[Bug fortran/47844] Pointer-valued function: Provide wrong result when dereferenced automatically after list-write

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47844 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code CC|

[Bug fortran/47845] [OOP] Polymorphic deferred function: Not matched class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47845 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org Summ

[Bug fortran/47845] New: Polymorphic deferred function: Not matched class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47845 Summary: Polymorphic deferred function: Not matched class Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo:

[Bug fortran/47844] New: Pointer-valued function: Provide wrong result when dereferenced automatically after list-write

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47844 Summary: Pointer-valued function: Provide wrong result when dereferenced automatically after list-write Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug rtl-optimization/46002] ICE: in update_copy_costs, at ira-color.c:319 with -fira-algorithm=priority

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46002 --- Comment #4 from Chung-Lin Tang 2011-02-22 03:23:24 UTC --- Author: cltang Date: Tue Feb 22 03:23:21 2011 New Revision: 170388 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170388 Log: 2011-02-21 Chung-Lin Tang PR rtl-optimiza

[Bug target/47487] ICE in rs6000_output_function_epilogue, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:21782 building 64bit libgo

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47487 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose 2011-02-22 03:03:28 UTC --- libgo has configury bits for powerpc*-linux. that was my reason to assume that Go is supported on powerpc.

[Bug target/43999] Gcc (lib1funcs.asm) doesn't build on ARM/Thumb2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43999 --- Comment #9 from Jing Yu 2011-02-22 01:53:11 UTC --- I am on leave from 02/01/2011 to 05/30/2011. I may not reply your email during this period. If you have Android toolchain questions/issues/requests, please contact Doug (dougk...@google.com

[Bug target/43999] Gcc (lib1funcs.asm) doesn't build on ARM/Thumb2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43999 Michael K. Edwards changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m.k.edwards at gmail dot

[Bug target/47825] SSE bitwise operations on floats work -g, fail -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47825 --- Comment #7 from cck0011 at yahoo dot com 2011-02-22 00:54:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > The issue is that maskarray is initialized as array of ints but then you > load it as array of floats, the scheduler re-orders those so you see > a

[Bug c++/46170] [4.4/4.5 Regression] g++ wrongly rejects pointer-to-member in template arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170 --- Comment #26 from David Fang 2011-02-22 00:16:19 UTC --- Friendly ping?

[Bug c/47842] New: gcc forces 16-byte stack alignment on Solaris i386, when SYSV requires word alignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47842 Summary: gcc forces 16-byte stack alignment on Solaris i386, when SYSV requires word alignment Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug middle-end/42973] [4.4 regression] IRA apparently systematically making reload too busy on 2 address instructions with 3 operands

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42973 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/47790] [4.5/4.6 Regression] optimize_bitfield_assignment_op no longer works in 4.5.x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47790 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/45644] [4.6 Regression] 450.soplex in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45644 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mbooth at redhat dot com --- Comment #9

[Bug target/46452] Apparently invalid optimization of bitfield access (4.5 regression?)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46452 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/47746] [trans-mem] invalid conversion in gimple call, ICE verify_stmts failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47746 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/47746] [trans-mem] invalid conversion in gimple call, ICE verify_stmts failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47746 --- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-02-21 22:49:36 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Mon Feb 21 22:49:34 2011 New Revision: 170377 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170377 Log: PR 47746 * trans-mem.c (ipa_tm_ins

[Bug c++/47746] [trans-mem] invalid conversion in gimple call, ICE verify_stmts failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47746 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/47348] wrong string length with array constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47348 --- Comment #9 from tkoenig at netcologne dot de 2011-02-21 22:40:52 UTC --- Hi Paul, > (In reply to comment #7) >> Any plan to backport the fix in revision 170317? > > I had not planned so to do but would respond positively to popular pressure

[Bug target/46452] Apparently invalid optimization of bitfield access (4.5 regression?)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46452 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-02-21 22:14:15 UTC --- Also note that the code will not compile with the current trunk of gcc as the definition of struct lens triggers a long standing bug with anonymous members which was fixed in the GCC

[Bug fortran/41359] Wrong line numbers for debugging/profiling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41359 --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2011-02-21 21:47:59 UTC --- I think the current gcov output is OK: 1:1:program main -:2: implicit none -:3: integer :: a = 7 1:4: if( a == 0 ) then #:

[Bug rtl-optimization/46002] ICE: in update_copy_costs, at ira-color.c:319 with -fira-algorithm=priority

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46002 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-02-21 21:45:47 UTC --- Still fail on Linux/x86-64 as of revision 170371: [hjl@gnu-34 gcc]$ /export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test-intel64corei7/bld/gcc/xgcc -B/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test-intel64corei7/bld/gcc/ -Os -

[Bug target/47822] [4.6 Regression] Multiple test suite failures due to revision 170321

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822 --- Comment #21 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21 21:38:23 UTC --- Author: mrs Date: Mon Feb 21 21:38:21 2011 New Revision: 170376 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170376 Log: PR target/47822 * config/darwin-pro

[Bug target/46452] Apparently invalid optimization of bitfield access (4.5 regression?)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46452 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 fro

[Bug target/47822] [4.6 Regression] Multiple test suite failures due to revision 170321

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822 --- Comment #20 from Mike Stump 2011-02-21 21:02:16 UTC --- Ah, never mind, we have another thread going where the problem was pointed out. Sorry for missing it.

[Bug target/47822] [4.6 Regression] Multiple test suite failures due to revision 170321

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822 --- Comment #19 from Mike Stump 2011-02-21 20:58:35 UTC --- ? The patch does touch rs6000 is the same way as we touch i386. I think there is an additional issue on ppc. My previous patch is necessary, but not sufficient. So, if someone has a

[Bug target/47840] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] incorrect _mm256_insert_epi{32,64} implementations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47840 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/47840] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] incorrect _mm256_insert_epi{32,64} implementations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47840 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21 20:05:02 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Mon Feb 21 20:04:57 2011 New Revision: 170373 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170373 Log: PR target/47840 * config/i386/avxint

[Bug target/47840] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] incorrect _mm256_insert_epi{32,64} implementations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47840 --- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21 20:02:08 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Mon Feb 21 20:02:02 2011 New Revision: 170372 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170372 Log: PR target/47840 * config/i386/avxint

[Bug target/47840] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] incorrect _mm256_insert_epi{32,64} implementations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47840 --- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21 19:59:55 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Mon Feb 21 19:59:52 2011 New Revision: 170371 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170371 Log: PR target/47840 * config/i386/avxint

[Bug bootstrap/47230] [4.6 Regression] gcc fails to bootstrap on alpha in stage2 with "relocation truncated to fit: GPREL16 against ..."

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47230 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/47840] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] incorrect _mm256_insert_epi{32,64} implementations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47840 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/47802] [4.6 Regression] libgfortran/intrinsics/ctime.c:75:3: error: too few arguments to function 'ctime_r'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802 --- Comment #12 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-02-21 19:38:33 UTC --- On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802 > > --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-21 > 18:58:2

[Bug middle-end/46790] [4.6 regression] EH failures in libstdc++ testsuite with --gc-sections and GNU ld 2.18

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46790 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-21 19:23:36 UTC --- Created attachment 23431 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23431 variant 3 This is code-wide like variant 1, but configury is actually checking for the bug (slightl

[Bug middle-end/46790] [4.6 regression] EH failures in libstdc++ testsuite with --gc-sections and GNU ld 2.18

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46790 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-21 19:21:49 UTC --- Created attachment 23430 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23430 variant 2 This one will just disable .gcc_except_table.foo for the buggy linkers (in addition to th

[Bug middle-end/46790] [4.6 regression] EH failures in libstdc++ testsuite with --gc-sections and GNU ld 2.18

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46790 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #23428|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug regression/47836] Some Cross Compiler can't build target-libiberty or target-zlib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-02-21 19:20:20 UTC --- Why does these libraries fail?

[Bug bootstrap/47806] Failure to build cross-combiner to powerpc-ibm-aix6.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47806 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/47841] [4.6 Regression] New guality test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47841 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug libfortran/47802] [4.6 Regression] libgfortran/intrinsics/ctime.c:75:3: error: too few arguments to function 'ctime_r'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-21 18:58:27 UTC --- In libgfortran it is not the user, but libgfortran implementation, so it makes sure it always passes buffer of at least 26 bytes. If there are OSes where we can't trust ctime_r, we c

[Bug lto/47841] [4.6 Regression] New guality test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47841 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from

[Bug lto/47841] New: [4.6 Regression] New guality test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47841 Summary: [4.6 Regression] New guality test failures Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: unassig..

[Bug libfortran/47802] [4.6 Regression] libgfortran/intrinsics/ctime.c:75:3: error: too few arguments to function 'ctime_r'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802 --- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-02-21 18:51:09 UTC --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/21/11 11:09, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802 > > --- Comment #8 from Tobias

[Bug libfortran/47802] [4.6 Regression] libgfortran/intrinsics/ctime.c:75:3: error: too few arguments to function 'ctime_r'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802 --- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-02-21 18:49:02 UTC --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/21/11 10:41, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802 > > Jakub Jelinek changed: > >

[Bug target/47840] New: incorrect _mm256_insert_epi{32,64} implementations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47840 Summary: incorrect _mm256_insert_epi{32,64} implementations Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo

[Bug libfortran/47802] [4.6 Regression] libgfortran/intrinsics/ctime.c:75:3: error: too few arguments to function 'ctime_r'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2011-02-21 18:08:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Certain implementations pass in a buffer size > parameter to deal with that problem, others (glibc) presumably do some > checking before dumping results into

[Bug middle-end/46790] [4.6 regression] EH failures in libstdc++ testsuite with --gc-sections and GNU ld 2.18

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46790 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-21 17:51:00 UTC --- HAVE_GAS_HIDDEN and HAVE_COMDAT_GROUP checks use ld --version date too.

[Bug middle-end/46790] [4.6 regression] EH failures in libstdc++ testsuite with --gc-sections and GNU ld 2.18

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46790 --- Comment #11 from Steven Bosscher 2011-02-21 17:47:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) Interesting, I didn't know that :-) Do you have an example?

[Bug rtl-optimization/46178] gcc.target/i386/(u)divmod-[58].c FAIL: ICE: in dec_register_pressure, at ira-lives.c:215 with -fira-algorithm=priority

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46178 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/46002] ICE: in update_copy_costs, at ira-color.c:319 with -fira-algorithm=priority

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46002 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-02-21 17:43:18 UTC --- Author: law Date: Mon Feb 21 17:43:15 2011 New Revision: 170370 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170370 Log: PR rtl-optimization/46178 * gcc.target/i386

[Bug rtl-optimization/46178] gcc.target/i386/(u)divmod-[58].c FAIL: ICE: in dec_register_pressure, at ira-lives.c:215 with -fira-algorithm=priority

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46178 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-02-21 17:43:18 UTC --- Author: law Date: Mon Feb 21 17:43:15 2011 New Revision: 170370 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170370 Log: PR rtl-optimization/46178 * gcc.target/i386

[Bug libfortran/47802] [4.6 Regression] libgfortran/intrinsics/ctime.c:75:3: error: too few arguments to function 'ctime_r'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 f

[Bug c++/47833] ICE during GC in gt_ggc_mx_pending_template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47833 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-21 17:32:22 UTC --- Different testcase at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=479920

[Bug middle-end/46790] [4.6 regression] EH failures in libstdc++ testsuite with --gc-sections and GNU ld 2.18

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46790 --- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka 2011-02-21 17:30:00 UTC --- Testing datestamp seems resonable to me. I can do the changes needed to avoid .text subsections then (basically the elf implementation should then return NULL) Honza

[Bug c++/44118] ICE: in instantiate_decl, at cp/pt.c:16657

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44118 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c++/44737] ICE in instantiate_decl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44737 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/46790] [4.6 regression] EH failures in libstdc++ testsuite with --gc-sections and GNU ld 2.18

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46790 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-21 17:23:02 UTC --- Created attachment 23428 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23428 gcc46-pr46790-configury.patch Completely untested draft of a configury patch (still no code changes

[Bug c++/46831] [4.6 Regression][C++0x] Crash when it tries to do an invalid ICS with a conversion function template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46831 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/46790] [4.6 regression] EH failures in libstdc++ testsuite with --gc-sections and GNU ld 2.18

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46790 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-21 17:14:10 UTC --- So, I've tried a few linkers from various RHEL/Fedora distros, and narrowed it down to the fact that 20071102 ld still fails, while 20080208 ld already works. There have been pretty bi

[Bug c++/47207] [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: in decl_constant_var_p, at cp/decl2.c:3563 on invalid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47207 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/47839] ICE in dwarf2out.c:add_AT_specification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47839 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/47838] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/foldconst-2.c scan-tree-dump-not optimized "fundamentals..0"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47838 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #2

[Bug libfortran/47802] [4.6 Regression] libgfortran/intrinsics/ctime.c:75:3: error: too few arguments to function 'ctime_r'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-02-21 16:56:18 UTC --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/18/11 13:56, dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802 > > --- Comment #2 from da

[Bug c/47772] warnings from -Wmissing-field-initializers contradict documentation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47772 Jonathan 'Sky' Squirawski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||webmas...@sky-siteweb.com ---

[Bug fortran/47839] ICE in dwarf2out.c:add_AT_specification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47839 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-21 16:19:20 UTC --- --- a.f90 MODULE globalvar_mod integer:: xstart, ystart, zstart, xstop, ystop, zstop CONTAINS END MODULE globalvar_mod --- b.f90 MODULE PEC_mod CONTAINS SUBROUTINE PECapp

[Bug fortran/47839] New: ICE in dwarf2out.c:add_AT_specification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47839 Summary: ICE in dwarf2out.c:add_AT_specification Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: lto Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug rtl-optimization/47477] [4.6 regression] Sub-optimal mov at end of method

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47477 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.0 |4.7.0

[Bug debug/47106] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -fpartial-inlining -flto -fconserve-stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47106 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-21 15:53:54 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Feb 21 15:53:49 2011 New Revision: 170366 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170366 Log: PR debug/47106 * g++.dg/debug/pr47106.C: R

[Bug middle-end/38219] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp47.c fails on powerpc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38219 --- Comment #11 from John David Anglin 2011-02-21 15:51:59 UTC --- Still fails on hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20 with 4.6.0 revision 170207.

[Bug c++/47207] [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: in decl_constant_var_p, at cp/decl2.c:3563 on invalid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47207 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-02-21 15:35:52 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Feb 21 15:35:44 2011 New Revision: 170365 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170365 Log: PR c++/47207 * decl2.c (decl_constant_var_p

[Bug tree-optimization/47835] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr46909.c scan-tree-dump ifcombine "optimizing two comparisons to x_[0-9]+\(D\) != 4"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47835 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/47838] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/foldconst-2.c scan-tree-dump-not optimized "fundamentals..0"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47838 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2011-02-21 15:12:18 UTC --- Created attachment 23427 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23427 Tree dump.

[Bug tree-optimization/47838] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/foldconst-2.c scan-tree-dump-not optimized "fundamentals..0"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47838 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/foldconst-2.c scan-tree-dump-not optimized "fundamentals..0" Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug c++/47207] [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: in decl_constant_var_p, at cp/decl2.c:3563 on invalid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47207 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug fortran/46321] [OOP] Polymorphic deallocation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46321 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21 15:06:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Note: There are four cases where a polymorphic deallocate is needed - though > some might end up in the same code path: > > - explicit DEALLOCATE (

[Bug target/47487] ICE in rs6000_output_function_epilogue, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:21782 building 64bit libgo

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47487 --- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner 2011-02-21 15:02:40 UTC --- I don't recall anyone adding GO support for powerpc{,64}-linux, so I'm guessing such a patch should be added when that is submitted?

[Bug c/47837] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26) Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug regression/47836] New: Some Cross Compiler can't build target-libiberty or target-zlib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836 Summary: Some Cross Compiler can't build target-libiberty or target-zlib Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Com

[Bug tree-optimization/47835] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr46909.c scan-tree-dump ifcombine "optimizing two comparisons to x_[0-9]+\(D\) != 4"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47835 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2011-02-21 14:37:14 UTC --- Created attachment 23426 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23426 Tree dump.

[Bug fortran/47778] reading two arrays of structures from namelist fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47778 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-02-21 14:35:20 UTC --- Status update. I have more or less isolated the problem in list-read.c. I do not have an exact solution yet, but I am able to get the test case to work. I just need now to find the ri

[Bug tree-optimization/42108] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] 50% performance regression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42108 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2009-11-19 16:49:51 |2011-02-21 16:49:51 --- Comment #51 fr

[Bug objc/47832] [4.6 Regression] ObjC errors on structures with flexible data members

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47832 --- Comment #4 from Nicola Pero 2011-02-21 14:33:14 UTC --- > for ObjC I guess it depends if in @interface there are variables (then > variables with flexible array members in theory could be treated there like > ISO > C99 treats variables), or

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 --- Comment #22 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-02-21 14:32:14 UTC --- On my system I get with: print *, "--" print "(F0.0)", -0.0 ! => -0. print "(F3.0)", -0.0 ! => -0. print "(F2.0)", -0.0 ! => ** print "(F1.0)

[Bug tree-optimization/47835] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/pr46909.c scan-tree-dump ifcombine "optimizing two comparisons to x_[0-9]+\(D\) != 4"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47835 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/pr46909.c scan-tree-dump ifcombine "optimizing two comparisons to x_[0-9]+\(D\) != 4" Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/47199] [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: expected class 'type', have 'declaration' (function_decl) in same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p, at cp/typeck.c:1407 with -fno-elide-constructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47199 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 --- Comment #21 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-02-21 14:22:51 UTC --- OK, can you tell I am time slicing this one. ;)

[Bug target/47825] SSE bitwise operations on floats work -g, fail -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47825 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC|hjl at gcc dot gnu.org |hjl.tools at gmail dot com, |

[Bug debug/47106] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -fpartial-inlining -flto -fconserve-stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47106 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug bootstrap/47820] [4.6 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47820 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/47820] [4.6 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47820 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-21 13:38:54 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Feb 21 13:38:48 2011 New Revision: 170359 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170359 Log: 2011-02-21 Richard Guenther PR lto/478

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 Thomas Henlich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug other/47824] Option to enable all warning (-Wall-real?)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47824 --- Comment #11 from Olaf van der Spek 2011-02-21 13:11:04 UTC --- > Dup. No kidding?

[Bug objc/47832] [4.6 Regression] ObjC errors on structures with flexible data members

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47832 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P4

[Bug c/47796] The code to write to a bit_field data strucuture will be removed unexpectedly with gcc 4.5.1 -O2 option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47796 --- Comment #7 from qihua.dai at intel dot com 2011-02-21 13:02:41 UTC --- Hi, I used -Wall -O2. But no warning for this situation. gcc will print strict-aliasing related warning. struct tmp1_s tmp; tmp.a = 0xc; // this code line is removed

[Bug fortran/40850] double free in nested types with allocatable components

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40850 --- Comment #13 from Mikael Morin 2011-02-21 13:01:23 UTC --- Comment 5 is not affected by the double free as the allocatable components are never allocated during the program, only the containing entity is.

[Bug fortran/40850] double free in nested types with allocatable components

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40850 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #12

[Bug c++/31573] -Wall-all to enable all warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31573 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-21 12:55:51 UTC --- *** Bug 47824 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug other/47824] Option to enable all warning (-Wall-real?)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47824 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/38306] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] 15% slowdown w.r.t. 4.3 of computational kernel on some architectures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38306 --- Comment #23 from Joost VandeVondele 2011-02-21 12:53:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #22) > What is the performance with 4.3 -O2? 4.3: > gfortran -O2 -march=native -funroll-loops -ffast-math test.f90 ; ./a.out Time for evaluation [s]:

[Bug other/47824] Option to enable all warning (-Wall-real?)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47824 --- Comment #9 from Olaf van der Spek 2011-02-21 12:47:24 UTC --- > > So "The list in the manual already." is false. > > The information is in the manual, even if not as an explicit list. That's true, but not what was said. > I expect adding a

  1   2   >