[Bug libfortran/48602] Invalid F conversion of G descriptor for values close to powers of 10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Henlich 2011-04-16 06:42:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > - if ((m > 0.0 && m < 0.1 - 0.05 * rexp_d) || (rexp_d * (m + 0.5) >= 1.0) ||\ > + if ((m > 0.0 && m < 0.1 - r * rexp_d) || (rexp_d * (m + r) >= 1.0) ||\

[Bug inline-asm/48637] New: %c in ARM inline asm leads to ICE (in arm_print_operand)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48637 Summary: %c in ARM inline asm leads to ICE (in arm_print_operand) Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48630 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug libfortran/48602] Invalid F conversion of G descriptor for values close to powers of 10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-16 04:30:04 UTC --- Here is a patch for testing. Index: io/write_float.def === --- io/write_float.def(revision 172502) +++ io/write_flo

[Bug libstdc++/48631] [C++0x] default_delete accepts pointer conversions in function call operator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48631 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 f

[Bug libstdc++/48631] [C++0x] default_delete accepts pointer conversions in function call operator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48631 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/48631] [C++0x] default_delete accepts pointer conversions in function call operator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48631 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-16 02:05:01 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Sat Apr 16 02:04:56 2011 New Revision: 172535 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172535 Log: 2011-04-15 Daniel Krugler Pao

[Bug libstdc++/48631] [C++0x] default_delete accepts pointer conversions in function call operator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48631 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-16 02:02:35 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Sat Apr 16 02:02:29 2011 New Revision: 172534 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172534 Log: 2011-04-15 Daniel Krugler Pao

[Bug libstdc++/48631] [C++0x] default_delete accepts pointer conversions in function call operator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48631 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/48635] [C++0x] unique_ptr moves the deleter instead of copying it

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48635 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/48635] [C++0x] unique_ptr moves the deleter instead of copying it

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48635 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-16 00:55:59 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Sat Apr 16 00:55:53 2011 New Revision: 172533 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172533 Log: 2011-04-15 Daniel Krugler Pao

[Bug libstdc++/48635] [C++0x] unique_ptr moves the deleter instead of copying it

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48635 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-16 00:55:49 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Sat Apr 16 00:55:43 2011 New Revision: 172532 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172532 Log: 2011-04-15 Daniel Krugler Pao

[Bug target/48495] ICE in in reload_cse_simplify_operands

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48495 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/48635] [C++0x] unique_ptr moves the deleter instead of copying it

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48635 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/48629] ICE on gcc.dg/pr42389.c on ia64-*-* with -fsched-pressure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48629 --- Comment #1 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-04-15 23:32:58 UTC --- Author: bernds Date: Fri Apr 15 23:32:55 2011 New Revision: 172525 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172525 Log: PR target/48629 * haifa-sched.c (prune_rea

[Bug lto/48492] [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failure in copy_constant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48492 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2011-04-15 22:52:08 UTC --- The scenario is as follows: 1. during LTO stage, copy-prop eliminates a DECL_IN_CONSTANT_POOL variable from the GIMPLE IR, except for a reference in a GIMPLE_DEBUG statement (ADDR_EX

[Bug c/48623] gcc 4.6.0 generates no code for a function with __attribute__((always_inline))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48623 --- Comment #11 from Richard Weinberger 2011-04-15 22:27:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > You have to make use of 'p' of course. Your return value still is based > on &ti. Damn, you're right! Now gcc produces a functional UML kernel. :-)

[Bug rtl-optimization/44194] struct returned by value generates useless stores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194 --- Comment #15 from Easwaran Raman 2011-04-15 22:22:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, eraman at google dot com wrote: > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194 > > > > Easwaran Raman changed: > > > >

[Bug c/48623] gcc 4.6.0 generates no code for a function with __attribute__((always_inline))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48623 Michael Matz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libstdc++/48635] [C++0x] unique_ptr moves the deleter instead of copying it

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48635 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler 2011-04-15 21:44:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) The exactly same problem exists for the specialization std::unique_ptr.

[Bug fortran/18918] Eventually support Fortran 2008's coarrays [co-arrays]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18918 --- Comment #36 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-15 21:41:28 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Apr 15 21:41:25 2011 New Revision: 172522 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172522 Log: 2011-04-15 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/1

[Bug rtl-optimization/48633] IRA causes ICE in compensate_edge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48633 --- Comment #1 from Michael Matz 2011-04-15 21:17:22 UTC --- During reducing the testcase I had this hunk applied for ira-build.c: Index: ira-build.c === --- ira-build.c (Revision 1

[Bug fortran/48624] gfortran DECL issues in function declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48624 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-15 21:16:20 UTC --- The reason for the issue can be found in trans-decl.c: gfc_get_extern_function_decl (gfc_symbol * sym) [...] /* Do not use procedures that have a procedure argument because this

[Bug fortran/48636] New: Enable more inlining with -O2 and higher

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636 Summary: Enable more inlining with -O2 and higher Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 C

[Bug libstdc++/48635] New: [C++0x] unique_ptr moves the deleter instead of copying it

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48635 Summary: [C++0x] unique_ptr moves the deleter instead of copying it Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug libfortran/48602] Invalid F conversion of G descriptor for values close to powers of 10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602 --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-15 20:57:31 UTC --- Ha, OK thanks. I see it.

[Bug target/48634] New: Missed optimization for use of __builtin_ctzll() and __builtin_clzll

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48634 Summary: Missed optimization for use of __builtin_ctzll() and __builtin_clzll Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/48462] [4.6/4.7 Regression] realloc on assignment: matmul Segmentation Fault with Allocatable Array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48462 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas 2011-04-15 20:40:58 UTC --- Created attachment 24008 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24008 A fix for the PR This fixes the PR and bootstraps/regtests on FC9/x86_64. I will continue to look for

[Bug libfortran/48602] Invalid F conversion of G descriptor for values close to powers of 10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Henlich 2011-04-15 20:41:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > OK I knew I was "looking" at it wrong. The formulas you mention we are using > and are in write_float.def starting at line 798. The table is there as well.

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 --- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-15 20:30:44 UTC --- Super! If you have not already figured it out. We are really short on help.

[Bug c/48623] gcc 4.6.0 generates no code for a function with __attribute__((always_inline))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48623 --- Comment #9 from Richard Weinberger 2011-04-15 20:26:48 UTC --- Created attachment 24007 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24007 preprocessed softirq.c

[Bug c/48623] gcc 4.6.0 generates no code for a function with __attribute__((always_inline))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48623 --- Comment #8 from Richard Weinberger 2011-04-15 20:26:03 UTC --- Created attachment 24006 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24006 preprocessed __local_bh_enable function

[Bug c/47939] Missing DW_TAG_typedef for qualified types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47939 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libfortran/48602] Invalid F conversion of G descriptor for values close to powers of 10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-15 20:13:12 UTC --- OK I knew I was "looking" at it wrong. The formulas you mention we are using and are in write_float.def starting at line 798. The table is there as well. I have been exploring the code

[Bug rtl-optimization/48633] New: IRA causes ICE in compensate_edge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48633 Summary: IRA causes ICE in compensate_edge Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization AssignedTo: unass

[Bug c/48623] gcc 4.6.0 generates no code for a function with __attribute__((always_inline))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48623 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/48616] -ftree-vectorize -mxop miscompiles right shift

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616 --- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-15 20:08:19 UTC --- See PR48317 for one reason why vector stuff isn't optimized too well.

[Bug rtl-optimization/48628] ICE in reload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48628 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm-eabi --- Comment #2 from Richard G

[Bug c++/48632] Internal compiler error when using OpenMP with template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48632 --- Comment #1 from Phelippe Neveu 2011-04-15 20:06:07 UTC --- Created attachment 24005 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24005 Preprocessed source file.

[Bug c++/48632] New: Internal compiler error when using OpenMP with template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48632 Summary: Internal compiler error when using OpenMP with template Product: gcc Version: 4.5.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libfortran/48602] Invalid F conversion of G descriptor for values close to powers of 10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Henlich 2011-04-15 19:58:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > I am missing something here: > > "print "(RU,G15.2)", .991d0 > prints 1.00 but the expected result is 1.0 because 1 - r * 10**-2 < .991 with > r > = 1 bec

[Bug libstdc++/48631] New: [C++0x] default_delete accepts pointer conversions in function call operator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48631 Summary: [C++0x] default_delete accepts pointer conversions in function call operator Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 --- Comment #13 from Andreas Kloeckner 2011-04-15 19:46:45 UTC --- Just requested the assignment forms. I'll let you know when we've returned them.

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48630 Summary: Poor g++ suggestion: did you forget the ‘&’ Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig.

[Bug libfortran/48602] Invalid F conversion of G descriptor for values close to powers of 10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602 --- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-15 19:31:06 UTC --- I am missing something here: "print "(RU,G15.2)", .991d0 prints 1.00 but the expected result is 1.0 because 1 - r * 10**-2 < .991 with r = 1 because of UP rounding mode" We are askin

[Bug rtl-optimization/44194] struct returned by value generates useless stores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194 --- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-04-15 19:31:36 UTC --- On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, eraman at google dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194 > > Easwaran Raman changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug rtl-optimization/44194] struct returned by value generates useless stores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194 Easwaran Raman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eraman at google dot com --- Comment #13

[Bug tree-optimization/48616] -ftree-vectorize -mxop miscompiles right shift

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-15 19:08:50 UTC --- Created attachment 24003 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24003 gcc46-pr48616.patch This untested patch seems to work for me, though the generated code is in some c

[Bug middle-end/48585] [4.7 Regression] 483.xalancbmk in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48585 --- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor 2011-04-15 18:34:30 UTC --- Well, I guess I should have verified this but it seems that &__comp_dtor is not actually one of the constants propagated by IPA-CP. So we'll have to figure out where it actually comes

[Bug middle-end/48600] [4.6 regression] ICE when using cold attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48600 --- Comment #3 from Matt Hargett 2011-04-15 18:30:23 UTC --- I added the attachment; are you still waiting on something from me? Let me know :)

[Bug middle-end/48601] [4.7 Regression] ICE in lower_emutls_function_body, at tree-emutls.c:623

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48601 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/48601] [4.7 Regression] ICE in lower_emutls_function_body, at tree-emutls.c:623

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48601 --- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor 2011-04-15 18:20:51 UTC --- Author: jamborm Date: Fri Apr 15 18:20:46 2011 New Revision: 172512 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172512 Log: 2011-04-15 Martin Jambor PR middle-end/48

[Bug target/48629] New: ICE on gcc.dg/pr42389.c on ia64-*-* with -fsched-pressure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48629 Summary: ICE on gcc.dg/pr42389.c on ia64-*-* with -fsched-pressure Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug middle-end/48585] [4.7 Regression] 483.xalancbmk in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48585 --- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor 2011-04-15 17:48:01 UTC --- Unfortunately it seems that cgraph_create_virtual_clone already does that... so either this information is not actually used to create the node in the LTRANS stage or it gets lost alon

[Bug rtl-optimization/48628] ICE in reload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48628 --- Comment #1 from belagod at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-15 17:40:38 UTC --- Created attachment 24002 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24002 test case with complex expressions

[Bug c/48623] gcc 4.6.0 generates no code for a function with __attribute__((always_inline))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48623 --- Comment #6 from Richard Weinberger 2011-04-15 17:38:55 UTC --- Created attachment 24001 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24001 objdump of __local_bh_enable

[Bug rtl-optimization/48628] New: ICE in reload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48628 Summary: ICE in reload Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug c/48623] gcc 4.6.0 generates no code for a function with __attribute__((always_inline))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48623 Richard Weinberger changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVAL

[Bug c/48623] gcc 4.6.0 generates no code for a function with __attribute__((always_inline))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48623 --- Comment #4 from Richard Weinberger 2011-04-15 17:34:33 UTC --- Created attachment 24000 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24000 objdump of __local_bh_enable

[Bug ada/48621] Can't install gcc because Ada doctool installation process uses wrong gcc, thus producing incompatible ALI file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48621 --- Comment #4 from Georg Bauhaus 2011-04-15 16:55:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > > I have started again using a absolute path to configure, as you have > > suggested. > > Thanks, let's see whether this changes something. Findings so f

[Bug libobjc/48627] New: libobjc_gc should be tested

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48627 Summary: libobjc_gc should be tested Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libobjc AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.o

[Bug libobjc/32037] --enable-objc-gc on OS X won't build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32037 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED URL|

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 --- Comment #12 from Steve Kargl 2011-04-15 16:59:41 UTC --- On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 04:41:06PM +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Steve, I can clean this up but i am not clear on copyright assignment. Any > issues on this? The patch

[Bug tree-optimization/48616] -ftree-vectorize -mxop miscompiles right shift

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-15 16:49:36 UTC --- extern void abort (void); int a[4] __attribute__((aligned (32))); int b[4] __attribute__((aligned (32))); int c[4] __attribute__((aligned (32))); int d[4] __attribute__((aligned (32)))

[Bug libobjc/48626] New: --enable-objc-gc should be automatic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48626 Summary: --enable-objc-gc should be automatic Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libobjc AssignedTo: unassig...@

[Bug libfortran/48589] Invalid G0/G0.d editing for NaN/infinity

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48589 --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-15 16:42:13 UTC --- Fixed on trunk. Shall we backport to 4.6.1?

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 --- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-15 16:40:58 UTC --- Steve, I can clean this up but i am not clear on copyright assignment. Any issues on this?

[Bug libfortran/48589] Invalid G0/G0.d editing for NaN/infinity

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48589 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-15 16:33:14 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Fri Apr 15 16:33:07 2011 New Revision: 172503 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172503 Log: 2011-04-15 Jerry DeLisle PR libgfortran

[Bug libfortran/48589] Invalid G0/G0.d editing for NaN/infinity

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48589 --- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-15 16:29:50 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Fri Apr 15 16:29:44 2011 New Revision: 172502 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172502 Log: 2011-04-15 Jerry DeLisle PR libgfortran

[Bug target/40171] GCC does not pass -mtune and -march options to assembler!

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40171 Dzianis Kahanovich changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #22444|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/48625] New: Segfault in libitm when compiling with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48625 Summary: Segfault in libitm when compiling with -O2 Product: gcc Version: trans-mem Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: trans-mem Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/48624] New: gfrtran DECL issues in function declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48624 Summary: gfrtran DECL issues in function declaration Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: f

[Bug fortran/18918] Eventually support Fortran 2008's coarrays [co-arrays]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18918 --- Comment #35 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-15 16:13:35 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Apr 15 16:13:28 2011 New Revision: 172499 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172499 Log: 2011-04-15 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/1

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 --- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl 2011-04-15 16:02:17 UTC --- On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 03:29:36PM +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > I have looked over the patch. I need to do some tests and I have about three > bugs in front of this

[Bug ada/48621] Can't install gcc because Ada doctool installation process uses wrong gcc, thus producing incompatible ALI file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48621 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2011-04-15 16:02:34 UTC --- > I did first run > > $ make boostrap > > which I should have stated less implicitly, sorry. Just run "make", this is how it is tested nowadays. > I have started again using a abso

[Bug tree-optimization/48616] -ftree-vectorize -mxop miscompiles right shift

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-15 16:00:43 UTC --- Created attachment 23997 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23997 pr48616.ii.bz2 Preprocessed, for -O2 -ftree-vectorize -mxop -m64. The bug is during the second vect

[Bug middle-end/48601] [4.7 Regression] ICE in lower_emutls_function_body, at tree-emutls.c:623

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48601 --- Comment #6 from gee 2011-04-15 15:40:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Created attachment 23996 [details] > Proposed fix > > I don't have (easy) access to a platform exhibiting this bug but this > patch should rather obviously fix it. It

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/48622] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline-analysis.c:425 with -flto -finline-small-functions -fno-early-inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48622 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 --- Comment #8 from Andreas Kloeckner 2011-04-15 14:53:52 UTC --- Ping?

[Bug libstdc++/48476] [C++0x] conversion between std::tuple which have reference member is rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48476 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/48476] [C++0x] conversion between std::tuple which have reference member is rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48476 --- Comment #11 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-15 14:53:02 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Apr 15 14:52:57 2011 New Revision: 172498 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172498 Log: 2011-04-15 Takaya Saito PR libs

[Bug c/48623] gcc 4.6.0 generates no code for a function with __attribute__((always_inline))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48623 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-15 14:52:04 UTC --- Instead using static inline struct thread_info *current_thread_info(void) { struct thread_info *ti; void *p; asm volatile ("" : "=r" (p) : "0" (&ti)); ti = (struct thread_i

[Bug c/48623] gcc 4.6.0 generates no code for a function with __attribute__((always_inline))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48623 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/48601] [4.7 Regression] ICE in lower_emutls_function_body, at tree-emutls.c:623

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48601 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug c/48623] New: gcc 4.6.0 generates no code for a function with __attribute__((always_inline))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48623 Summary: gcc 4.6.0 generates no code for a function with __attribute__((always_inline)) Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P

[Bug ada/48621] Can't install gcc because Ada doctool installation process uses wrong gcc, thus producing incompatible ALI file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48621 --- Comment #2 from Georg Bauhaus 2011-04-15 14:16:38 UTC --- I did first run $ make boostrap which I should have stated less implicitly, sorry. And then, as the report says, $ make check # with -k, actually. ACATS results were good and only

[Bug c/48623] gcc 4.6.0 generates no code for a function with __attribute__((always_inline))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48623 --- Comment #1 from Richard Weinberger 2011-04-15 14:16:22 UTC --- Created attachment 23995 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23995 Testcase for gcc 4.6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/48290] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr38529.c, ICE in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1072

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48290 --- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-15 14:02:50 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Apr 15 14:02:41 2011 New Revision: 172494 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172494 Log: 2011-04-15 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug fortran/48286] gfortran.dg/cray_pointers_8.f90 FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48286 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-15 14:06:51 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Apr 15 14:06:44 2011 New Revision: 172495 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172495 Log: 2011-04-15 Richard Guenther PR testsui

[Bug tree-optimization/48290] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr38529.c, ICE in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1072

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48290 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/48286] gfortran.dg/cray_pointers_8.f90 FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48286 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/48616] -ftree-vectorize -mxop miscompiles right shift

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-15 13:39:08 UTC --- I should mention it is the only vpsrad insn in the testcase. In *.cunroll we have: [pr48616.C : 113:76] D.52396_86 = MEM[(const AliasingEntryType * {ref-all})&shifts]; ... [pr486

[Bug tree-optimization/48622] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE: in estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline-analysis.c:425 with -flto -finline-small-functions -fno-early-inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48622 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: in estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline-analysis.c:425 with -flto -finline-small-functions -fno-early-inlining Product: gcc Version: 4.7.

[Bug ada/48621] Can't install gcc because Ada doctool installation process uses wrong gcc, thus producing incompatible ALI file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48621 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/48616] -ftree-vectorize -mxop miscompiles right shift

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-15 13:07:56 UTC --- The shift corresponding to a = Vec(16); a >>= shifts; is actually there, but a wrong one, V4SImode = V4SImode >> SImode rather than V4SImode = V4SImode >> V4SImode which needs

[Bug middle-end/48601] [4.7 Regression] ICE in lower_emutls_function_body, at tree-emutls.c:623

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48601 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/48584] [4.7 Regression] AVX testcase failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48584 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/48620] many libstdc++ tests FAIL with -m32 -fno-early-inlining -fipa-pta

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48620 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/48621] New: Can't install gcc because Ada doctool installation process uses wrong gcc, thus producing incompatible ALI file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48621 Summary: Can't install gcc because Ada doctool installation process uses wrong gcc, thus producing incompatible ALI file Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONF

  1   2   >