http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48723
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48734
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44828
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43781
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48757
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i686-pc-linux-gnu
Status|UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48757
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48768
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48757
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.4.7
Summary|internal compiler
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-26
08:44:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> I guess, in the 4.6.1 time frame we can only workaround the issue in C++03
> mode
> by doing the piecewise work in the body. I can maybe help for the co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48588
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-26
08:41:38 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Apr 26 08:41:31 2011
New Revision: 172953
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172953
Log:
2011-04-26 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48588
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48683
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43781
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-26
08:47:22 UTC ---
I'd say made latent.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48585
--- Comment #17 from Martin Jambor 2011-04-26
08:48:25 UTC ---
*** Bug 48683 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48768
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48714
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48694
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-26
09:20:14 UTC ---
*** Bug 48714 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48694
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-26
09:21:47 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Apr 26 09:21:44 2011
New Revision: 172954
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172954
Log:
2011-04-26 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48112
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-26
09:18:31 UTC ---
Seems as if the regression has been introduced in by one of the 16 commits
between:
Working: 2010-05-13-r159362
Failing: 2010-05-18-r159523
Janus, I have the feeling that it is ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48694
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48767
Kazumoto Kojima changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|sh4-linux-gnu |sh*-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48742
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48749
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |4.7.0
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48742
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.4.4
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48757
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48753
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-26
10:03:14 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Apr 26 10:03:12 2011
New Revision: 172955
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172955
Log:
2011-04-26 Richard Guenther
PR testsui
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48753
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48761
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48740
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-26
10:04:22 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Apr 26 10:04:18 2011
New Revision: 172956
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172956
Log:
2011-04-26 Jakub Jelinek
Backported from m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760
--- Comment #13 from Paolo Carlini 2011-04-26
10:03:41 UTC ---
Thanks. Thus, since the original issue boils down to a C++ front-end issue
only, I guess we have to wait for Jason' opinion whether we can avoid adding a
builtin and go the way propos
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48763
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48763
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-26
10:08:55 UTC ---
*** Bug 48761 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48761
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48694
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-26
10:12:18 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Apr 26 10:12:14 2011
New Revision: 172957
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172957
Log:
2011-04-26 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48248
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-26
10:14:37 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Apr 26 10:14:34 2011
New Revision: 172959
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172959
Log:
2011-04-26 Richard Guenther
PR prepro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48112
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-26
10:18:23 UTC ---
Rev. 159475 works, Rev. 159476 fails, which is the following commit:
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159476
Log:
2010-05-17 Janus Weil
PR fortran/44044
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48770
Summary: [4.7 Regression] wrong code with -O -fprofile-arcs
-fPIC -fno-dce -fno-forward-propagate
-fno-tree-forwprop
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48740
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48764
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48742
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48764
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-26
11:17:59 UTC ---
The following fixes it (partially, global vars need similar treatment) at the
cost of extra decls and points-to bits.
We have to give what we point to a name, not only rely in the n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48742
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48766
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42210
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-04-26
11:35:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 24102
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24102
extended testcase
Added testcase with some more variations of "setting bits in I/O" theme.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48768
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-26
11:35:01 UTC ---
Ugh. Well, ok I suppose.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48769
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48732
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-26
12:13:50 UTC ---
With -O1 we do not perform expensive control-dependend DCE and thus do not
end up removing the empty loops. We do however remove the dead store in
the innermost loop which then cau
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48734
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-26
12:15:13 UTC ---
Looks good to me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48770
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48763
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2011-04-26
12:56:30 UTC ---
I would say that PR48761 testcase is not 100% dup of this one. One tests that
cgraph merging check type compatibility of direct call edges, the second tests
that ipa-prop does type comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48731
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-26
12:59:33 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Apr 26 12:59:22 2011
New Revision: 172963
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172963
Log:
2011-04-26 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48731
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-26
13:00:58 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Apr 26 13:00:53 2011
New Revision: 172964
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172964
Log:
2011-04-26 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka 2011-04-26 13:06:08 UTC
---
> Looks like the issue is somehow caused by caller being a global
> constructor.
Hmm, yes, it is entirely possible - when new functions are added, we need to
analyze them.
I tought it i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48763
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-26
13:05:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I would say that PR48761 testcase is not 100% dup of this one. One tests that
> cgraph merging check type compatibility of direct call edges, the second
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48731
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48753
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48763
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2011-04-26 13:20:24 UTC
---
> We should defer detection of incompatibilities to when we see the call stmt,
> thus expand_call_inline. We shouldn't worry about this disturbing inliner
Undoing the inliner decisions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48766
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iant at google dot com
--- Comment #2 from H.J.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48753
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-26
13:31:21 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Apr 26 13:31:17 2011
New Revision: 172966
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172966
Log:
PR testsuite/48753
* gcc.dg/tree-prof/val-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48768
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-26
13:35:24 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Apr 26 13:35:21 2011
New Revision: 172968
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172968
Log:
PR debug/48768
* tree-ssa.c (insert_debug_t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48279
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-26
13:36:50 UTC ---
Works with: 2010-09-28-r164677
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48734
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-26
13:33:55 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Apr 26 13:33:49 2011
New Revision: 172967
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172967
Log:
PR tree-optimization/48734
* tree-ssa-reass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48753
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48734
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-26
13:44:54 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Apr 26 13:44:51 2011
New Revision: 172969
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172969
Log:
PR tree-optimization/48734
* tree-ssa-reass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48768
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48734
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48771
Summary: [C++0x] is_literal_type incorrect for references to
non-literal types
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48112
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-26
13:50:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> The crucial part of the patch is:
> + /* Avoid double resolution of function result symbols. */
> + if ((sym->result || sym->attr.result) && (sym->ns != g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48768
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-26
13:47:17 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Apr 26 13:47:13 2011
New Revision: 172970
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172970
Log:
PR debug/48768
* tree-ssa.c (insert_debug_t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #54 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-26
14:07:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #53)
> reduced testcase for 4.7
Does not fail here - can you still reproduce it? (It might have been fixed by
the patch for PR 48588. If it still occurs, I will
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48771
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760
--- Comment #14 from Gabriel Dos Reis 2011-04-26
14:12:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > I guess, in the 4.6.1 time frame we can only workaround the issue in C++03
> > mode
> > by doing the piecewise work in the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760
--- Comment #15 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-04-26 14:30:50 UTC ---
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, john at johnmaddock dot co.uk wrote:
> Sorry to be dumb, but doesn't the result of the C code violate section G.5.2
> in
> C99 - which is to say
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48771
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48772
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in
walk_non_aliased_vuses (gimple.h:1100) with -O
-fnon-call-exceptions -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-dce
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48742
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-04-26 14:50:47 UTC ---
There shouldn't be nested C_MAYBE_CONST_EXPR. The code you quote
> if (!in_late_binary_op)
> {
> if (!op0_maybe_const
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760
--- Comment #16 from Paolo Carlini 2011-04-26
14:54:12 UTC ---
Thanks Joseph for the explanation and the references. Now maybe I'm digressing
in terms of the C++ issue we are facing, but I'm wondering: at some point, even
for C99, shouldn't we su
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48770
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-04-26 14:57:08
UTC ---
(gdb) disassemble
...
0x00400d06 <+18>:addq $0x1,(%rax)
0x00400d0a <+22>:mov$0x8,%eax
0x00400d0f <+27>:test %edi,%edi
0x0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48773
Summary: Dataflow and REG_DEAD notes
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unassig...@g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760
--- Comment #17 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-04-26 15:03:49 UTC ---
As far as I can see, the main (only?) use of imaginary types is for this
issue of constructing complex values. In addition, you need to define for
each target the A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48772
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
Jiangning Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jiangning.liu at arm dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48742
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-26
15:16:05 UTC ---
Created attachment 24104
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24104
gcc46-pr48742.patch
So do you mean something like this? Haven't bootstrapped/regtested it yet...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2011-04-26
15:19:12 UTC ---
Seth, Tom, if you get a chance to test the changes I propose in Comment 7
(suitably, trivially tweaked for 4.4.x), please let me know as soon as
possible.
If Johannes cannot provide f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48742
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-04-26 15:24:13 UTC ---
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Created attachment 24104
> --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24104
> gcc46-pr48742.patch
>
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48774
Summary: gcc-4.6.0 optimization regression on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48754
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth 2011-04-26 16:25:49 UTC
---
Created attachment 24105
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24105
-fdump-tree-optimized for mips-sgi-irix6.5, N32 ABI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48754
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc*-*-*|powerpc*-*-*, mips*-*-*
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48663
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48775
Summary: gcc.dg/pr48616.c FAILs on Tru64 UNIX
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48279
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-26
17:06:03 UTC ---
Works: 2010-10-15-r165507 (a5b23678e24cec2da289a54ae62f98f7b1301c36)
Fails: 2010-10-23-r165882 (2dfbcd30bb4e761a9c5144a0656b8dfc6336ed37)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48604
Edmar Wienskoski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||edmar at freescale dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48438
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-04-26 17:36:51 UTC ---
> - large_real_kind_2.F90
> Fails for CTEST_POWER(0.0, 5.4), which is:
> abs(0.0**5.4 - 0.0**5.4)/(0.0**5.4) > eps
>
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48258
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner 2011-04-26
17:48:34 UTC ---
Author: meissner
Date: Tue Apr 26 17:48:29 2011
New Revision: 172981
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172981
Log:
PR target/48258, improve vector reduction on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48279
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-26
17:54:11 UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165749
-with-ppl --with-cloog-include=/usr/include/cloog-ppl/
--disable-ppl-version-check
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20110426 (experimental) (GCC)
$ gcc gcc.c-torture/execute/20010910-1.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-ftree-loop-distribution
$ valgrind -q ./a.out
(no output)
(however, there see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka 2011-04-26
17:59:49 UTC ---
Hi,
the testcase doesn't seem to work for me. I get
In file included from
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/cctype:43:0,
from
/test/gnu/g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750
--- Comment #10 from Tom 2011-04-26 18:09:05
UTC ---
Hi Paulo,
Yes, this certainly fixes my segfault.
Valgrind complains a little - although I am not sure if this is important (I
am very new to the helgrind tool). In case it is useful, I attac
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752
--- Comment #11 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-04-26 18:11:43 UTC ---
> Any clue what is wrong?
> After dinner I will try to look into the add_new_function path and figure out
> why summaries are not computed as they should.
These are th
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
