http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46809
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46801
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46801
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46803
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46753
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression]|[4.4/4.5 Regression] ICE:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36674
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dustin at howett dot net
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46814
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36674
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46814
Summary: Off by one in "In file included from" with
already-preprocessed source
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46813
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46813
--- Comment #1 from jwfc at nii dot net 2010-12-06 03:11:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 22647
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22647
preprocessed source file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46813
Summary: crashes on template definition error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40125
--- Comment #7 from Dave Korn 2010-12-06 00:54:23
UTC ---
That still leaves libffi and libgcc_s to fix; I'll get to them shortly.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46695
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46695
--- Comment #7 from Dave Korn 2010-12-06 00:50:11
UTC ---
Author: davek
Date: Mon Dec 6 00:50:04 2010
New Revision: 167480
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167480
Log:
config/ChangeLog:
2010-12-06 Dave Korn
PR targ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40125
--- Comment #6 from Dave Korn 2010-12-06 00:50:11
UTC ---
Author: davek
Date: Mon Dec 6 00:50:04 2010
New Revision: 167480
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167480
Log:
config/ChangeLog:
2010-12-06 Dave Korn
PR targ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46806
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46806
Chris Stankevitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46812
--- Comment #1 from Andi Kleen 2010-12-05
22:58:12 UTC ---
BTW I specified a different prefix than /usr, so libtool looked into the wrong
directory anyways here.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38987
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gafunchal at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40272
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46806
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46812
Summary: Linux libgo compilation fails when a "libnet" is
already installed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46810
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #36 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-05
21:57:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #35)
> Surely this design isn't complete as it doesn't cover the changes or the
> requirements for lto. Without those, I can't review the design to see if it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #35 from Mike Stump 2010-12-05
21:13:30 UTC ---
Surely this design isn't complete as it doesn't cover the changes or the
requirements for lto. Without those, I can't review the design to see if it is
sufficient to actually fix the pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43751
--- Comment #17 from Iain Sandoe 2010-12-05 20:26:53
UTC ---
dsymutil will generate the same issues for languages already enabled (there are
some cases in the c/c++ test-suite on i686-Darwin9).
my 0.02 euros:
I would prefer to have it enabled
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43751
--- Comment #16 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-05
20:12:30 UTC ---
As a refresher, the original comments from the Apple dsymutil maintainer on the
FORM_ref4 were...
The warning was cause for alarm, and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43751
--- Comment #15 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-05
20:01:27 UTC ---
The testresults on x86_64-apple-darwin9 for the proposed patch expanding the
source files types calling dsymutil and the pruning the warnings from dsymutil
due to bugs in Xcode 3.1.x a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43751
--- Comment #14 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-05
19:58:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 22646
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22646
patch to expand source types that call dsymutil for darwin9 and later
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45263
--- Comment #10 from Eric Weddington
2010-12-05 19:52:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Is R15 used anywhere else in startup code that might not obey the register
> save
> conventions (ie does do_global_ctors need to preserve R15)
I strong
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46806
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46760
--- Comment #18 from Jan Hubicka 2010-12-05
19:04:38 UTC ---
I tried with the default checking earlier (this is not LTO plugin, just the
plugin support that does not cause that much of difference). I will try
tonight or after I return from trip.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42690
--- Comment #39 from H.J. Lu 2010-12-05 18:23:55
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #38)
> (In reply to comment #36)
>
> $ touch empty.c
> $ gcc -nodefaultlibs -r -flto -fuse-linker-plugin empty.c
> /usr/local/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.21.51.201012
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46806
--- Comment #7 from Chris Stankevitz 2010-12-05
18:11:55 UTC ---
If I understand correctly, you are saying "The following is not a valid way to
test whether a user-supplied int is withing the bounds of an enum:"
if (
Eight >= static_cast(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46811
--- Comment #1 from pedro_nf at yahoo dot com 2010-12-05 17:26:16 UTC ---
Created attachment 22645
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22645
The same program but with the correct parameters, it compiles instantly
This is the same p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46811
Summary: Compiler lock with no error message while compiling
boost::condition with bad parameters
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46760
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu 2010-12-05 17
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42690
--- Comment #38 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2010-12-05 16:48:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #36)
$ touch empty.c
$ gcc -nodefaultlibs -r -flto -fuse-linker-plugin empty.c
/usr/local/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.21.51.20101204 assertion fail
../../bin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46734
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2010-12-05 16:47:26
UTC ---
It was caused by revision 154413:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-11/msg00634.html
and fixed by revision 161655:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-07/msg6.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46810
Summary: [4.6 regression] sparc64-linux bootstrap fails with
"C++ preprocessor "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46803
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39933
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46760
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka 2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40272
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey Walton 2010-12-05
14:01:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 22643
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22643
GCC crash on precompiled header, -g3, and empty file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40272
Jeffrey Walton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||noloader at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46809
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-12-05
13:56:38 UTC ---
Confirmed as a regression between r162456 and r166102. GDB gives
Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory.
Reason: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at address: 0x000
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46809
--- Comment #2 from Salvatore Filippone
2010-12-05 13:30:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 22642
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22642
test case
As usual, quite reduced from the original, but not necessarily minimal.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46809
--- Comment #1 from Salvatore Filippone
2010-12-05 13:29:12 UTC ---
With trunk at r167453 I get
[sfili...@localhost bug27]$ gfortran -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gfortran
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gnu46/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46809
Summary: [OOP] ICE with -fcheck=all
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46803
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Gray 2010-12-05 12:44:55
UTC ---
I don't understand the quoting suggestion, why does gcc/unwind-generic.h for
example then contain lines such as
typedef unsigned _Unwind_Word __attribute__((__mode__(__unwind_word__))
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42690
--- Comment #37 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2010-12-05 12:37:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #36)
It seems to work. Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46808
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43806
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46716
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
--- Comment #6 from Ri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46734
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46800
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46753
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46758
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenthe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46777
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46808
Summary: Too verbose diagnostic messages when compiling with
LTO
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46803
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||*-openbsd*
Status|UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46663
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46806
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46663
--- Comment #4 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-05 11:31:12 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Sun Dec 5 11:31:09 2010
New Revision: 167472
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167472
Log:
PR tree-optimization/46663
* tree-v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46785
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46803
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Gray 2010-12-05 11:20:18
UTC ---
disabling pch doesn't seem to help here, it still bails out in stage1
Examples of the headers can be found at:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/~checkout~/src/include/time.h?rev=
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46805
--- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-12-05 11:19:08
UTC ---
Created attachment 22641
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22641
C-ified, but doesn't crash
Actually I tried to C-ify the testcase, but it no longer crashes. Maybe I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46805
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46803
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever Confirmed|1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46794
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Kraft 2010-12-05 10:09:29
UTC ---
Author: domob
Date: Sun Dec 5 10:09:25 2010
New Revision: 167471
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167471
Log:
2010-12-05 Daniel Kraft
PR fortran/46794
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46785
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at il dot ibm.com
--- Comment #2 from Ir
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46663
--- Comment #3 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-05 08:27:46 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Sun Dec 5 08:27:42 2010
New Revision: 167470
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167470
Log:
PR tree-optimization/46663
* tree-v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46663
--- Comment #2 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-05 08:15:39 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Sun Dec 5 08:15:33 2010
New Revision: 167469
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167469
Log:
PR tree-optimization/46663
* tree-v
75 matches
Mail list logo