[Bug middle-end/48849] [4.7 Regression] 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48849 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug target/48723] ICE on function returning structure with -fstack-check on corei7-avx

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48723 --- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 07:20:06 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Tue May 3 07:20:01 2011 New Revision: 173288 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173288 Log: PR target/48723

[Bug target/48723] ICE on function returning structure with -fstack-check on corei7-avx

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48723 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/48723] ICE on function returning structure with -fstack-check on corei7-avx

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48723 --- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 07:20:35 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Tue May 3 07:20:30 2011 New Revision: 173289 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173289 Log: PR target/48723

[Bug c/48850] New: Bogus overflow in constant expression warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48850 Summary: Bogus overflow in constant expression warning Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic, rejects-valid Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/48848] [C++0x] std::valarrayT functions missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48848 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 09:03:22 UTC --- Good point. I think the requirement for constant complexity should have been removed by LWG 675. Pending clarification from the committee I think I would

[Bug tree-optimization/48846] Many -O2 -flto testsuite failures with -m32 -mavx

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48846 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/48848] [C++0x] std::valarrayT functions missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48848 --- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-03 09:27:24 UTC --- Agreed, thanks for the feedback, let's implement it like this, for now.

[Bug libstdc++/48848] [C++0x] std::valarrayT functions missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48848 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 09:55:45 UTC --- It would be possible to make it constant complexity, by delaying destruction+deallocation of the old elements of *this until its destructor runs (at which

[Bug libstdc++/48848] [C++0x] std::valarrayT functions missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48848 --- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-03 10:11:48 UTC --- I think I see what you mean, but actually, I'm not sure that this kind of sophistication would be consistent with the rationale of LWG 675: if I

[Bug libstdc++/48848] [C++0x] std::valarrayT functions missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48848 --- Comment #13 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-03 10:25:12 UTC --- I'm wondering if, waiting for some possible feedback from the Committee, we shouldn't instead simply swap the data members and disregard LWG 675 for

[Bug tree-optimization/48846] Many -O2 -flto testsuite failures with -m32 -mavx

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48846 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 10:21:48 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue May 3 10:21:44 2011 New Revision: 173299 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173299 Log: 2011-05-03 Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/48846] Many -O2 -flto testsuite failures with -m32 -mavx

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48846 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 10:18:32 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue May 3 10:18:29 2011 New Revision: 173298 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173298 Log: 2011-05-03 Richard

[Bug c/48850] Bogus overflow in constant expression warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48850 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-05-03 10:45:43 UTC --- Remarks: * This is clearly a bug; the diagnostics given are simply wrong. * It's not a conformance bug, as C99 permits a limit on

[Bug libstdc++/48848] [C++0x] std::valarrayT functions missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48848 --- Comment #14 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-03 10:44:41 UTC --- I'm also thinking that in terms of complexity, in this entire discussion we are just shuffling work around in time. In LWG 675 it is established that

[Bug target/48808] ICE in spill_failure, at reload1.c:2113

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48808 Ian Bolton ibolton at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug libstdc++/48848] [C++0x] std::valarrayT functions missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48848 --- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 11:18:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) I think I see what you mean, but actually, I'm not sure that this kind of sophistication would be consistent with the rationale

[Bug driver/48832] -O2 does not imply -fomit-frame-pointer, contrary to --help=optimizers -v -Q

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48832 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 11:15:30 UTC --- On the 4.5 branch this is expected. On trunk I get as well ./xgcc -B. -S t.c -m32 -O2 cat t.s .file t.c .text .p2align 4,,15

[Bug gcov-profile/48845] [4.7 regression] All g++.dg/tree-prof and gcc.dg/{matrix, tree-prof} executions tests fail on Solaris 8/9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48845 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug middle-end/48849] [4.7 Regression] 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48849 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto

[Bug rtl-optimization/48696] Horrible bitfield code generation on x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48696 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libfortran/48787] Invalid UP/DOWN rounding with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48787 Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Invalid UP rounding with F |Invalid

[Bug libstdc++/48848] [C++0x] std::valarrayT functions missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48848 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|SUSPENDED

[Bug tree-optimization/48625] [trans-mem] Segfault in libitm when compiling with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48625 --- Comment #3 from Patrick Marlier patrick.marlier at gmail dot com 2011-05-03 12:06:13 UTC --- The problem is that _ITM_beginTransaction shouldn't have caller save optimization because if the transaction aborts, registers will get random

[Bug lto/48851] New: lto-plugin.c:224:7: error: missing sentinel in function call [-Werror=format]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48851 Summary: lto-plugin.c:224:7: error: missing sentinel in function call [-Werror=format] Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug libfortran/48852] New: Invalid spaces in list-directed output of complex constants

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852 Summary: Invalid spaces in list-directed output of complex constants Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/48792] ICE in failed_reload, at reload1.c:6000

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48792 Ian Bolton ibolton at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug rtl-optimization/42522] (zero_extract:SI (mem:QI) ...) misoptimized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42522 ami_stuff ami_stuff at o2 dot pl changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|| --- Comment #15 from

[Bug target/48774] [4.6/4.7 Regression] gcc-4.6.0 optimization regression on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48774 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 13:01:17 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue May 3 13:01:12 2011 New Revision: 173301 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173301 Log: PR target/48774 *

[Bug target/48774] [4.6/4.7 Regression] gcc-4.6.0 optimization regression on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48774 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/48774] [4.6/4.7 Regression] gcc-4.6.0 optimization regression on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48774 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 13:06:14 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue May 3 13:06:06 2011 New Revision: 173302 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173302 Log: PR target/48774 *

[Bug debug/48853] New: [4.7 Regression] Wrong DWARF codegen when Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Wrong DWARF codegen when Pmode != ptr_mode Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug lto/48851] lto-plugin.c:224:7: error: missing sentinel in function call [-Werror=format]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48851 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug debug/48853] [4.7 Regression] Wrong DWARF codegen when Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 13:53:46 UTC --- x32 is not a supported target. Do you have something that is reproduceable on supported targets? ia64-hpux is the only one I think...

[Bug debug/48853] [4.7 Regression] Wrong DWARF codegen when Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sje at cup dot hp.com

[Bug lto/48851] lto-plugin.c:224:7: error: missing sentinel in function call [-Werror=format]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48851 --- Comment #2 from Michael Richmond michael.a.richmond at nasa dot gov 2011-05-03 14:01:53 UTC --- I believe it is a compiled compiler. Here are the two instructions that immediately precede the error messages: /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC

[Bug libstdc++/48848] [C++0x] std::valarrayT functions missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48848 --- Comment #17 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-03 14:13:37 UTC --- I'm under the impression that later today we can resolve this: Howard and Daniel agree on the reflector that we want something similar to the clear() +

[Bug libstdc++/48750] for_each_template_random_access_ed has unbalanced new/delete[]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 --- Comment #18 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 14:20:49 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue May 3 14:20:45 2011 New Revision: 173309 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173309 Log: 2011-05-03

[Bug lto/48851] lto-plugin.c:224:7: error: missing sentinel in function call [-Werror=format]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48851 Nathan Froyd froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||froydnj at gcc

[Bug c++/48854] New: signal mask is not restored when exiting signal handler via exception

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48854 Summary: signal mask is not restored when exiting signal handler via exception Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Priority: P3

[Bug debug/48853] [4.7 Regression] Wrong DWARF codegen when Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853 --- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-05-03 15:02:26 UTC --- Yes, I am seeing some new failures on IA64 HP-UX. I do not get the stackalign failures but I do get: FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/static-local-var-in-ctor.C

[Bug c++/48854] signal mask is not restored when exiting signal handler via exception

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48854 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug debug/48853] [4.7 Regression] Wrong DWARF codegen when Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c/48796] gcc: Internal error: Killed (program cc1) while compiling PHP

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48796 --- Comment #2 from William Johnston wgj at cast dot uark.edu 2011-05-03 15:37:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) You appearantly ran out of memory and the kernel decided to kill cc1. This is likely not a GCC bug. How much memory do you

[Bug c++/28501] ICE with __real__ and implicit type conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28501 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|mark at codesourcery dot|jason at

[Bug c/48796] gcc: Internal error: Killed (program cc1) while compiling PHP

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48796 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 15:46:42 UTC --- That's not a lot of memory. You could use gzip to compress the file before attaching it.

[Bug libstdc++/48750] for_each_template_random_access_ed has unbalanced new/delete[]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 --- Comment #19 from Seth Heeren bugs at sehe dot nl 2011-05-03 15:47:28 UTC --- Cheers!

[Bug lto/48851] lto-plugin.c:224:7: error: missing sentinel in function call [-Werror=format]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48851 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 16:02:21 UTC --- NULL seems to be just 0, ok for C++ maybe but broken for C. Thus this seems to be a OpenBSD header issue.

[Bug debug/48853] [4.7 Regression] Wrong DWARF codegen when Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 16:04:42 UTC --- Created attachment 24170 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24170 gcc47-pr48853.patch This patch should fix var2.c on ia64-hpux - the patch

[Bug lto/48851] lto-plugin.c:224:7: error: missing sentinel in function call [-Werror=format]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48851 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug bootstrap/48855] New: [4.7 Regression] LTO profiledbootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48855 Summary: [4.7 Regression] LTO profiledbootstrap failure Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap

[Bug lto/48851] lto-plugin.c:224:7: error: missing sentinel in function call [-Werror=format]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48851 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2011-05-03 16:20:35 UTC --- 0 is a valid null pointer constant in C. If you want to use NULL as a sentinel you must always cast it.

[Bug c/48742] [4.5 Regression] Internal error in gimplify_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48742 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 16:34:37 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue May 3 16:34:32 2011 New Revision: 173326 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173326 Log: Backport from mainline

[Bug c++/48856] New: Crash when compiling certain source code with C++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48856 Summary: Crash when compiling certain source code with C++0x Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/48856] Crash when compiling certain source code with C++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48856 --- Comment #1 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org 2011-05-03 16:31:38 UTC --- Created attachment 24171 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24171 Preprocessed sources showing the error (gzipped)

[Bug target/48857] New: V2DI arguments are not passed like other vectors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48857 Summary: V2DI arguments are not passed like other vectors Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo:

[Bug middle-end/48597] x86-64 unwind register save location misses half-register write?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48597 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 16:36:02 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue May 3 16:35:56 2011 New Revision: 173327 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173327 Log: Backport from mainline

[Bug testsuite/48809] [4.4/4.5 Regression] switch statement optimization error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48809 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 16:37:19 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue May 3 16:37:12 2011 New Revision: 173328 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173328 Log: Backport from mainline

[Bug tree-optimization/48846] Many -O2 -flto testsuite failures with -m32 -mavx

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48846 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/48774] [4.6/4.7 Regression] gcc-4.6.0 optimization regression on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48774 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 16:38:34 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue May 3 16:38:25 2011 New Revision: 173329 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173329 Log: PR target/48774 *

[Bug c++/48856] Crash when compiling certain source code with C++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48856 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 16:54:08 UTC --- It would also be helpful to reduce the testcase: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/minimize.html

[Bug driver/48832] -O2 does not imply -fomit-frame-pointer, contrary to --help=optimizers -v -Q

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48832 marcus at jet dot franken.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug c/48685] [4.5 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7034

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 16:33:15 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue May 3 16:33:09 2011 New Revision: 173324 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173324 Log: Backport from mainline

[Bug c++/48856] Crash when compiling certain source code with C++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48856 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|normal ---

[Bug c/48685] [4.5 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7034

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug testsuite/48809] [4.4 Regression] switch statement optimization error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48809 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.4/4.5 Regression] switch |[4.4 Regression]

[Bug c++/48856] Crash when compiling certain source code with C++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48856 --- Comment #4 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org 2011-05-03 17:20:13 UTC --- Sorry, I forgot the information. Version: 4.6.0 System: Linux 2.6.38, 32-bit Command-line: g++ -std=c++0x qxmlschema.ii GCC was configured with: ./configure

[Bug c/48742] [4.5 Regression] Internal error in gimplify_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48742 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug lto/45375] [meta-bug] Issues with building Mozilla with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375 --- Comment #91 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 17:34:56 UTC --- Hi, with the patch I just posted for removal of hash tables for cgraph/varpool node set, the situation with hashing is better. We got from 900s WPA stage to

[Bug c++/48856] Crash when compiling certain source code with C++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48856 --- Comment #5 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org 2011-05-03 17:21:09 UTC --- To be exact on the version: gcc version 4.6.0 20110422 (prerelease) (GCC)

[Bug c++/48856] Crash when compiling certain source code with C++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48856 --- Comment #6 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org 2011-05-03 17:42:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) It would also be helpful to reduce the testcase: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/minimize.html Thanks for the suggestion. I can't promise I

[Bug c++/28501] ICE with __real__ and implicit type conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28501 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 17:32:43 UTC --- That patch looks fine to me.

[Bug libstdc++/48750] for_each_template_random_access_ed has unbalanced new/delete[]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/48750] for_each_template_random_access_ed has unbalanced new/delete[]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 --- Comment #20 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 17:54:41 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue May 3 17:54:35 2011 New Revision: 173335 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173335 Log: 2011-05-03

[Bug c++/28501] ICE with __real__ and implicit type conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28501 --- Comment #9 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 18:30:41 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue May 3 18:30:37 2011 New Revision: 173337 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173337 Log: /cp 2011-05-03

[Bug c++/28501] ICE with __real__ and implicit type conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28501 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/48808] ICE in spill_failure, at reload1.c:2113

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48808 --- Comment #2 from Ryan Mansfield rmansfield at qnx dot com 2011-05-03 19:20:35 UTC --- The change that introduced the ICE is rev 172201. http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=172201

[Bug c++/48838] [4.6/4.7 Regression] valid template code does not compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48838 Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/48536] C++0x Automatic Enumerator Incrementation is not compliant with Clause 7.2/5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48536 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot

[Bug c++/48856] Crash when compiling certain source code with C++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48856 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug c++/48838] [4.6/4.7 Regression] valid template code does not compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48838 --- Comment #4 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org 2011-05-03 20:15:50 UTC --- A candidate patch was posted to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg00219.html

[Bug bootstrap/48855] [4.7 Regression] LTO profiledbootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48855 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/48536] C++0x Automatic Enumerator Incrementation is not compliant with Clause 7.2/5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48536 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/48211] [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] Segment Fault When Compiling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48211 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c++/47723] internal compiler: Segmentation fault - gcc 4.5.2 Arch Linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47723 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/47723] internal compiler: Segmentation fault - gcc 4.5.2 Arch Linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47723 --- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 21:18:14 UTC --- Actually, I think it's unclear. 318 had to do with elaborated type specifiers, for which we explicitly say that the lookup is done ignoring any non-type

[Bug fortran/18918] Eventually support Fortran 2008's coarrays [co-arrays]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18918 --- Comment #41 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 21:35:48 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Tue May 3 21:35:44 2011 New Revision: 173341 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173341 Log: 2011-05-03 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/18918] Eventually support Fortran 2008's coarrays [co-arrays]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18918 --- Comment #42 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 21:44:30 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Tue May 3 21:44:27 2011 New Revision: 173342 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173342 Log: 2011-05-03 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/48858] Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic interface specifics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858 --- Comment #1 from Bill Long longb at cray dot com 2011-05-03 21:51:29 UTC --- As an aside, the code in the Description is a work-around to avoid using the TR 29113 feature that allows Optional arguments. This would be the preferred code in the

[Bug fortran/48858] New: Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic interface specifics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858 Summary: Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic interface specifics Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/18918] Eventually support Fortran 2008's coarrays [co-arrays]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18918 --- Comment #43 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 21:56:47 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Tue May 3 21:56:45 2011 New Revision: 173343 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173343 Log: 2011-05-03 Tobias Burnus

[Bug libstdc++/48848] [C++0x] std::valarrayT functions missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48848 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |NEW ---

[Bug debug/48853] [4.7 Regression] Wrong DWARF codegen when Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853 --- Comment #6 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-05-03 22:15:38 UTC --- The patch works for me on ia64-hp-hpux11.23. It fixed the four new failures I had and caused no regressions.

[Bug libstdc++/48848] [C++0x] std::valarrayT functions missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48848 --- Comment #19 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 22:25:28 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue May 3 22:25:24 2011 New Revision: 173344 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173344 Log: 2011-05-03

[Bug libstdc++/48848] [C++0x] std::valarrayT functions missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48848 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/39055] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] ICE with questionable default parameter of a member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39055 --- Comment #13 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-03 22:52:57 UTC --- Jason, sorry for bothering, did we eventually get feedback from the committee about this issue?

[Bug c++/38634] ICE with wrong number of template parameters

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38634 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at

[Bug c++/38634] ICE with wrong number of template parameters

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38634 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 23:39:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) No, that's a regression in diagnostic quality.

[Bug c++/48859] New: Regression: incorrect uninitialized const member error on new without new-initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48859 Summary: Regression: incorrect uninitialized const member error on new without new-initializer Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/48859] Regression: incorrect uninitialized const member error on new without new-initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48859 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-04 00:03:08 UTC --- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29043 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25811

  1   2   >