http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48553
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48553
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-23
00:09:28 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Sat Apr 23 00:09:23 2011
New Revision: 172883
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172883
Log:
PR go/48553
libgo: Bring over patch to l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48596
Kazumoto Kojima changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48733
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-22 22:31:20
UTC ---
It is BFD linker bug:
http://www.sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12696
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
--- Comment #32 from Andreas Tobler 2011-04-22
22:15:28 UTC ---
The last build was successful with commenting BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT and adding
PREFERRED_STACK_BOUNDARY 32.
I'll continue later.
Thanks Andreas!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
--- Comment #31 from Andreas Schwab 2011-04-22 21:40:00
UTC ---
Also BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT is bigger than (PREFERRED_)STACK_BOUNDARY.
: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: daniel.krueg...@googlemail.com
CC: ja...@redhat.com
gcc 4.7.0 20110422 (experimental) in C++0x mode rejects the following code:
//-
template
T&& create();
++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: daniel.krueg...@googlemail.com
CC: ja...@redhat.com
The following code causes an internal compiler error with gcc 4.7.0 20110422
(experimental) in C++0x mode at the line marked with X:
//-
template
T&& create();
ormal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: daniel.krueg...@googlemail.com
CC: ja...@redhat.com
gcc 4.7.0 20110422 (experimental) in C++0x mode rejects the following code:
//-
template
char
with-libelf=/usr/local --enable-lto
--prefix=/home/regehr/z/compiler-install/gcc-r172870-install
--program-prefix=r172870- --enable-languages=c,c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20110422 (experimental) (GCC)
[regehr@gamow tmp013]$ cat small.c
int
safe_21 (int si)
{
return si == -214748364
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
--- Comment #30 from Andreas Schwab 2011-04-22 20:38:45
UTC ---
The real problem appears to be that netbsd-elf redefines STACK_BOUNDARY to 32,
but leaves PREFERRED_STACK_BOUNDARY at the default 16.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
--- Comment #29 from Andreas Tobler 2011-04-22
20:38:28 UTC ---
Unfortunately the issue is not solved yet. I was informed that 68010 needs
STRICT_ALIGNMENT. So I have to think about how to solve this.
Afaik, netbsd has 68010 machines (Sun?).
Lea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
--- Comment #28 from diggskevin38 at gmail dot com 2011-04-22 20:31:41 UTC ---
If there are any bug'etiquette steps I am supposed to perform, please tell me
(i.e. I have to close/resolve it since I opened it).
kevin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
--- Comment #27 from diggskevin38 at gmail dot com 2011-04-22 20:29:55 UTC ---
Thanks!!!
This worked. I never thought to try a Linux build. Live and learn.
I guess it is a good thing I'm not a gamblin' man.
kevin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48733
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Many LTO failures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48142
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2011-04-22
19:49:10 UTC ---
> This test fails again after the fix for PR target/48723 [1,2].
Sure, stack checking is totally broken:
Running /home/eric/svn/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/dg.exp ...
FAIL: gnat.dg/sta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-22
19:20:38 UTC ---
Seems that was introduced by:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg00279.html
but we don't have GIMPLE_MODIFY_STMT any longer and MODIFY_EXPR does have a
type, so I guess we ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48717
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48732
Summary: Nested loops with small iteration count gobble time in
"tree reassociation"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48731
Summary: regression: __attribute__((flatten)) produces error
with function calling variadic functions
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48723
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48723
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48717
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-22
18:53:32 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Apr 22 18:53:30 2011
New Revision: 172869
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172869
Log:
PR tree-optimization/48717
* tree-ssa-forwp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48142
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48717
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-22
18:52:51 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Apr 22 18:52:48 2011
New Revision: 172868
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172868
Log:
PR tree-optimization/48717
* tree-ssa-forwp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32998
--- Comment #13 from Jan Kratochvil
2011-04-22 18:49:06 UTC ---
CU specific -O flag indication is needed for proper prologue skipping:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12573
[rfc, 7.3?] -O2 -g breakpoints internal error + prolog
--disable-lto
--disable-libgomp
--with-build-time-tools=/Volumes/development/tools/nbsdcross/install
--with-headers=/Volumes/development/tools/nbsdcross/sys/usr/include
--with-libs=/Volumes/development/tools/nbsdcross/sys/usr/lib
Thread model: single
gcc version 4.7.0 20110422 (experimental) [trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48723
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-22 18:44:00 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Apr 22 18:43:57 2011
New Revision: 172867
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172867
Log:
PR target/48723
* config/i386/i386.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48723
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-22 18:40:26 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Apr 22 18:40:23 2011
New Revision: 172866
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172866
Log:
PR target/48723
* config/i386/i386.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48503
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48503
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-22
18:23:50 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Apr 22 18:23:47 2011
New Revision: 172864
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172864
Log:
PR go/48503
libgo: Bring over http/cgi e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
Andreas Tobler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
--- Comment #24 from diggskevin38 at gmail dot com 2011-04-22 17:21:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> Ok. The breaking revision is 121736.
>
> If you add this to m68k/netbsd-elf.h it compiles.
>
> #undef STRICT_ALIGNMENT
> #define STRICT_ALI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
--- Comment #23 from Andreas Tobler 2011-04-22
16:56:53 UTC ---
Ok. The breaking revision is 121736.
If you add this to m68k/netbsd-elf.h it compiles.
#undef STRICT_ALIGNMENT
#define STRICT_ALIGNMENT 0
I had to disable libgomp too since this n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-04-22 16:53:53 UTC ---
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> And it has void_type_node like its argument, which is void_type_node
> COND_EXPR.
> The second argument of the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48726
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48726
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2011-04-22
16:26:19 UTC ---
Maybe it isn't? Because I just rebuilt 4_6-branch (Rev. 172860) and still ICEs
for me. Mainline is fine, however.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48728
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48728
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-22
16:16:26 UTC ---
See Table 100 in the FDIS, X(il) is equivalent to X(il.begin(), il.end()) and
those functions return a const T*, which cannot be moved, so I think the
library is correct and this bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48729
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48730
Summary: static function scope not honored by -fms-extensions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22572
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig 2011-04-22
15:57:01 UTC ---
We should generate
function optmatmul (a, b, c, m, n, count)
implicit none
integer, intent(in) :: m, n, count
double precision :: optmatmul(m, n)
double precision, intent(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48726
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-22
15:56:48 UTC ---
if this is PR 48281 then it's fixed in 4.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48729
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48720
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl
2011-04-22 15:16:02 UTC ---
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 08:00:33AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:47:03PM +, jvdelisle at frontier dot com wrote:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48728
Summary: cannot construct a vector of unique_ptr from an
initializer list
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48727
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/opt/devirt2.C scan-assembler-times xyzzy
2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #88 from Jan Hubicka 2011-04-22
15:03:16 UTC ---
As a quick status update, mozilla now builds and works with TOT GCC tree again,
after fixes to debug info streaming and clone materialization. -g still fails
at PR48724
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48720
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl
2011-04-22 15:00:50 UTC ---
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:47:03PM +, jvdelisle at frontier dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48720
>
> --- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at frontier dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48726
Summary: ICE with initializer_list of unique_ptr in gcc-4.6.0
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48690
--- Comment #22 from Andreas Tobler 2011-04-22
14:16:13 UTC ---
I need some time to bisect. I'll let you know asap which version is the
breaking one.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48718
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48716
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-22
14:11:46 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Apr 22 14:11:44 2011
New Revision: 172860
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172860
Log:
PR c/48716
* gimplify.c (gimplify_bind_expr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48716
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-22
14:10:48 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Apr 22 14:10:45 2011
New Revision: 172859
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172859
Log:
PR c/48716
* gimplify.c (gimplify_bind_expr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48725
--- Comment #2 from Vadim Markovtsev 2011-04-22
13:12:17 UTC ---
> Can you, please, fill in binutils bug?
Done. The link to it is http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12695
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48585
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48725
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka 2011-04-22 12:56:21 UTC
---
> /.../x86_64-gcc-4.6.0/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.0/../../../../x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ld.gold:
> internal error in symtab_section, at ../../gold/layout.h:684
> collect2
> /.../x86_64-gcc-4.6.0/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.0/../../../../x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ld.gold:
> internal error in symtab_section, at ../../gold/layout.h:684
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[1]: *** [../../../../bin/7z.so] Error 1
This is ICE in gold. Might be becase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #87 from Jan Hubicka 2011-04-22
12:52:17 UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg01854.html has updated bulild
time/memory stats. With Michaels WPA patch, we now need about 5GB of address
space on 64bit build, so we might
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48585
--- Comment #15 from Martin Jambor 2011-04-22
12:52:32 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri Apr 22 12:52:30 2011
New Revision: 172858
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172858
Log:
2011-04-22 Martin Jambor
PR middle-end/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48720
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at frontier dot com 2011-04-22 12:46:16 UTC ---
On 04/21/2011 09:08 PM, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
--- snip ---
>>
>> I think we are not handling the 'q' as any more than an exponent marker. 'e'
>> works just as w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48585
--- Comment #14 from Martin Jambor 2011-04-22
12:36:28 UTC ---
OK, I have submitted a patch using the analyzed flag to the mailing list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg01855.html
I will commit it momentarily.
Thanks,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48405
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36750
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36750
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov 2011-04-22
11:53:05 UTC ---
Author: amonakov
Date: Fri Apr 22 11:53:01 2011
New Revision: 172857
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172857
Log:
PR c/36750
* c-typeck.c (pop_init_le
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-22
11:42:59 UTC ---
The NON_LVALUE_EXPR in question is created by the C FE, in build_c_cast:
4712 /* Don't let a cast be an lvalue. */
4713 if (value == expr)
4714value = non_lvalue_loc (loc, value
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48723
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48723
--- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak 2011-04-22 11:28:30
UTC ---
Patch in testing:
Index: i386.c
===
--- i386.c(revision 172856)
+++ i386.c(working copy)
@@ -10628,6 +10628,7 @@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48725
Summary: 4.6.0 fails to link p7zip 9.20.1 with LTO and gold
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo: u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48717
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48723
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48723
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86-64-pc-linux-gnu
Status|UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48717
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48508
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48724
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2011-04-22
09:24:59 UTC ---
Hmm,
grep didn't seem to find any interesting positives on this. However I did not
update my mozilla tree since last build that did not reproduce this and nothing
seems to have changed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48714
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48724
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-22
09:16:34 UTC ---
Does it set MAKE? I suppose we need to split (and preserve?) arguments :/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48724
Summary: Lto build of mozilla dies at lto-wrapper: error trying
to exec 'make -j1': execvp: No such file or directory
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48723
Summary: ICE in ix86_expand_prologue() with -fstack-check +
function returning struct, on corei7-avx
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48585
--- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka 2011-04-22 08:45:38
UTC ---
> Index: gcc/tree-inline.c
> ===
> --- gcc/tree-inline.c (revision 172817)
> +++ gcc/tree-inline.c (working copy)
> @
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eric.weddington at atmel
81 matches
Mail list logo
