[Bug c++/49092] [4.7 Regression] ice in tree_add_const_value_attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49092 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-22 04:41:02 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun May 22 04:40:55 2011 New Revision: 174024 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174024 Log: PR c++/49092 * dwarf2out.c (tree_add_const_

[Bug tree-optimization/48988] [4.7 regression] ICE at pred_chain_length_cmp at tree-ssa-uninit.c:1624

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48988 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2011-05-22 07:09:01 UTC --- > Please verify. Works for me, thanks!

[Bug tree-optimization/49087] crash in vect_is_slp_reduction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49087 Ira Rosen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

Re: Possibly a bug

> hello.c: In function ‘main’: > hello.c:13:1: internal compiler error: in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:394 > Please submit a full bug report, > with preprocessed source if appropriate. > See for instructions. This error means that some basic blocks are unreachable

[Bug tree-optimization/49087] crash in vect_is_slp_reduction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49087 --- Comment #2 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-22 08:04:46 UTC --- Author: irar Date: Sun May 22 08:04:43 2011 New Revision: 174026 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174026 Log: PR tree-optimization/49087

[Bug ada/49084] [4.7 regression] bootstrap failure with Ada enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i686-pc-mingw32 Status|UNCONF

[Bug tree-optimization/49087] crash in vect_is_slp_reduction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49087 Ira Rosen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/49103] [4.6/4.7 Regression] local variables exchange values / wrong code with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/49106] New: static variable is optimized away even though it is referenced by a nested constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49106 Summary: static variable is optimized away even though it is referenced by a nested constructor Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug libstdc++/49107] New: [C++0x] incomplete type regression with std::pair

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49107 Summary: [C++0x] incomplete type regression with std::pair Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assigned

[Bug fortran/49103] [4.6/4.7 Regression] local variables exchange values / wrong code with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-05-22 11:07:19 UTC --- > I would say look if -fno-whole-file works (or -fno-inline) or alternatively > watch out for not properly merged DECLs. ISTR some issues with module > globals. None of these

[Bug bootstrap/49104] bootstrap failure on AMD K6-2 with illegal instruction (cmove) in stage2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49104 --- Comment #1 from Reinhard Foerster 2011-05-22 11:09:24 UTC --- Created attachment 24324 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24324 preprocessed lex.c

[Bug bootstrap/49104] bootstrap failure on AMD K6-2 with illegal instruction (cmove) in stage2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49104 --- Comment #2 from Reinhard Foerster 2011-05-22 11:18:42 UTC --- init_vectorized_lexer() is in libcpp/lex.c which is compiled in stage2 by: /home/rf11/src/build1/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/home/rf11/src/build1/./prev-gcc/ -B/usr/pkg/gcc-4.6/i586-pc-lin

[Bug middle-end/49106] static variable is optimized away even though it is referenced by a nested constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49106 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/49108] New: Support constructors tied to a variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49108 Summary: Support constructors tied to a variable Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug libstdc++/49107] [C++0x] incomplete type regression with std::pair

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49107 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/49107] [C++0x] incomplete type regression with std::pair

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49107 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot

[Bug tree-optimization/34265] Missed optimizations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34265 --- Comment #34 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-05-22 12:06:20 UTC --- Created attachment 24325 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24325 reduced tests The attached bzipped tar contains the files induct_red.f90 with the all the in

[Bug libstdc++/49107] [C++0x] incomplete type regression with std::pair

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49107 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse 2011-05-22 12:12:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > I think since std::pair started using noexcept and therefore is_constructible > & > co. Frankly doesn't look to me like a library-proper issue, I'm adding Dan

[Bug tree-optimization/49006] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Missed vectorization due to revision 167531

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-05-22 12:22:48 UTC --- > (In reply to comment #4) > > The problem is you don't see: > > induct_v4.f90:1766: note: LOOP VECTORIZED. > > induct_v4.f90:2177: note: LOOP VECTORIZED. > anymore, right? > >

[Bug c++/49107] [C++0x] incomplete type regression with std::pair

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49107 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Component|libstdc++ |c++ --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 20

[Bug c++/49107] [C++0x] incomplete type regression with std::pair

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49107 --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse 2011-05-22 13:03:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Thanks Marc. Well, now I would say it's a C++ front-end issue. Ok. > Consider the below: uncomment the seemingly unrelated VectorH3 constructor > from > con

Re: C++ template bugs in gcc 4.6

re http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2011-05/msg01899.html The gcc-bugs mailing list is for mails automatically generated by bugzilla, if you want to report a bug please do so in bugzilla, not by email. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ for instructions. If you want to ask for help using g++ then use the

Re: C++ template bugs in gcc 4.6

On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 02:29:08PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > re http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2011-05/msg01899.html > > The gcc-bugs mailing list is for mails automatically generated by > bugzilla, if you want to report a bug please do so in bugzilla, not by > email. See http://gcc.gnu.org/

Re: C++ template bugs in gcc 4.6

On 22 May 2011 15:16, Ruben Safir wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 02:29:08PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> re http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2011-05/msg01899.html >> >> The gcc-bugs mailing list is for mails automatically generated by >> bugzilla, if you want to report a bug please do so in bu

[Bug fortran/48858] Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic interface specifics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-22 14:17:45 UTC --- The OPTIONAL problem is solved by allowing OPTIONAL with -std=gnu (default) and -std=f2008tr. Regarding the original problem: I think I have convince myself that having two procedures

[Bug target/48743] -march=native mis-detects AMD K6-2+ / K6-3 as Athlon - compiled C fails with "illegal instruction"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48743 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-05-22 14:23:21 UTC --- Created attachment 24326 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24326 untested fix The previous patch doesn't look quite right to me. The fundamental problem IMO is

[Bug bootstrap/49104] bootstrap failure on AMD K6-2 with illegal instruction (cmove) in stage2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49104 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #3

[Bug middle-end/12966] x86 array comparison optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12966 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2005-12-24 19:46:22 |2011-05-22 16:37:22 --- Comment #4 from

[Bug tree-optimization/9814] gcc fails to optimise if (l&2) l|=2 away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9814 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/14792] ((int)b & 1) != 0 is not folded to b & 1 != 0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14792 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2009-04-22 23:16:25 |2011-05-22 16:50:25 Known to fail|

Re: C++ template bugs in gcc 4.6

On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 03:24:11PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 22 May 2011 15:16, Ruben Safir wrote: > > On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 02:29:08PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > >> re http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2011-05/msg01899.html > >> > >> The gcc-bugs mailing list is for mails automatical

[Bug rtl-optimization/11488] Pre-regalloc scheduling severely worsens performance

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11488 --- Comment #10 from Steven Bosscher 2011-05-22 15:02:03 UTC --- Someone should try with -fsched-pressure...

[Bug web/49109] New: bugzilla's patch viewer sometimes hides file headers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49109 Summary: bugzilla's patch viewer sometimes hides file headers Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: web AssignedTo:

[Bug tree-optimization/15419] memcpy pessimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15419 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2009-04-22 23:01:37 |2011-05-22 17:12:37 --- Comment #3 from

[Bug java/15687] need types_compatible_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15687 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/49110] New: Deferred-length character result triggers (false positive) error for pure procedures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49110 Summary: Deferred-length character result triggers (false positive) error for pure procedures Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug tree-optimization/16856] Missed optimisation opportunity with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16856 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/16541] code quality issue for bit manipulations with 64bit

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16541 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/18437] vectorizer failed for matrix multiplication

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18437 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2005-12-21 03:40:32 |2011-05-22 17:36:32 --- Comment #4 from

[Bug fortran/49111] New: Unnecessary warning for private interfaces having the BIND(C) attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49111 Summary: Unnecessary warning for private interfaces having the BIND(C) attribute Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/18767] No vectorization for simple loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18767 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com --- Comment #3 f

[Bug tree-optimization/18438] vectorizer failed for vector matrix multiplication

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18438 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2006-09-19 07:10:15 |2011-05-22 17:40:15 --- Comment #6 from

[Bug rtl-optimization/17731] sub-optimal code generated for left shift

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17731 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Last reconfirmed|2006-01-16

[Bug tree-optimization/18439] vectorizer failed for vector normalization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18439 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2005-12-21 03:49:30 |2011-05-22 17:43:30 CC|

[Bug fortran/49112] New: Missing type-bound procedure, "duplicate save" warnings and internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49112 Summary: Missing type-bound procedure, "duplicate save" warnings and internal compiler error Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priori

[Bug fortran/49112] Missing type-bound procedure, "duplicate save" warnings and internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49112 --- Comment #1 from John 2011-05-22 16:15:24 UTC --- Created attachment 24329 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24329 Test case

[Bug fortran/49112] Missing type-bound procedure, "duplicate save" warnings and internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49112 --- Comment #2 from John 2011-05-22 16:16:25 UTC --- Created attachment 24330 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24330 Test case for ICE

[Bug fortran/49111] Unnecessary warning for private interfaces having the BIND(C) attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49111 --- Comment #1 from John 2011-05-22 16:14:48 UTC --- Created attachment 24328 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24328 Test case

[Bug fortran/49110] Deferred-length character result triggers (false positive) error for pure procedures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49110 --- Comment #1 from John 2011-05-22 16:13:49 UTC --- Created attachment 24327 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24327 Test case

[Bug fortran/49110] Deferred-length character result triggers (false positive) error for pure procedures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49110 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug libfortran/48931] Backtrace functionality not async-signal-safe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48931 --- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-05-22 16:38:08 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Sun May 22 16:38:05 2011 New Revision: 174030 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174030 Log: PR 48931 Make backtrace async-signal-safe, reformat

[Bug fortran/49110] Deferred-length character result triggers (false positive) error for pure procedures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49110 --- Comment #4 from John 2011-05-22 16:46:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > This patch allows your code to compile, but I > don't know if it works correctly. Do you have > a complete self-contained small testcase? > > Index: resolve.c > ==

[Bug libfortran/48931] Backtrace functionality not async-signal-safe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48931 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/49075] Documentation - live web pages and header files of old versions have dead links in them

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49075 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/49110] Deferred-length character result triggers (false positive) error for pure procedures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49110 --- Comment #3 from John 2011-05-22 16:45:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > This patch allows your code to compile, but I > don't know if it works correctly. Do you have > a complete self-contained small testcase? > > Index: resolve.c > ==

[Bug fortran/49110] Deferred-length character result triggers (false positive) error for pure procedures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49110 --- Comment #5 from John 2011-05-22 16:57:02 UTC --- Created attachment 24331 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24331 Test case with main unit

[Bug ada/49113] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE in int_cst_value, at tree.c:9970

+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+ | 4.7.0 20110522 (experimental) [trunk revision 174023] (hppa-unknown-linux-gnu) GCC error:| | in int_cst_value, at tree.c:9970 | | Error detected around a-calend.adb:1254:7

[Bug fortran/49111] Unnecessary warning for private interfaces having the BIND(C) attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49111 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #24328|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|

[Bug fortran/49110] Deferred-length character result triggers (false positive) error for pure procedures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49110 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl 2011-05-22 17:11:03 UTC --- On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 04:57:44PM +, jwmwalrus at gmail dot com wrote: > > This patch allows your code to compile, but I > > don't know if it works correctly. Do you have > > a co

[Bug fortran/49112] Missing type-bound procedure, "duplicate save" warnings and internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49112 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug fortran/49110] Deferred-length character result triggers (false positive) error for pure procedures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49110 --- Comment #7 from John 2011-05-22 17:24:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 04:57:44PM +, jwmwalrus at gmail dot com wrote: > > > This patch allows your code to compile, but I > > > don't know if it works correctl

[Bug web/49109] bugzilla's patch viewer sometimes hides file headers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49109 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2011-05-22 17:45:27 UTC --- There should really be an option to disable the patch viewer, I find it completely useless.

[Bug fortran/49112] Missing type-bound procedure, "duplicate save" warnings and internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49112 --- Comment #4 from John 2011-05-22 17:58:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #0) > > ...:~$ gfortran -c test_gfortran_ice.f90 > > test_gfortran_ice.f90:20.41: > > > > class(DateTime), intent(IN) :: dt > >

[Bug bootstrap/49104] bootstrap failure on AMD K6-2 with illegal instruction (cmove) in stage2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49104 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/48955] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Wrong result for array assignment due to missing temporary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48955 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas 2011-05-22 18:28:18 UTC --- Created attachment 24332 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24332 A fix for the PR This uses the same basic idea as Thomas' patch but is based on the original logic

[Bug fortran/49110] Deferred-length character result triggers (false positive) error for pure procedures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49110 --- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-22 18:35:37 UTC --- I think the subject line is incorrect. The following testcase that gets rid of the C interop garbage, works for an input array of characters with an explicit-shape, but fails

[Bug c++/18635] use of uninitialised reference accepted in C++ front end

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18635 --- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-05-22 18:40:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > If we cannot decide, we should at least give a verbose warning, included into > -Wall. There's already a warning for the original testcase, the one in c

[Bug bootstrap/49104] bootstrap failure on AMD K6-2 with illegal instruction (cmove) in stage2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49104 --- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-22 18:53:35 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Sun May 22 18:53:32 2011 New Revision: 174032 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174032 Log: PR target/49104 * config/i386/cpuid.

[Bug middle-end/45098] Missed induction variable optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45098 --- Comment #8 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-22 18:57:21 UTC --- Author: vries Date: Sun May 22 18:57:19 2011 New Revision: 174033 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174033 Log: 2011-05-22 Tom de Vries PR target/

[Bug c++/48647] [C++0x] SFINAE does not handle incompatible pointer types well in conditional operator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48647 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/49104] bootstrap failure on AMD K6-2 with illegal instruction (cmove) in stage2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49104 --- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak 2011-05-22 18:45:30 UTC --- Actually, PMOVMSKB belongs to "AMD extensions to MMX" instruction set, so we should check MMXEXT bit (see PR 48743). bit_CMOVE can be also checked in %edx as returned from 0x8000 0001 f

[Bug c++/48646] [C++0x] SFINAE does not handle comparisons between incompatible pointer types well

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48646 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/48689] [4.7 Regression] ICE in fold-const.c:13798 with fold checking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48689 --- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-22 19:00:35 UTC --- Author: vries Date: Sun May 22 19:00:33 2011 New Revision: 174035 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174035 Log: 2011-05-22 Tom de Vries PR middle-

[Bug c++/48647] [C++0x] SFINAE does not handle incompatible pointer types well in conditional operator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48647 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-22 18:59:30 UTC --- *** Bug 48646 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/48617] [C++0x] Problem with non-type template parameters and decltype

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48617 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/48647] [C++0x] SFINAE does not handle incompatible pointer types well in conditional operator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48647 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-22 18:48:42 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun May 22 18:48:39 2011 New Revision: 174031 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174031 Log: PR c++/48647 * typeck.c (composite_pointer_

[Bug fortran/49110] Deferred-length character result triggers (false positive) error for pure procedures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49110 --- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-22 19:00:06 UTC --- Note the routine need not be pure to invoke the segfault. Here's an even shorter test case. program foo implicit none character s(5) s = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e']

[Bug c++/48285] [C++0x] ICE in tsubst_copy_and_build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48285 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/49029] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5266

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49029 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-22 19:03:02 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sun May 22 19:02:59 2011 New Revision: 174036 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174036 Log: PR middle-end/49029 * expmed.c (extract_fix

[Bug middle-end/49029] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5266

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49029 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-22 19:00:04 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sun May 22 19:00:00 2011 New Revision: 174034 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174034 Log: PR middle-end/49029 * expmed.c (extract_fix

[Bug c++/48969] ICE with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48969 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 fr

[Bug bootstrap/49104] bootstrap failure on AMD K6-2 with illegal instruction (cmove) in stage2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49104 --- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-22 19:14:54 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Sun May 22 19:14:50 2011 New Revision: 174038 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174038 Log: PR target/49104 * config/i386/cpuid.

[Bug target/49114] New: [x32] 454.calculix in SPEC CPU 2006 failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114 Summary: [x32] 454.calculix in SPEC CPU 2006 failed Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassi

[Bug fortran/49110] Deferred-length character result triggers (false positive) error for pure procedures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49110 --- Comment #10 from John 2011-05-22 19:36:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > Note the routine need not be pure to invoke the segfault. Here's > an even shorter test case. > > program foo >implicit none >character s(5) >s = ['a'

[Bug c++/48106] [C++0x] ICE with scoped enum with fixed underlying type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48106 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/49104] bootstrap failure on AMD K6-2 with illegal instruction (cmove) in stage2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49104 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED URL|

[Bug c++/49115] New: invalid return value optimization (?) when exception is thrown and caught

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49115 Summary: invalid return value optimization (?) when exception is thrown and caught Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/47544] [C++0x] linker does not find =default constructor for explicitly instantiated template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47544 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/45098] Missed induction variable optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45098 --- Comment #9 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-22 19:57:22 UTC --- Author: vries Revision: 174033 Modified property: svn:log Modified: svn:log at Sun May 22 19:57:20 2011 --

[Bug middle-end/49029] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5266

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49029 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/47336] [C++0x] ICE: "Error reporting routines re-entered"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47336 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/49115] invalid return value optimization (?) when exception is thrown and caught

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49115 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug c++/47263] [C++0x] lambda + dynamic-exception-specification std::unexpected() is not called.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47263 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/49058] [C++0x] Bind no-arguments functor failed using std::bind with -pedantic option.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot

[Bug tree-optimization/15419] memcpy pessimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15419 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned

[Bug ada/49113] [4.7 Regression] ICE in int_cst_value, at tree.c:9970

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49113 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/48647] [C++0x] SFINAE does not handle incompatible pointer types well in conditional operator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48647 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-22 20:32:03 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun May 22 20:31:59 2011 New Revision: 174044 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174044 Log: PR c++/48647 * typeck.c (composite_pointer_

[Bug fortran/49110] Deferred-length character result triggers (false positive) error for pure procedures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49110 --- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-05-22 20:46:56 UTC --- This PR seems related to http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170#c9 .

[Bug rtl-optimization/48826] ICE in dwarf2out_var_location, at dwarf2out.c:22013

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48826 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

  1   2   >