http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47695
Summary: [C++0X] Calling a deleted function fails twice
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47241
--- Comment #12 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-11 08:55:14
UTC ---
Yes, I know. The other part is related to binutils itself.
I just want to wait that patch for ld gets approval and a final test can be
done. AFAICS are now all
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47400
--- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-11 10:01:33 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Feb 11 10:01:29 2011
New Revision: 170046
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170046
Log:
igcc/testsuite:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47400
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47324
--- Comment #48 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-02-11
10:09:15 UTC ---
Also eliminates PR47324 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 without additional regressions
for --enable-build-with-cxx BOOT_CFLAGS=-g -O3 CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-g -O3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47433
--- Comment #14 from singler at gcc dot gnu.org singler at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-11 10:11:46 UTC ---
Author: singler
Date: Fri Feb 11 10:11:41 2011
New Revision: 170047
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170047
Log:
2011-02-11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47324
--- Comment #49 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-11 10:13:13
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #48)
Also eliminates PR47324 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 without additional
regressions
for --enable-build-with-cxx BOOT_CFLAGS=-g -O3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47691
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47172
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47629
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-11 11:09:25 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Feb 11 11:09:21 2011
New Revision: 170049
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170049
Log:
PR target/47629
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47629
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47649
Gerald Pfeifer gerald at pfeifer dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47649
Gerald Pfeifer gerald at pfeifer dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47665
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-11
14:19:49 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 11 14:19:44 2011
New Revision: 170050
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170050
Log:
PR target/47665
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47684
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-11
14:24:30 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 11 14:24:26 2011
New Revision: 170051
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170051
Log:
PR debug/47684
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47684
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47694
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46567
--- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-11
14:42:35 UTC ---
Awaiting approval:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg00742.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47696
Summary: [AVR] Compilation for atmega2560 produces incomplete
interrupt vector table (USART2,3)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47697
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/template/inherit6.C
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47172
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
-libssp
--enable-lto --with-gnu-ld --verbose --disable-multilib
--target=x86_64-slackware-linux --build=x86_64-slackware-linux
--host=x86_64-slackware-linux
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.6.0 20110211 (experimental) (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47698
--- Comment #1 from Udo Steinberg us15 at os dot inf.tu-dresden.de 2011-02-11
15:40:27 UTC ---
Created attachment 23308
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23308
Testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47698
Udo Steinberg us15 at os dot inf.tu-dresden.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23308|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
--- Comment #28 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-11
16:01:24 UTC ---
Author: bernds
Date: Fri Feb 11 16:01:19 2011
New Revision: 170053
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170053
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47699
Summary: Support PCH without #include
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: pch
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47698
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47699
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39437
--- Comment #3 from Olaf van der Spek olafvdspek at gmail dot com 2011-02-11
16:42:45 UTC ---
Somebody?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47699
--- Comment #2 from Olaf van der Spek olafvdspek at gmail dot com 2011-02-11
16:44:21 UTC ---
Nice! I actually read about that at
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Precompiled-Headers.html but didn't realize
-include was a command line option.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47700
Summary: Warning for C casts in C++
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47701
Summary: separate warning to detect c99 enum constraint
violation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47700
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-11
16:56:15 UTC ---
There is already an option: -Wold-style-cast .
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17308
Eric Blake ericb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ericb at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39437
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47700
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47700
Olaf van der Spek olafvdspek at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47698
Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39437
--- Comment #5 from Olaf van der Spek olafvdspek at gmail dot com 2011-02-11
17:06:57 UTC ---
Why not? It doesn't seem too complex to me. The compiler writes a comment to
the object file, the linker reads this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47702
Summary: feature request: sentinel_value
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47700
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-11
17:12:07 UTC ---
Try
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.5.2/gcc/C_002b_002b-Dialect-Options.html#index-Wno_002dold_002dstyle_002dcast-178
.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47700
--- Comment #5 from Olaf van der Spek olafvdspek at gmail dot com 2011-02-11
17:18:05 UTC ---
I don't get why it's listed on that page. IMO it should be at
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html#Warning-Options
Why isn't it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47172
--- Comment #7 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-11
17:27:04 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Fri Feb 11 17:27:00 2011
New Revision: 170055
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170055
Log:
Revert Fix PR c++/47172
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47700
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47700
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-11
17:41:29 UTC ---
Or more accurately, multi-language, not language-independent. In any case
-Wold-style-cast is C++-only so is on a separate page.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47697
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47697
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47700
--- Comment #8 from Olaf van der Spek olafvdspek at gmail dot com 2011-02-11
17:48:06 UTC ---
This isn't really about a dialect, so it still doesn't make sense.
And: Why isn't it included in -Wall -Wextra -pedantic?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47698
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-02-11 17:48:43
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
noce_operand_ok doesn't disregard volatile MEMs:
/* We special-case memories, so handle any of them with
no address side
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47703
Summary: [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: std::sort chokes on
simple lambda function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46192
simon at pushface dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simon at pushface dot org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47678
--- Comment #3 from Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-11
18:13:15 UTC ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Fri Feb 11 18:13:11 2011
New Revision: 170056
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170056
Log:
PR driver/47678
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47678
Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46192
--- Comment #3 from simon at pushface dot org 2011-02-11 18:18:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Still present in gcc version 4.6.0 20110203 (experimental) [trunk revision
157963] for x86_64-apple-darwin10. Generated assembler is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46567
--- Comment #9 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-11
18:18:11 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Fri Feb 11 18:18:09 2011
New Revision: 170057
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170057
Log:
PR 46567
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46567
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-src/configure --enable-lto --prefix=/usr
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.6.0 20110211 (experimental) (GCC)
It was built from svn trunk, revision 170055
The following code fails to compile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47704
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47703
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47687
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47688
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47703
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vituscze at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47703
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-11
18:59:56 UTC ---
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x005520db in location_of (t=0x0) at
../../gcc-4.6-20110205/gcc/cp/error.c:2496
2496
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47705
Summary: internal compiler error: in convert_nontype_argument,
at cp/pt.c:5006
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47687
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-11
19:04:15 UTC ---
cc1plus goes into a loop and runs out of stack space
#471582 dependent_type_p (type=0x2b1b2348) at
../../gcc-4.6-20110205/gcc/cp/pt.c:17918
#471583
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47703
--- Comment #4 from froydnj at codesourcery dot com froydnj at codesourcery
dot com 2011-02-11 19:06:39 UTC ---
FWIW, it was working a week ago.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47705
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39437
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43366
--- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-11
19:38:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
The following patch makes the test case in comment #3 work correctly:
I think your current patch only works if declared type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17308
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
Harald Anlauf anlauf at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47482
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47700
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
--- Comment #6 from John T jrt at worldlinc dot net 2011-02-11 19:56:02 UTC
---
I built the reference BLAS included with Lapack from source. I just got the
results from blas_testing using gcc-4.4.5 and results good again. I don't know
where to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47694
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-11
20:06:41 UTC ---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.5.2/gfortran/Runtime.html#Runtime
and try these.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47706
Summary: std::min/max and NaN
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47511
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2011-02-11 20:23:14 UTC ---
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 07:56:05PM +, jrt at worldlinc dot net wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
--- Comment #6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
--- Comment #9 from Harald Anlauf anlauf at gmx dot de 2011-02-11 20:24:27
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Interesting, I just built this a few days ago using trunk and ran make testing
without any errors, but I had no optimization turned on.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47694
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-11
20:33:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
See http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.5.2/gfortran/Runtime.html#Runtime
and try these.
GFORTRAN_UNBUFFERED_ALL=1 ./a.out
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47707
Summary: Loss of step type precision leads to bad scalar
evolution
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47614
--- Comment #16 from Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-11
20:52:58 UTC ---
Author: pthaugen
Date: Fri Feb 11 20:52:55 2011
New Revision: 170059
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170059
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
--- Comment #10 from Harald Anlauf anlauf at gmx dot de 2011-02-11 20:55:32
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
I just found that some testcases still have the old problem
of using the wrong threshold. cblat3.f tries to compute EPS
and finds
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47707
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-11
20:56:09 UTC ---
Yeah, signed_type_for isn't really suitable for middle-end use.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47550
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-11
21:07:20 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Feb 11 21:07:17 2011
New Revision: 170060
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170060
Log:
2011-02-11 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47550
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47420
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-11
21:19:18 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Feb 11 21:19:16 2011
New Revision: 170061
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170061
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47420
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47694
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Known
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47614
Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46807
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47569
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-11
23:27:35 UTC ---
Submitted patch (with some modifications):
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-02/msg00087.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47706
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47706
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-02-12
01:54:53 UTC ---
Never mind the second half of my comment, the issue has nothing to do with
irreflexivity of course.
The point is, in the implementation of std::min the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47708
Summary: incorrect code on -O2 without -fno-tree-pre
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47709
Summary: is_heap(standard iterator) becomes ambiguous in C++0x
mode
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47708
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com pinskia at gmail dot com
2011-02-12 06:36:09 UTC ---
You are violating c/c++ aliasing rules. nbsp;The code is undefined.
Sent from my Palm Pre on ATamp;T
On Feb 11, 2011 22:27, zephyrtronium at
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
