http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47981
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46944
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gseanmcg at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48003
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48015
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22572
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48003
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-08
05:28:16 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Mar 8 05:28:13 2011
New Revision: 170771
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170771
Log:
PR c++/48003
* pt.c (convert_nontype_argume
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48015
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-08
05:28:07 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Mar 8 05:28:02 2011
New Revision: 170770
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170770
Log:
PR c++/48015
* init.c (constant_value_1): A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22572
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45911
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-08
03:08:24 UTC ---
Right. Assigning a bug to myself and setting the status to Assigned/In
Progress is a common enough action that there should be a shortcut so I don't
need to type my email address in e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48030
Summary: Implement read_x using fbuf_getc
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedTo: unassig...@g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47952
--- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson 2011-03-08
00:44:41 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Tue Mar 8 00:44:37 2011
New Revision: 170768
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170768
Log:
PR 47952
* trans-mem.c (tm_mangle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47952
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #4 from Richard H
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47952
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #16 from davidxl 2011-03-08 00:26:47
UTC ---
The second patch should work for the two cases (verified with -mbranch-cost=0
on x86).
David
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #15 from davidxl 2011-03-08 00:25:29
UTC ---
Created attachment 23581
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23581
patch2
Please validate the more generalized patch.
David
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48028
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2011-03-08
00:20:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> So the code looks like (after inlining and folding of *&):
Woops that is wrong, the first e!=0 should have been == 0 but we don't warn
there, hmm.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48028
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48028
--- Comment #1 from Matt Hargett 2011-03-08 00:06:26 UTC
---
Created attachment 23580
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23580
pre-processed source of the file that triggers the -Wuninitialized warning
regression on x86-64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
--- Comment #24 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-03-08
00:04:10 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Tue Mar 8 00:04:05 2011
New Revision: 170763
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170763
Log:
2011-03-07 Benjamin Kosnik
Matthia
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48029
Summary: ICE in finish_member_declaration() with --param
ggc-min-expand=0 --param ggc-min-heapsize=0
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45911
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-07
23:46:05 UTC ---
That just renames the state, it doesn't help address the logical flaw, which is
that the fact a bug is being worked on and the person working on it are not
independent.
Having an IN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48028
Summary: [4.4 Regression] undeserved uninitialized variable
warning regression since 4.4.2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29874
--- Comment #2 from stevenj at alum dot mit.edu 2011-03-07 23:13:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 23579
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23579
benchmark extracted from FFTW3 - size 64 FFT with SSE2
I extracted a little benchmark of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45911
--- Comment #4 from Frédéric Buclin 2011-03-07
23:03:33 UTC ---
The word "ASSIGNED" is confusing people, because it sounds like a synonym for
the assignee field. In Bugzilla 4.0, we renamed ASSIGNED to IN_PROGRESS.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45911
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45911
--- Comment #2 from Frédéric Buclin 2011-03-07
22:52:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Our bugzilla used to change the assign-to field away from
> unassig...@gcc.gnu.org automatically. Now you have to do
> it in two steps.
Correct, we did t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47991
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48027
Summary: setmem pattern using undesirable RTL
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassig.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47991
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-07
22:11:59 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 7 22:11:55 2011
New Revision: 170759
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170759
Log:
PR debug/47991
* var-tracking.c (find_use_v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31827
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-07
21:35:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 23578
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23578
Implement stack in c_parser_binary_operation as VEC
And here is the alternative to use global VEC a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22572
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23575|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31827
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-07
20:41:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 23576
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23576
hack
The c_parser_binary_expression stack impact could be decreased, either through
a hack like thi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48015
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #23 from Sean McGovern 2011-03-07
20:16:09 UTC ---
Ping.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48008
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48008
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-07
20:10:56 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Mar 7 20:10:44 2011
New Revision: 170752
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170752
Log:
PR c++/48008
* mangle.c (write_type): Strip
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47947
--- Comment #11 from Pat Haugen 2011-03-07
20:10:02 UTC ---
PR47862 has been fixed on trunk and 4.5 development branch. Can you verify if
that fixes this problem also?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47981
--- Comment #3 from Sean McGovern 2011-03-07
20:08:00 UTC ---
changing the cabs() call to __builtin_cabs() does succeed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47862
Pat Haugen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773
--- Comment #75 from Paolo Carlini 2011-03-07
19:58:24 UTC ---
For 4.7, if Rainer can help testing, we can certainly seriously attack and
resolve this issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22572
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31827
Sean McGovern changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47862
--- Comment #6 from Pat Haugen 2011-03-07
19:47:07 UTC ---
Author: pthaugen
Date: Mon Mar 7 19:47:03 2011
New Revision: 170750
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170750
Log:
PR target/47862
* config/rs6000/rs6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48026
Summary: #pragma optimize ignored for C++
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47862
--- Comment #5 from Pat Haugen 2011-03-07
19:40:21 UTC ---
Author: pthaugen
Date: Mon Mar 7 19:40:15 2011
New Revision: 170749
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170749
Log:
PR target/47862
* config/rs6000/rs6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48025
Summary: Unnecessary function evaluations in arguments to size
and ubound
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48024
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48024
Summary: [4.6 Regression] g++.dg/torture/pr42883.C:63:1:
internal compiler error: in dfs_enumerate_from, at
cfganal.c:1209
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47862
--- Comment #4 from Pat Haugen 2011-03-07
19:27:13 UTC ---
Author: pthaugen
Date: Mon Mar 7 19:27:09 2011
New Revision: 170748
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170748
Log:
PR target/47862
* config/rs6000/rs6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773
--- Comment #74 from Marc Glisse 2011-03-07
19:21:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #73)
> > asking him to play a bit with the
> > straightforward cpp_init_builtins patch defining __cplusplus to 199711 for
> > c++98 (and 201103 in c++0x mode?)
>
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47230
Serge Belyshev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||link-failure
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773
--- Comment #73 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-07 19:05:14 UTC ---
> --- Comment #72 from Paolo Carlini
> 2011-03-07 16:38:06 UTC ---
> If I remember correctly, mostly Solaris issues prevented us from defining
> __cplusplus to a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48015
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #14
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47997
--- Comment #7 from Mike Stump 2011-03-07
18:16:13 UTC ---
Ok, you can look for strlen (s) == IDENTIFIER_LENGTH (x) in either the
darwin.[ch] files, or, failing one there, in the backend files... I know I've
seen one before, just can't recall wh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45413
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45413
--- Comment #3 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-07
18:07:33 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Mar 7 18:07:31 2011
New Revision: 170744
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170744
Log:
2011-03-07 Jack Howarth
PR target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571
--- Comment #27 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-03-07 17:59:27 UTC ---
> >> All fortran testing is broken on Tru64 UNIX, where libgfortran.so has an
> >> undefined reference to clock_gettime:
> >> The function is defined in librt only.
> >
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47997
--- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth 2011-03-07
17:46:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Ok. I'm hoping you double checked the incantation with the other version that
> exists.
How would I do that?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47997
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48008
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48008
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P3
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #13 from davidxl 2011-03-07 16:58:03
UTC ---
Yes -- I also wanted to do the generalization.
David
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > Please verify the patch on hpux and os390.
>
> Perhaps you could enhance you
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48022
--- Comment #1 from rjones at redhat dot com
2011-03-07 16:51:14 UTC ---
Report on Fedora devel mailing list:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-March/thread.html#149342
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48014
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-03-07 16:45:54 UTC ---
Under POSIX, *_t is part of the implementation namespace rather than the
user namespace if any POSIX header is included. (I don't know why this
particular non-POSIX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48000
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48000
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-07
16:41:57 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 7 16:41:53 2011
New Revision: 170740
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170740
Log:
PR bootstrap/48000
* cfgloopmanip.c (fix_bb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at CeBiTec dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48022
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47957
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48023
Summary: [trans-mem] no-builtin flag and TM builtin like memset
Product: gcc
Version: trans-mem
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assigne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571
--- Comment #26 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-07 16:20:17 UTC ---
> --- Comment #25 from Tobias Burnus 2011-03-07
> 16:08:23 UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #24)
>> All fortran testing is broken on Tru64 UNIX, where libgfortran.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47747
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47606
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org|rth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571
--- Comment #25 from Tobias Burnus 2011-03-07
16:08:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> All fortran testing is broken on Tru64 UNIX, where libgfortran.so has an
> undefined reference to clock_gettime:
> The function is defined in librt only.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48022
Summary: [4.6 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow warning on code
that doesn't have overflows
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #12 from Andreas Krebbel 2011-03-07
16:01:37 UTC ---
Created attachment 23573
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23573
uninit-pred-8_a.c.128t.uninit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #11 from Andreas Krebbel 2011-03-07
16:01:09 UTC ---
Created attachment 23572
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23572
uninit-pred-8_a.c.126t.cddce2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Krebbel 2011-03-07
15:59:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Please verify the patch on hpux and os390.
Perhaps you could enhance your patch to cover then uninit-pred-8_a.c case as
well. It looks quite similiar:
/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773
--- Comment #71 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-07
15:57:59 UTC ---
N.B. The latest C++0x draft, N3042, specifies the value 201103L
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47997
--- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth 2011-03-07
15:37:54 UTC ---
The proposed patch in Comment 2 fixes the problem testcase and causes no
regressions on x86_64-apple-darwin10.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-03/msg00571.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47952
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47786
Nathan Froyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47786
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Froyd 2011-03-07
15:32:29 UTC ---
Author: froydnj
Date: Mon Mar 7 15:32:25 2011
New Revision: 170739
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170739
Log:
PR c/47786
* c-common.c (c_type_hash): Cal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47952
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23513|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48015
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48015
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE: unexpected expression |[4.6 Regression] [C++0x]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48015
--- Comment #2 from Erik Schnetter 2011-03-07
15:14:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 23570
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23570
Same source code preprocessed with gcc 4.5.2
If I use gcc 4.5.2:
$ g++-mp-4.5 --version
g++-mp-4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48015
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48021
Summary: [trans-mem] call to an undefined clone
Product: gcc
Version: trans-mem
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||alpha-dec-osf5.1b
Status|RESOLV
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48016
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-07
14:44:49 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Mar 7 14:44:45 2011
New Revision: 170735
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170735
Log:
Adjust mode of non-local goto stack save are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48016
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-07 14:40:35
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> The gimple middle-end only knows one pointer type mode, ptr_type_mode. If
> we want to save Pmode then we need to use an appropriate integer type
> and a proper a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48020
Summary: libgo flag test FAILs on Solaris 2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
AssignedTo: i...@airs.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48019
Summary: Need to handle EINTR in libgo testsuite
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
AssignedTo: i...@airs.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48018
Summary: libgo needs to handle Solaris 2 syslog
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
AssignedTo: i...@airs.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48016
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-07
14:13:10 UTC ---
The gimple middle-end only knows one pointer type mode, ptr_type_mode. If
we want to save Pmode then we need to use an appropriate integer type
and a proper alias set.
I guess thi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48017
Summary: Network tests should fail gracefully without network
connectivity
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48003
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenthe
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo