http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47494
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Multiple test suite failures due to
revision 170321
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44118
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-20 11:11:08 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Feb 20 11:11:05 2011
New Revision: 170336
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170336
Log:
2011-02-20 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44118
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44118
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45077
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45077
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2011-02-20
11:39:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Fixes the problem. Bootstraps and regtests OK.
I glanced at it and it looks OK.
> dg-additional-sources is not sufficient is it? That is does it generate
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47797
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-02-20
13:45:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 23411
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23411
Draft patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47820
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||*-darwin*
Status|UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47711
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47813
--- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero 2011-02-20 14:54:47
UTC ---
This is fixed in trunk (but not really, the problem is just hidden). The
following patch --
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg01297.html
fixes it for real though.
Thanks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-20
15:05:00 UTC ---
Huh. WTF is this builtin used for at all??
int main()
{
return __builtin___CFStringMakeConstantString ("Hello");
}
and at gimple stage we already have
main ()
{
int D.2718;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45077
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-02-20
15:08:18 UTC ---
Although pr40440 has been marked as fixed the original test in comment #0
(i.e., using a non included iso_varying_string.mod) is still yielding an ICE
with trunk:
pr40440.f90:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31849
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39029
Olaf van der Spek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olafvdspek at gmail dot com
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47823
Summary: #pragma once not documented
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: preprocessor
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-02-20
15:19:41 UTC ---
Well, the problem does not seem fully darwin specific. It also shows on
moxie-unknown-elf and may be to some extent on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu (see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47824
Summary: Option to enable all warning (-Wall-real?)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37534
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38306
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47735
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47824
--- Comment #1 from Olaf van der Spek 2011-02-20
15:33:21 UTC ---
It would also be nice to list all warnings not included in -Wall -Wextra.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-20
15:33:56 UTC ---
It will show on all targets without a builtin_decl hook and target builtins.
x86 is no such target, it shows there because of the darwin builtin not
playing by the rules.
I will f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37534
--- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-20
15:41:32 UTC ---
It would also be interesting if with profile-feedback and/or LTO this
particular problem vanishes, given that both should result in better
static branch predictions.
||powerpc64-linux-gnu
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose 2011-02-20 15:49:19
UTC ---
still seen on trunk 20110220, powerpc-linux-gnu and powerpc64-linux-gnu targets
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38306
--- Comment #19 from Joost VandeVondele
2011-02-20 16:17:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> Hello Joost, could you please check if this is still a problem in GCC 4.6?
I think it still is a minor problem, but (without -fschedule-insns) some
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45077
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas 2011-02-20 16:23:57
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Feb 20 16:23:50 2011
New Revision: 170337
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170337
Log:
2011-02-20 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/45077
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44945
--- Comment #33 from Paul Thomas 2011-02-20 16:23:57
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Feb 20 16:23:50 2011
New Revision: 170337
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170337
Log:
2011-02-20 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/45077
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38306
--- Comment #20 from Joost VandeVondele
2011-02-20 16:28:00 UTC ---
additionally for trunk, lto/profile-use seem not to help:
> gfortran -O3 -march=native -funroll-loops -ffast-math -flto -fprofile-use
> test.f90 ; ./a.out
Time for evaluatio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44945
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38306
--- Comment #21 from Joost VandeVondele
2011-02-20 16:32:38 UTC ---
... however, the following works great:
> gfortran -O2 -march=native -funroll-loops -ffast-math -ftree-vectorize
> test.f90 ; ./a.out
Time for evaluation [s]:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45077
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
--- Comment #12 from Mikael Morin 2011-02-20
16:49:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 23412
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23412
Patch, no regression modulo an error message change in null_1.f90
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47825
Summary: SSE bitwise operations on floats work -g, fail -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46818
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas 2011-02-20 17:00:50
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Feb 20 17:00:47 2011
New Revision: 170338
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170338
Log:
2011-02-20 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/46818
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46818
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-20
17:15:55 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Sun Feb 20 17:15:53 2011
New Revision: 170339
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170339
Log:
2011-02-20 Richard Guenther
PR lto/478
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47825
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47711
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47825
--- Comment #2 from cck0011 at yahoo dot com 2011-02-20 17:35:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 23414
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23414
source file with _may_alias_ attribute added
Hi Richard,
thanks for replying. I added _m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46394
--- Comment #6 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-02-20
17:37:06 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Sun Feb 20 17:37:03 2011
New Revision: 170341
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170341
Log:
PR c++/46394
gcc/cp/
PR c++/46394
* pt.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47784
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47825
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-20
17:42:41 UTC ---
Probably the same on maskarray. You should also try to update GCC to
4.3.5.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47813
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46394
--- Comment #7 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-02-20
18:08:14 UTC ---
Fixed in trunk (4.6).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46394
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47826
Summary: r170321 breaks bootstrap-lto on x86_64-apple-darwin10
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #8 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20
18:10:06 UTC ---
Created attachment 23415
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23415
darwin patch (moxie is unrelated)
Here is a darwin patch. Not my code, but if I understand
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47825
--- Comment #4 from cck0011 at yahoo dot com 2011-02-20 18:22:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Probably the same on maskarray. You should also try to update GCC to
> 4.3.5.
Hi Richard,
added to maskarray as well: no change in results. Add
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38306
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47826
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2011-02-20
18:59:39 UTC ---
The bootstrap-lto failure is "fixed" at r170339.
r170339 | rguenth | 2011-02-20 12:15:53 -0500 (Sun, 20 Feb 2011) | 6 lines
2011-02-20 Richard Guenther
PR lto/47822
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47826
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2011-02-20
19:02:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 23416
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23416
config.log from stage2 in intl on x86_64-apple-darwin10 at r170320
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47826
--- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth 2011-02-20
19:03:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 23417
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23417
config.log from stage2 in intl on x86_64-apple-darwin10 at r170321
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-02-20 19:12:31 UTC ---
> Dominique, can you try a build on ppc?
Mike, could you be more precise: do you want me to test the patch in comment #8
before or after updating to revision 170339 (which fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #11 from Mike Stump 2011-02-20
19:23:07 UTC ---
Could you try building with the patch on a ppc box if you have one, without the
"Fix" to tree.c in it, so that it will fail, if the problem isn't really fixed.
If you don't, then a seco
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47826
--- Comment #4 from Mike Stump 2011-02-20
19:35:26 UTC ---
Is this a dup of PR47822? If so, that's been fixed twice over already.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-02-20 19:40:18 UTC ---
> Could you try building with the patch on a ppc box if you have one, without
> the
> "Fix" to tree.c in it, so that it will fail, if the problem isn't really
> fixed.
I hav
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at nitro dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47826
--- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth 2011-02-20
19:54:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Is this a dup of PR47822? If so, that's been fixed twice over already.
Apparently as the proposed patch from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47823
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-02-20
20:40:03 UTC ---
At one point it was documented in the C preprocessor manual but it is no longer
documented there.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47824
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2011-02-20
20:40:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> It would also be nice to list all warnings not included in -Wall -Wextra.
The list in the manual already.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47824
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31573
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olafvdspek at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
--- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-02-20 20:49:44 UTC ---
I have applied the patch in comment #12 on top of revision 170344.
> Patch, no regression modulo an error message change in null_1.f90
The error is changed from
Error: Diffe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39029
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47824
--- Comment #4 from Olaf van der Spek 2011-02-20
21:07:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > It would also be nice to list all warnings not included in -Wall -Wextra.
>
> The list in the manual already.
Where?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47827
Summary: gcc fails to bootstrap on i386-pc-solaris2.10
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46472
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merril
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47827
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-20
21:59:30 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sun Feb 20 21:59:28 2011
New Revision: 170346
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170346
Log:
PR bootstrap/47827
* printf/quadmath-printf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
--- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-02-20 22:01:54 UTC ---
> (apparently this new feature is not tested in the test suite)
This wrong, there are several tests;-) The one that is missing is of the form:
module psb_base_mat_mod
type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47797
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-02-20
22:16:51 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Feb 20 22:16:47 2011
New Revision: 170347
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170347
Log:
2011-02-20 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/47
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47797
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47824
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47703
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
--- Comment #15 from Mikael Morin 2011-02-20
23:13:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Although I prefer the first form, if it is proven that it is too much work to
> recover it, the second one requires only to adjust the tests.
I didn't noti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46472
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-02-20
23:18:06 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Feb 20 23:18:01 2011
New Revision: 170348
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170348
Log:
PR c++/46472
* method.c (process_subob_fn):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47703
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-02-20
23:18:16 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Feb 20 23:18:11 2011
New Revision: 170349
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170349
Log:
PR c++/47703
* error.c (location_of): Handl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47703
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46472
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46831
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merril
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47774
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2011-02-20
23:33:24 UTC ---
Please double check that now that 46472 is fixed this is also fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46790
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46790
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46831
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2011-02-21
01:50:44 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 21 01:50:39 2011
New Revision: 170354
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170354
Log:
PR c++/46831
* call.c (convert_class_to_ref
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47774
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46472
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dev.lists at jessamine dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47764
--- Comment #3 from Carrot 2011-02-21 03:15:45 UTC
---
> Any ideas of how this improvement could be implemented, Carrot?
The root cause of this problem is that arm/thumb store instruction can't
directly store a immediate number to memory, but gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47826
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #14 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
04:09:52 UTC ---
*** Bug 47826 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47796
qihua.dai at intel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolutio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47828
Summary: GCC instantiates function template with "auto" type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47199
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-02-21
05:26:01 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 21 05:25:56 2011
New Revision: 170356
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170356
Log:
PR c++/47199
* semantics.c (cxx_eval_call_e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46790
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-02-21
05:30:18 UTC ---
We control lots of things based on whether or not the other tools support a
particular feature. Doing the same for this issue doesn't seem strange at all
to me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47829
Summary: no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47796
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo