/local --with-cloog=/usr/local
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-nls --disable-libgcj --enable-lto
--disable-lto-plugin --enable-sjlj-exceptions
Thread model: win32
gcc version 4.6.0 20101219 (experimental) mingw-20090616 (Cross MingW32 GCC
4.6)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-c' &#
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47021
Summary: graphite branch fails to bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47002
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-20 05:25:00
UTC ---
I tested tr...@168000.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47002
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-20 05:23:29
UTC ---
I cannot reproduce the error on amd64-linux with "./cc1 -O3 bug.i"
Please report the exact flags and the architecture.
However I can see several unrelated memory leaks (i.e., not the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47020
Summary: [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: unexpected expression
'foo' of kind overload when storing address of
overloaded function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47019
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: in rename_uses, at sese.c:535
with -O -ftree-pre -fgraphite-identity
-fno-tree-copy-prop
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
Summary: ICE: in pre_and_rev_post_order_compute, at
cfganal.c:1047 with -fnon-call-exceptions
-fvar-tracking -g
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46950
--- Comment #3 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-12-20 00:36:28 UTC ---
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> The same revision caused pr46916. Could you try the patch in
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=227
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47015
--- Comment #3 from Brian Brooks 2010-12-19
22:05:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> gengtype-lex.c:1: warning: ISO C forbids an empty translation unit
>
>
> Do you have GNU flex installed?
Yes, under /usr/bin/flex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47015
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46972
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski 2010-12-19
21:53:14 UTC ---
I think enumtls has been fixed on the trunk with respect of fsection-anchors.
Can you try the trunk?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47007
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-19
21:32:49 UTC ---
Vaguely related: PR 35862 (rounding on input). Both PR 35862 and this PR seem
to require writing a libgfortran-specific version of
strtof/strtod/strtold/quadmath_strtopQ - currently,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47017
Summary: [4.6 Regression] gnatlib ICE on sparc64-linux
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46677
--- Comment #15 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-12-19 21:21:30 UTC ---
Author: amylaar
Date: Sun Dec 19 21:21:26 2010
New Revision: 168075
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168075
Log:
PR other/46677
http://gcc.gnu.o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46901
Göran Uddeborg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment #4 from Göran Uddeb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20478
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever Confirmed|1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47016
Summary: bootstrap on darwin needs much more disk space than
expected to complete
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47015
--- Comment #1 from Brian Brooks 2010-12-19
20:30:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 22824
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22824
make log
command: "sudo make -j8"
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47015
Summary: gcc/gengtype.c: undefined references
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...@g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46950
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-12-19
20:20:16 UTC ---
The same revision caused pr46916. Could you try the patch in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22787 ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46950
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2010-12-19
20:11:52 UTC ---
Introduced by following change:
2010-12-12 Jan Hubicka
Rainer Orth
* varasm.c (default_function_section): Check flag_reorder_functions
and target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46915
--- Comment #14 from John David Anglin 2010-12-19
19:50:20 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sun Dec 19 19:50:17 2010
New Revision: 168072
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168072
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2010-12-18
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46972
--- Comment #5 from Paulius Zaleckas
2010-12-19 19:39:07 UTC ---
Did some testing through various GCC versions:
4.5.2 - buggy
4.4.5 - buggy
4.3.5 - OK, but does not have -fsection-anchors optimization for ARM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #3 from ak at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-19 19:36:29 UTC ---
Author: ak
Date: Sun Dec 19 19:36:25 2010
New Revision: 168071
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168071
Log:
Fix -fno-lto (PR lto/46905)
gcc/
2010-12-19 A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47012
--- Comment #6 from js-gcc at webkeks dot org
2010-12-19 19:19:33 UTC ---
Well, I did not plan to get that included in 4.6.
If you are interested in optimizing the lookup: The lookup could be greatly
improved if we also change the ABI, which is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47012
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47012
--- Comment #4 from Nicola Pero 2010-12-19 19:12:33
UTC ---
Yes, I was actually thinking about this, and you're right - it makes sense not
to use retain/autorelease! ;-)
'nonatomic' means that other threads are not involved. Which also means th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47012
--- Comment #3 from Nicola Pero 2010-12-19 19:10:29
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Sun Dec 19 19:10:26 2010
New Revision: 168070
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168070
Log:
In libobjc/:
2010-12-19 Nicola Pero
PR libob
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46520
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-19
19:01:41 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Dec 19 19:01:38 2010
New Revision: 168069
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168069
Log:
2010-12-19 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/46
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39511
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47012
--- Comment #2 from js-gcc at webkeks dot org
2010-12-19 18:49:39 UTC ---
Hi Nicola,
yes, I do remember our talk at FOSDEM and I plan to attend it next year again,
since I unfortunately could not attend it this year.
Well, I guess it's not real
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45953
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47012
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47014
--- Comment #1 from 1zeeky at gmail dot com 2010-12-19 18:04:41 UTC ---
The problem arises (or at least seems to) whenever you 'force' (i.e. via
reinterpret_cast) a non-function as template-parameter (e.g. an int fails to
compile with almost the sa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47007
--- Comment #11 from Alexander Varnin 2010-12-19
18:04:04 UTC ---
I was glad to help.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47007
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46869
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|bkoz at gcc d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46869
--- Comment #14 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-19 16:20:29 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Dec 19 16:20:25 2010
New Revision: 168063
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168063
Log:
2010-12-19 John David Anglin
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46972
--- Comment #4 from Paulius Zaleckas
2010-12-19 16:07:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 22823
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22823
diff with and without -fsection-anchors
I have found out that it is -fsection-anchors optimizatio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45342
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45342
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2010-12-19
15:51:25 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sun Dec 19 15:51:22 2010
New Revision: 168060
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168060
Log:
PR testsuite/45342
* gcc.dg/tls/thr-c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46978
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Morin 2010-12-19
15:47:14 UTC ---
This seems to be the problem :
the front-end generates a transposed descriptor for a non-intrinsic function.
If the function is an intrinsic, the descriptor is filled in the library, a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47007
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47014
Summary: internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree
that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have
‘nop_expr’ in decl_linkage, at cp/tree.c:2975
Product: gcc
Version: 4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47013
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/sms-*.c scan-rtl-dump-times sms "SMS
succeeded" *
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47007
--- Comment #8 from Alexander Varnin 2010-12-19
14:13:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 22821
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22821
Write namelist test case
Here is also test case for writing namelist. It shows, that '.' is used
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47007
--- Comment #7 from Alexander Varnin 2010-12-19
13:58:35 UTC ---
$ gfortran -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu/Linaro
4.4.4-14ubuntu5' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47007
--- Comment #6 from Alexander Varnin 2010-12-19
13:54:58 UTC ---
Created attachment 22820
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22820
Test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29057
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44334
--- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres
2010-12-19 13:37:17 UTC ---
> Could you try if this solves the problem?
The patch in comment #14 fixed the problem on x86_64-apple-darwin10 (I cannot
say anything for AMD). I have run the polyhedron test
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46729
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.6.0 |4.5.2
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46797
Ralf Wildenhues changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46729
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46729
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2010-12-19
12:20:12 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sun Dec 19 12:20:08 2010
New Revision: 168050
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168050
Log:
PR target/46729
* config/sparc/sparc.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46729
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou 2010-12-19
12:19:16 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sun Dec 19 12:19:12 2010
New Revision: 168049
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168049
Log:
PR target/46729
* config/sparc/sparc.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47012
Summary: nonatimic Properties behave wrong
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libobjc
AssignedTo: unassig...@g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47000
--- Comment #23 from Jan Hubicka 2010-12-19
11:58:35 UTC ---
sha256_4way.c:287:78: warning: called from here
sha256_4way.c:50:23: warning: inlining failed in call to ‘ROTR’: --param
inline-unit-growth limit reached
so you could also workaround w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47000
--- Comment #22 from Jan Hubicka 2010-12-19
11:53:32 UTC ---
freq: 8000 size: 2 time: 2 D.13088_5480 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(D.8004_729);
freq: 8000 size: 2 time: 2 D.13087_5481 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(a_5271);
freq: 8000 size: 7 time: 16 D
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47000
--- Comment #21 from Jan Hubicka 2010-12-19 11:49:53
UTC ---
> I'd like to wait for Honza's opinion before we just start trying random
> patches.
Well, if H.J.'s proposed backport of the builtin cost sizes helps, I guess it
is sane
way to fix th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44334
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47007
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-19
11:35:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> The standard says namelist IO will
> use whatever current decimal separator is. If locale sets
> the default to ',', then that is what should be used unless
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47008
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2010-12-19
11:34:22 UTC ---
Yep, this indeed looks like aliasing bug...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46974
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-19
11:24:34 UTC ---
*** Bug 34199 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34199
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221
--- Comment #27 from Dave Korn 2010-12-19 11:14:23
UTC ---
Author: davek
Date: Sun Dec 19 11:14:19 2010
New Revision: 168047
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168047
Log:
PR middle-end/46674
PR middle-end/46221
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674
--- Comment #12 from Dave Korn 2010-12-19 11:14:23
UTC ---
Author: davek
Date: Sun Dec 19 11:14:19 2010
New Revision: 168047
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168047
Log:
PR middle-end/46674
PR middle-end/46221
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34199
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres
2010-12-19 10:53:47 UTC ---
This PR seems to have been fixed at revision 168044 (likely r 168031). May be
pr46974 was a duplicate of this PR. Could someone check this and close this PR
if it is the case?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47011
--- Comment #1 from Lorenzo Castelli 2010-12-19
10:18:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 22819
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22819
Code to reproduce the error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47011
Summary: ICE when using attribute optimize
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47004
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
72 matches
Mail list logo
