[Bug target/48767] compiler error: Segmentation fault with set void in va_arg

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48767 --- Comment #5 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-30 06:03:35 UTC --- It isn't a regression, is it? My gcc-4.2 segfaults too for that testcase.

[Bug target/49186] optimize problem with unsigned long long value.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49186 --- Comment #5 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-30 06:05:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) Could you backport each branches? I'll do so.

3-yr-old infloop in dwarf2out.c

coverity pointed out the infinite loop below. I guess it is unreachable or at least hard to reach, or it would have been reported/fixed before now: 17605 if (index TREE_CODE (index) == RANGE_EXPR) 17606 { 17607 int count = tree_low_cst

[Bug tree-optimization/49199] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in vect_create_epilog_for_reduction at tree-vect-loop.c:3445 with -O -fno-tree-scev-cprop -ftree-vectorize -funswitch-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49199 --- Comment #3 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-30 07:15:35 UTC --- Author: irar Date: Mon May 30 07:15:31 2011 New Revision: 174425 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174425 Log: PR tree-optimization/49199 *

[Bug middle-end/49201] [4.7 Regression] ice in tree_add_const_value_attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49201 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/49218] Incorrect optimization of a 'for' loop creates an infinite loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49218 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug c++/49227] New: ice in inline_small_functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49227 Summary: ice in inline_small_functions Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo:

[Bug c++/49227] ice in inline_small_functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49227 --- Comment #1 from dcb dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2011-05-30 08:37:39 UTC --- Created attachment 24393 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24393 gzipped C++ source code

[Bug bootstrap/49228] New: gcc fails to compile on darwin (with lto)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49228 Summary: gcc fails to compile on darwin (with lto) Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo:

[Bug debug/49130] discrepancies between DW_AT_name and demangler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49130 --- Comment #6 from Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com 2011-05-30 08:44:43 UTC --- Another issue is with DMGL_VERBOSE. nm -C does not use DMGL_VERBOSE: libstdc++.so.6.0.16.debug 000a4e50 t bool __gnu_cxx::operator==char*,

[Bug c++/49225] [C++0x] Weird SFINAE behavior with variadic templates

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49225 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2011-05-30 08:46:33 UTC --- I did some further investigation of this. The problem seems *not* to be located in __my_and_, but it seems that the compiler expands is_sameT,

[Bug target/45263] registers used in __do_global_ctors can get clobbered

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45263 --- Comment #15 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-30 08:53:15 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Mon May 30 08:53:12 2011 New Revision: 174427 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174427 Log: PR target/45263 *

[Bug tree-optimization/49227] [4.7 Regression] ice in inline_small_functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49227 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at

[Bug tree-optimization/49218] Incorrect optimization of a 'for' loop creates an infinite loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49218 --- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-05-30 09:00:46 UTC --- Triggered by r163724: Author: rguenth Date: Wed Sep 1 11:39:55 2010 New Revision: 163724 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163724 Log:

[Bug debug/48354] internal compiler error: in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:8064

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48354 --- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2011-05-30 09:02:55 UTC --- On Fri, 27 May 2011, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48354 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka

[Bug tree-optimization/49199] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in vect_create_epilog_for_reduction at tree-vect-loop.c:3445 with -O -fno-tree-scev-cprop -ftree-vectorize -funswitch-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49199 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/48699] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [OOP] MOVE_ALLOC inside SELECT TYPE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48699 --- Comment #15 from Salvatore Filippone sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2011-05-30 09:11:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) Moreover, I think that this test case is in fact invalid, cf. PR 48887. Hm. I see; I wonder, is this something that

[Bug bootstrap/49228] gcc fails to compile on darwin (with lto)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49228 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/49218] Incorrect optimization of a 'for' loop creates an infinite loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49218 --- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-30 09:13:17 UTC --- I'm going to test @@ -3423,11 +3423,14 @@ adjust_range_with_scev (value_range_t *v

[Bug lto/48086] bootstrap-lto creates c-common.s with too many sections on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48086 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/49225] [C++0x] Weird SFINAE behavior with variadic templates

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49225 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-30 09:20:30 UTC --- Thanks Daniel. Depending on how this issue is resolved - at this point I'm pretty sure it's an actual issue - given also the inconsistency vs the

[Bug fortran/48699] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [OOP] MOVE_ALLOC inside SELECT TYPE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48699 --- Comment #16 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-30 09:22:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) Moreover, I think that this test case is in fact invalid, cf. PR 48887. We are talking about comment 4, aren't we? (That test

[Bug bootstrap/49228] gcc fails to compile on darwin (with lto)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49228 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-05-30 09:28:50 UTC --- If you want to keep most of Xcode 3.2.6, but live dangerously with lto, you can also do what I have done: i.e., replace Apple Inc version

[Bug fortran/48699] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [OOP] MOVE_ALLOC inside SELECT TYPE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48699 --- Comment #17 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-30 09:35:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) I see; I wonder, is this something that was added in F2008 or was it present in F2003? If you talk about that associate-names

[Bug middle-end/49210] [4.7 regression] verify_gimple fails building ada/einfo.o at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49210 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/49210] [4.7 regression] verify_gimple fails building ada/einfo.o at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49210 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-30 11:13:41 UTC --- I think a similar case could be constructed with restrict qualified pointers. I have a patch.

[Bug tree-optimization/49218] Incorrect optimization of a 'for' loop creates an infinite loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49218 --- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-30 11:15:25 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon May 30 11:15:20 2011 New Revision: 174429 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174429 Log: 2011-05-30 Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/49218] Incorrect optimization of a 'for' loop creates an infinite loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49218 --- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-30 11:17:38 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon May 30 11:17:35 2011 New Revision: 174430 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174430 Log: 2011-05-30 Richard

[Bug c++/49229] New: [C++0x][SFINAE] ICE with variadics and depending non-type default parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49229 Summary: [C++0x][SFINAE] ICE with variadics and depending non-type default parameter Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/49218] Incorrect optimization of a 'for' loop creates an infinite loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49218 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/49229] [C++0x][SFINAE] ICE with variadics and depending non-type default parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49229 Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/49229] [C++0x][SFINAE] ICE with variadics and depending non-type default parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49229 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-05-30 11:33:31 UTC --- Thanks for your further investigation of these issues, Daniel. I'm not sure to understand what you mean by degenerate specialization, though. In my

[Bug rtl-optimization/49230] New: please provide workaround for setjmp/longjmp in mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49230 Summary: please provide workaround for setjmp/longjmp in mingw32 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/49223] Internal compiler error when using OpenMP

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49223 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug c++/49223] Internal compiler error when using OpenMP

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49223 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-30 11:56:18 UTC --- Created attachment 24394 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24394 gcc46-pr49223.patch Untested fix. The problem is that require_complete_type

[Bug debug/48354] internal compiler error: in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:8064

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48354 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #24343|0 |1 is

[Bug target/48108] lto should be containerized in a single mach-o section on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108 vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/46500] target.h includes tm.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46500 --- Comment #9 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-30 12:11:07 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Mon May 30 12:11:03 2011 New Revision: 174431 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174431 Log: PR

[Bug c++/49223] Internal compiler error when using OpenMP

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49223 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-30 12:16:08 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon May 30 12:16:04 2011 New Revision: 174432 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174432 Log: PR c++/49223 *

[Bug c++/49223] Internal compiler error when using OpenMP

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49223 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-30 12:19:02 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon May 30 12:18:59 2011 New Revision: 174433 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174433 Log: PR c++/49223 *

[Bug target/48108] lto should be containerized in a single mach-o section on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-05-30 12:19:45 UTC --- This is pr49190. If you want to proceed, you need to revert revision 174286 (or to wait for a fix). BTW which version of Xcode are you using?

[Bug target/48108] lto should be containerized in a single mach-o section on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108 --- Comment #8 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch 2011-05-30 12:26:37 UTC --- On 30 May, 2011, at 2:20 PM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108 --- Comment #7 from

[Bug libgomp/49231] New: #pragma omp parallel for never returns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49231 Summary: #pragma omp parallel for never returns Product: gcc Version: 4.4.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgomp AssignedTo:

[Bug target/48108] lto should be containerized in a single mach-o section on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-05-30 13:04:29 UTC --- ok, I will wait for a fix Meanwhile you can also configure with --enable-checking=release.

[Bug middle-end/49210] [4.7 regression] verify_gimple fails building ada/einfo.o at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49210 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-30 13:12:27 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon May 30 13:12:23 2011 New Revision: 174435 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174435 Log: 2011-05-30 Richard

[Bug middle-end/49210] [4.7 regression] verify_gimple fails building ada/einfo.o at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49210 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c/40528] Add a new ifunc attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40528 --- Comment #15 from Agner Fog agner at agner dot org 2011-05-30 13:13:06 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) (In reply to comment #13) What is the status of this issue? It is implemented on ifunc branch. Is option 3 implemented? Yes,

[Bug libgomp/49231] #pragma omp parallel for never returns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49231 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug c++/49221] [4.7 Regression] Several ICEs in the obj-c++ test suite after revision 174307

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49221 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-05-30 14:09:28 UTC --- Most *-*-solaris* does not seem affected by this pr (see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-05/msg03426.html or

[Bug target/49211] MMIX: Code generation broken, when using global variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49211 Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot

[Bug target/49211] MMIX: Code generation broken, when using global variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49211 Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug target/49211] MMIX: Code generation broken, when using global variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49211 --- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-30 14:29:32 UTC --- See gcc/config/mmix/crtn.asm, where the global registers used by the ABI are allocated.

[Bug target/33049] [avr] bit extraction non optimal, inversing logic solves problem

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33049 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gjl at gcc dot

[Bug target/49211] MMIX: Code generation broken, when using global variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49211 --- Comment #3 from Nils Asmussen n...@script-solution.de 2011-05-30 14:47:40 UTC --- Thanks for your reply! Perhaps I miss something, but I've no idea how that should work. Regardless of whether $254 is initialized previously or not (in my

[Bug target/49211] MMIX: Code generation broken, when using global variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49211 Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug libgomp/49231] #pragma omp parallel for never returns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49231 Parviz Fariborz parviz_fariborz at mentor dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/48108] lto should be containerized in a single mach-o section on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108 --- Comment #11 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-05-30 15:16:25 UTC --- Created attachment 24397 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24397 Iain's work in progress for LTO containerization

[Bug target/48108] lto should be containerized in a single mach-o section on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108 --- Comment #10 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-05-30 15:15:31 UTC --- I have been using Iain's last work in progress patch and it works fine with both gcc 4.6 branch and gcc trunk. Hopefully he can get back to polishing it

[Bug target/45263] registers used in __do_global_ctors can get clobbered

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45263 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.6.1 |4.5.1 Target

[Bug target/49211] MMIX: Code generation broken, when using global variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49211 --- Comment #5 from Nils Asmussen n...@script-solution.de 2011-05-30 15:22:37 UTC --- Again, I suggest you have a look at crtn.asm, in particular these lines: % This must be the last file on the link-line, allocating global registers % from

[Bug target/48108] lto should be containerized in a single mach-o section on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108 Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug fortran/49232] New: Pointer assignment of stride to CONTIGUOUS pointer not diagnosed as invalid

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49232 Summary: Pointer assignment of stride to CONTIGUOUS pointer not diagnosed as invalid Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: accepts-invalid, diagnostic

[Bug libgomp/49231] #pragma omp parallel for never returns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49231 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c/49233] New: Please un-deprecate rvalues in memory constraints

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49233 Summary: Please un-deprecate rvalues in memory constraints Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo:

[Bug bootstrap/49190] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 174286 on several platforms

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49190 --- Comment #14 from Nathan Froyd froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-30 16:42:12 UTC --- Author: froydnj Date: Mon May 30 16:42:05 2011 New Revision: 174445 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174445 Log: fix PR bootstrap/4910

[Bug c/4910] imacat ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4910 --- Comment #4 from Nathan Froyd froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-30 16:42:10 UTC --- Author: froydnj Date: Mon May 30 16:42:05 2011 New Revision: 174445 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174445 Log: fix PR bootstrap/4910 gcc/

[Bug bootstrap/49190] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 174286 on several platforms

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49190 --- Comment #15 from Nathan Froyd froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-30 16:43:01 UTC --- I've reverted the offending commit. If somebody could confirm that the failures are gone, this PR can be closed.

[Bug c/49234] New: -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 Summary: -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo:

[Bug tree-optimization/46728] GCC does not generate fmadd for pow (x, 0.75)+y on powerpc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46728 --- Comment #10 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-30 17:12:58 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Mon May 30 17:12:53 2011 New Revision: 174446 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174446 Log: 2011-05-30 Bill

[Bug fortran/45786] [4.5/4.6 Regression] Relational operators .eq. and == are not recognized as equivalent

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45786 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression]|[4.5/4.6

[Bug rtl-optimization/48830] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] unrecognized insn: storing invalid upper fp reg in SImode to stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48830 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target

[Bug rtl-optimization/49235] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE: in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:424 with -O -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -fno-tree-scev-cprop -ftree-vectorize -fno-vect-cost-model

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49235 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:424 with -O -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -fno-tree-scev-cprop -ftree-vectorize -fno-vect-cost-model

[Bug libfortran/48906] Wrong rounding results with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906 Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #24364|0 |1 is

[Bug bootstrap/49190] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 174286 on several platforms

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49190 --- Comment #16 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-05-30 18:52:18 UTC --- At r174446, lto profiled bootstrap works fine on x86_64 darwin.

[Bug fortran/49112] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [OOP] Missing type-bound procedure, duplicate save warnings and internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49112 --- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-30 19:28:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Here is a reduced test case for the duplicate SAVE attribute: The duplicate SAVE warning of comment #3 can be fixed with something like this:

[Bug target/49168] [4.7 Regression] Aligned store used with unaligned address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49168 --- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-30 20:00:16 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Mon May 30 20:00:11 2011 New Revision: 174451 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174451 Log: Handle misaligned

[Bug fortran/49112] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [OOP] Missing type-bound procedure, duplicate save warnings and internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49112 --- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-30 20:09:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) string = dt%getFormattedString(0, FMT) 1 Error: 'getformattedstring' at (1) is not a member

[Bug libstdc++/49236] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/weak_ptr/comparison/cmp_neg.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49236 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/weak_ptr/comparison/cmp_neg.cc Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/49236] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/weak_ptr/comparison/cmp_neg.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49236 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redi at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/33498] Optimizer (-O2) may convert a normal loop to infinite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33498 --- Comment #17 from Bruno.THOMAS at solucom dot fr 2011-05-30 20:24:31 UTC --- Je suis absent jusqu'au 6 juin 2011 et ne peux répondre à votre mail. En cas d'urgence, vous pouvez joindre le 01 49 03 20 50.

[Bug lto/49237] New: error with -flto: 'f' causes a section type conflict

void f(Bar) {} }; template struct FooBar; g++-snapshot --version g++-snapshot (GCC) 4.7.0 20110530 (experimental) g++-snapshot bug.cc -c -flto g++-snapshot bug.o -flto In file included from bug.cc:8:0, from :14: bug.cc: In member function ‘f’: bug.cc:9:15: error: f causes

[Bug tree-optimization/33498] Optimizer (-O2) may convert a normal loop to infinite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33498 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc

[Bug c/49233] Please un-deprecate rvalues in memory constraints

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49233 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug tree-optimization/49234] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug rtl-optimization/49235] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:424 with -O -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -fno-tree-scev-cprop -ftree-vectorize -fno-vect-cost-model

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49235 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug libstdc++/49236] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/weak_ptr/comparison/cmp_neg.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49236 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-30 21:14:04 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Mon May 30 21:14:01 2011 New Revision: 174455 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174455 Log: 2011-05-30 Paolo

[Bug libstdc++/49236] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/weak_ptr/comparison/cmp_neg.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49236 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/49190] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 174286 on several platforms

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49190 Gerald Pfeifer gerald at pfeifer dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-apple-darwin10,

[Bug bootstrap/49190] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 174286 on several platforms

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49190 --- Comment #18 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-05-31 00:03:14 UTC --- Bootstrap restored on i686-apple-darwin9. Dave

[Bug target/49238] New: ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2113

version 4.7.0 20110530 (experimental) [trunk revision 174450] (GCC) $ ./xgcc -B. ~/ice.i -O1 /home/ryan/ice.i: In function 'foo': /home/ryan/ice.i:27:1: error: unrecognizable insn: (insn 61 60 62 3 (set (reg:SI 147 t) (geu:SI (reg:SI 3 r3 [ D.1975+4 ]) (const_int -1

[Bug middle-end/49239] New: Random gcc.dg/vect/vect-strided-u8-i8-gap4-unknown.c failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49239 Summary: Random gcc.dg/vect/vect-strided-u8-i8-gap4-unknown.c failure Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/49239] Random gcc.dg/vect/vect-strided-u8-i8-gap4-unknown.c failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49239 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-05-31 04:55:41 UTC --- The error is: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-strided-u8-i8-gap4-unknown.c execution test

[Bug c/49233] Please un-deprecate rvalues in memory constraints

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49233 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot