http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48404
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-06
06:53:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> My gcc4.5 and gcc4.4 apparently did not have libquadmath-support
Yes, libquadmath is a new GCC 4.6 feature, cf.
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.6/changes.html and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48477
Summary: [4.7 Regression]: gfortran.dg/coarray_13.f90
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601
Dongsheng Song changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dongsheng.song at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48453
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Krügler
2011-04-06 06:34:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I agree, I just recognize that 13.3.1.6 [over.match.ref] p. 1 b. 1 is written
to support this:
"The conversion functions of S and its base classes are consi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48454
--- Comment #2 from Ira Rosen 2011-04-06 06:15:10 UTC
---
Created attachment 23894
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23894
char_result_13.s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
--- Comment #8 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-04-06 05:25:21 UTC ---
In hashmap.hpp
static inline uint32_t
Hashcode( const char* s, uint32_t len, bool case_insensitive)
{
// prepare to run through string in 4-byte chunks
const uint32
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48453
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47919
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Depends on|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48476
Summary: [C++0x] conversion between std::tuple which have
reference member is rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48404
Scot Breitenfeld changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48471
Nathan Froyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48471
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Froyd 2011-04-06
01:06:44 UTC ---
Author: froydnj
Date: Wed Apr 6 01:06:42 2011
New Revision: 172016
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172016
Log:
PR bootstrap/48471
* dbxout.c (debug_nesti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48445
--- Comment #9 from Blanca Mancilla
2011-04-06 00:50:09 UTC ---
Yeap! The problem was the libraries not found and the make install assumming
make run without error. I had a conflict between the ubuntu c++ and 4.7 in some
other program and while t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48473
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48434
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone|--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48464
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47889
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48389
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42687
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48330
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48435
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, ra
Target Milestone|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Component|othe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48445
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48471
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48465
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48475
Summary: gcc.dg/initpri3.c FAILs with -flto -O2 --param
partial-inlining-entry-probability=100
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47919
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-04-05
23:37:52 UTC ---
Nevermind, I switched back to the old tree and found out the second testcase is
a different problem (or at least one that is not fixed by the patch for bug
47994)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48465
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at ucw dot cz
--- Comment #3 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47919
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48471
--- Comment #5 from Steve Ellcey 2011-04-05 23:12:25
UTC ---
Bootstrap finished, everything looked good.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47994
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48474
--- Comment #1 from froydnj at codesourcery dot com 2011-04-05 22:50:53 UTC ---
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 10:42:03PM +, mrs at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> I have a target port, but with the update to 4.6.0 from 4.5.1, it now fails to
> build becaus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48474
Summary: gcc fails to bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48470
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #45 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-04-05
22:19:21 UTC ---
Author: bernds
Date: Tue Apr 5 22:19:17 2011
New Revision: 172006
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172006
Log:
PR bootstrap/48403
* haifa-sched.c (sched
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48472
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48465
--- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-04-05 21:47:55
UTC ---
The problem might be the combination of the fact that _S_compare is static, and
"extern template class basic_string < char >;" declaration.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48444
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48473
Summary: [4.7 Regression]
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/decimal/incdec.cc FAILs with -O
-fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-sra -m32
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48472
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-04-05
21:22:03 UTC ---
No this is not in the global namespace but rather namelookup looks at std::bind
when one of the arguments are in std namespace.
namespace std
{
class A
{};
}
namespace std
{
templa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48471
--- Comment #4 from Steve Ellcey 2011-04-05 21:20:09
UTC ---
The patch looks good. I haven't finished my bootstrap but I am in stage2 and
dbxout.c compiled correctly.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48472
Summary: some flavors of std::bind are included in the global
namespace when you include with
-std=c++0x
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48471
Nathan Froyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48471
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Froyd 2011-04-05
20:45:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 23888
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23888
untested patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48469
--- Comment #5 from Steve Ellcey 2011-04-05 20:43:47
UTC ---
I have submitted it as PR 48471.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48471
--- Comment #1 from Steve Ellcey 2011-04-05 20:44:32
UTC ---
FYI: I could not find a changelog entry for the r171981 change to dbxout.c.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48471
Summary: ia64-*-* does not bootstrap due to unused variables in
dbxout.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
--- Comment #7 from Matt Hargett 2011-04-05 20:39:33 UTC
---
Created attachment 23887
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23887
reduced test case, commandline to compile in bug comments
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
--- Comment #6 from Matt Hargett 2011-04-05 20:38:41 UTC
---
in the 46bug/ dir in the attached tarball:
g++ -O3 -g -I. -c te_field_id.cpp && g++ *.o -o test
induces the crash:
==31412== General Protection Fault
==31412==at 0x400F38: TE_Fie
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48469
Nathan Froyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48469
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
--- Comment #3 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48470
Summary: ICE in expand_expr_addr_expr_1 at expr.c:6835
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48469
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Froyd 2011-04-05
19:33:52 UTC ---
Author: froydnj
Date: Tue Apr 5 19:33:49 2011
New Revision: 171998
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171998
Log:
PR bootstrap/48469
* combine.c (combine_in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48469
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||froydnj at codesourcery dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48469
Summary: [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassig...@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48466
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-05 19:12:53
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Created attachment 23885 [details]
> gcc46-pr48466.patch
>
> This seems to work and doesn't regress PR36977 (which I've added as guality
> testcase too). Whether
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48463
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48466
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-05
18:55:37 UTC ---
Created attachment 23885
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23885
gcc46-pr48466.patch
This seems to work and doesn't regress PR36977 (which I've added as guality
test
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48404
--- Comment #7 from Scot Breitenfeld 2011-04-05
18:46:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Thus: How have you obtained the compiler? Are you sure that the correct
> compiler/library combination is used?
>
One compiler was from Debian packages,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48468
Summary: [C++0x][SFINAE] noexcept operator does handle function
templates well
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48467
Summary: [LTO/driver] Anomalous behavior of -save-temps
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo: unassi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48441
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48441
--- Comment #8 from Steven Bosscher 2011-04-05
18:15:08 UTC ---
Author: steven
Date: Tue Apr 5 18:15:04 2011
New Revision: 171994
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171994
Log:
PR middle-end/48441
* cprop.c (one_cprop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48466
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48466
Summary: [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Wrong variable locations at
-O0 on i686
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48455
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48465
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48465
Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] undefined reference to
std::basic_string::_S_compare(unsigned long, unsigned
long)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48444
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46040
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||carrot at google dot com
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46548
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46548
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Froyd 2011-04-05
16:33:00 UTC ---
I believe this was fixed by the fix for PR 46040.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48328
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Severity|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46548
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48454
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48464
Jan-Benedict Glaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||vax-linux
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48464
Summary: Regression @171649: ICE in setup_pressure_classes, at
ira.c:877
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48444
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-04-05 16:03:32
UTC ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/05/11 09:58, bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48444
>
> Benjamin Kosnik changed:
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48461
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48444
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |---
--- Comment #6 from Benjamin Kosnik
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48462
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48461
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-05 15:54:17 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Apr 5 15:54:13 2011
New Revision: 171990
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171990
Log:
2011-04-05 Tom de Vries
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #44 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-04-05 15:45:20
UTC ---
Just a note for those experiencing a comparison failure with
--disable-checking, I know what's causing it and should have a fix shortly.
That failure is being tracked by PR48444.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46489
--- Comment #7 from Joseph S. Myers 2011-04-05
15:43:46 UTC ---
FWIW, the following files include tm.h and appear not to have any direct uses
of target macros, or uses of the most common headers (such as rtl.h or
cp-tree.h) that depend on tm.h.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48462
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48444
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48462
--- Comment #2 from Joost VandeVondele
2011-04-05 15:40:41 UTC ---
somewhat reduced:
program main
implicit none
integer, parameter :: dp = kind(0.0d0)
real(kind=dp), allocatable :: a(:,:)
real(kind=dp), allocatable :: b(:,:)
allo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48462
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48463
Christian changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48463
Summary: gcov generating bad function coverage
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-profile
AssignedTo: unass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48461
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Summary|[4.7 Regressi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48461
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |vries at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48461
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48462
Summary: matmul Segmentation Fault with Allocatable Array
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48461
Summary: [4.7 Regression function.c:5268:1: error:
emit_use_return_register_into_block defined but not
used
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46500
--- Comment #6 from Joseph S. Myers 2011-04-05
15:17:44 UTC ---
The cumulative_args_t changes should be updated and resubmitted now we are in
4.7 stage 1.
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo