[Bug lto/44334] rnflow.f90 ~27% slower with -fwhole-program -flto after revision 159852

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44334 Jack Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth at nitro dot |

[Bug rtl-optimization/47414] [4.6 Regression] wrong code with -O -freorder-blocks -fschedule-insns2 -fno-early-inlining -fstrict-aliasing -ftracer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47414 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/47418] warning: array subscript is above array bounds at O2 with sin6_addr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47418 --- Comment #3 from Xavier 2011-01-23 02:06:35 UTC --- Created attachment 23084 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23084 simpler testcase $ gcc -O3 -Wall -c small-test.c small-test.c: In function 'main': small-test.c:18:51: war

[Bug c/47418] warning: array subscript is above array bounds at O2 with sin6_addr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47418 Xavier changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chantry.xavier at gmail dot |

question about lead & contact generation

Hello, I was researching online tools for lead and contact generation (or extraction) from the web and came across your information. Do you currently use an online or web-based system? If so, would you mind sharing with me what system you use and how it's working for you? Thanks for your tim

[Bug inline-asm/47419] New: missed 'mov (base,index,scale),reg' optimization?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47419 Summary: missed 'mov (base,index,scale),reg' optimization? Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: inline-asm Assigne

[Bug libstdc++/47387] AIX ctype 'mask' override not working

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47387 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/47387] AIX ctype 'mask' override not working

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47387 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug c/47418] warning: array subscript is above array bounds at O2 with sin6_addr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47418 --- Comment #1 from Dan McGee 2011-01-23 00:15:29 UTC --- Also of note is the commented bit in the test case- if you instead dereference the s6_addr bit of the union, it all works without warnings. In the preprocessed source, replace ap = (cha

[Bug c/47418] New: warning: array subscript is above array bounds at O2 with sin6_addr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47418 Summary: warning: array subscript is above array bounds at O2 with sin6_addr Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug lto/47225] [4.6 regression]: cross-compile fails while configuring libgcc with "xgcc: fatal error: -fuse-linker-plugin, but liblto_plugin.so not found"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot |

[Bug lto/47333] [4.6 regression] g++.dg/lto/20091219 FAILs on Solaris 2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka 20

[Bug lto/47333] [4.6 regression] g++.dg/lto/20091219 FAILs on Solaris 2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-22 23:45:47 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Sat Jan 22 23:45:45 2011 New Revision: 169137 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169137 Log: PR lto/47333 * g++.dg/lto/pr47333.C: New fi

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47417 --- Comment #2 from Pawel Sikora 2011-01-22 22:42:26 UTC --- Created attachment 23082 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23082 preprocessed testcase.

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47417 --- Comment #1 from Pawel Sikora 2011-01-22 22:41:56 UTC --- Created attachment 23081 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23081 source testcase.

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47417 Summary: [4.6 Regression][C++0x] error: use of deleted function 'S::S(const S&)' Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/40737] Pointer references sometimes fail to define "span" symbols

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40737 --- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-01-22 22:37:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > Isn't this the same as PR34640? I think so, see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46339#c11 .

[Bug lto/47333] [4.6 regression] g++.dg/lto/20091219 FAILs on Solaris 2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-22 22:10:08 UTC --- testing the following patch for pasto in reachable_from_this_partition_p Index: lto-cgraph.c === --- lto-cgraph.c

[Bug lto/47333] [4.6 regression] g++.dg/lto/20091219 FAILs on Solaris 2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at g

[Bug fortran/43062] NAMELIST attribute conflicts with ALLOCATABLE attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43062 --- Comment #23 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-22 21:58:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #21) > It is not resolved because we are waiting for an interpretation from the > Fortran standards committee on whether the test case is valid or invalid > Fortr

[Bug fortran/47339] Fortran 2003/2008: Valid NAMELIST rejected; Fortran 95: Invalid namelist objects accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47339 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #23018|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/43884] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Performance degradation for simple fibonacci numbers calculation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43884 --- Comment #21 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-22 21:47:43 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Sat Jan 22 21:47:40 2011 New Revision: 169136 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169136 Log: PR tree-optimization/43884 PR lto/44334

[Bug target/43884] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Performance degradation for simple fibonacci numbers calculation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43884 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/43062] NAMELIST attribute conflicts with ALLOCATABLE attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43062 --- Comment #22 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-22 21:50:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #20) > so, I am bit lost, "bug" is resolved or not ? > Correction available with next version of gcc ? No the bug (or problem report, PR) is not yet resolved. Bu

[Bug lto/44334] rnflow.f90 ~27% slower with -fwhole-program -flto after revision 159852

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44334 --- Comment #26 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-22 21:49:19 UTC --- OK, i comitted the branch prediction change. I am bit confused by the rest of trail, can you please confirm if the problem is fixed in all the configurations mentioned?

[Bug lto/44334] rnflow.f90 ~27% slower with -fwhole-program -flto after revision 159852

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44334 --- Comment #25 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-22 21:47:43 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Sat Jan 22 21:47:40 2011 New Revision: 169136 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169136 Log: PR tree-optimization/43884 PR lto/44334

[Bug target/43884] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Performance degradation for simple fibonacci numbers calculation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43884 --- Comment #20 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-22 21:45:23 UTC --- Patch posted http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01597.html I tested that is seems to bring us back to the 4.3 speed jh@gcc10:~/trunk/build/gcc$ time ./a.out 45 fib(45)=1134903

[Bug c++/47416] ICE in build_data_member_initialization, at cp/semantics.c:5509

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47416 --- Comment #1 from Pawel Sikora 2011-01-22 21:44:24 UTC --- Created attachment 23079 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23079 testcase

[Bug c++/47416] New: ICE in build_data_member_initialization, at cp/semantics.c:5509

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47416 Summary: ICE in build_data_member_initialization, at cp/semantics.c:5509 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Com

[Bug middle-end/47401] Support for must-not-throw regions with SJLJ exceptions broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47401 Ulrich Weigand changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/47401] Support for must-not-throw regions with SJLJ exceptions broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47401 --- Comment #5 from Ulrich Weigand 2011-01-22 21:24:57 UTC --- Author: uweigand Date: Sat Jan 22 21:24:54 2011 New Revision: 169134 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169134 Log: PR middle-end/47401 * except.c (sjlj_as

[Bug tree-optimization/47415] New: -fcompare-debug failure with -O -fpredictive-commoning -fno-tree-fre

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47415 Summary: -fcompare-debug failure with -O -fpredictive-commoning -fno-tree-fre Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/47414] New: [4.6 Regression] wrong code with -O -freorder-blocks -fschedule-insns2 -fno-early-inlining -fstrict-aliasing -ftracer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47414 Summary: [4.6 Regression] wrong code with -O -freorder-blocks -fschedule-insns2 -fno-early-inlining -fstrict-aliasing -ftracer Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status:

[Bug c++/19351] operator new[] can return heap blocks which are too small

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19351 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #22 fr

[Bug fortran/47399] [OOP] ICE with TBP of a PARAMETER

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47399 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-22 19:22:46 UTC --- The ICE is fixed (cf. comment 1), but the issue of comment 2 (spec-expr vs. init/constant-expr) still exists; for this PR itself, the issue is about the missing diagnostic for automati

[Bug libfortran/46267] strerror() is not necessarily thread-safe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46267 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/47352] [F03] ICE with proc-pointers in generic procedures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47352 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-22 17:48:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c > === > --- gcc/fortran/resolve.c (revision 16905

[Bug c++/47412] Output: x = 31 but y = 30

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47412 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-22 17:31:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > It seems interesting for me. It means Java doesn't assume it as an undefined > behavior point or at least Java's compiler does in a unique way and doesn't

[Bug fortran/38536] ICE with C_LOC in resolve.c due to not properly going through expr->ref

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38536 --- Comment #21 from Thomas Koenig 2011-01-22 17:30:27 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Jan 22 17:30:22 2011 New Revision: 169130 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169130 Log: 2011-01-22 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/3853

[Bug tree-optimization/47413] New: Constant Propagation and Virtual Function Tables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47413 Summary: Constant Propagation and Virtual Function Tables Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug fortran/47348] wrong string length with array constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47348 --- Comment #5 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com 2011-01-22 16:50:00 UTC --- Dear Thomas, > Paul, this is a case of something (trans-*?) picking up the > wrong string length and ignoring the substring.  Do you have > any idea where to sta

[Bug lto/47410] Linker plugin specification makes it difficult to handle mixed IR/non-IR objects

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47410 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-22 16:49:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > How it was fixed? It is very trivial. Linker just needs to add the object-only file to input file list: http://git.kernel.org/?p=devel/binutils/hjl/x86.git;a=pat

[Bug target/43884] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Performance degradation for simple fibonacci numbers calculation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43884 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at g

[Bug lto/44334] rnflow.f90 ~27% slower with -fwhole-program -flto after revision 159852

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44334 --- Comment #24 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-22 16:23:49 UTC --- PR 43884 has similar problem with deep loop nests.

[Bug lto/47410] Linker plugin specification makes it difficult to handle mixed IR/non-IR objects

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47410 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-22 16:06:27 UTC --- How it was fixed?

[Bug c/21659] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] "weak declaration must precede definition" error missing at >= O1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21659 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at g

[Bug tree-optimization/47193] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in function_and_variable_visibility, at ipa.c:857 with static var weakref'd to other weakref'd static var

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47193 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/47190] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in function_and_variable_visibility, at ipa.c:934 with static weakref variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47190 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/47412] Output: x = 31 but y = 30

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47412 HM changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hamotahari at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 from HM

[Bug fortran/47293] libquadmath: strtoflt128 - NAN not correctly read and C99 hex floating point format missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47293 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot |

[Bug fortran/47296] I/O Segfault when running out of file descriptors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47296 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/47412] Output: x = 31 but y = 30

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47412 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/47412] New: Output: x = 31 but y = 30

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47412 Summary: Output: x = 31 but y = 30 Product: gcc Version: 4.4.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug libfortran/47285] G format outputs wrong number of characters when decimal supplied in literal

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47285 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-01-22 13:53:52 UTC --- Created attachment 23076 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23076 A possible patch This patch seems to be acceptable. I add a try return value to output float to com

[Bug fortran/47399] [OOP] ICE with TBP of a PARAMETER

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47399 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-22 13:50:28 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sat Jan 22 13:50:25 2011 New Revision: 169126 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169126 Log: 2011-01-22 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/47

[Bug lto/47410] Linker plugin specification makes it difficult to handle mixed IR/non-IR objects

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47410 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/47411] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap failure on x86-64/Darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47411 Geert Bosch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug preprocessor/47311] [4.6 Regression][C++0x] ICE in tsubst @cp/pt.c:10502

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311 --- Comment #25 from Pawel Sikora 2011-01-22 11:14:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #24) > A candidate fix was posted to > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01381.html with this patch the *current* gcc-trunk (with fixed PR47317) ICEs i

[Bug c++/47317] [4.6 Regression][C++0x] ICE in fixed_type_or_null.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47317 --- Comment #4 from Pawel Sikora 2011-01-22 11:11:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Seems to have been fixed already, perhaps by my patch for 46977. yes, pure gcc works now but the recent fix-candidate http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-

[Bug tree-optimization/47411] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap failure on x86-64/Darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47411 --- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-22 09:41:19 UTC --- Created attachment 23075 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23075 Reduced testcase for x86 To be compiled at -O2.

[Bug tree-optimization/47411] New: [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap failure on x86-64/Darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47411 Summary: [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap failure on x86-64/Darwin Product: gcc Version: 4.5.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization