undefined reference errors with -flto -fuse-linker-plugin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42690 --- Comment #30 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-24 15:07:17 UTC --- Goal: We should preserve the same linker command line order as if there are no IR. Problem: a. LTO may generate extra symbol references which aren't in IR.

[Bug target/43715] configure option --enable-plugin fails on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43715 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug other/46633] [meta-bug] frontends use BITS_PER_UNIT when they mean TYPE_PRECISION (char_type_node)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46633 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-11-24 15:13:38 UTC --- On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: E.g. consider this code from c-family/c-common.c:fix_string_type : else if

[Bug rtl-optimization/44249] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] IRA generates extra register move

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44249 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug lto/45302] g++.dg/lto/20100723-1 cp_lto_20100723-1_0.o-cp_lto_20100723-1_0.o link, -fcompare-debug -flto/-fwhopr ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45302 --- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2010-11-24 15:15:22 UTC --- Apparently fixed on gcc trunk between r166696 and r166717.

[Bug rtl-optimization/45685] [4.6 Regression] GCC optimizer for Intel x64 generates inefficient code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45685 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug lto/43218] [LTO] Conflicting function types cause ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43218 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/46636] attribute aligned is documented as using bytes, uses addressable units instead.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46636 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-11-24 15:32:00 UTC --- On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Well, on these targets bytes really are larger I suppose (for example each

[Bug rtl-optimization/45685] [4.6 Regression] GCC optimizer for Intel x64 generates inefficient code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45685 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 15:27:41 UTC --- I guess it would be helpful if some tree pass figured out that computing cond_expr is usually quite expensive, and that instead of computing 4 different

[Bug c/46635] c-family/c-common.c uses BITS_PER_UNIT in lieu of TYPE_PRECISION (char_type_node)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46635 --- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 15:49:22 UTC --- As Joseph S. Myers bentioned in comment 1 of PR46633, if TREE_STRING_LENGTH is considered to be measured in BITS_PER_UNIT rather than TYPE_PRECISION

[Bug rtl-optimization/45685] [4.6 Regression] GCC optimizer for Intel x64 generates inefficient code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45685 --- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 15:55:45 UTC --- Separating predicate computation from predicate use should help this.

[Bug rtl-optimization/46642] New: ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7095 with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46642 Summary: ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7095 with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status:

[Bug rtl-optimization/46642] ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7095 with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46642 --- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz 2010-11-24 16:08:49 UTC --- Created attachment 22511 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22511 reduced testcase $ gcc -O -fschedule-insns2 -fsel-sched-pipelining

[Bug rtl-optimization/46642] ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7095 with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46642 --- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz 2010-11-24 16:09:54 UTC --- Created attachment 22512 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22512 reduced testcase 2 $ gcc -O -fschedule-insns2 -fsel-sched-pipelining

[Bug tree-optimization/46639] [4.6 Regression] Missing optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46639 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug rtl-optimization/46642] ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7095 with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46642 Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/38546] configure: too many arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38546 Michael Haubenwallner michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug fortran/46638] Wrong result with TRANSFER from string to DT

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46638 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 16:42:19 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Wed Nov 24 16:42:06 2010 New Revision: 167119 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167119 Log: 2010-11-24 Tobias Burnus

[Bug rtl-optimization/46614] [4.5/4.6 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-strided-u8-i8-gap4.c FAILs with -fno-rename-registers -fsched2-use-superblocks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46614 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 16:56:49 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 24 16:56:44 2010 New Revision: 167121 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167121 Log: PR

[Bug lto/43218] [LTO] Conflicting function types cause ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43218 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 17:06:46 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Nov 24 17:06:41 2010 New Revision: 167122 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167122 Log: 2010-11-24 Richard

[Bug lto/43218] [LTO] Conflicting function types cause ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43218 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/46614] [4.5 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-strided-u8-i8-gap4.c FAILs with -fno-rename-registers -fsched2-use-superblocks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46614 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/44249] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] IRA generates extra register move

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44249 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at redhat dot com 2010-11-24 17:40:56 UTC --- Reload creates additional insn for insn (insn 9 7 11 2 (parallel [ (set (reg:DI 71) (lshiftrt:DI (reg/v:DI 60 [ tag ])

[Bug fortran/46641] Specification-expr checks and results with C_SIZEOF and SIZEOF

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46641 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/46643] New: warn_unused_result is not enforced if return type is templated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46643 Summary: warn_unused_result is not enforced if return type is templated Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/46640] ICE: in insn_default_length, at config/i386/i386.md:588 (unrecognizable insn) with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46640 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||43603 ---

[Bug target/46640] ICE: in insn_default_length, at config/i386/i386.md:588 (unrecognizable insn) with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46640 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/43603] gcc-4.4.3 ICE on ia64 with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zsojka at

[Bug target/46519] Missing vzeroupper

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46519 --- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 18:24:46 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Nov 24 18:24:39 2010 New Revision: 167124 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167124 Log: Improve vzeroupper

[Bug c++/46643] warn_unused_result is not enforced if return type is templated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46643 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 18:27:58 UTC --- It has nothing to do with templates but rather non-PODs: class foo { public: int baz() __attribute__((warn_unused_result)); private: int a; }; foo

[Bug c++/46643] warn_unused_result is not enforced if return type is templated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46643 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/38172] warn_unused_result does not work with structs not containing a copy constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38172 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrew at

[Bug tree-optimization/45685] [4.6 Regression] missed conditional move opportunity in loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45685 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug c++/46643] warn_unused_result is not enforced if return type is templated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46643 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 18:37:53 UTC --- It looks as though 4.4 had a problem with templates too, here ST is a POD but there's no warning for foo::bar templatetypename struct S { };

[Bug target/46644] New: Built-in memcpy() does not test for unaligned destination address on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46644 Summary: Built-in memcpy() does not test for unaligned destination address on ARM Product: gcc Version: 4.4.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3

[Bug target/46519] Missing vzeroupper

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46519 --- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 19:16:48 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Nov 24 19:16:40 2010 New Revision: 167126 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167126 Log: Don't check

[Bug target/46644] Built-in memcpy() does not test for unaligned destination address on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46644 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Blot eblot.ml at gmail dot com 2010-11-24 19:17:01 UTC --- Sorry, output assembler in last example (32-bit) is: memcpy_test: 0:e59f3014 ldrr3, [pc, #20]; 1c memcpy_test+0x1c 4:

[Bug target/46644] Built-in memcpy() does not test for unaligned destination address on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46644 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/46645] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation/explicit_instantiation.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46645 Summary: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation /explicit_instantiation.cc Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/46500] target.h includes tm.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46500 --- Comment #3 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 19:46:09 UTC --- Created attachment 22513 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22513 additional patch for microblaze I realized a bit late that I

[Bug c++/46646] New: [trans-mem] __cxa_rethrow and __builtin_eh_pointer are unsafe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46646 Summary: [trans-mem] __cxa_rethrow and __builtin_eh_pointer are unsafe Product: gcc Version: trans-mem Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/46645] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation/explicit_instantiation.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46645 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug libstdc++/46645] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation/explicit_instantiation.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46645 Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bkoz at gcc dot

[Bug target/46647] New: Can't inline memset with -1

ret .cfi_endproc .LFE1: .sizefunc2, .-func2 .comma,4,1 .identGCC: (GNU) 4.6.0 20101124 (experimental) [trunk revision 167121] .section.note.GNU-stack,,@progbits [...@gnu-16 gcc]$ Why can't we inline __builtin_memset (a,123,sizeof (a))?

[Bug c++/45923] constexpr diagnostics, more more

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45923 --- Comment #10 from Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 20:44:49 UTC --- Follow up to #9, as per discussions in Batavia and http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg02406.html There was some thought of providing an

[Bug target/46647] Can't inline memset with -1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46647 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-24 20:47:25 UTC --- We can inline 0x7fff and fail 0x8fff.

[Bug middle-end/46647] Can't inline memset with -1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46647 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot

[Bug bootstrap/46528] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46528 --- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-11-24 21:00:02 UTC --- Created attachment 22514 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22514 preprocessed file

[Bug lto/46648] New: [4.6 Regression] type mismatch in array reference; verify_stmts failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46648 Summary: [4.6 Regression] type mismatch in array reference; verify_stmts failed Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug bootstrap/46528] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46528 --- Comment #7 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-11-24 21:01:16 UTC --- Created attachment 22516 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22516 corresponding profile ~/gcc-build/prev-gcc/cc1 -g -O2 -fprofile-use -quiet

[Bug middle-end/46647] Can't inline memset with -1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46647 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-24 21:08:10 UTC --- fold_builtin_memset fails to handle 0x[8-f]fff.

[Bug bootstrap/46528] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46528 --- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 21:18:43 UTC --- I can't reproduce it on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu with ./configure --disable-checking --enable-languages=c or with ./configure

[Bug middle-end/46647] Can't inline memset with -1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46647 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/46647] Can't inline memset with -1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46647 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-24 21:43:11 UTC --- char a[4] isn't handled by fold_builtin_memset.

[Bug bootstrap/46528] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46528 --- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 21:50:55 UTC --- The CFGs match, the spanning tree as well. Instrumenting needs to split two edges, but that shouldn't matter and happens elsewhere as well. But we have

[Bug middle-end/46647] Can't inline memset with -1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46647 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-24 21:52:46 UTC --- The problem seems to be target_char_cast.

[Bug middle-end/46647] Can't inline memset with -1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46647 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-24 22:00:25 UTC --- This seems to work: --- diff --git a/gcc/builtins.c b/gcc/builtins.c index c9e8e68..840ec29 100644 --- a/gcc/builtins.c +++ b/gcc/builtins.c @@ -630,11 +630,10 @@

[Bug middle-end/46647] Can't inline memset with -1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46647 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 22:04:11 UTC --- I'd prefer to replace the host_integerp call in that routine with TREE_CODE (...) == INTEGER_CST check. While currently callers check it as well, it isn't too

[Bug c++/46645] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation/explicit_instantiation.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46645 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at redhat dot

[Bug bootstrap/46528] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46528 --- Comment #10 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-11-24 22:10:11 UTC --- Created attachment 22517 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22517 -fno-inline preprocessed source

[Bug middle-end/46647] Can't inline memset with -1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46647 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-24 22:11:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) I'd prefer to replace the host_integerp call in that routine with TREE_CODE (...) == INTEGER_CST check. While currently callers check

  1   2   >