http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #18 from Anitha Boyapati anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com
2011-06-14 07:00:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
Created attachment 24512 [details]
loosen constraints on register elimination
This seems to fix the problem. At
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48542
--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
07:02:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
on trunk: the
initial-value machinery should have handled the register with the
return-address being clobbered. It does
/jarryd/installers/gcc-svn/configure
--prefix=/home/jarryd/local/gcc-4.7 --disable-multilib
--enable-languages=c,c++,go
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20110614 (experimental) (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48542
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23938|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835
--- Comment #10 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-06-14
08:12:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
- __gnat_malloc is defined in Ada to return Address (integer, so in d0), but
it's called from a couple of places via fake extern
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49399
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
08:15:14 UTC ---
when you say works fine do you mean doesn't do the access check?
surely if SFINAE correctly honours access control then the function shouldn't
be callable and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49400
Summary: Proc-pointer declaration in BLOCK construct
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49397
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
08:27:44 UTC ---
More information:
* (2): Case g works: If the print *, g() as the p = g is in the same
scoping unit, there is no error or ICE.
* (1) If the print *, f is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
08:44:12 UTC ---
In that case the Ada side of __gnat_malloc has to be changed to use a pointer
type rather than Address. Is Interfaces.C.Strings.chars_ptr acceptible,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49401
Summary: Warning regression for 'uninitialized' variable on
non-existant code path (in mep-pragma.c)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49402
Summary: Duplicate use of v850.opt
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49403
Summary: v850e-elf: incompatible pointer type (near
initialization for ‘targetm.memory_move_cost’)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
+ gcc 4.3.2.
Target: avr
Configured with: ../../gcc.gnu.org/trunk/configure --target=avr
--prefix=/local/gnu/install/gcc-4.7 --disable-nls --disable-shared
--enable-languages=c,c++
Thread model: single
gcc version 4.7.0 20110614 (experimental) (GCC)
GNU assembler version 2.21 (avr) using BFD version
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49382
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49365
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835
--- Comment #12 from Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot org 2011-06-14 10:59:03
UTC ---
Why not patch the frontend to magically make System.Address a pointer type for
the backend to deal with? That way, no functions have to be changed, and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835
--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
11:27:24 UTC ---
Why not patch the frontend to magically make System.Address a pointer type for
the backend to deal with? That way, no functions have to be changed, and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49392
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
11:31:55 UTC ---
It looks like a linker error but ...
Hmmm with a later version of gcc 4.6 branch that I have lying around the same
example doesn't spew out such
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49399
--- Comment #2 from Jarryd Beck jarrydb at cse dot unsw.edu.au 2011-06-14
11:52:58 UTC ---
By works fine I mean that the code compiles, and when it runs, the program
returns the number 4.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding how this is all supposed to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49022
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49399
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
12:11:05 UTC ---
The program should not compile.
In C++03 it should fail to compile because it accesses a private member. SFINAE
does not take access control into account in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49022
--- Comment #17 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2011-06-14 12:20:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
I had another look at this issue. Something I didn't realize at the time is
that simply adding begin() and end()
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49399
--- Comment #4 from Jarryd Beck jarrydb at cse dot unsw.edu.au 2011-06-14
12:21:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
The program should not compile.
In C++03 it should fail to compile because it accesses a private member.
SFINAE
does not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49399
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
12:27:35 UTC ---
Then they never should have compiled in the first place, and won't compile with
clang or Comeau either.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49390
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49399
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
12:30:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Ah, I see. Well the example you gave also doesn't compile. This is exactly
what
the boost library does too, I missed that part in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49278
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
12:32:02 UTC ---
I have now filled an interpretation request (J3/11-201) - in time for WG5 and
J3 meeting (m195), which is end of June. Let's see what J3/WG5 will decide. Cf.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49178
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49399
--- Comment #7 from Jarryd Beck jarrydb at cse dot unsw.edu.au 2011-06-14
12:34:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #4)
Ah, I see. Well the example you gave also doesn't compile. This is exactly
what
the boost library
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49399
--- Comment #8 from Jarryd Beck jarrydb at cse dot unsw.edu.au 2011-06-14
12:35:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #4)
Ah, I see. Well the example you gave also doesn't compile. This is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49392
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
12:40:03 UTC ---
There wasn't any change on the branch that would change this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49399
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
12:40:52 UTC ---
Note that returning 4 was *never* correct for that program. In C++03 it
shouldn't compile and in C++0x it should return 1. There's a bug in the
Boost.MPL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49367
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
12:44:35 UTC ---
The last example is because with a restrict qualified loaded pointer the
later conversion to a restrict qualified pointer is thrown away.
As for the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49394
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49396
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49398
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49382
--- Comment #5 from Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com
2011-06-14 12:50:22 UTC ---
../../../gccemptyrange/libgcc/../gcc/config/soft-fp/floattitf.c:34:8: warning:
no previous prototype for ‘__floattitf’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49022
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
12:51:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
Then, the snippet:
std::valarrayint v1{ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 }, v2{ 5, 6, 7, 8, 9};
for (int i : v1 + v2)
{ std::cout i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49396
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
12:53:45 UTC ---
Same error on all branches back to 4.4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49382
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
12:54:34 UTC ---
Yeah, sure, I've noticed that an hour ago too. Fixed in my copy, but now libgo
build failed for unrelated reason :(.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49362
Greta Yorsh Greta.Yorsh at arm dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Greta.Yorsh at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49022
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
13:01:24 UTC ---
Ah, no the problem is std::__addressofconst _Tp(__ex()[0]) which takes the
address of a temporary returned by operator[]
The range-based for seems to do the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49324
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
13:07:07 UTC ---
(Comment fixed 8 fixed the missing deep copy.)
Regarding the reallocate (cf. comment 6, but using scalars to reduce the dump
size): For
type t
integer,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49022
--- Comment #20 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-06-14
13:22:13 UTC ---
I'm not sure, really. I'm going to attach a variant which more explicitly only
uses return by const ref and shows the same fundamental problem for me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49022
--- Comment #21 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-06-14
13:23:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 24519
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24519
patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49022
--- Comment #22 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-06-14
13:27:03 UTC ---
To be clear: I fully agree with the exclusion sentence. But I had to play a bit
with this stuff to realize that really adding overloads to begin() and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49396
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2011-06-14 13:23:09 UTC ---
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
I think it should be
Index: c-family/c-cppbuiltin.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #21 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
13:31:47 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Tue Jun 14 13:31:43 2011
New Revision: 175018
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175018
Log:
PR debug/48459
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49404
Summary: ARM _Unwind_Backtrace returns _URC_FAILURE too eagerly
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49362
mark.pupilli at dyson dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49022
--- Comment #23 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-06-14
13:50:56 UTC ---
Ok, now I see, it's the operator[] of _BinBase which returns by value, I
overlooked that. Thus, fine it seems confirmed that range-based for-loop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36610
--- Comment #21 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-14 13:53:56 UTC ---
objc.dg/torture/forward-1.m now seems to XPASS (almost?) everywhere with
-fgnu-runtime:
alpha-dec-osf5.1b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49022
--- Comment #24 from Gabriel Dos Reis gdr at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
13:54:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
It should be identical to
auto range = v1 + v2;
for (auto b = std::begin(range), e = std::end(range); b != e; ++b)
{ ... }
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36610
--- Comment #22 from js-gcc at webkeks dot org js-gcc at webkeks dot org
2011-06-14 14:02:05 UTC ---
Nope, it's still using __builtin_apply.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49022
--- Comment #25 from Gabriel Dos Reis gdr at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
14:01:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
Ok, now I see, it's the operator[] of _BinBase which returns by value, I
overlooked that.
Yes, val in valarray stands for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49022
--- Comment #26 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-06-14
14:02:15 UTC ---
... among other things, std::valarray, at variance with the containers, does
*not* have member begin and end, thus I don't even think novice
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48365
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48365
Gabriel Dos Reis gdr at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gdr at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49362
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45098
--- Comment #14 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14 14:30:01 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Jun 14 14:29:58 2011
New Revision: 175022
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175022
Log:
2011-06-14 Zdenek Dvorak o...@ucw.cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49390
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
14:59:55 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jun 14 14:59:52 2011
New Revision: 175023
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175023
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49390
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
15:01:15 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jun 14 15:01:10 2011
New Revision: 175024
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175024
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45098
--- Comment #15 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14 15:05:29 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Jun 14 15:05:26 2011
New Revision: 175025
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175025
Log:
2011-06-14 Tom de Vries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
15:27:28 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jun 14 15:27:24 2011
New Revision: 175028
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175028
Log:
PR fortran/49103
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49103
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
15:28:27 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jun 14 15:28:21 2011
New Revision: 175029
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175029
Log:
PR fortran/49103
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49402
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton nickc at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14 15:30:15
UTC ---
Author: nickc
Date: Tue Jun 14 15:30:05 2011
New Revision: 175030
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175030
Log:
PR target/49403
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49403
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton nickc at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14 15:30:15
UTC ---
Author: nickc
Date: Tue Jun 14 15:30:05 2011
New Revision: 175030
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175030
Log:
PR target/49403
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49403
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com 2011-06-14 15:32:13
UTC ---
Fixed in mainline.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49402
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com 2011-06-14 15:32:49
UTC ---
Fixed in mainline.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49375
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-14 15:41:50 UTC ---
IMO this is a clear example why LD_LIBRARY_PATH is evil: the execution
tests in the testsuite should be linked with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333
--- Comment #15 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-14 15:47:16 UTC ---
--- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-12
12:48:32 UTC ---
A target issue as it only
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49214
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47364
--- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
16:32:01 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Jun 14 16:31:57 2011
New Revision: 175034
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175034
Log:
Properly expand strlen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
--- Comment #22 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
16:32:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
(In reply to comment #19)
A full build for AVR fails, but that seems to be related to other
open bugs.
What bugs?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47364
--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
16:36:16 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Jun 14 16:36:12 2011
New Revision: 175035
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175035
Log:
Pass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47364
--- Comment #9 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
16:36:50 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Jun 14 16:36:45 2011
New Revision: 175036
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175036
Log:
Expand strlen to Pmode.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49402
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49405
Summary: Inlining in inheritance seems broken
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49405
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49290
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
18:15:46 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 14 18:15:43 2011
New Revision: 175041
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175041
Log:
PR c++/49290
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49389
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
18:16:00 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 14 18:15:58 2011
New Revision: 175043
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175043
Log:
PR c++/49389
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49369
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
18:15:53 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 14 18:15:51 2011
New Revision: 175042
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175042
Log:
PR c++/49369
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49117
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
18:16:08 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 14 18:16:06 2011
New Revision: 175044
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175044
Log:
PR c++/49117
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49406
Summary: Inlining in inheritance seems broken
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36610
Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nicola at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49406
--- Comment #1 from neotheone222 at gmail dot com 2011-06-14 18:33:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 24520
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24520
Base header file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49406
--- Comment #2 from neotheone222 at gmail dot com 2011-06-14 18:33:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 24521
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24521
Base implementation file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49406
--- Comment #3 from neotheone222 at gmail dot com 2011-06-14 18:34:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 24522
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24522
Base preprocessed file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49406
--- Comment #4 from neotheone222 at gmail dot com 2011-06-14 18:34:43 UTC ---
Created attachment 24523
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24523
Derived header file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49406
--- Comment #5 from neotheone222 at gmail dot com 2011-06-14 18:35:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 24524
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24524
Derived implementation file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49406
--- Comment #6 from neotheone222 at gmail dot com 2011-06-14 18:35:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 24525
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24525
Derived preprocessed file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49406
--- Comment #7 from neotheone222 at gmail dot com 2011-06-14 18:36:01 UTC ---
Created attachment 24526
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24526
InlineText main file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49406
--- Comment #8 from neotheone222 at gmail dot com 2011-06-14 18:36:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 24527
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24527
InlineText preprocessed file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49406
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14
18:37:28 UTC ---
your program is invalid
if a function is declared inline in one translation unit (such as Base.c++)
then it must be declared inline in all translation units
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49406
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49407
--- Comment #1 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-06-14 19:04:34
UTC ---
Created attachment 24528
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24528
testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49407
Summary: unusable debuginfo for dll-imported functions.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo:
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: jan.kratoch...@redhat.com
CC: do...@gcc.gnu.org
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
FAIL gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20110614 (prerelease)
FAIL gcc (GCC) 4.7.0 20110614 (experimental)
struct S {
void m (int x) {}
};
templatevoid (S
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
