[Bug c++/48759] New: Inconsistency in code generation for inline virtual functions depending on position of the inline keyword

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48759 Summary: Inconsistency in code generation for inline virtual functions depending on position of the inline keyword Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/48758] gcc miscompiles Emacs by incorrectly substituting memcpy for memmove

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48758 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libfortran/48615] Invalid UP/DOWN rounding with E and ES descriptors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615 --- Comment #12 from Thomas Henlich thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net 2011-04-25 08:43:32 UTC --- The patch submitted to the list is different to the one I based my comments on. My mistake. Good work. With the current method of letting

[Bug libfortran/48684] Incorrect field alignment with Gw.dEe descriptor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48684 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Henlich thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net 2011-04-25 08:46:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) On 04/23/2011 02:27 PM, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: --- snip --- Unpatched gfortran and ifort give: I

[Bug lto/48725] 4.6.0 fails to link p7zip 9.20.1 with LTO and gold

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48725 --- Comment #3 from Vadim Markovtsev gmarkhor at gmail dot com 2011-04-25 09:47:25 UTC --- BTW, gold fails to link if used in a similar way in LLVM LTO, so it is likely not a GCC bug.

[Bug libstdc++/48760] New: std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760 Summary: std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug middle-end/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression (?)] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsm28 at

[Bug middle-end/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression (?)] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-04-25 12:41:59 UTC --- PR24581 can be related, its additional, unexpected, nans. A C snippet showing the issue would be: int main() { float r = 0; float i =

[Bug middle-end/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression (?)] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-04-25 13:21:58 UTC --- By the way, just in case isn't super-clear to people coming from C, there is nothing C++1x specific here (26.4.4/1 and /2 are identical to 26.2.4 in the

[Bug lto/48725] 4.6.0 fails to link p7zip 9.20.1 with LTO and gold

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48725 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug middle-end/48761] New: Indirect inlining needs to perform type checking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48761 Summary: Indirect inlining needs to perform type checking Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug middle-end/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression (?)] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-04-25 16:02:11 UTC --- On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote: A C snippet showing the issue would be: int main() { float r = 0;

[Bug lto/48725] 4.6.0 fails to link p7zip 9.20.1 with LTO and gold

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48725 --- Comment #5 from Vadim Markovtsev gmarkhor at gmail dot com 2011-04-25 16:06:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) Does it work with BFD linker in CVS? I will check that out tomorrow.

[Bug libstdc++/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression (?)] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |libstdc++

[Bug libstdc++/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression (?)] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/48762] New: valgrind: Invalid read/write of size 8 in cse_main with -O --param max-cse-path-length=0 on basic code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48762 Summary: valgrind: Invalid read/write of size 8 in cse_main with -O --param max-cse-path-length=0 on basic code Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libfortran/25830] [libgfortran] Optionally support multi-process locking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25830 --- Comment #4 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-25 16:41:26 UTC --- Some writings arguing that POSIX locking is more or less fundamentally broken: http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/locking.html

[Bug libstdc++/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression (?)] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug lto/48763] New: Inliner type ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48763 Summary: Inliner type ICE Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug lto/48763] Inliner type ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48763 --- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-25 17:04:55 UTC --- OK, the problem is that we check only return types for compatibility: 244 /* Redirect all incoming edges. */ 245 compatible_p 246 =

[Bug c++/48707] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [c++0x] ICE initializing static const int

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48707 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug libstdc++/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression (?)] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760 --- Comment #7 from John Maddock john at johnmaddock dot co.uk 2011-04-25 17:21:15 UTC --- Sorry to be dumb, but doesn't the result of the C code violate section G.5.2 in C99 - which is to say that no matter what the value of the imaginary part

[Bug libstdc++/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression (?)] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760 Gabriel Dos Reis gdr at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gdr at gcc dot

[Bug libstdc++/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression (?)] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at

[Bug testsuite/48753] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/val-prof-2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48753 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/48720] quad precision literals do not work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48720 --- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-25 18:44:48 UTC --- See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg01986.html for a patch.

[Bug tree-optimization/48764] New: wrong-code bug in gcc-4.5.x, related to __restrict

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48764 Summary: wrong-code bug in gcc-4.5.x, related to __restrict Product: gcc Version: 4.5.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug debug/48670] explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48670 --- Comment #4 from Matt Hargett matt at use dot net 2011-04-25 18:55:36 UTC --- ping? Anything else you need from me on this?

[Bug middle-end/48722] ICE in df_refs_verify() with -mno-push-args

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48722 --- Comment #1 from Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-25 20:47:52 UTC --- Created attachment 24095 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24095 reduced testcase Similar failure on powerpc64-linux when building cpu2006

[Bug tree-optimization/48765] New: ICE in vect_transform_stmt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48765 Summary: ICE in vect_transform_stmt Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo:

[Bug libstdc++/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression (?)] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760 Gabriel Dos Reis gdr at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at redhat

[Bug c++/48707] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [c++0x] ICE initializing static const int

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48707 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-25 21:51:36 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Apr 25 21:51:33 2011 New Revision: 172941 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172941 Log: PR c++/48707 *

[Bug c++/48707] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [c++0x] ICE initializing static const int

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48707 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-25 21:54:04 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Apr 25 21:53:57 2011 New Revision: 172942 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=172942 Log: PR c++/48707 * pt.c

[Bug c++/48707] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [c++0x] ICE initializing static const int

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48707 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression (?)] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760 --- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-04-25 22:04:56 UTC --- Thanks Gaby, your analysis certainly helps. Let's see what Jason, thinks, then.

[Bug middle-end/48663] [4.7 regression] final.c:dump_basic_block_info breaks several Tru64 UNIX tests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48663 Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/48766] New: Infinite recursion in fold_binary_loc()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48766 Summary: Infinite recursion in fold_binary_loc() Product: gcc Version: 4.4.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug c/48767] New: compiler error: Segmentation fault with set void in va_arg

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48767 Summary: compiler error: Segmentation fault with set void in va_arg Product: gcc Version: 4.4.6 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752 --- Comment #7 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-26 01:57:57 UTC --- ICE occurs at i==2. Breakpoint 1, evaulate_conditions_for_edge (e=0x78730cf0, inline_p=1 '\001') at ../../gcc/gcc/ipa-inline-analysis.c:481 481

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at

[Bug tree-optimization/48768] New: ICE in get_expr_operands()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48768 Summary: ICE in get_expr_operands() Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: