http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49093
--- Comment #11 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-02 07:03:04 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Thu Jun 2 07:02:57 2011
New Revision: 174559
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174559
Log:
PR tree-optimization/49093
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49093
Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49239
--- Comment #4 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-06-02 07:13:20 UTC
---
H.J. is it fixed?
Thanks,
Ira
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45786
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-02
09:09:57 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Jun 2 09:09:53 2011
New Revision: 174560
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174560
Log:
2011-06-02 Thomas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45786
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49261
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-02
09:44:34 UTC ---
Well, it's unfortunate that the new function header matches assignments.
Consider omitting the spaces around the '='s there.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49266
Summary: [C++0x] Another incomplete type regression with
noexcept
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49264
Dimitris Eftaxiopoulos eftaxi12 at otenet dot gr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49264
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-02
11:43:31 UTC ---
http://www.gnu.org/software/gzip/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49264
--- Comment #4 from Dimitris Eftaxiopoulos eftaxi12 at otenet dot gr
2011-06-02 11:49:36 UTC ---
Created attachment 24415
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24415
Preprocessed file that triggers the bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49163
Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49239
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47858
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48840
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48840
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-02
13:04:45 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Jun 2 13:04:43 2011
New Revision: 174566
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174566
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48840
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu |sparc64-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49264
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #97 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-02
13:28:28 UTC ---
Today I noticed by an accident that the following hack:
Index: lto-streamer-out.c
===
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-02 13:40:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #3)
Created attachment 24234 [details]
Proposed patch
The attached patch seems to fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48658
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #98 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-02
14:28:47 UTC ---
Martin suggested ingoring BINFOs without FLAG_2 set.
It don't seem make much difference:
[WPA] Compression: 430287537 input bytes, 1997250286 uncompressed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49264
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-02
14:45:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 24417
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24417
pr49264.ii
Partially reduced testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49264
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49264
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-02
15:18:54 UTC ---
Seems we have memcpy (any, D.2892, 1) and fold_stmt_1 it.
Folding turns this into MEM_REF[any] = MEM_REF[D.2892], which
gimplify_and_update_call_from_tree
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44618
--- Comment #24 from Edmar Wienskoski edmar at freescale dot com 2011-06-02
15:33:16 UTC ---
The patch was approved by David, but I don't have WAA.
Can I get anyone in this list to volunteer to do the commit ?
Thanks,
Edmar
2011-05-23 Edmar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49243
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-06-02
15:33:40 UTC ---
Patch posted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg00145.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44897
--- Comment #21 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2011-06-02 16:10:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
The problem as confirmed in Comment 9 no longer reproduce on mainline. So
problem is either fixed or went latent. I am
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48807
--- Comment #1 from Stuart Henderson shenders at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-02
16:16:56 UTC ---
Author: shenders
Date: Thu Jun 2 16:16:52 2011
New Revision: 174567
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174567
Log:
2011-06-02 Stuart
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49261
--- Comment #3 from davidxl xinliangli at gmail dot com 2011-06-02 16:33:37
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Well, it's unfortunate that the new function header matches assignments.
Consider omitting the spaces around the '='s there.
Yes -- it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48807
Stuart Henderson shenders at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47951
Stuart Henderson shenders at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49265
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-02 17:39:14 UTC ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Jun 2 17:39:11 2011
New Revision: 174569
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174569
Log:
2011-06-02 Steven G. Kargl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49181
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49267
Summary: Ambiguity with conversion functions T and T,
initializing a T
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49134
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48539
--- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-02 18:54:34
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Thu Jun 2 18:54:32 2011
New Revision: 174575
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174575
Log:
In gcc/objc/:
2011-06-02
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48539
Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49268
Summary: Invalid code generated for assumed-size Cray pointee
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49268
Asher Langton langton at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |langton at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48825
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48220
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49265
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-02 19:53:05 UTC ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Jun 2 19:53:02 2011
New Revision: 174576
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174576
Log:
2011-06-02 Steven G. Kargl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49265
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48840
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-02
19:59:49 UTC ---
The problem is that reload chooses a FP reg as reload register for a V8QI value
coming in from a general register. So a secondary memory is needed and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
--- Comment #5 from DJ Delorie dj at redhat dot com 2011-06-02 20:33:43 UTC
---
Given that I forgot I had it, probably no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7302
--- Comment #26 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-02
21:29:53 UTC ---
(can this bug be un-ASSIGNED?)
(In reply to comment #25)
Here, H must have a virtual destructor. The point where it can know it should
warn is the delete
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48010
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7302
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|mueller at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7302
--- Comment #28 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-02
21:46:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
I've posted a patch to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg00191.html
which gives this for the code in comment 25
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44897
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49268
Asher Langton langton at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37039
Asher Langton langton at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49269
Summary: wifstream::tellg reports invalid stream position after
reading single wchar_t character with NullCodecvt
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49260
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49163
Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49244
--- Comment #2 from Ryan Lortie desrt at desrt dot ca 2011-06-02 23:05:58 UTC
---
I'd be happy enough if GCC published a recommended sequence or something so
that it would be easier to check for this exact sequence...
A new user-accessible
-Werror -Wold-style-definition
-Wc++-compat -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../gcc-4.7-20110602/gcc
-I../../gcc-4.7-20110602/gcc/. -I../../gcc-4.7-20110602/gcc/../include
-I../../gcc-4.7-20110602/gcc/../libcpp/include -I/sw/include -I/sw/include
-I../../gcc-4.7-20110602/gcc/../libdecnumber
-I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49270
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-06-03
00:15:47 UTC ---
Configured bootstrap as...
../gcc-4.7-20110602/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.7
--mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc4.7/info
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49270
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-06-03
00:21:47 UTC ---
/* Read predicate from IB. */
static struct predicate
read_predicate (struct lto_input_block *ib)
{
struct predicate out;
clause_t clause;
int k
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49271
Summary: Compiler crashed and asked me to submit a report
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49270
--- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-06-03
00:35:08 UTC ---
Index: gcc/ipa-inline-analysis.c
===
--- gcc/ipa-inline-analysis.c(revision 174584)
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../gcc-4.7-20110602/gcc
-I../../gcc-4.7-20110602/gcc/. -I../../gcc-4.7-20110602/gcc/../include
-I../../gcc-4.7-20110602/gcc/../libcpp/include -I/sw/include -I/sw/include
-I../../gcc-4.7-20110602/gcc/../libdecnumber
-I../../gcc-4.7-20110602/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49272
Summary: FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.jason/rfg10.C (test for
errors, line 11)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49273
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/cdtor-1.C
scan-assembler-times [^\n\r]*DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name:
2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49270
--- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-06-03
00:50:08 UTC ---
There already exists an unreviewed patch to fix this issue (which lacks a
PR)...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg02301.html
it appears to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49221
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47590
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-03
01:41:57 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Jun 3 01:41:54 2011
New Revision: 174595
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174595
Log:
PR debug/47590
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49274
Summary: Regression: unique_ptr needs full definition of map
type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49270
--- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-06-03
02:40:41 UTC ---
I can confirm that r174593 with
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg02301.html (as
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg02304.html is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49274
merkert at comcast dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |libstdc++
--- Comment #1
/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1000/darwin_objdir/prev-x86_64-apple-darwin11.0.0/libstdc++-v3/include
-I/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1000/gcc-4.7-20110602/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++
-L/sw/src/fink.build/gcc47-4.7.0-1000/darwin_objdir/prev-x86_64-apple-darwin11.0.0/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-c -g -O3 -flto
-apple-darwin*
Host||x86_64-apple-darwin*
Build||x86_64-apple-darwin*
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-06-03
05:54:28 UTC ---
$ ../gcc-4.7-20110602/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49275
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-06-03
05:55:52 UTC ---
This problem doesn't exist without --enable-build-with-cxx.
74 matches
Mail list logo
