[Bug middle-end/49363] [feature request] multiple target attribute (and runtime dispatching based on cpuid)

2011-06-11 Thread vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363 --- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch 2011-06-11 05:58:46 UTC --- These new developments sound interesting. Hope somebody is working on it and will publish a testable version soon. On the other hand I was

[Bug c++/49351] Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)

2011-06-11 Thread michael at jarvis dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49351 Mike Jarvis michael at jarvis dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |minor --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/49363] [feature request] multiple target attribute (and runtime dispatching based on cpuid)

2011-06-11 Thread xinliangli at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363 davidxl xinliangli at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tmsriram at google

[Bug middle-end/49363] [feature request] multiple target attribute (and runtime dispatching based on cpuid)

2011-06-11 Thread vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363 --- Comment #4 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch 2011-06-11 07:06:24 UTC --- Thanks for the clarification, waiting for some patch/branch to test. please keep me posted (or let me know with PR I shall watch).

[Bug tree-optimization/49352] [4.7 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -O2 -ftree-vectorize

2011-06-11 Thread irar at il dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49352 --- Comment #8 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-06-11 07:54:55 UTC --- Created attachment 24490 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24490 an updated patch I updated your patch: - call vect_is_slp_reduction only if

[Bug libfortran/49296] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Wrong END OF FILE error for list-directed I/O with strings

2011-06-11 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jb at gcc dot

[Bug driver/49371] New: xgcc: error: unrecognized option '-pie' on *-apple-darwin*

2011-06-11 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49371 Summary: xgcc: error: unrecognized option '-pie' on *-apple-darwin* Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug driver/49371] xgcc: error: unrecognized option '-pie' on *-apple-darwin*

2011-06-11 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49371 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-06-11 12:07:39 UTC --- It seems that there are the same failures on i686-pc-linux-gnu (see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-06/msg01202.htm ).

[Bug driver/49371] xgcc: error: unrecognized option '-pie' on *-apple-darwin*

2011-06-11 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49371 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-06-11 12:17:24 UTC --- It seems that there are the same failures on i686-pc-linux-gnu In this case it is runtime failures of the kind: ./run-le.exe: error while loading

[Bug ada/48835] Porting GNAT to GNU/Linux/m68k

2011-06-11 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835 --- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-06-11 12:33:09 UTC --- Created attachment 24491 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24491 patch fixing m68k function call abi issues in gnat WRT the the m68k

[Bug driver/49371] xgcc: error: unrecognized option '-pie' on *-apple-darwin*

2011-06-11 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49371 Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/49372] New: Temporaries evaluated for arguments of a default constructors of array elements not destructed properly (?)

2011-06-11 Thread schaub.johannes at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49372 Summary: Temporaries evaluated for arguments of a default constructors of array elements not destructed properly (?) Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug c++/49372] Temporaries evaluated for arguments of a default constructors of array elements not destructed properly (?)

2011-06-11 Thread schaub.johannes at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49372 --- Comment #1 from Johannes Schaub schaub.johannes at googlemail dot com 2011-06-11 13:46:46 UTC --- To elaborate on it, I have the following weird behavior: - GCC4.6 outputs nothing for the program (on my linux machine). That seems definitely

[Bug middle-end/49373] New: [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

2011-06-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49373 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo:

[Bug middle-end/49373] [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

2011-06-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49373 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/49373] [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

2011-06-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49373 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-06-11 16:13:38 UTC --- All most all failures are caused by revision 174952: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-06/msg00441.html

[Bug target/49374] New: [4.5 Regression] x86 backend is broken

2011-06-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49374 Summary: [4.5 Regression] x86 backend is broken Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo:

[Bug driver/49371] xgcc: error: unrecognized option '-pie' on *-apple-darwin*

2011-06-11 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49371 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-06-11 16:22:20 UTC --- What is the meaning of %{fpie:-pie} in gcc/config/darwin.h?

[Bug target/49374] [4.5 Regression] x86 backend is broken

2011-06-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49374 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-06-11 16:27:59 UTC --- It could be my setup problem.

[Bug driver/49371] xgcc: error: unrecognized option '-pie' on *-apple-darwin*

2011-06-11 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49371 --- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-11 16:52:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) What is the meaning of %{fpie:-pie} in gcc/config/darwin.h? that causes '-pie' to be placed on sub-command lines when '-fpie' is seen

[Bug driver/49371] xgcc: error: unrecognized option '-pie' on *-apple-darwin*

2011-06-11 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49371 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth at

[Bug middle-end/49373] [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

2011-06-11 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49373 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-11 17:08:08 UTC --- The patch is expected to cause g++.dg/torture/pr43879-1_1.C. I do not get the other LTO failures. Perhaps it depends whether or not one use linker plugin. The

[Bug testsuite/49375] New: Target libstdc++.so used by host cc1plus

2011-06-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49375 Summary: Target libstdc++.so used by host cc1plus Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite AssignedTo:

[Bug middle-end/49373] [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

2011-06-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49373 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-06-11 17:43:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) The patch is expected to cause g++.dg/torture/pr43879-1_1.C. I do not get the other LTO failures. Perhaps it depends whether or not

[Bug driver/49371] xgcc: error: unrecognized option '-pie' on *-apple-darwin*

2011-06-11 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49371 --- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-11 17:44:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) If -pie is darwin9 later, shouldn't its passage to the linker be in darwin9.h instead? yes, this will need sorting out too - darwin

[Bug middle-end/49373] [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

2011-06-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49373 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-06-11 17:51:29 UTC --- Revision 174957 still gave: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strlen-3.c execution, -O2 -flto FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strlen-3.c execution, -O2

[Bug middle-end/49373] [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

2011-06-11 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49373 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-11 17:51:52 UTC --- The first problem should be solved by: * lto-streamer-out.c (produce_symtab): Stream out the newly represented aliases. The builtins failure is

[Bug middle-end/49373] [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

2011-06-11 Thread laurent at guerby dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49373 Laurent GUERBY laurent at guerby dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||laurent at

[Bug tree-optimization/49343] [4.7 regression] ICE on field with variable offset

2011-06-11 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49343 --- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-11 18:27:49 UTC --- Created attachment 24492 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24492 Proposed fix This is a proposed (fully tested) fix. How do you want me to

[Bug target/49094] ARM aligned(1) attribute is sometimes dropped

2011-06-11 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49094 --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-11 19:12:16 UTC --- Just for the record, I am aware of this bug, I have managed to reproduce it on the sparc64 in the compile farm and have had a look at it a few times already

[Bug c/49376] New: ICE when compiling linux kernel on mipsel

2011-06-11 Thread aurelien at aurel32 dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49376 Summary: ICE when compiling linux kernel on mipsel Product: gcc Version: 4.4.6 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo:

[Bug driver/49371] xgcc: error: unrecognized option '-pie' on *-apple-darwin*

2011-06-11 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49371 --- Comment #8 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-06-11 19:56:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) This patch bootstraps fine on x86_64-apple-darwin11 and passes -pie as expected... [MacPro:~] howarth% gcc-fsf-4.7 -fpie -v

[Bug driver/49371] xgcc: error: unrecognized option '-pie' on *-apple-darwin*

2011-06-11 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49371 --- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-11 20:08:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) (In reply to comment #7) This patch bootstraps fine on x86_64-apple-darwin11 and passes -pie as expected... [MacPro:~] howarth%

[Bug fortran/49324] Deep copy missing for array constructors of DT w/ allocatable components

2011-06-11 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49324 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-11 22:08:49 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sat Jun 11 22:08:46 2011 New Revision: 174959 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=174959 Log: 2011-06-12 Tobias Burnus

[Bug target/49094] ARM aligned(1) attribute is sometimes dropped

2011-06-11 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49094 --- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-11 23:08:59 UTC --- Created attachment 24494 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24494 Fix - a first draft OK, a fix is probably going to look very much like

[Bug c++/49377] New: Template specialization attributes cause type mismatches when used

2011-06-11 Thread rmorell at nvidia dot com
--prefix=/home/xbobx/src/gcc/install-174959/ --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 4.7.0 20110611 (experimental) (GCC) If I remove the attribute on the template specialization _or_ the float2 data field 'd', the test compiles fine. The bug also occurs if float2

[Bug c++/49378] New: [4.7 Regression] C++ is broken

2011-06-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49378 Summary: [4.7 Regression] C++ is broken Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo:

[Bug c++/49378] [4.7 Regression] C++ is broken

2011-06-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49378 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/49378] [4.7 Regression] C++ is broken

2011-06-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49378 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |middle-end Target

[Bug c/49379] New: warning from Mac OS X linker alignment lost for -ftree-vectorize optimization

2011-06-11 Thread nenad at intrepid dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49379 Summary: warning from Mac OS X linker alignment lost for -ftree-vectorize optimization Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug c/49379] warning from Mac OS X linker alignment lost for -ftree-vectorize optimization

2011-06-11 Thread nenad at intrepid dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49379 --- Comment #1 from Nenad Vukicevic nenad at intrepid dot com 2011-06-12 02:26:32 UTC --- Created attachment 24495 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24495 Sample code for MAc OS X linker warning