http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47494
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Multiple test suite failures due to
revision 170321
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44118
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-20 11:11:08 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Feb 20 11:11:05 2011
New Revision: 170336
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170336
Log:
2011-02-20 Paolo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44118
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44118
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45077
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |pault at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45077
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20
11:39:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Fixes the problem. Bootstraps and regtests OK.
I glanced at it and it looks OK.
dg-additional-sources is not sufficient is it?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47797
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20
13:45:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 23411
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23411
Draft patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47820
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||*-darwin*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47711
Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47813
--- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20 14:54:47
UTC ---
This is fixed in trunk (but not really, the problem is just hidden). The
following patch --
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg01297.html
fixes it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20
15:05:00 UTC ---
Huh. WTF is this builtin used for at all??
int main()
{
return __builtin___CFStringMakeConstantString (Hello);
}
and at gimple stage we already have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45077
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-02-20
15:08:18 UTC ---
Although pr40440 has been marked as fixed the original test in comment #0
(i.e., using a non included iso_varying_string.mod) is still yielding an ICE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31849
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39029
Olaf van der Spek olafvdspek at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olafvdspek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47823
Summary: #pragma once not documented
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: preprocessor
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-02-20
15:19:41 UTC ---
Well, the problem does not seem fully darwin specific. It also shows on
moxie-unknown-elf and may be to some extent on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu (see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47824
Summary: Option to enable all warning (-Wall-real?)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37534
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38306
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47735
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47824
--- Comment #1 from Olaf van der Spek olafvdspek at gmail dot com 2011-02-20
15:33:21 UTC ---
It would also be nice to list all warnings not included in -Wall -Wextra.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20
15:33:56 UTC ---
It will show on all targets without a builtin_decl hook and target builtins.
x86 is no such target, it shows there because of the darwin builtin not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37534
--- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20
15:41:32 UTC ---
It would also be interesting if with profile-feedback and/or LTO this
particular problem vanishes, given that both should result in better
static branch
||powerpc64-linux-gnu
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose doko at ubuntu dot com 2011-02-20 15:49:19
UTC ---
still seen on trunk 20110220, powerpc-linux-gnu and powerpc64-linux-gnu targets
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38306
--- Comment #19 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
2011-02-20 16:17:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
Hello Joost, could you please check if this is still a problem in GCC 4.6?
I think it still is a minor problem,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45077
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20 16:23:57
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Feb 20 16:23:50 2011
New Revision: 170337
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170337
Log:
2011-02-20 Paul Thomas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44945
--- Comment #33 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20 16:23:57
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Feb 20 16:23:50 2011
New Revision: 170337
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170337
Log:
2011-02-20 Paul Thomas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38306
--- Comment #20 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
2011-02-20 16:28:00 UTC ---
additionally for trunk, lto/profile-use seem not to help:
gfortran -O3 -march=native -funroll-loops -ffast-math -flto -fprofile-use
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44945
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38306
--- Comment #21 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
2011-02-20 16:32:38 UTC ---
... however, the following works great:
gfortran -O2 -march=native -funroll-loops -ffast-math -ftree-vectorize
test.f90 ; ./a.out
Time
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45077
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
--- Comment #12 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20
16:49:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 23412
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23412
Patch, no regression modulo an error message change in null_1.f90
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47825
Summary: SSE bitwise operations on floats work -g, fail -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46818
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20 17:00:50
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Feb 20 17:00:47 2011
New Revision: 170338
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170338
Log:
2011-02-20 Paul Thomas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46818
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20
17:15:55 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Sun Feb 20 17:15:53 2011
New Revision: 170339
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170339
Log:
2011-02-20 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47825
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47711
Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47825
--- Comment #2 from cck0011 at yahoo dot com 2011-02-20 17:35:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 23414
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23414
source file with _may_alias_ attribute added
Hi Richard,
thanks for replying. I added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46394
--- Comment #6 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20
17:37:06 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Sun Feb 20 17:37:03 2011
New Revision: 170341
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170341
Log:
PR c++/46394
gcc/cp/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47784
Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47825
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20
17:42:41 UTC ---
Probably the same on maskarray. You should also try to update GCC to
4.3.5.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47813
Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46394
--- Comment #7 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20
18:08:14 UTC ---
Fixed in trunk (4.6).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46394
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47826
Summary: r170321 breaks bootstrap-lto on x86_64-apple-darwin10
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #8 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20
18:10:06 UTC ---
Created attachment 23415
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23415
darwin patch (moxie is unrelated)
Here is a darwin patch. Not my
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47825
--- Comment #4 from cck0011 at yahoo dot com 2011-02-20 18:22:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Probably the same on maskarray. You should also try to update GCC to
4.3.5.
Hi Richard,
added to maskarray as well: no change in results.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38306
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
m...@gcc.gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47826
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-02-20
18:59:39 UTC ---
The bootstrap-lto failure is fixed at r170339.
r170339 | rguenth | 2011-02-20 12:15:53 -0500 (Sun, 20 Feb 2011) | 6 lines
2011-02-20 Richard Guenther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47826
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-02-20
19:02:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 23416
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23416
config.log from stage2 in intl on x86_64-apple-darwin10 at r170320
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47826
--- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-02-20
19:03:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 23417
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23417
config.log from stage2 in intl on x86_64-apple-darwin10 at r170321
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-02-20 19:12:31 UTC ---
Dominique, can you try a build on ppc?
Mike, could you be more precise: do you want me to test the patch in comment #8
before or after updating to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #11 from Mike Stump mikestump at comcast dot net 2011-02-20
19:23:07 UTC ---
Could you try building with the patch on a ppc box if you have one, without the
Fix to tree.c in it, so that it will fail, if the problem isn't really fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47826
--- Comment #4 from Mike Stump mikestump at comcast dot net 2011-02-20
19:35:26 UTC ---
Is this a dup of PR47822? If so, that's been fixed twice over already.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-02-20 19:40:18 UTC ---
Could you try building with the patch on a ppc box if you have one, without
the
Fix to tree.c in it, so that it will fail, if the problem isn't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47826
--- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-02-20
19:54:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Is this a dup of PR47822? If so, that's been fixed twice over already.
Apparently as the proposed patch from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47823
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20
20:40:03 UTC ---
At one point it was documented in the C preprocessor manual but it is no longer
documented there.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47824
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20
20:40:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
It would also be nice to list all warnings not included in -Wall -Wextra.
The list in the manual already.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47824
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31573
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olafvdspek at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
--- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-02-20 20:49:44 UTC ---
I have applied the patch in comment #12 on top of revision 170344.
Patch, no regression modulo an error message change in null_1.f90
The error is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39029
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47824
--- Comment #4 from Olaf van der Spek olafvdspek at gmail dot com 2011-02-20
21:07:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
It would also be nice to list all warnings not included in -Wall -Wextra.
The list in the manual
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47827
Summary: gcc fails to bootstrap on i386-pc-solaris2.10
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46472
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47827
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20
21:59:30 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sun Feb 20 21:59:28 2011
New Revision: 170346
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170346
Log:
PR bootstrap/47827
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
--- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-02-20 22:01:54 UTC ---
(apparently this new feature is not tested in the test suite)
This wrong, there are several tests;-) The one that is missing is of the form:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47797
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20
22:16:51 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Feb 20 22:16:47 2011
New Revision: 170347
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170347
Log:
2011-02-20 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47797
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47824
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47703
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
--- Comment #15 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20
23:13:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
Although I prefer the first form, if it is proven that it is too much work to
recover it, the second one requires only to adjust
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46472
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20
23:18:06 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Feb 20 23:18:01 2011
New Revision: 170348
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170348
Log:
PR c++/46472
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47703
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20
23:18:16 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Feb 20 23:18:11 2011
New Revision: 170349
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170349
Log:
PR c++/47703
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47703
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46472
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46831
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47774
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-02-20
23:33:24 UTC ---
Please double check that now that 46472 is fixed this is also fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46790
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46790
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46831
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
01:50:44 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 21 01:50:39 2011
New Revision: 170354
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170354
Log:
PR c++/46831
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47774
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46472
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dev.lists at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47764
--- Comment #3 from Carrot carrot at google dot com 2011-02-21 03:15:45 UTC
---
Any ideas of how this improvement could be implemented, Carrot?
The root cause of this problem is that arm/thumb store instruction can't
directly store a immediate
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47826
m...@gcc.gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #14 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
04:09:52 UTC ---
*** Bug 47826 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47796
qihua.dai at intel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47828
Summary: GCC instantiates function template with auto type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47199
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
05:26:01 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 21 05:25:56 2011
New Revision: 170356
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170356
Log:
PR c++/47199
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46790
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
05:30:18 UTC ---
We control lots of things based on whether or not the other tools support a
particular feature. Doing the same for this issue doesn't seem strange at all
to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47829
Summary: no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47796
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
