http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47763
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-16
08:08:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Yeah, normally we don't care about such cases. But this one comes from
dhrystone. If it can be fixed cleanly, why not do it?
Then
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17994
--- Comment #8 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-02-16 08:20:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 23360
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23360
Initial fix that emits the output shown in comment 5
(In reply to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43653
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47763
--- Comment #6 from Jie Zhang jiez at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-16 08:32:14 UTC
---
I think we all know that dhrystone is a bad benchmark. But some users don't.
Which is more difficult: educating all users about that vs apply a simple patch
in GCC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44367
Juha Kallioinen juha.kallioinen at nokia dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47763
--- Comment #7 from Jie Zhang jiez at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-16 08:49:46 UTC
---
Sorry, in my last comment, I meant to say 4.4 does NOT have such
initialization.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47283
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-16
08:55:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 23361
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23361
gcc46-pr47283.patch
Untested patch for this. Can anyone test this on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47283
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47704
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-16
09:08:51 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 16 09:08:48 2011
New Revision: 170209
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170209
Log:
PR c++/47704
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47704
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47757
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47754
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47760
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47763
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43653
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47763
--- Comment #9 from Jie Zhang jiez at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-16 11:29:50 UTC
---
The clobber is optimized away in 172r.cprop3 because the register renaming in
171r.web breaks the def-use relationship between the clobber and the use in the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47765
Summary: Wrong template deduction
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47738
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rakdver at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47758
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-02-16
12:51:44 UTC ---
Do you know when it last worked?
Well it was my first attempt to build 4.6 on my poor G4 (almost ten year old,
so slow with a crowded disk that I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47326
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47766
Summary: [x32] -fstack-protector doesn't work
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47283
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-16
13:50:05 UTC ---
FYI I've bootstrapped/regtested #c12 patch on x86_64-linux and i686-linux
(though, of course, it doesn't make much difference there, given that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47738
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-16
14:26:50 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 16 14:26:43 2011
New Revision: 170212
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170212
Log:
2011-02-12 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47738
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-16
14:27:46 UTC ---
With release checking now no bad IL prevails.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47689
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47690
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-16
15:21:49 UTC ---
*** Bug 47689 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47747
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47758
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-16 16:14:02
UTC ---
thanks, IIRC, when the patch was originally applied it was not possible to test
on Darwin 8 (libquadmath was broken for other reasons).
---
This is not an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47247
--- Comment #18 from Rafael Avila de Espindola rafael.espindola at gmail dot
com 2011-02-16 16:14:52 UTC ---
I have created a small test of the symbol table problem. It is in
http://people.mozilla.com/~respindola/test.tar.xz
The test is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47690
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-16
16:23:33 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Wed Feb 16 16:23:28 2011
New Revision: 170213
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170213
Log:
PR 47690
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47690
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47326
--- Comment #10 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-16
16:30:22 UTC ---
Candidate patch posted to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg01050.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #47 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-16
16:30:31 UTC ---
With the elfhack issues gone, the build now fails with:
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47757
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-16
17:18:44 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 16 17:18:41 2011
New Revision: 170215
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170215
Log:
PR libfortran/47757
20110216 (experimental) (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-o' 'selectTypeFail.exe' '-g' '-fbacktrace' '-v'
'-shared-libgcc' '-mtune=generic' '-march=pentiumpro'
/usr/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.0/f951
selectTypeFail.F90 -cpp=/tmp/ccro8Gvw.f90 -quiet -v selectTypeFail.F90 -quiet
-dumpbase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #21543|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44334
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47757
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47767
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47758
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-16
17:44:48 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Feb 16 17:44:45 2011
New Revision: 170216
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170216
Log:
2011-02-16 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47768
Summary: ICE: printing a derived-type variable with
proc-pointer components
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
--- Comment #12 from Harald Anlauf anlauf at gmx dot de 2011-02-16 18:01:16
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
(In reply to comment #8)
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 07:56:05PM +, jrt at worldlinc dot net wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17994
--- Comment #9 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-16
18:04:08 UTC ---
Going by the internals document, INCOMING_FRAME_SP_OFFSET is already defined
but it is not used anywhere (in my patch).
Certainly it's going to be used by
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47768
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47763
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2011-02-16 18:26:31
UTC ---
There is no undefined behaviour if all calls to foo ignore the returned value.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47767
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-16 18:31:06 UTC ---
Here is a variant: Apart from SELECT TYPE, this bug can also be exposed via the
SAME_TYPE_AS intrinsic.
module Tree_Nodes
type treeNode
contains
procedure :: walk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45810
--- Comment #25 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-02-16 18:38:19 UTC ---
AFAICT the patch in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg00973.html
seems to fix most of the fatigue.f90 problems:
At revision 170178 without
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47769
Summary: [missed optimization] use of btr (bit test and reset)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47770
Summary: wrong code -O2 -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores
-fno-tree-reassoc
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47758
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47769
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47771
Summary: gcc crashes on MinGW platform
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47725
--- Comment #11 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-16
20:15:12 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Feb 16 20:15:07 2011
New Revision: 170218
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170218
Log:
Check zero/sign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47766
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-16
20:22:06 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Feb 16 20:22:03 2011
New Revision: 170219
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170219
Log:
Add x32 support to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47326
--- Comment #11 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-16
20:45:18 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Wed Feb 16 20:45:15 2011
New Revision: 170222
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170222
Log:
PR c++/47326
gcc/cp/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47772
Summary: warnings from -Wmissing-field-initializers contradict
documentation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47773
Summary: Versatile string lacks a default hash function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47745
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-16 20:52:00 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Wed Feb 16 20:51:56 2011
New Revision: 170223
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170223
Log:
2011-02-16 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47745
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47772
--- Comment #1 from Darren Kulp darren at kulp dot ch 2011-02-16 20:58:17 UTC
---
Here is the output of `gcc -v' on the one system to which I have direct access:
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-apple-darwin10
Configured with:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47326
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47771
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47767
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47768
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-16 22:22:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
(In reply to comment #0)
Adding a data pointer component leads to rejection:
print *,x
1
Error: Data transfer element at (1)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47770
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz 2011-02-16 22:36:17
UTC ---
-ftree-loop-if-convert -fno-tree-reassoc -fno-tree-vectorize gives about 316
exec failures on current trunk. I should try the fix for PR46029 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47768
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47774
Summary: [C++0x] constexpr specifier on ctor not ignored when
template instantiation causes ctor to not satify
constexpr requirements
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47773
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
problem --
runnable as sh script
Added an additional test file, runnable as sh script, which tests various
combinations of ctor specifications and member types.
Compiling with gcc version 4.6.0 20110216 (experimental) (GCC) built tonight
yields:
$ sh constexpr-ctor-templ.cpp
+ g++ -c constexpr-ctor
39339456 libxul1.so
34436696 libxul2.so
Yep, it seems similar to what I was getting. Quite important difference and
all the stuff
gets loaded into memory at startup by dynamic linker.
For a 5 MB reduction I might end up writing a wrapper that runs ld twice :-)
You might try GNU-ld's plugin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47247
--- Comment #19 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-02-16 23:12:32
UTC ---
39339456 libxul1.so
34436696 libxul2.so
Yep, it seems similar to what I was getting. Quite important difference and
all the stuff
gets loaded into memory at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47767
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Benson abenson at caltech dot edu 2011-02-16
23:17:49 UTC ---
I can confirm that this patch resolves the problem in the application from
which my original test case was derived.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47247
--- Comment #20 from ccoutant at google dot com 2011-02-16 23:35:28 UTC ---
I have created a small test of the symbol table problem. It is in
http://people.mozilla.com/~respindola/test.tar.xz
The test is firefox's libxul with most files
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47775
Summary: Error on allocatable array returned by function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47775
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47620
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-16
23:49:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 23371
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23371
ice.i.bz2
For the s390-linux ICE, which is still present on the current
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47620
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-16
23:51:11 UTC ---
Created attachment 23372
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23372
ice.gcda
Corresponding ice.gcda.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47620
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-16
23:54:42 UTC ---
The ICE happens even with the #c6 patch applied on top of today's trunk.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47770
Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47745
--- Comment #10 from rodneyp at physics dot uq.edu.au 2011-02-17 00:48:38 UTC
---
Thanks for the report, Rodney!
Thanks for working so hard on the compiler.
I'm learning Fortran 03 and 08 at the moment, so I'm likely to compile
a lot of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47694
--- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-17
01:07:20 UTC ---
the file is not seekable so the position eturne by seek always returns zero.
I plane to see if we can do something with the seek to get it to return a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47692
--- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-17
01:12:44 UTC ---
Always set LD_LIBRARY_PATH or another way is to compile with -static to make
sure the correct runtime functions get invoked.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47247
--- Comment #21 from Rafael Avila de Espindola rafael.espindola at gmail dot
com 2011-02-17 01:13:35 UTC ---
Most of it is in the string table. Ian gave me some pointers and I will try to
fix it tomorrow :-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47773
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-17 01:24:42 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Feb 17 01:24:37 2011
New Revision: 170235
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170235
Log:
2011-02-16 Paolo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47773
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47724
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-17
01:47:25 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Feb 17 01:47:21 2011
New Revision: 170236
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170236
Log:
2011-02-17 Jonathan Wakely
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46207
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47724
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-17
01:55:05 UTC ---
I've checked in a change which prevents the crash, but only by treating line
anchors as non-metacharacters. Unfortunately our regex implementation is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47724
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47745
--- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-17 02:57:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
I'm learning Fortran 03 and 08 at the moment, so I'm likely to compile
a lot of invalid code. Should I report a bug every time gfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47776
Summary: [4.6 Regression] New libstc++ test failures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567
--- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-17
05:19:54 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Feb 17 05:19:50 2011
New Revision: 170239
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170239
Log:
2011-02-16 Jerry
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47172
--- Comment #9 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-17
06:50:40 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Thu Feb 17 06:50:35 2011
New Revision: 170240
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170240
Log:
Fix PR c++/47172
gcc/cp/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47172
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
Summary: use __aeabi_idivmod to compute quotient and remainder
at the same time
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47775
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47776
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|paolo.carlini at oracle dot |
97 matches
Mail list logo