[Bug fortran/49466] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Memory leak with assignment of extended derived types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49466 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-06-20 06:21:27 UTC --- This is due to revision 165973: Author:janus Date:Tue Oct 26 17:38:42 2010 UTC (7 months, 3 weeks ago) Changed paths:10 Log Message: 2010-10-26 Janus Weil

[Bug debug/48459] [4.6/4.7 Regression] avr: Assertion failure with -gdwarf-2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459 --- Comment #33 from Anitha Boyapati 2011-06-20 05:00:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #32) > Fixed with: > > 2011-06-17 Richard Henderson > > Backport from mainline > 2011-03-22 Richard Henderson > > * dwarf2out.c

[Bug middle-end/49465] [4.7 Regression] Revision 175114 miscompiled 403.gcc in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49465 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/47080] [C++0x] explicit conversion function return conversions not restricted to qualifications

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47080 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/49470] no matching constructor for initialization errors not detected in g++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49470 --- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2011-06-20 03:12:23 UTC --- This test case originates from http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9627.

[Bug c++/49470] New: no matching constructor for initialization errors not detected in g++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49470 Summary: no matching constructor for initialization errors not detected in g++ Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/47601] [OOP] Internal Error: mio_component_ref(): Component not found

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47601 --- Comment #35 from Kris 2011-06-20 02:31:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #34) > Thanks, Janus -- you rock! I concur. Thanks!

[Bug c++/47635] [C++0x] ICE on invalid code in constructor_name_p, at cp/name-lookup.c:1809

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47635 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/48138] __attribute__((aligned)) should give an error when applied to a typedef or template parameter, at least in C++0x mode.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48138 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/49205] [C++0x] Default constructor with pack expansion parameter not detected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49205 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37089 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/49383] [4.7 regression] powerpc64-linux bootstrap failure due to ice in cgraph_only_called_directly_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49383 --- Comment #5 from William J. Schmidt 2011-06-20 01:02:33 UTC --- We've verified that one-line fix allows the bootstrap to complete successfully.

[Bug bootstrap/49383] [4.7 regression] powerpc64-linux bootstrap failure due to ice in cgraph_only_called_directly_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49383 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 from

[Bug fortran/49074] [OOP] Defined assignment w/ CLASS arrays: Incomplete error message

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49074 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/49469] New: GCC fails to bootstrap when building with embedded zlib on Mac OS X 10.6.7

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49469 Summary: GCC fails to bootstrap when building with embedded zlib on Mac OS X 10.6.7 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/49417] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] ICE on invalid CLASS component declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49417 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/48699] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [OOP] MOVE_ALLOC inside SELECT TYPE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48699 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/47601] [OOP] Internal Error: mio_component_ref(): Component not found

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47601 --- Comment #34 from Rich Townsend 2011-06-19 21:18:47 UTC --- Thanks, Janus -- you rock! On Jun 19, 2011, at 4:16 PM, janus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47601 > > --- Comment #33 from janus at gcc do

[Bug fortran/47601] [OOP] Internal Error: mio_component_ref(): Component not found

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47601 --- Comment #33 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-19 21:16:06 UTC --- Ok, the backport has landed on the 4.6 branch and should be just in time for the 4.6.1 release.

[Bug fortran/49074] [OOP] Defined assignment w/ CLASS arrays: Incomplete error message

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49074 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-19 21:05:22 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Sun Jun 19 21:05:18 2011 New Revision: 175194 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175194 Log: 2011-06-19 Janus Weil PR fortran/4

[Bug fortran/47601] [OOP] Internal Error: mio_component_ref(): Component not found

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47601 --- Comment #32 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-19 21:05:22 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Sun Jun 19 21:05:18 2011 New Revision: 175194 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175194 Log: 2011-06-19 Janus Weil PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/48699] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [OOP] MOVE_ALLOC inside SELECT TYPE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48699 --- Comment #19 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-19 21:05:22 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Sun Jun 19 21:05:18 2011 New Revision: 175194 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175194 Log: 2011-06-19 Janus Weil PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/49417] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] ICE on invalid CLASS component declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49417 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-19 21:05:22 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Sun Jun 19 21:05:18 2011 New Revision: 175194 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175194 Log: 2011-06-19 Janus Weil PR fortran/4

[Bug fortran/49466] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Memory leak with assignment of extended derived types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49466 --- Comment #6 from Rich Townsend 2011-06-19 18:57:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > > In the first assignment b.U is allocated, in the second assignment it is not > > freed, before being allocated again. > > I don't think it should be freed

[Bug fortran/49466] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Memory leak with assignment of extended derived types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49466 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-06-19 18:45:09 UTC --- > In the first assignment b.U is allocated, in the second assignment it is not > freed, before being allocated again. I don't think it should be freed then allocated for the se

[Bug other/31400] enable static linking of support libraries through -static-libXY

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31400 Matt Arsenault changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arsenm2 at rpi dot edu --- Comment #20 f

[Bug target/49461] boehm-gc and gcj incompatible with pie

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49461 m...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug target/49461] boehm-gc and gcj incompatible with pie

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49461 --- Comment #9 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-19 18:07:54 UTC --- Author: mrs Date: Sun Jun 19 18:07:52 2011 New Revision: 175193 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175193 Log: 2011-06-19 Jack Howarth PR target/494

[Bug target/49461] boehm-gc and gcj incompatible with pie

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49461 m...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug target/49461] boehm-gc and gcj incompatible with pie

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49461 --- Comment #7 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-19 17:54:26 UTC --- Author: mrs Date: Sun Jun 19 17:54:24 2011 New Revision: 175192 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175192 Log: PR target/49461 * mh-darwin: Turn o

[Bug fortran/49466] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Memory leak with assignment of extended derived types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49466 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Memory leak with assignment |[4.6/4.7 Regression] Memory

[Bug target/49461] boehm-gc and gcj incompatible with pie

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49461 m...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/49461] boehm-gc and gcj incompatible with pie

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49461 --- Comment #5 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-19 17:51:04 UTC --- Author: mrs Date: Sun Jun 19 17:51:02 2011 New Revision: 175191 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175191 Log: 2011-06-19 Jack Howarth PR target/494

[Bug target/49461] boehm-gc and gcj incompatible with pie

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49461 --- Comment #4 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-19 17:48:15 UTC --- Author: mrs Date: Sun Jun 19 17:48:13 2011 New Revision: 175190 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175190 Log: PR target/49461 * mh-darwin: Turn of

[Bug target/49461] boehm-gc and gcj incompatible with pie

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49461 m...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/49461] boehm-gc and gcj incompatible with pie

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49461 --- Comment #3 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-19 17:39:22 UTC --- Author: mrs Date: Sun Jun 19 17:39:19 2011 New Revision: 175189 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175189 Log: 2011-06-18 Jack Howarth PR target

[Bug target/49263] SH Target: underutilized "TST #imm, R0" instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49263 --- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo 2011-06-19 16:42:01 UTC --- Thanks for having a look at it Kaz. Yes, the fiddling with the combine pass is fragile. I've tried out your peephole idea. It works in most cases but not all the time. E.g. it doesn't catc

[Bug target/48863] A Bug When Assembler Instructions with C Expression Operands in arm-elf-gcc 4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48863 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-06-19 16:26:25 UTC --- Created attachment 24562 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24562 runtime test case Here's a small runtime test case. > cat pr48863.c /* pr48863.c */ static inl

[Bug fortran/49466] Memory leak with assignment of extended derived types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49466 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/49468] SH Target: inefficient integer abs code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49468 --- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo 2011-06-19 15:48:41 UTC --- Created attachment 24561 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24561 Before/After Examples

[Bug fortran/49466] Memory leak with assignment of extended derived types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49466 --- Comment #2 from Rich Townsend 2011-06-19 15:39:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > > In the attached sample code, which is a reduced test case from the full > > code, > > the assignment "as_b = as_a" leaks memory

[Bug target/49468] SH Target: inefficient integer abs code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49468 --- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo 2011-06-19 15:29:45 UTC --- Created attachment 24560 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24560 Proposed patch The patch adds explicit handling of abs:SI and abs:DI to the machine description instead

[Bug fortran/49466] Memory leak with assignment of extended derived types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49466 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug target/49468] New: SH Target: inefficient integer abs code

ias=sh-elf CFLAGS=-Os CXXFLAGS=-Os --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --no-create --no-recursion Thread model: single gcc version 4.7.0 20110619 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug target/48256] gcc4.4.5 internal compiler error: in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:1954

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48256 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-06-19 14:02:27 UTC --- Created attachment 24559 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24559 preprocessed test case Several files in gsoc2010-fftw-neon ICE gcc-4.4 in change_address_1, this

[Bug tree-optimization/27460] Does not vectorize statements with mixed type COND_EXPRs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27460 Ira Rosen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vincenzo.innocente at cern

[Bug tree-optimization/49457] integer comparison does not vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49457 Ira Rosen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/49442] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Misaligned store support pessimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49442 Ira Rosen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com --- Comment #4 from Ir

[Bug tree-optimization/49443] gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-3.c and vect-peel-4.c fail on IA64 after testsuite change

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49443 --- Comment #2 from Ira Rosen 2011-06-19 08:09:43 UTC --- Both tests contain misaligned accesses and cannot be vectorized on targets that have no misalignment support, like ia64. So, I think, the tests should just fail: Index: vect-peel-3.c