http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45726
--- Comment #18 from Ryan Hill dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2010-12-26
08:03:51 UTC ---
Ignore that.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47065
Summary: Replace trim(a) by a(1:len_trim(a))
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
bruno at clisp dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bruno at clisp dot org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #18 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2010-12-26
18:35:49 UTC ---
Rainer, can you have another look to this issue and possibly actually close it?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47065
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47065
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-26
21:34:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 22852
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22852
Partial patch
This appears to work for the cases where there is no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-26
21:52:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
For this reason, I would find it bad if gcc -std=c99 or gcc -std=gnu99
would cause values-xpg6.o to be included in the link.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44081
Valeriy nordq at ya dot ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nordq at ya dot ru
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18584
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thenlich at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47039
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46979
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46917
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46917
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46825
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46874
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46703
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46405
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46411
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46520
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45909
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45988
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dfranke at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46703
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-27
01:03:55 UTC ---
-ffloat-store is the first thing I tried and no change. However, the run-time
side, libgfortran, is not compiled normally with -ffloat-store so maybe we
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45676
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dfranke at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40876
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40876
--- Comment #8 from Bill Long longb at cray dot com 2010-12-27 01:42:20 UTC
---
I am out of the office until Monday, January 3, 2011. Send technical questions
to spsl...@cray.com.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dfranke at gcc
Error at (1):
mio_component_ref(): Component not found
$ gfortran-svn -v
gcc version 4.6.0 20101226 (experimental) (GCC)
The error is consistent and reproducible for me, nothing fishy from valgrind.
Although the error is identical, no idea if the reason to trigger it is the
same
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47066
Summary: HOST=i386-unknown-freebsd6.2, TARGET=arm--elf,
cpu=arm7tdmi
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47066
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
---
29 matches
Mail list logo