[Bug tree-optimization/48837] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.6 Regression] Wrong optimization of recursive function calls

2011-05-07 Thread rakdver at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48837 --- Comment #9 from Zdenek Dvorak 2011-05-07 19:43:21 UTC --- Author: rakdver Date: Sat May 7 19:43:18 2011 New Revision: 173534 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173534 Log: PR tree-optimization/48837 * tree-tailcal

[Bug fortran/48889] f951: internal compiler error: in gfc_is_constant_expr, at fortran/expr.c:906

2011-05-07 Thread david.ham at imperial dot ac.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48889 --- Comment #2 from David Ham 2011-05-07 18:37:22 UTC --- Created attachment 24205 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24205 Small test exhibiting the problem. I am one of the fluidity development team. This is a very cut down

[Bug bootstrap/48679] [4.7 regression] bootstrap comparison failures on m68k-linux

2011-05-07 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48679 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-05-07 16:25:34 UTC --- It's calls.c that gets miscompiled. If stage2 cc1 is relinked with calls.o from stage1 then it generates the same code for alloca.c as stage1 does. If stage1 cc1 is relinked with

[Bug fortran/48926] New: gfortran.dg/coarray/image_index_1.f90 -fcoarray=single -O2 (test for excess errors)

2011-05-07 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
/testsuite/gfortran/../../ -B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1000/darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple-darwin10.7.0/i386/libgfortran/ /sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1000/gcc-4.7-20110507/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray/image_index_1.f90 -fcoarray=single -O2 -B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1000

[Bug fortran/48926] gfortran.dg/coarray/image_index_1.f90 -fcoarray=single -O2 (test for excess errors)

2011-05-07 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48926 --- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2011-05-07 16:05:56 UTC --- Also possibly related are the failures... FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_10.f90 -O (test for excess errors) Excess errors: /sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1000/gcc-4.7-20110507/gcc

[Bug middle-end/48905] [4.7 Regression] STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow (or erroneous memory access) compiling namet.adb

2011-05-07 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48905 --- Comment #3 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-05-07 14:46:56 UTC --- On Sat, 07 May 2011, danglin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Introduced in revision 173428. Testing "cris-elf" fix. The attached patch fixes this PR. It was derived from

[Bug target/48529] [x32] Testsuite failures

2011-05-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48529 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-05-07 13:18:05 UTC --- Also FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr48661.C -O1 execution test FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr48661.C -O2 execution test FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr48661.C -O2 -flto execution test FAIL: g++.dg/torture/p

[Bug other/33426] Support of #pragma ivdep

2011-05-07 Thread gjunk at sapience dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33426 --- Comment #11 from gene 2011-05-07 12:15:22 UTC --- Any update on this ?

[Bug libfortran/48925] New: Code cleanup in write_float.def

2011-05-07 Thread thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48925 Summary: Code cleanup in write_float.def Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: libfortran AssignedTo: unassig.