[Bug middle-end/46488] [4.5 regression] server/core_filters.c from apache httpd 2.2.17 miscompiled at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46488 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|sparc64-sun-solaris2.* | Known

[Bug c++/46690] New: Using declaration of a dependent name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46690 Summary: Using declaration of a dependent name Product: gcc Version: 4.4.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo:

[Bug c++/46690] Using declaration of a dependent name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46690 --- Comment #1 from ilpoilves at hotmail dot com 2010-11-28 09:38:04 UTC --- Here is the result of gcc -v, which was left out by accident. Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v

[Bug c++/46691] New: Null pointer in template deduction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46691 Summary: Null pointer in template deduction Product: gcc Version: 4.4.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo:

[Bug libstdc++/46683] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: ext/profile/all.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46683 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/46683] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: ext/profile/all.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46683 --- Comment #1 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-28 10:22:59 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Sun Nov 28 10:22:55 2010 New Revision: 167219 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167219 Log: 2010-11-28 Paolo

[Bug libstdc++/46683] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: ext/profile/all.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46683 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/46689] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/shared_ptr/comparison/cmp.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46689 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/46691] Null pointer in template deduction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46691 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/23055] overload resolution does not find templated function (zero - pointer)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23055 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ilpoilves

[Bug fortran/42112] overloaded function with allocatable result problem

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42112 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-28 11:17:03 UTC --- Tobias, (In reply to comment #7) (In reply to comment #6) One probably needs: a) If a is no TARGET: deallocate (a) f(a) At present, this is not

[Bug c++/46690] Using declaration of a dependent name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46690 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug middle-end/46488] [4.5 regression] server/core_filters.c from apache httpd 2.2.17 miscompiled at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46488 --- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-28 12:28:27 UTC --- It appears that inlining brigade_move into ap_core_input_filter and ap_core_output_filter at -O3 causes (one of) the latter functions to be miscompiled

[Bug tree-optimization/46675] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46675 --- Comment #13 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-11-28 12:46:10 UTC --- Whoa. Negative logic should be banned from sources. Index: tree-ssa-loop-niter.c === ---

[Bug target/46692] New: Missing LM32 multilibs for divider and sign extender

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46692 Summary: Missing LM32 multilibs for divider and sign extender Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug middle-end/46488] [4.5 regression] server/core_filters.c from apache httpd 2.2.17 miscompiled at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46488 --- Comment #18 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-28 13:21:51 UTC --- Using #define APR_RING_SENTINEL(hp, elem, link)\ (struct elem *)((char *)(hp) - APR_OFFSETOF(struct elem, link)) should be safer wrt

[Bug fortran/35810] [TR 15581 / F2003] Automatic reallocation on assignment to allocatable variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35810 --- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-28 13:47:31 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Sun Nov 28 13:47:26 2010 New Revision: 167220 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167220 Log: 2010-11-28 Paul Thomas

[Bug target/46692] Missing LM32 multilibs for divider and sign extender

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46692 Ralf Corsepius corsepiu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||corsepiu at

[Bug middle-end/46647] Can't inline memset with -1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46647 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug lto/46531] Many benchmarks in SPEC CPU 2006 are miscompiled by LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46531 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug lto/46576] BFD linker plugin generates bad executables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46576 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug lto/46531] Many benchmarks in SPEC CPU 2006 are miscompiled by LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46531 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug lto/46505] LTO miscompiled 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46505 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/45114] implement C++0x alias-declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45114 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/46628] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/tree-prof/partition1.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46628 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/46468] enabling -fomit-frame-pointer by default breaks Wine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46468 --- Comment #9 from marcus at jet dot franken.de 2010-11-28 14:55:31 UTC --- (gdb) bt #0 0xe425 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0xf7d1eb46 in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6 #2 0x7efab485 in server_protocol_error (err=0x7efcfe71 write errnp=%d,

[Bug tree-optimization/46675] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46675 --- Comment #14 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-11-28 15:07:39 UTC --- Hm, no. The patch in comment #13 is not correct fix. However, the comment of bound_difference says that no overflows are assumed: /* Stores the bounds on the

[Bug target/46468] enabling -fomit-frame-pointer by default breaks Wine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46468 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-28 15:23:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) So we basically exited our thread, closed the fd already ... and crash during What caused the crash? the final unwinding. The

[Bug fortran/46262] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-28 15:23:56 UTC --- I believe I have this isolated to the changes in resolve.c Eliminating those changes in the offending patch eliminates the ICE. Of course, though the

[Bug c/46693] New: incorrect code generation with -O2 optimization enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46693 Summary: incorrect code generation with -O2 optimization enabled Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/46693] incorrect code generation with -O2 optimization enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46693 --- Comment #1 from Sergey Matyukevich geomatsi at gmail dot com 2010-11-28 15:48:05 UTC --- Created attachment 22554 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22554 testcase code example

[Bug c/46693] incorrect code generation with -O2 optimization enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46693 --- Comment #2 from Sergey Matyukevich geomatsi at gmail dot com 2010-11-28 15:48:48 UTC --- Created attachment 22555 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22555 dumpspecs gcc dumpspecs

[Bug c/46693] incorrect code generation with -O2 optimization enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46693 --- Comment #3 from Sergey Matyukevich geomatsi at gmail dot com 2010-11-28 15:49:27 UTC --- Created attachment 22556 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22556 gcc version

[Bug fortran/46262] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-28 15:52:06 UTC --- Specifically, this line is involved with the problem. Index: resolve.c === --- resolve.c

[Bug tree-optimization/46675] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46675 --- Comment #15 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-28 15:54:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) Hm, no. The patch in comment #13 is not correct fix. However, the comment of bound_difference says that no overflows are

[Bug c/46693] incorrect code generation with -O2 optimization enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46693 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm-gnueabi

[Bug tree-optimization/46675] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46675 --- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-28 16:10:08 UTC --- -- void foo (int n) { int npairs, i; npairs = n - (-__INT_MAX__ - 1); if (npairs 0) for (i = 0; i npairs; i++) j++; } -- is miscompiled. But

[Bug c/46693] incorrect code generation with -O2 optimization enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46693 --- Comment #5 from Sergey Matyukevich geomatsi at gmail dot com 2010-11-28 16:12:47 UTC --- I am using an arm gcc cross-toolchain created with OpenEmbedded. Toolchain version and its dumpspecs are available in attachements. Wrong code for

[Bug target/46693] incorrect code generation with -O2 optimization enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46693 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |target

[Bug c/46693] incorrect code generation with -O2 optimization enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46693 Sergey Matyukevich geomatsi at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug tree-optimization/46675] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46675 --- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-28 16:25:34 UTC --- For npairs = n - -2147483648; VRP1 concludes Value ranges after VRP: i_1: [0, 0] n_2(D): VARYING npairs_3: VARYING But for npairs = n + 2147483648; VRP1

[Bug target/46693] incorrect code generation with -O2 optimization enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46693 Sergey Matyukevich geomatsi at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |target

[Bug tree-optimization/46675] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46675 --- Comment #18 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-28 17:09:17 UTC --- Good gimple dump: unsigned int n.0; unsigned int D.2691; int j.1; int j.2; int npairs; int i; n.0 = (unsigned int) n; D.2691 = n.0 + 2147483648;

[Bug driver/46694] New: driver does not pass all options to the compiler gnat1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46694 Summary: driver does not pass all options to the compiler gnat1 Product: gcc Version: 4.4.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: driver

[Bug tree-optimization/46675] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46675 --- Comment #19 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-28 17:20:23 UTC --- Good original dump: int npairs; int i; int npairs; int i; npairs = (int) ((unsigned int) n + 2147483648); Bad dump: int npairs; int i;

[Bug tree-optimization/46675] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46675 --- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2010-11-28 17:22:58 UTC --- On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46675 --- Comment #19 from H.J. Lu

[Bug tree-optimization/46675] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46675 --- Comment #21 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-28 17:58:49 UTC --- Does this: [...@gnu-6 bad]$ cat x.c.083t.forwprop3 ;; Function foo (foo) Replaced 'npairs_3 0' with 'n_2(D) != -2147483648' foo (int n) { int npairs;

[Bug tree-optimization/46675] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46675 --- Comment #22 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-28 18:12:14 UTC --- fold_binary_loc turns npairs = n - -2147483648; if (npairs 0) into if (n != -2147483648)

[Bug fortran/46662] [OOP] gfortran accepts CALL polymorphic%abstract_type%ppc()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46662 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-28 18:37:58 UTC --- I will commit the following patch as obvious: Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c === --- gcc/fortran/resolve.c

[Bug tree-optimization/46675] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46675 --- Comment #23 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-28 18:56:51 UTC --- We check op + 2147483648 for overflow. I don't think we properly check op - -2147483648 for overflow.

[Bug target/46468] enabling -fomit-frame-pointer by default breaks Wine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46468 --- Comment #11 from marcus at jet dot franken.de 2010-11-28 19:31:27 UTC --- it is unclear. ... it seems to crash in libgcc_s.so.1 (both the installed 4.5 and the built 4.6 trunk versuon) during this pthread_exit unwinding. behaviour changes if

[Bug target/46468] enabling -fomit-frame-pointer by default breaks Wine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46468 --- Comment #12 from marcus at jet dot franken.de 2010-11-28 19:31:58 UTC --- the gcc or glibc unwinding is in use, not wine's if I take it correctly from the bakctrace.

[Bug target/46468] enabling -fomit-frame-pointer by default breaks Wine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46468 --- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-28 19:47:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) it is unclear. ... it seems to crash in libgcc_s.so.1 (both the installed 4.5 and the built 4.6 trunk versuon) during this

[Bug target/46468] enabling -fomit-frame-pointer by default breaks Wine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46468 --- Comment #14 from marcus at jet dot franken.de 2010-11-28 19:53:45 UTC --- actually it is built with it and crashes. Atfer i change thread.o with -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables it starts to work again. so somehting in there confuses the

[Bug fortran/46662] [OOP] gfortran accepts CALL polymorphic%abstract_type%ppc()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46662 --- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-28 20:22:32 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Sun Nov 28 20:22:29 2010 New Revision: 167225 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167225 Log: 2010-11-28 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug fortran/46662] [OOP] gfortran accepts CALL polymorphic%abstract_type%ppc()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46662 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/46468] enabling -fomit-frame-pointer by default breaks Wine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46468 --- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-28 20:38:46 UTC --- Which glibc are you using?

[Bug other/46695] New: [4.6 regression] failure to build X from darwin to cris-elf with lto enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46695 Summary: [4.6 regression] failure to build X from darwin to cris-elf with lto enabled Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug target/46468] enabling -fomit-frame-pointer by default breaks Wine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46468 --- Comment #16 from marcus at jet dot franken.de 2010-11-28 20:44:38 UTC --- glibc-32bit-2.11.2-3.3.1.x86_64 /lib/libc.so.6 GNU C Library stable release version 2.11.2 (20100531), by Roland McGrath et al. [...] Configured for i686-suse-linux.

[Bug tree-optimization/46675] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46675 --- Comment #24 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-28 21:04:10 UTC --- Does this patch make any senses? --- diff --git a/gcc/fold-const.c b/gcc/fold-const.c index c195073..4bcdd07 100644 --- a/gcc/fold-const.c +++ b/gcc/fold-const.c

[Bug target/46468] enabling -fomit-frame-pointer by default breaks Wine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46468 --- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-28 21:05:41 UTC --- It sounds like this bug http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3597 But your glibc should be OK.

[Bug tree-optimization/46675] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46675 --- Comment #25 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-11-28 21:18:39 UTC --- Created attachment 22557 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22557 A patch Does it look OK?

[Bug target/46693] incorrect code generation with -O2 optimization enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46693 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug tree-optimization/46675] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46675 --- Comment #26 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-28 23:14:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #22) fold_binary_loc turns npairs = n - -2147483648; if (npairs 0) into if (n != -2147483648) That's ok.

[Bug tree-optimization/46675] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46675 --- Comment #27 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-28 23:16:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #25) Created attachment 22557 [details] A patch Does it look OK? It doesn't make any sense.

[Bug target/46655] invalid '.line 0' directive emitted with -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46655 --- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-29 00:17:54 UTC --- Has anyone reported this AIX assembler behavior to IBM? It would be much more effective coming from an external customer than from me.

[Bug tree-optimization/46621] gimple.h includes tm.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46621 --- Comment #2 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-29 00:50:09 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Mon Nov 29 00:50:04 2010 New Revision: 167230 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167230 Log: PR

[Bug middle-end/46685] [4.6 Regression] New stack alignment failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.0 |--- ---

[Bug middle-end/46685] [4.6 Regression] New stack alignment failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug other/46677] frontends and tree optimizers use *_TYPE_SIZE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46677 --- Comment #10 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-29 02:53:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) * POINTER_SIZE and ADA_LONG_TYPE_SIZE I haven't looked at in detail - We have several possible substitutes for

[Bug c++/46696] New: Implicit copy constructor can't construct array of subtype with user-defined copy constructor.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46696 Summary: Implicit copy constructor can't construct array of subtype with user-defined copy constructor. Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/46701] New: internal compiler error: in build_data_member_initialization, at cp/semantics.c:5503

20101128-1) 4.6.0 20101128 (experimental) [trunk revision 167220] Here's the un-preprocessed source (preprocessed source attached): #include string #include map void f (const std::string name, const std::string val) { std::mapconst std::string, std::string::value_type (name, val

[Bug c++/46701] internal compiler error: in build_data_member_initialization, at cp/semantics.c:5503

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46701 --- Comment #1 from miles at gnu dot org 2010-11-29 04:25:03 UTC --- Created attachment 22559 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22559 preprocessed source showing crash Generated with: g++-snapshot -E -std=c++0x

[Bug c++/46701] internal compiler error: in build_data_member_initialization, at cp/semantics.c:5503

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46701 --- Comment #2 from miles at gnu dot org 2010-11-29 04:30:16 UTC --- BTW, sorry about the duplicate bugs. Bugzilla complains about not being able to autodetect the attachment content-type, and says hit BACK and try again -- but doesn't mention

[Bug bootstrap/44756] [meta-bug] --enable-werror-always issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44756 --- Comment #9 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-29 04:38:27 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Mon Nov 29 04:38:21 2010 New Revision: 167234 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167234 Log: PR

[Bug middle-end/46674] [4.6 Regression] Weak alias is mistakenly optimized away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674 Jie Zhang jiez at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug c++/46697] New: internal compiler error: in build_data_member_initialization, at cp/semantics.c:5503

Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE I don't know if this is the same as the other ICEs in build_data_member_initialization, but it's at a different line number anyway... Compiler version is: g++ (Debian 20101128-1) 4.6.0

[Bug c++/46701] internal compiler error: in build_data_member_initialization, at cp/semantics.c:5503

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46701 --- Comment #3 from miles at gnu dot org 2010-11-29 05:14:29 UTC --- *** Bug 46697 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/46701] internal compiler error: in build_data_member_initialization, at cp/semantics.c:5503

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46701 --- Comment #4 from miles at gnu dot org 2010-11-29 05:14:53 UTC --- *** Bug 46698 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/46698] New: internal compiler error: in build_data_member_initialization, at cp/semantics.c:5503

Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE I don't know if this is the same as the other ICEs in build_data_member_initialization, but it's at a different line number anyway... Compiler version is: g++ (Debian 20101128-1) 4.6.0

[Bug c++/46699] New: internal compiler error: in build_data_member_initialization, at cp/semantics.c:5503

Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE I don't know if this is the same as the other ICEs in build_data_member_initialization, but it's at a different line number anyway... Compiler version is: g++ (Debian 20101128-1) 4.6.0

[Bug c++/46701] internal compiler error: in build_data_member_initialization, at cp/semantics.c:5503

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46701 --- Comment #5 from miles at gnu dot org 2010-11-29 05:15:18 UTC --- *** Bug 46699 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/46701] internal compiler error: in build_data_member_initialization, at cp/semantics.c:5503

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46701 --- Comment #6 from miles at gnu dot org 2010-11-29 05:15:43 UTC --- *** Bug 46700 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/46700] New: internal compiler error: in build_data_member_initialization, at cp/semantics.c:5503

Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE I don't know if this is the same as the other ICEs in build_data_member_initialization, but it's at a different line number anyway... Compiler version is: g++ (Debian 20101128-1) 4.6.0

[Bug c/46702] New: inlining generates strict-aliasing warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46702 Summary: inlining generates strict-aliasing warnings Product: gcc Version: 4.4.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo:

[Bug middle-end/46685] [4.6 Regression] New stack alignment failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|hppa-unknown-linux-gnu

[Bug rtl-optimization/45354] [4.6 regression] ICE: fallthru edge crosses section boundary (bb 6) with g++.dg/bprob/g++-bprob-1.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45354 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|ebotcazou at gcc dot|