http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45777
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-08
09:38:17 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Jan 8 09:38:13 2011
New Revision: 168596
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168596
Log:
2011-01-08 Thomas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45777
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36462
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|wrong-code |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47031
--- Comment #7 from Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-08 11:39:38
UTC ---
Usually, the lock is not held. If it is, you do a little trick: You spin 10
times and if you still could not get the lock, it's likely the current thread
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47078
Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
One failure is
/tmp/ccJSP9PV.lto.o: In function `main':^M
ccWUIi0z.o:(.text.startup+0x1d): undefined reference to `g_ebp_save'^M
ccWUIi0z.o:(.text.startup+0x23): undefined reference to `g_esp_save'^M
ccWUIi0z.o:(.text.startup+0x3b): undefined reference to `g_edi'^M
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47222
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-01-08 13:43:27 UTC
---
One failure is
/tmp/ccJSP9PV.lto.o: In function `main':^M
ccWUIi0z.o:(.text.startup+0x1d): undefined reference to `g_ebp_save'^M
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47223
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
2011-01-08 14:01:47 UTC ---
Try to configure with `--disable-shared --enable-shared=lto-plugin'.
What is the failure?
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47223
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-01-08 14:38:20 UTC
---
What is the failure?
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47223
--- Comment #3 from coolypf coolypf at qq dot com 2011-01-08 14:42:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
What is the failure?
Honza
when configuring target-libgcc,
failed with xgcc cannot create executable
config.log shows 'liblto_plugin-0.dll
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47078
Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |nicola at gcc dot
when configuring target-libgcc,
failed with xgcc cannot create executable
config.log shows 'liblto_plugin-0.dll not found'
maybe -fuse-linker-plugin option not handled correctly
Yes, it seems that linker plugin handling on cygwin is not done well.
Is linker plugin built for you and does the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47223
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-01-08 14:56:10 UTC
---
when configuring target-libgcc,
failed with xgcc cannot create executable
config.log shows 'liblto_plugin-0.dll not found'
maybe -fuse-linker-plugin option not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47223
--- Comment #5 from coolypf coolypf at qq dot com 2011-01-08 15:05:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
when configuring target-libgcc,
failed with xgcc cannot create executable
config.log shows 'liblto_plugin-0.dll not found'
maybe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47218
Yu Simin silver24k at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||silver24k at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47116
Yu Simin silver24k at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47218
--- Comment #3 from Yu Simin silver24k at gmail dot com 2011-01-08 15:13:42
UTC ---
A simple test in PR47116:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22866
lto and linker plugin was OK in 20110101 snapshot
in which '-fuse-linker-plugin' was off by default
but in rev 168594, the option becomes on by default
Yes, I've changed the default when linker is detected to have linker support and
lto-plugin is build.
this option causes checking
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47223
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-01-08 15:17:54 UTC
---
lto and linker plugin was OK in 20110101 snapshot
in which '-fuse-linker-plugin' was off by default
but in rev 168594, the option becomes on by default
Yes,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46367
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38292
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45566
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18687
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18687
--- Comment #53 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-08
16:10:38 UTC ---
Concerning Steven's comment, for infcode the time report is:
callgraph optimization: 0.07 ( 1%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.04 ( 0%) wall
139 kB ( 0%) ggc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47031
--- Comment #8 from js-gcc at webkeks dot org js-gcc at webkeks dot org
2011-01-08 16:14:28 UTC ---
Yeah, but Linux is just one of the many OSes supported by GCC. And I don't know
of any other OS that uses futexes fors pthread mutexes.
It would
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2008-10-03 23:54:40 |2011-02-06
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46469
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-08
16:34:03 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sat Jan 8 16:33:57 2011
New Revision: 168598
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168598
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47218
--- Comment #4 from Dave Korn davek at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-08 16:35:31
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
A simple test in PR47116:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22866
Thankyou, that should make debugging it easier :)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46469
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-08
16:37:20 UTC ---
Fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47224
Summary: ICE with procedure pointer component
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
Summary: [4.6.0 regression]: cross-compile fails while
configuring libgcc with xgcc: fatal error:
-fuse-linker-plugin, but liblto_plugin.so not found
Product: gcc
Version:
There is indeed no liblto_plugin.so found in my build tree.
With r168592 I had the last confirmed successful build.
Seems like plugin autodetection somehow screws up. Do you get the
lto-plugin/Makefile configured? What is it building there?
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-01-08 17:58:59 UTC
---
There is indeed no liblto_plugin.so found in my build tree.
With r168592 I had the last confirmed successful build.
Seems like plugin autodetection somehow
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47218
--- Comment #5 from Dave Korn davek at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-08 18:06:07
UTC ---
Bug is caused by the change at rev 167795 applied to fix PR46667.
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=167795
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47222
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-01-08 18:07:00
UTC ---
I got the same failure with gold:
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/builtin-apply-3.c -O2 -flto execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/builtin-apply-3.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47222
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-01-08 18:20:58
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Hmm, this does not seem to be dependent on plugin implementation, but it seems
like
bug in 32bit only testcase. The testcase seems
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
--- Comment #2 from John Tytgat John.Tytgat at aaug dot net 2011-01-08
18:22:14 UTC ---
I'm giving the --disable-shared configure option for building cross-compiler as
I'm not interested in shared target libraries and it looks like this is passed
I tried
-int g_edi=INIT_EDI, g_esi=INIT_ESI, g_ebx=INIT_EBX;
-int g_ebp, g_ebp_save, g_esp, g_esp_save;
+int g_edi __attribute__((externally_visible)) =INIT_EDI;
+int g_esi __attribute__((externally_visible)) =INIT_ESI;
+int g_ebx __attribute__((externally_visible)) = INIT_EBX;
+int g_ebp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47222
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-01-08 18:54:30 UTC
---
I tried
-int g_edi=INIT_EDI, g_esi=INIT_ESI, g_ebx=INIT_EBX;
-int g_ebp, g_ebp_save, g_esp, g_esp_save;
+int g_edi __attribute__((externally_visible))
I.e. only static library of lto-plugin gets built.
Ahh, static library for lto-plugin is of course pointless thing. I guess we
want to disable plugin when --disable-shared is passed. I will see if my
autoconf-fu is on par to do so.
Still, it is bit sad situation - you are right that you are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-01-08 18:58:09 UTC
---
I.e. only static library of lto-plugin gets built.
Ahh, static library for lto-plugin is of course pointless thing. I guess we
want to disable plugin when
Hi,
is this dup of PR47225? I.e. is the --disable-shared the problem?
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47223
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-01-08 18:58:46 UTC
---
Hi,
is this dup of PR47225? I.e. is the --disable-shared the problem?
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47218
--- Comment #6 from Dave Korn davek at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-08 19:00:25
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Bug is caused by the change at rev 167795 applied to fix PR46667.
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=167795
Full
Hi,
since lto plugin already enables shared libiberty, this patch extends the
machinery
for plugin itself too.
Does it fix your problem? I seem to be able to bootstrap (C only) with
disable-shared.
Index: configure
===
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-01-08 19:15:24 UTC
---
Hi,
since lto plugin already enables shared libiberty, this patch extends the
machinery
for plugin itself too.
Does it fix your problem? I seem to be able to
Hi,
I posed patch to the aforementioned PR, hopefully it will fix this one too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47223
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-01-08 19:16:09 UTC
---
Hi,
I posed patch to the aforementioned PR, hopefully it will fix this one too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46896
--- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-08 19:17:06
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Sat Jan 8 19:17:03 2011
New Revision: 168600
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168600
Log:
2011-01-08 Paul Thomas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
.
This program has absolutely no warranty.
evans:/abuild/jh/trunk-3/build-inst2/gcc/:[0]# /abuild/jh/trunk-install/bin/g++
--version
g++ (GCC) 4.6.0 20110108 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47078
--- Comment #3 from Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-08 19:44:34
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Sat Jan 8 19:44:30 2011
New Revision: 168601
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168601
Log:
In gcc/:
2011-01-08 Nicola
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47078
Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42402
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42613
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46710
Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43659
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43891
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
--- Comment #6 from John Tytgat John.Tytgat at aaug dot net 2011-01-08
19:58:00 UTC ---
That patch results in successful build. And lto works as well.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44904
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45007
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45810
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-08
20:08:26 UTC ---
Does --param hot-bb-frequency-fraction=10 work here?
This is weird!-( I have done the following profiling and it shows that -flto
prevents the inlining
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46083
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46492
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46578
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47209
Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE: SIGSEGV in |ICE: SIGSEGV in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47209
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47226
Summary: GCC doesn't expand template parameter pack that
appears in a lambda-expression
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #25 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-08
21:06:27 UTC ---
With current mainline and release checking compiler, I can for first time build
mozilla with debug info. 7.5GB of RAM is needed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #26 from Alexey Feldgendler alexey at feldgendler dot ru
2011-01-08 21:10:50 UTC ---
This is a great success, although I have to say it's still way too much RAM to
ask for. In particular, this excludes the possiblity of compiling on a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45089
--- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-08
21:22:42 UTC ---
Confirmed that mozilla now builds with debug info.
-gnu/arm-unknown-linux-gnu
--disable-nls --enable-threads=posix --enable-symvers=gnu --enable-__cxa_atexit
--enable-languages=c++ --enable-shared --enable-c99 --enable-long-long
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.6.0 20110108 (experimental) [trunk revision 168603] (GCC)
$ ./xgcc -B. -march=armv6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44951
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44846
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-08
21:28:15 UTC ---
The workaround was comitted to the mainline, but the duplicated decl issue
probably remains.
There is a lot of room for improvement in the WPA memory use, but I am not sure
how much we can still fit in 4.6.0...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #27 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-01-08 21:35:00
UTC ---
There is a lot of room for improvement in the WPA memory use, but I am not sure
how much we can still fit in 4.6.0...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46017
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43136
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-08
22:18:31 UTC ---
We have to watch out for aliasing here; if
foo changes the arguments, we have to have a copy.
Compare PR 47065.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005
--- Comment #17 from Laurent GUERBY laurent at guerby dot net 2011-01-08
22:48:51 UTC ---
For reference ACATS is now clean on arm-linux as well:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-01/msg00648.html
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Jan 7 00:49:12 UTC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47227
Summary: GCC ignores conversion function template
specializatons if a derived class' conversion function
converts to the same type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46405
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-08
22:59:45 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Jan 8 22:59:42 2011
New Revision: 168604
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168604
Log:
2011-01-08 Thomas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46405
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #5 from Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2011-01-08
23:16:25 UTC ---
slim lto will take some time (next stage1)
i also plan to drop most of the code because with forced plugin
the elf code in collect2 should not be needed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47218
Dave Korn davek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38536
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #6 from Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2011-01-08
23:56:48 UTC ---
And to add: if you have more fixes for -fno-lto please add them now,
don't wait.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47218
--- Comment #7 from Dave Korn davek at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-09 00:47:15
UTC ---
Created attachment 22932
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22932
proposed patch
Ensures thunks get a section name assigned in
Consider the patch pre-approved if it passes testing. Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47218
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-01-09 00:57:12 UTC
---
Consider the patch pre-approved if it passes testing. Thanks!
slim lto will take some time (next stage1)
I was chatting about this with Diego yesterday and he seems to be fine with the
basic slim LTO patch getting in. So it seems to me that we might get the slim
LTO patch for 4.6.0 and flip the default for 4.7.0
i also plan to drop most of the code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-01-09 01:10:25 UTC
---
slim lto will take some time (next stage1)
I was chatting about this with Diego yesterday and he seems to be fine with the
basic slim LTO patch getting in. So it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47209
--- Comment #5 from Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz 2011-01-09 01:17:54
UTC ---
Created attachment 22933
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22933
different testcase
(In reply to comment #4)
Well, the issue here seems to be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46769
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2010-12-03 13:29:21 |2011-01-08
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44463
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-09
02:11:27 UTC ---
Well, walking the alias pairs don't seem to be that easy after all. If I
understand it right, we first merge the decls and then read the alias pairs.
This
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41816
Rob rob1weld at aol dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rob1weld at aol dot com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47224
--- Comment #1 from Martien Hulsen m.a.hulsen at tue dot nl 2011-01-09
07:35:28 UTC ---
The second line should be removed. Modified code:
module element_defs_m
type coefficients_t
procedure (dum_vfunc), pointer, nopass :: vfunc = null()
98 matches
Mail list logo
