http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45827
--- Comment #37 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-28 08:14:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #36)
(In reply to comment #35)
Yes, I think I know what's going on. One way to fix it is the following:
I managed to get an ICE with your version
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47056
--- Comment #2 from Laurent GUERBY laurent at guerby dot net 2010-12-28
08:48:11 UTC ---
Reduced test case:
procedure C390002 is
type Object is tagged null record;
begin
null;
end C390002;
gue...@babe:~/tmp$ gnatmake -f -O1 c390002.adb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47074
Summary: tree check fail in create_access_replacement
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46838
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45827
--- Comment #38 from Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-28
12:22:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 22856
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22856
testcase, ICE with patch in comment #35
(In reply to comment #37)
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46838
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-28 12:51:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Here's a patch:
The patch in comment #4 had a few regressions (e.g. on alloc_comp_basics_1.f90
etc), but the following version regtests cleanly:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45827
--- Comment #39 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-28 13:18:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #38)
I managed to get an ICE with your version (sym == NULL)
No, that's not possible. My version (i.e. comment #35) is inserted at a
slightly
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46838
--- Comment #6 from Salvatore Filippone sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it
2010-12-28 13:40:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
Here's a patch:
The patch in comment #4 had a few regressions (e.g. on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46597
--- Comment #1 from Jay jay.krell at cornell dot edu 2010-12-28 13:50:06 UTC
---
I put #define ENABLE_CHECKING_GCC_VERSION ((GCC_VERSION 3003) ||
(!defined(__cplusplus) (GCC_VERSION 2007)))
in include/ansidecl.h after #define GCC_VERSION and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46801
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-28
14:36:58 UTC ---
This seems to be a fallout from the fix to PR 46351 and PR 46377
(revision 166535, patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg00933.html).
The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47017
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47010
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-28
14:50:51 UTC ---
I think it sets up a frame to have possible spills of xmm registers land in
aligned stack slots.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47000
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47061
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47056
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47056
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47038
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47068
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47075
Summary: Missed deprecation warnings for @property when using
getter/setter directly
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47075
Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47051
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47036
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47037
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47032
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47029
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47033
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spop at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47025
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47076
Summary: Protocol referenced in @interface declarations should
be defined
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47076
Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47025
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |rguenth at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47019
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47022
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47074
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47062
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47077
Summary: ICE on invalid code (method implementation outside of
implementation context)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45827
--- Comment #40 from Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-28
17:27:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #39)
Ok, I get it. Sorry about the misconception. Feel free to commit the patch in
comment #36 (provided it regtests ok). Or should I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47078
Summary: ICE on invalid type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: objc
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44232
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47079
Summary: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/nrv-1.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47080
Summary: explicit conversion function return conversions not
restricted to qualifications
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45654
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45086
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dfranke at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27318
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27318
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33117
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-28
18:27:08 UTC ---
*** Bug 46478 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45086
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46478
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47079
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45827
--- Comment #41 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-28 18:53:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #40)
Feel free to commit the patch in
comment #36 (provided it regtests ok). Or should I take care of it?
Please, you did the hard work - it's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47080
--- Comment #1 from Johannes Schaub schaub.johannes at googlemail dot com
2010-12-28 19:10:25 UTC ---
It should be noted that this can yield to ambiguities in combination with other
conversion functions. Consider
enum E { };
struct A {
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47081
Summary: Macro usage too clever for localization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47081
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-28
19:21:25 UTC ---
I don't know if generator files should be have translated error messages.
Unlike other programs, the gen* programs are only used internally inside gcc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47081
--- Comment #2 from Göran Uddeborg goeran at uddeborg dot se 2010-12-28
19:23:57 UTC ---
Oh, I see. You mean this message is never seen by an end user? In that case,
maybe they could be excluded from the set of files scanned for messages to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47081
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2010-12-28 19:44:02 UTC ---
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
I don't know if generator files should be have translated error messages.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47082
Summary: [OOP] ICE in gfc_conv_component_ref
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47083
Summary: alpha-dec-osf5.1 fails to build
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47083
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3746
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amylaar at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46931
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-28
20:20:32 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Dec 28 20:20:29 2010
New Revision: 168299
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168299
Log:
PR debug/46931
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47084
Summary: am33_2.0-linux fails to build
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47085
Summary: [OOP] Problem in allocate( SOURCE=) for polymorphic
component
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47086
Summary: ICE: verify_flow_info failed: BB 3 can not throw but
has an EH edge with -O -fexceptions
-fnon-call-exceptions -ftrapv
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47087
Summary: ICE: verify_stmts failed: statement marked for throw,
but doesn't with -O -fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions
-ftrapv
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46931
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47017
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47074
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47082
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47088
Summary: arm-freebsd6 fails to build
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45827
--- Comment #42 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-28 21:21:56 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Dec 28 21:21:53 2010
New Revision: 168302
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168302
Log:
2010-12-28 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47079
Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20896
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39427
--- Comment #24 from Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-28
21:49:39 UTC ---
*** Bug 40824 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40824
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47089
Summary: ICE: in gimple_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at
tree-cfg.c:5003 with -O -fgraphite-identity
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45128
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dfranke at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
--- Comment #19 from Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-28
22:30:10 UTC ---
Other potential dupes: PR40737, PR45128.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40737
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dfranke at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40899
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47090
Summary: Incorrect parsing by ssanf/fscanf with scanset.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40850
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47090
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-28
22:58:42 UTC ---
GCC does not include sscanf. And can you quote where in the standard it says
what the output supposed to be?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47079
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-28
23:04:39 UTC ---
Created attachment 22863
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22863
Patch that fixes the problem
Here's the patch that I'm testing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45318
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46801
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-29
00:07:02 UTC ---
Proposed fix posted to the mailing list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg01912.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47091
Summary: arm-netbsd fails to build
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47091
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-netbsd, arm-pe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46478
Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47092
Summary: [4.6 Regression]
gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/forall_4.f90 is VERY
slow with -fgraphite-identity
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47093
Summary: [meta-bug]: broken configurations
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build, meta-bug
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47094
Summary: i386-freebsd6.0_aout fails to build
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47095
Summary: defunct configuration v850e1-*-*
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47076
--- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-29 01:16:59
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Wed Dec 29 01:16:55 2010
New Revision: 168307
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168307
Log:
In gcc/objc/:
2010-12-28
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47096
Summary: i686-interix3 fails building dbxout.o
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47096
--- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-29 01:47:28 UTC ---
The definition of DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER comes from config/i386/i386-interix.h .
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47097
Summary: i686-lynxos fails building dbxout.o
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47098
Summary: i686-openbsd3.0: OBSD_LIB_SPEC missing
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47068
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-29
02:17:51 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Dec 29 02:17:47 2010
New Revision: 168309
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168309
Log:
PR c++/47068
*
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo