http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49557
--- Comment #12 from Arjen Markus 2011-07-04
06:58:46 UTC ---
Hello,
well, I have re-read the installation instructions, put the sources
for gmp, mpfr and mpc into the GCC source
directory, reconfigured it (from a clean build directory) and got
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49623
Summary: Segfault of "gfortran -L" if no argument follows the
"-L"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49622
Summary: Compiler segfault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
Repor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49620
--- Comment #4 from julian gardner 2011-07-03
21:51:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> A single .o file is not a complete program, it also needs a main() and
> whatever
> else is needed to call the problematic code and observe whether it work
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49620
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-07-03
21:38:19 UTC ---
A single .o file is not a complete program, it also needs a main() and whatever
else is needed to call the problematic code and observe whether it worked or
not.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49620
--- Comment #2 from julian gardner 2011-07-03
21:06:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Please add a complete self-contained test case. (The given test case isn't.)
> Also please also indicate with which gcc options you compiled the test case.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38342
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49618
--- Comment #8 from Sedat Dilek 2011-07-03
20:47:37 UTC ---
Confirmed... Image built with gcc-4.6.x-disable-opt-flags.patch works also
fine.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49620
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-07-03
20:39:11 UTC ---
Please add a complete self-contained test case. (The given test case isn't.)
Also please also indicate with which gcc options you compiled the test case.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49618
Eugene Rudoy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ernews at gmx dot de
--- Comment #7 from E
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49621
Summary: [4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] ICE in trunc_int_for_mode, at
explow.c:57
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49620
Summary: piece of code from modification to dvblast but cant
get it to compile and run correctly
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49618
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49618
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2011-07-03
19:27:08 UTC ---
__dso_handle should be marked as weak in the source.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48851
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Gray 2011-07-03 19:00:36
UTC ---
Thanks for pointing that out, I've changed the definitions in OpenBSD to
#ifndef NULL
#ifdef __GNUG__
#define NULL__null
#elif defined(__cplusplus)
#define NULL0L
#else
#def
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49619
Summary: ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5362
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49618
--- Comment #4 from Sedat Dilek 2011-07-03
17:46:07 UTC ---
With the Patch from [1] I could boot a firmware-image on my router.
[1]
http://freetz.org/attachment/ticket/1310/gcc-4.6.x-disable-if-conversion.patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296
--- Comment #15 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-07-03
17:40:11 UTC ---
Created attachment 24662
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24662
Updated testcase
Updated testcase that checks integer, real, and logical types in addition to
cha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296
--- Comment #14 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-07-03
17:37:33 UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Sun Jul 3 17:37:30 2011
New Revision: 175789
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175789
Log:
PR 49296 Fix wrong PR number in ChangeLog
Modified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49583
--- Comment #3 from sgunderson at bigfoot dot com 2011-07-03 17:20:11 UTC ---
Hi,
My bug report was (as you can see in the title) not about the fstps/fld
sequence; it was about the extraneous fxch instructions. (My original code was
with -ffast-ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40054
--- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl
2011-07-03 17:12:15 UTC ---
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 04:25:39PM +, janus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40054
>
> --- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40054
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2011-07-03
16:29:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I think it will be very hard (if not impossible) to implement this, while
> maintaining support for statement functions at the same time. In particular,
> h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40054
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-03 16:24:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> > In any case, statement functions are obsolescent since F95, so would it be
> > an
> > option to not support them with -std=f2008?
>
> Obsolescen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40054
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296
--- Comment #13 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-07-03
16:00:34 UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Sun Jul 3 16:00:32 2011
New Revision: 175788
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175788
Log:
PR 49296 Fix wrong PR number in ChangeLog entry
Mo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296
--- Comment #12 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-07-03
15:54:05 UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Sun Jul 3 15:54:02 2011
New Revision: 175787
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175787
Log:
PR 48296 Accept EOF as separator when reading strin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48296
--- Comment #6 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-07-03 15:54:05
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Sun Jul 3 15:54:02 2011
New Revision: 175787
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175787
Log:
PR 48296 Accept EOF as separator when reading string
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40054
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-03 15:43:39 UTC ---
I think it will be very hard (if not impossible) to implement this, while
maintaining support for statement functions at the same time. In particular,
how is one supposed to i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49618
--- Comment #3 from dileks 2011-07-03 15:39:02
UTC ---
Short feedback: -O{0,1,2,} works (beq* is there), -Os doesn't (beq deleted).
[ -O0 ]
beq$2,$0,$L2
[ -O1 ]
beql$2,$0,$L3
[ -O2 ]
beql$2,$0,$L2
[ -Os ]
[ empty ]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49618
--- Comment #2 from Török Edwin 2011-07-03
15:07:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Ouch. I can see where it might be NULL… but in anal-C99 taking a pointer of
> an object (&__dso_handle) can never be a NULL pointer, so GCC might, in a
> very
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49618
Thorsten Glaser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tg at mirbsd dot org
--- Comment #1 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49583
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40054
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-03 11:32:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
>
> two() = 7
> contains
> function two ()
> integer, pointer :: two
> allocate(two)
> end function two
> end
>
> Fails with:
>
> fu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49616
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40054
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-03 11:27:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> cf. also PR 49562
after PR49562 is fixed on trunk, type-bound pointer functions already work (in
contrast to ordinary, non-type-bound pointer funct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49618
Summary: When building uClibc with GCC 4.6.1 old_atexit is
miscompiled
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49610
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49610
--- Comment #3 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-03 10:14:59 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Sun Jul 3 10:14:55 2011
New Revision: 175786
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175786
Log:
PR tree-optimization/49610
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49617
Summary: gcc misses uninititialized variables in contained
functions
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49616
Summary: REGRESSION vectorization fails in case of runtime
dimensioned vector
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49495
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor 2011-07-03
09:45:44 UTC ---
Patch posted to the mailing list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg00140.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49612
--- Comment #2 from Krisztian Kocsis
2011-07-03 05:59:34 UTC ---
Ok, I'll try 4.6.1.
Yes, it's definitely 4.5.3:
krisztiankocsis@optimaster:/project/optinux/products/mpbr$
/project/optinux/toolchains/geode-lx-r1/bin/i686-optinux-linux-gnu-gcc
-
42 matches
Mail list logo
