[Bug lto/46798] [4.6 Regression] invalid conversion in gimple call; verify_stmts failed

2010-12-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46798 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking

[Bug driver/46760] LTO bootstrap doesn't work with FDO

2010-12-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46760 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-12-04 17:04:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) Created attachment 22604 [details] Patch I am testing to allow profile merging This patch should allow merging of LTO units with

[Bug libfortran/46800] New: Handle CTRL-D correctly with STDIN

2010-12-04 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46800 Summary: Handle CTRL-D correctly with STDIN Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libfortran AssignedTo:

[Bug debug/46799] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -ftree-parallelize-loops=2 -fno-tree-dce

2010-12-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46799 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug driver/46760] LTO bootstrap doesn't work with FDO

2010-12-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46760 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-12-04 17:13:57 UTC --- Program received signal SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception. 0x00f6e670 in merge_profile_summaries () at /export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/lto-cgraph.c:1513

[Bug driver/46760] LTO bootstrap doesn't work with FDO

2010-12-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46760 --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-12-04 17:24:28 UTC --- (gdb) p cgraph_nodes-local.lto_file_data-profile_info $4 = {num = 0, runs = 9409, sum_all = 0, run_max = 0, sum_max = 1302797449} (gdb)

[Bug c/46788] unsigned int possible treated as signed in a union/struct

2010-12-04 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46788 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug driver/46760] LTO bootstrap doesn't work with FDO

2010-12-04 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46760 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc

[Bug driver/42690] Undefined reference errors with -flto -fuse-linker-plugin

2010-12-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42690 --- Comment #33 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-12-04 17:37:39 UTC --- This bug should be fixed with the 2 stage BFD linker patch: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-12/msg00182.html No changes to GCC are needed.

[Bug tree-optimization/46801] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized gnat_rcheck

2010-12-04 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46801 Summary: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized gnat_rcheck Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/46801] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized gnat_rcheck

2010-12-04 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46801 --- Comment #1 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-12-04 18:01:04 UTC --- Attached tree dump.

[Bug target/43814] gcc failed to inline memcpy

2010-12-04 Thread mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43814 --- Comment #9 from Maxim Kuvyrkov mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-04 18:09:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) In the end we _should_ be able to use alignment information of the types used at the access (that's also more reliable as

[Bug driver/46802] New: GCC option handling change breaks dejagnu

2010-12-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46802 Summary: GCC option handling change breaks dejagnu Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: driver AssignedTo:

[Bug libstdc++/46803] New: libstdc++ build errors on unknown attributes

2010-12-04 Thread jsg at openbsd dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46803 Summary: libstdc++ build errors on unknown attributes Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo:

[Bug driver/46802] GCC option handling change breaks dejagnu

2010-12-04 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46802 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-12-04 18:44:51 UTC --- On Sat, 4 Dec 2010, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: g++: warning: switch '-fvtable-gc' is no longer supported g++: warning: switch

[Bug driver/46802] GCC option handling change breaks dejagnu

2010-12-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46802 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-12-04 18:49:29 UTC --- You can use GCC 4.6 to run make check in ld to see the failures for yourselves. I checked this patch into binutils:

[Bug target/43814] gcc failed to inline memcpy

2010-12-04 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43814 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2010-12-04 18:49:34 UTC --- On Sat, 4 Dec 2010, mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43814 --- Comment #9 from Maxim Kuvyrkov

[Bug driver/46802] GCC option handling change breaks dejagnu

2010-12-04 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46802 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-12-04 18:56:17 UTC --- This is not a GCC bug. It is correct that the message says g++. (You have not given a convincing analysis of why it breaks anything,

[Bug target/43814] gcc failed to inline memcpy

2010-12-04 Thread mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43814 --- Comment #11 from Maxim Kuvyrkov mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-04 19:04:29 UTC --- I looked into CCP a bit and it seems like no alignment analysis whatsoever is done for either tmp nor src[0] in == __builtin_memcpy (tmp, src[0], 8); ==

[Bug driver/46802] GCC option handling change breaks dejagnu

2010-12-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46802 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-12-04 19:06:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) This is not a GCC bug. It is correct that the message says g++. (You have not given a convincing analysis of why it breaks anything,

[Bug driver/46760] LTO bootstrap doesn't work with FDO

2010-12-04 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46760 --- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-04 19:35:27 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Sat Dec 4 19:35:23 2010 New Revision: 167458 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167458 Log: PR

[Bug driver/46802] GCC option handling change breaks dejagnu

2010-12-04 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46802 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/46804] New: [4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/char_cshift_2.f90 FAILs with -fregmove

2010-12-04 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46804 Summary: [4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/char_cshift_2.f90 FAILs with -fregmove Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/46803] libstdc++ build errors on unknown attributes

2010-12-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46803 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug target/43814] gcc failed to inline memcpy

2010-12-04 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43814 --- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2010-12-04 21:12:35 UTC --- On Sat, 4 Dec 2010, mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43814 --- Comment #11 from Maxim Kuvyrkov

[Bug libstdc++/46803] libstdc++ build errors on unknown attributes

2010-12-04 Thread jsg at openbsd dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46803 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Gray jsg at openbsd dot org 2010-12-04 21:15:38 UTC --- like so: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/usr/gcc \ --program-transform-name=s,^,e, \ --disable-nls \ --enable-checking \

[Bug target/43751] dsymutil is not called for fortran and, under some circumstances not for other FEs.

2010-12-04 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43751 --- Comment #12 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2010-12-04 22:00:39 UTC --- The problem dsymutil issues are fixed for darwin10 when using Xcode 3.2.4 and the patch... Index: gcc/config/darwin10.h

[Bug target/43751] dsymutil is not called for fortran and, under some circumstances not for other FEs.

2010-12-04 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43751 --- Comment #13 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2010-12-04 22:02:00 UTC --- The second form of the error should have been... warning: DWARFDebugInfoEntry::AppendDependants() -- check on this item TAG_subrange_type: attr =

[Bug driver/42690] Undefined reference errors with -flto -fuse-linker-plugin

2010-12-04 Thread d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42690 --- Comment #34 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com 2010-12-04 22:29:59 UTC --- Created attachment 22633 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22633 Testcase for ld.bfd with Hongjiu Lu's patch (In reply to comment

[Bug driver/42690] Undefined reference errors with -flto -fuse-linker-plugin

2010-12-04 Thread d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42690 --- Comment #35 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com 2010-12-04 22:31:01 UTC --- Created attachment 22634 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22634 Backtrace from ld.bfd with Hongjiu Lu's patch

[Bug tree-optimization/46805] New: ICE: SIGSEGV in optab_for_tree_code (optabs.c:407) with -O -fno-tree-scev-cprop -ftree-vectorize

2010-12-04 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46805 Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in optab_for_tree_code (optabs.c:407) with -O -fno-tree-scev-cprop -ftree-vectorize Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug driver/42690] Undefined reference errors with -flto -fuse-linker-plugin

2010-12-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42690 --- Comment #36 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-12-05 00:44:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #34) Created attachment 22633 [details] Testcase for ld.bfd with Hongjiu Lu's patch (In reply to comment #33) Received SIGSEGV on

[Bug driver/46760] LTO bootstrap doesn't work with FDO

2010-12-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46760 --- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-12-05 00:51:39 UTC --- With revision 167460, I got [...@gnu-18 gcc]$ /export/build/gnu/gcc-lto/build-x86_64-linux/./prev-gcc/xgcc

[Bug libstdc++/46803] libstdc++ build errors on unknown attributes

2010-12-04 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46803 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2010-12-05 01:17:33 UTC --- I don't think this is a library issue.

[Bug c++/46806] New: -O3 implies 0 = 8 = 7

2010-12-04 Thread cstankevitz at toyon dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46806 Summary: -O3 implies 0 = 8 = 7 Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug c++/46806] -O3 implies 0 = 8 = 7

2010-12-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46806 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-05 02:26:07 UTC --- the enum is unsigned and 8 is out of range of the enum.

[Bug c++/46806] -O3 implies 0 = 8 = 7

2010-12-04 Thread cstankevitz at toyon dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46806 --- Comment #2 from Chris Stankevitz cstankevitz at toyon dot com 2010-12-05 02:47:51 UTC --- 8 is out of range of the enum. I agree. Unfortunately, with -O3, 8 is reported as in the range.

[Bug c++/46806] -O3 implies 0 = 8 = 7

2010-12-04 Thread cstankevitz at toyon dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46806 Chris Stankevitz cstankevitz at toyon dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #22636|0 |1

[Bug c++/46806] -O3 implies 0 = 8 = 7

2010-12-04 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46806 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-05 04:16:26 UTC --- dup of PR 43680 - the default behaviour has changed in 4.6, -fstrict-enums restores the old semantics

[Bug c++/46806] -O3 implies 0 = 8 = 7

2010-12-04 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46806 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-05 04:18:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) 8 is out of range of the enum. I agree. Unfortunately, with -O3, 8 is reported as in the range. if a program has undefined

[Bug c++/46759] incorrect array bounds warning?

2010-12-04 Thread rwgk at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46759 --- Comment #4 from rwgk at yahoo dot com 2010-12-05 06:14:35 UTC --- Created attachment 22639 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22639 reproducer for similar warning from gcc 4.6 I'm getting a similar warning with g++ from the

[Bug c++/46807] New: internal compiler error: in synthesized_method_walk

2010-12-04 Thread rwgk at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46807 Summary: internal compiler error: in synthesized_method_walk Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo:

[Bug c++/46807] internal compiler error: in synthesized_method_walk

2010-12-04 Thread rwgk at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46807 --- Comment #1 from rwgk at yahoo dot com 2010-12-05 07:42:02 UTC --- Created attachment 22640 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22640 reproducer Reproducer depends on vector and boost as shipped with Fedora 14.

[Bug fortran/46794] ICE on valid code involving power of small integer kinds

2010-12-04 Thread domob at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46794 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Kraft domob at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-04 09:27:20 UTC --- Author: domob Date: Sat Dec 4 09:27:17 2010 New Revision: 167453 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167453 Log: 2010-12-04 Daniel Kraft

[Bug fortran/46794] ICE on valid code involving power of small integer kinds

2010-12-04 Thread domob at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46794 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Kraft domob at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-04 09:29:31 UTC --- Fixed on trunk. Since Tobias sees this problem also with 4.4, I will investigate further whether we should backport to 4.5 and 4.4.

[Bug fortran/46797] New: libquadmath: make install relinks libgfortran

2010-12-04 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46797 Summary: libquadmath: make install relinks libgfortran Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo:

[Bug debug/46749] gcc.dg/debug/pr41893-1.c -gdwarf-2 testsuite failures on darwin

2010-12-04 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749 --- Comment #34 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2010-12-04 10:27:58 UTC --- On Sat, 4 Dec 2010, mikestump at comcast dot net wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749 --- Comment #31 from Mike Stump

[Bug fortran/46794] ICE on valid code involving power of small integer kinds

2010-12-04 Thread domob at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46794 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Kraft domob at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-04 12:12:40 UTC --- Author: domob Date: Sat Dec 4 12:12:35 2010 New Revision: 167454 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167454 Log: 2010-12-04 Daniel Kraft

[Bug lto/46769] LTO failed to build gold

2010-12-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46769 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-04 12:17:09 UTC --- Created attachment 22627 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22627 reduced testcase Fails with -g -flto -flto-partition=none -r -nostdlib

[Bug libfortran/46584] FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_1.f90 -O (test for excess errors)

2010-12-04 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46584 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-04 13:08:15 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sat Dec 4 13:08:12 2010 New Revision: 167455 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=167455 Log: 2010-12-04 Tobias Burnus

[Bug libfortran/46584] FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_1.f90 -O (test for excess errors)

2010-12-04 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46584 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-04 13:13:51 UTC --- The committed patch removed the complex math functions from the quad_1.f90 test. I think the PR can be closed after confirmation that the failure is gone.

[Bug lto/46798] New: [4.6 Regression] invalid conversion in gimple call; verify_stmts failed

2010-12-04 Thread d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46798 Summary: [4.6 Regression] invalid conversion in gimple call; verify_stmts failed Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug lto/46798] [4.6 Regression] invalid conversion in gimple call; verify_stmts failed

2010-12-04 Thread d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46798 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com 2010-12-04 14:23:36 UTC --- Created attachment 22629 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22629 backtrace

[Bug debug/46799] New: -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -ftree-parallelize-loops=2 -fno-tree-dce

2010-12-04 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46799 Summary: -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -ftree-parallelize-loops=2 -fno-tree-dce Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: