http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47131
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04
08:58:05 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Jan 4 08:58:02 2011
New Revision: 168454
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168454
Log:
PR ada/47131
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47131
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47162
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47162
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47137
--- Comment #13 from Jie Zhang jiez at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04 10:21:29
UTC ---
Author: jiez
Date: Tue Jan 4 10:21:27 2011
New Revision: 168459
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168459
Log:
PR driver/47137
* gcc.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47137
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46523
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45701
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47056
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|ada
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47056
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04
10:53:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 22895
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22895
Tentative fix
This doesn't change GIMPLE but instead tweaks reachability
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47158
--- Comment #2 from Martin Ettl ettl.martin at gmx dot de 2011-01-04 10:54:05
UTC ---
Yes, of course!
2011/1/4 ian at airs dot com gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47158
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47165
Summary: gcc-4.6/changes.html wrongly describes
-W(no-)long-double
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
Summary: [4.5 4.6 Regression] SpecCpu2000 Ammp segfaults for
ARM with -O3 -mthumb
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47139
Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005
--- Comment #6 from Laurent GUERBY laurent at guerby dot net 2011-01-04
12:18:49 UTC ---
The autotesters should pick this change within a day or two.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
--- Comment #2 from Ian Bolton ibolton at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04 12:30:23
UTC ---
Created attachment 22896
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22896
Preprocessed source, before/after .s file, before/after IRA dump
Contains the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
--- Comment #3 from Ian Bolton ibolton at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04 12:32:50
UTC ---
pr47166/CMD - how to compile it
Sorry, I forgot to give cc1 commands:
cc1 -fpreprocessed rectmm.i -quiet -dumpbase rectmm.i -mthumb -mcpu=cortex-a9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45777
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46448
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04 12:59:26 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Jan 4 12:59:23 2011
New Revision: 168464
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168464
Log:
2011-01-04 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-01-04
13:02:50 UTC ---
Kai, in order to help people actually using cross-compilation a lot, please
install your patchlet. Actual patch pre-approved. Then we can figure out
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46448
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47131
--- Comment #6 from John Marino gnugcc at marino dot st 2011-01-04 13:23:28
UTC ---
I rebuilt the OpenBSD i386 port (SVN 168458, after 4th change to trans.c
today). It now passes test 34011B.
Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005
--- Comment #7 from John Marino gnugcc at marino dot st 2011-01-04 13:27:52
UTC ---
I confirm that test c62002a is still failing on OpenBSD i386 as of today (SVN
168458)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
--- Comment #10 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04 13:28:11
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Kai, in order to help people actually using cross-compilation a lot, please
install your patchlet. Actual patch pre-approved. Then we
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47082
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04 13:28:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
This does not solve the problem fully, but it reduces it to PR46448:
/tmp/cc9UG1CN.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/cc9UG1CN.s:65: Error: symbol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47082
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[OOP] ICE in|[4.6 Regression] [OOP] ICE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47162
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47024
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47162
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47024
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04 13:49:27 UTC ---
The dump for the test case in comment #0 currently looks like this [excerpt]:
y._data = 0B;
{
[...]
_gfortran_st_write (dt_parm.0);
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40316
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47154
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04
14:24:56 UTC ---
The patch passes regression testing. I will commit tonight with ChangeLog and
test case if someone can approve.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47167
Summary: Performance regression in numerical code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47154
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47168
Summary: Error with use-renaming
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46394
--- Comment #4 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04
15:32:53 UTC ---
I think what's happening is, at some point during template parameters
fixup (to build proper canonical types for dependent parms) we try to
substitute the U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47161
--- Comment #1 from Martin Ettl ettl.martin at gmx dot de 2011-01-04 15:46:07
UTC ---
Created attachment 22898
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22898
fixing more memleaks
A second run of cppcheck reveald further possible memory
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47169
Summary: cannot deduce base class functions from a lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47170
Summary: [cppcheck][PATCH] found resource leaks in
gcc/intl/localealias.c
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47131
--- Comment #7 from John Marino gnugcc at marino dot st 2011-01-04 16:21:17
UTC ---
When OpenBSD i386 finished the test suite, I was surprised to it passed gnat.dg
pack9 unexpectedly. This is the scan tree dump not optimized test that was
set to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47169
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47171
Summary: [cppcheck][PATCH] found a resource leak in
gcc/gcc/java/resource.c
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47131
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04
17:17:34 UTC ---
I'm wondering if this change to trans.c now causes SJLJ targets to pass the
pack9 test as a side effect?
Looking at the aforementioned PR 46801 will
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47170
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2011-01-04 17:39:49 UTC ---
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, ettl.martin at gmx dot de wrote:
during a check of gcc's sources with the static code analysis tool cppcheck
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
--- Comment #15 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04
17:39:45 UTC ---
I'd also prefer a general solution and would not actually mind very
much if we regressed in cases like this. Nevertheless, if we have a
consensus that we
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04
17:43:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
What's being checked for (pure form) is xsltproc + specific version of the
HTML
style sheets, which should be local and vendor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
--- Comment #13 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04 17:59:45
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Tue Jan 4 17:59:39 2011
New Revision: 168474
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168474
Log:
2011-01-04 Kai Tietz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47055
--- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04 18:05:11
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Tue Jan 4 18:05:06 2011
New Revision: 168475
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168475
Log:
2011-01-04 Kai Tietz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47055
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #21 from Sean McGovern gseanmcg at gmail dot com 2011-01-04
18:11:09 UTC ---
Why not introduce a warning for 4.6 that it is linking against this object file
and that any other libraries alongside that are not tested against C99 may
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
--- Comment #14 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-01-04
18:23:23 UTC ---
Kai, thanks. Please commit the ChangeLog entry too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47154
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04
18:24:19 UTC ---
Thanks Janne,
You are absolutely right, the multiple hit_eof's which call the generate_error.
So far I do not think we need to fix anything in hit_eof.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47162
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04
18:49:33 UTC ---
Proposed fix posted to the mailing list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg00161.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45520
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46688
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04
18:55:22 UTC ---
Should TYPE_NEEDS_CONSTRUCTING be false for a zero-length/flexible array
member?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47024
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47051
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |pault at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
Matthias Klose doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at ubuntu dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47172
Summary: [C++0x] cannot call member function without object
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47172
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47165
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47165
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47165
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|gcc-4.6/changes.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45520
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45520
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-01-04 22:47:10
UTC ---
It is caused by revision 158809:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-04/msg00916.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47172
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35722
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213
--- Comment #18 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04
23:18:15 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Jan 4 23:18:12 2011
New Revision: 168490
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168490
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213
--- Comment #20 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04
23:18:55 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Jan 4 23:18:52 2011
New Revision: 168492
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168492
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213
--- Comment #19 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04
23:18:32 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Jan 4 23:18:29 2011
New Revision: 168491
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168491
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47056
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04
23:22:35 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Jan 4 23:22:31 2011
New Revision: 168493
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168493
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47056
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46958
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com 2011-01-05 00:08:43
UTC ---
Fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46965
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46958
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-05
00:08:07 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Jan 5 00:07:59 2011
New Revision: 168495
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168495
Log:
PR go/46958
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46965
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-05
00:08:07 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Jan 5 00:07:59 2011
New Revision: 168495
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168495
Log:
PR go/46958
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46958
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17381
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-05
00:15:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
This is the patch which fixes the issue:Index: regrename.c
===
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46961
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-05
00:24:34 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Jan 5 00:24:15 2011
New Revision: 168500
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168500
Log:
PR go/46959
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46960
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-05
00:24:37 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Jan 5 00:24:15 2011
New Revision: 168500
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168500
Log:
PR go/46959
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46964
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-05
00:24:34 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Jan 5 00:24:15 2011
New Revision: 168500
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168500
Log:
PR go/46959
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46962
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-05
00:24:39 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Jan 5 00:24:15 2011
New Revision: 168500
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168500
Log:
PR go/46959
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46959
--- Comment #3 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-05
00:24:30 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Jan 5 00:24:15 2011
New Revision: 168500
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168500
Log:
PR go/46959
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46963
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-05
00:24:35 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Jan 5 00:24:15 2011
New Revision: 168500
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168500
Log:
PR go/46959
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46240
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-05
00:28:16 UTC ---
Created attachment 22902
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22902
pr46240.ii
Reduced testcase. Fails with -g -O3, works with -g -O3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46959
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46960
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46962
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46963
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46961
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46964
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40831
Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47158
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com 2011-01-05 01:07:49
UTC ---
Let me know when you have signed it. Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47158
--- Comment #4 from Martin Ettl ettl.martin at gmx dot de 2011-01-05 01:19:53
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Let me know when you have signed it. Thanks.
I have signed a few minutes ago.
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo