http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48525
Summary: -O0 produces incorrect results for inlined functions
sharing the same name.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48524
Summary: spec language does not cover switches with separated
form
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299
--- Comment #12 from Hans Boehm 2011-04-09 00:22:01
UTC ---
The duplicate definition of LINUX_THREADS looks like an old problem. The
upstream source now says:
#ifndef GC_THREADS
# define GC_THREADS
#endif /* GC_THREADS */
GC_THREADS eventuall
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48506
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48506
--- Comment #8 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-08
23:56:48 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Fri Apr 8 23:56:45 2011
New Revision: 172219
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172219
Log:
PR testsuite/48506
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48488
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48506
--- Comment #7 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-08
23:54:02 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Fri Apr 8 23:53:59 2011
New Revision: 172218
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172218
Log:
PR testsuite/48506
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48506
--- Comment #6 from Mike Stump 2011-04-08
22:41:16 UTC ---
How about something like the below. I't leaves the scan alone (nice property),
ensures there is a memory access and will work on common and no-common ports
equally well.
Ok?
Index: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48506
--- Comment #5 from Mike Stump 2011-04-08
22:35:19 UTC ---
Ah, insight, this is a no-common port I'm working on, so indeed an initializer
would fix it for me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47829
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48522
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48523
Summary: [C++0x] lambda cannot capture 'this' in class template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48516
--- Comment #5 from tommino at online dot de 2011-04-08 22:16:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Even with -flto in compilation/linking problem persisst.
BTW, gcc-toolchain is ARM from yagarto.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48516
--- Comment #4 from tommino at online dot de 2011-04-08 22:12:02 UTC ---
Created attachment 23935
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23935
SRC files
Complete SRC.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48516
--- Comment #3 from tommino at online dot de 2011-04-08 22:08:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 23934
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23934
Compilation batch file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48448
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48448
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig 2011-04-08
21:46:11 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Apr 8 21:46:08 2011
New Revision: 172215
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172215
Log:
2011-04-08 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/48448
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47829
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-08 21:41:39 UTC ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Apr 8 21:41:35 2011
New Revision: 172214
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172214
Log:
2011-04-08 Steven G. Kargl
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48522
Summary: decltype((object)) with templated classes crashes g++
4.5.1.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072
--- Comment #23 from Dr. David Kirkby
2011-04-08 21:31:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> I found an workaround. When I realized that /usr/bin/as was the culprit (from
> looking at IZ98134), I tried using as from other AIX box at TL4, and it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48521
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48521
Summary: [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] [C++0x] std::result_of
doesn't work with pointer to member
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48496
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2011-04-08
21:11:06 UTC ---
Can you try again after:
2011-04-08 Vladimir Makarov
PR 48435
* ira-color.c (setup_profitable_hard_regs): Add comments.
Don't take prohibited hard regs into
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48520
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|driver
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47829
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-08 20:57:48 UTC ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Apr 8 20:57:44 2011
New Revision: 172211
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172211
Log:
2011-04-08 Steven G. Kargl
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48389
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression]|[4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48389
--- Comment #12 from Michael Matz 2011-04-08 20:18:14
UTC ---
Author: matz
Date: Fri Apr 8 20:18:08 2011
New Revision: 172208
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172208
Log:
PR middle-end/48389
* jump.c (rebuild_jump_l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48520
Summary: "make install" for cross-compile silently clobbers
target-gcc
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072
--- Comment #22 from Paul Pryor 2011-04-08 19:56:15
UTC ---
I found an workaround. When I realized that /usr/bin/as was the culprit (from
looking at IZ98134), I tried using as from other AIX box at TL4, and it worked
out just fine. Here is what I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48484
--- Comment #2 from davidxl 2011-04-08 19:33:16
UTC ---
Reproduced.
David
(In reply to comment #0)
> Created attachment 23902 [details]
> auto-reduced testcase
>
> Compiler output:
> $ gcc -O -finline-functions -finline-small-functions -Wunin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48284
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48297
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48519
--- Comment #5 from Herbert 2011-04-08
18:41:35 UTC ---
by the way, I can replace "string test2;" with "vector test2;" as
example, and there is the same bug..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48516
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48510
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
Severity|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48519
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48519
--- Comment #3 from Herbert 2011-04-08
18:35:35 UTC ---
oh, sorry, you already wrote it o.O
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48519
--- Comment #2 from Herbert 2011-04-08
18:34:31 UTC ---
it prints 206000. maybe the bug is already fixed in a newer version!? Which
version have you?
regards
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48519
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-08
18:32:28 UTC ---
It prints 10 for me with gcc 4.4.3, what do you see?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48519
Summary: wrong return-value, with an if () {} after return
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48435
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-04-08 18:22:13
UTC ---
Proper patch:
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Apr 8 17:17:50 2011
New Revision: 172201
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172201
Log:
2011-04-08 Vladimir Makarov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48518
Summary: Inconsistent instantiation behavior depending on
operator overloading
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48435
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov 2011-04-08
17:48:27 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Apr 8 17:48:23 2011
New Revision: 172202
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172202
Log:
Fix PR # 48435 instead of 4435
Modified:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48510
jeremysalwen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |c
Severity|enhan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48509
--- Comment #2 from jeremysalwen at gmail dot com 2011-04-08 17:21:06 UTC ---
I was on an atom CPU, and I can verify that it is vectorized on a non-atom CPU.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4435
--- Comment #8 from Vladimir Makarov 2011-04-08
17:17:56 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Apr 8 17:17:50 2011
New Revision: 172201
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172201
Log:
2011-04-08 Vladimir Makarov
PR 4435
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48366
--- Comment #9 from John David Anglin 2011-04-08
16:21:47 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Fri Apr 8 16:21:39 2011
New Revision: 172197
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172197
Log:
PR target/48366
* config/pa/pa.c (hpp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48511
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-08
16:10:30 UTC ---
See http://www.cs.indiana.edu/~burger/FP-Printing-PLDI96.pdf
For improved method.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #79 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-04-08 16:10:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #78)
> What matters is what is used to build/link test.so, not elfhack itself, and
> from the look at the command line in comment 70, you're building test.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48511
--- Comment #1 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-08
15:57:55 UTC ---
I have looked at this before and we have discussed it on the list. Ok to flag
this as an enhancement. It would be worth investigating one kind (say kind=8)
and run some timing tests
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #78 from Mike Hommey 2011-04-08
15:57:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #75)
> (In reply to comment #74)
> > Interesting. -O3 makes no difference for me. I will look into your dumps
> > if I
> > can spot something useful.
> > ...
> >
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #77 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-04-08 15:51:09 UTC ---
Created attachment 23931
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23931
Output of -Wl,-Map bad
I've attached the output of "-Wl,-Map,map" of both
cases (-Os vs. -O2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #76 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-04-08 15:42:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 23930
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23930
Output of -Wl,-Map good
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45114
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-08
15:30:53 UTC ---
I stopped working on it before it was usable at all, it's just here in case
someone wants to use it as a starting point.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47513
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48508
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2011-04-08
15:17:33 UTC ---
To me all those debugging ICEs seems alike, but bugzilla don't seem to find any
other output_die ICE. I didn't had chance to look deeper into what is wrong,
but unlike most of other case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48481
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48107
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-08
15:16:58 UTC ---
excellent, thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48500
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48107
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48452
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48451
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48449
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48450
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48500
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-08
15:02:37 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Apr 8 15:02:28 2011
New Revision: 172195
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172195
Log:
PR c++/48500
* semantics.c (potential_const
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48468
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-08
15:02:22 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Apr 8 15:02:16 2011
New Revision: 172194
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172194
Log:
PR c++/48468
* except.c (build_noexcept_spe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48452
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-08
15:02:12 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Apr 8 15:02:08 2011
New Revision: 172193
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172193
Log:
PR c++/48452
* typeck.c (build_x_compound_e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48450
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-08
15:01:54 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Apr 8 15:01:50 2011
New Revision: 172191
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172191
Log:
PR c++/48450
* c-family/c-common.c (c_commo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48517
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-08
15:01:34 UTC ---
Reduced testcase:
unsigned is_valid_chgmode_keycode (unsigned short key)
{
static const unsigned short array[] = (const unsigned short []) { 0x0D2B };
const unsigned short *ptr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48517
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48516
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-04-08
14:58:31 UTC ---
Did you compile the .o files with an optimization level? If so you also need
to use that optimization level at link time too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48442
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.0
Known to fail|4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48517
Summary: ICE in build_unary_op, at c-typeck.c:3786
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48272
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-04-08
13:25:35 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Fri Apr 8 13:25:29 2011
New Revision: 172183
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172183
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/48272
* sc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48467
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48467
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-08
13:10:31 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Apr 8 13:10:27 2011
New Revision: 172181
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172181
Log:
2011-04-08 Richard Guenther
PR lto/484
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48389
--- Comment #11 from Michael Matz 2011-04-08 13:05:18
UTC ---
I know what's the problem. Your patch can't work. commit_one_edge_insertion
relies on edge splitting to work, which relies on being able to patch jump
insns, which relies on correctl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48455
--- Comment #5 from Richard Earnshaw 2011-04-08
13:01:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 23928
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23928
second testcase
Compile with -Os -mcpu=arm7tdmi -marm -fno-short-enums
Note, it looks like a com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40986
Markus Schöpflin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus.schoepflin at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48235
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Monakov 2011-04-08
11:58:25 UTC ---
Author: amonakov
Date: Fri Apr 8 11:58:23 2011
New Revision: 172177
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172177
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/48235
* sel-sche
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48302
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Monakov 2011-04-08
11:53:28 UTC ---
Author: amonakov
Date: Fri Apr 8 11:53:25 2011
New Revision: 172176
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172176
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/48302
* sel-sche
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48273
--- Comment #8 from Alexander Monakov 2011-04-08
11:49:47 UTC ---
Author: amonakov
Date: Fri Apr 8 11:49:43 2011
New Revision: 172175
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172175
Log:
PR target/48273
* cfgloop.h (loop_ha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
--- Comment #37 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-08
11:45:31 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Apr 8 11:45:29 2011
New Revision: 172174
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172174
Log:
PR tree-optimization/48377
* tree-vect-dat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48442
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Monakov 2011-04-08
11:44:54 UTC ---
Author: amonakov
Date: Fri Apr 8 11:44:51 2011
New Revision: 172173
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172173
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/48442
* sel-sche
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
--- Comment #36 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-08
11:38:23 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Apr 8 11:38:19 2011
New Revision: 172172
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172172
Log:
PR tree-optimization/48377
* tree-vect-dat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48389
--- Comment #10 from Michael Matz 2011-04-08 11:37:59
UTC ---
I was asking what specifically doesn't work. I.e. why the changes to cfgbuild
were necessary. I'm not so dense to not understand that it doesn't work.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48513
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48513
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-08
11:28:28 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Apr 8 11:28:23 2011
New Revision: 172171
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172171
Log:
2011-04-08 Richard Guenther
PR bootstr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48516
Summary: internal compiler error: in insert_value_copy_on_edge,
at tree-outof-ssa.c:242
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48496
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com
Known
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48513
--- Comment #4 from Stuart Henderson 2011-04-08
11:19:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 23926
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23926
fix.
A fix, FWIW.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48513
Stuart Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shenders at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48513
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-04-08
10:17:44 UTC ---
> Everywhere.
In order to not reproduce the mess of the last week-end, would it be possible
to freeze new commits until this pr is fixed or the revision reverted?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48499
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48508
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-08
10:09:15 UTC ---
I think I've seen this before ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48509
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48510
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
Statu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48513
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-apple-darwin10 |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48376
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo