[Bug fortran/49638] New: [OOP] length parameter is ignored when overriding type bound character functions with constant length.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49638 Summary: [OOP] length parameter is ignored when overriding type bound character functions with constant length. Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug middle-end/49628] [4.7 Regression] 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49628 --- Comment #6 from Ira Rosen 2011-07-05 08:18:09 UTC --- Sorry, I was wrong about group size check. It is ok without your patch. So, this should be enough: Index: tree-vect-data-refs.c ===

[Bug tree-optimization/49632] ICE in compute_affine_dependence (tree-data-ref.c:4038) with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49632 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/38342] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] __attribute__((__progmem__)) not propagated from typedef to data

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38342 --- Comment #11 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-07-05 08:43:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > I was using documented avr-libc features. Does that mean that this is an > avr-libc bug rather than a gcc bug? Neither of the web pages you reference

[Bug middle-end/49628] [4.7 Regression] 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49628 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-05 08:53:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > > I wonder where we are supposed to set GROUP_SIZE here > In vect_analyze_data_ref_access(), > but your patch does this: >

[Bug fortran/49636] Associate construct confused with slightly complicated case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49636 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code CC|

[Bug c++/49639] New: [4.7 Regression] 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006 runtime fail

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49639 Summary: [4.7 Regression] 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006 runtime fail Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug target/43052] Inline memcmp is *much* slower than glibc's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43052 --- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka 2011-07-05 11:08:50 UTC --- > > Do you think you could spin a script which also tests memcmp? memcmp is different story. Few years back I rewrote memcpy/memset codegen to allow choosing from several basic implem

[Bug middle-end/49628] [4.7 Regression] 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49628 --- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-05 11:24:30 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jul 5 11:24:26 2011 New Revision: 175847 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175847 Log: 2011-07-05 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug tree-optimization/49518] [4.6 Regression] ICE in vect_enhance_data_refs_alignment, at tree-vect-data-refs.c:1555

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49518 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.7.0 Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regr

[Bug middle-end/49628] [4.7 Regression] 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49628 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/49518] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in vect_enhance_data_refs_alignment, at tree-vect-data-refs.c:1555

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49518 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-05 11:24:30 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jul 5 11:24:26 2011 New Revision: 175847 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175847 Log: 2011-07-05 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug fortran/18918] Eventually support Fortran 2008's coarrays [co-arrays]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18918 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug middle-end/49640] New: Internal compiler in C99 code (using variable-length arrays) and OpenMP

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49640 Summary: Internal compiler in C99 code (using variable-length arrays) and OpenMP Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/49640] Internal compiler in C99 code (using variable-length arrays) and OpenMP

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49640 --- Comment #1 from doriankrause at web dot de 2011-07-05 11:49:09 UTC --- Created attachment 24688 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24688 The test code

[Bug target/49641] New: [ARM] Wrong code for ARMv4T and stmia

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49641 Summary: [ARM] Wrong code for ARMv4T and stmia Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassig...@

[Bug c/49642] New: constant part of a macro not optimized away as expected due to splitter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49642 Summary: constant part of a macro not optimized away as expected due to splitter Product: gcc Version: tree-ssa Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/49642] constant part of a macro not optimized away as expected due to splitter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49642 --- Comment #1 from marcus at jet dot franken.de 2011-07-05 12:41:05 UTC --- Created attachment 24690 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24690 ehca_mrmw.i gcc -m64 -O2 -fno-inline-functions-called-once -c ehca_mrmw.i ; objdump -dr

[Bug c++/49637] template function overload incorrectly ambiguous

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49637 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c/49642] constant part of a macro not optimized away as expected due to splitter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49642 --- Comment #2 from marcus at jet dot franken.de 2011-07-05 12:42:28 UTC --- looking at the assembly, both x() and y() call the assembler functions, just the static function is still emitted with <.ehca_get_max_hwpage_size.part.0>:

[Bug rtl-optimization/47449] [x32] can’t find a register in class ‘DIREG’ while reloading ‘asm’

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47449 --- Comment #13 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-05 12:47:38 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Tue Jul 5 12:47:35 2011 New Revision: 175849 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175849 Log: Don't propagate hard registers in forward_p

[Bug tree-optimization/49642] constant part of a macro not optimized away as expected due to splitter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49642 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/47449] [x32] can’t find a register in class ‘DIREG’ while reloading ‘asm’

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47449 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/36884] ifcvt poor optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36884 --- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-07-05 13:20:15 UTC --- Created attachment 24691 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24691 C Testcase pr36884.c This testcase shows the dis-optimization in 4.7. trunk

[Bug rtl-optimization/36884] ifcvt poor optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36884 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0 --- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann

[Bug testsuite/49643] New: FAIL: g++.dg/rtti/anon-ns1.C scan-assembler "*N[^"]+1AE"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49643 Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/rtti/anon-ns1.C scan-assembler "*N[^"]+1AE" Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug testsuite/49643] FAIL: g++.dg/rtti/anon-ns1.C scan-assembler "*N[^"]+1AE"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49643 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Target|hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11

[Bug testsuite/49643] FAIL: g++.dg/rtti/anon-ns1.C scan-assembler "*N[^"]+1AE"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49643 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin 2011-07-05 14:33:38 UTC --- I thought I had attached the hpux assembler. The string is similar to darwin: _ZTSN12_GLOBAL__N_11AE: .STRING "*N12_GLOBAL__N_11AE\x00"

[Bug c++/49639] [4.7 Regression] 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006 runtime fail

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49639 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/49519] [4.7 Regression] Revision 175272 miscompiled 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49519 --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2011-07-05 14:45:40 UTC --- *** Bug 49639 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/49598] [C++0x] Ice on lambda with implicit capture by value.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49598 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-07-05 14:47:26 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jul 5 14:47:21 2011 New Revision: 175857 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175857 Log: PR c++/49598 * semantics.c (finish_id_expre

[Bug middle-end/47654] [4.6/4.7 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-outer-4h.c FAILs with -floop-block

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47654 --- Comment #9 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-05 14:50:37 UTC --- Author: spop Date: Tue Jul 5 14:50:34 2011 New Revision: 175861 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175861 Log: Fix PR47654: Loop blocking should strip-mine at leas

[Bug c++/49598] [C++0x] Ice on lambda with implicit capture by value.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49598 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-07-05 14:51:59 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jul 5 14:51:56 2011 New Revision: 175863 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175863 Log: PR c++/49598 * semantics.c (finish_id_expre

[Bug rtl-optimization/49429] [4.7 Regression] dse.c change (r175063) causes execution failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49429 Steve Ellcey changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/49644] New: [ 4.5/4.6 Regression ] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644 Summary: [ 4.5/4.6 Regression ] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect. Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3

[Bug c++/49637] template function overload incorrectly ambiguous

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49637 --- Comment #3 from Timothy J Giese 2011-07-05 15:40:59 UTC --- The original minimal test case also fails to compile with g++ 4.5.1. I can confirm that the following compiles fine with g++ 4.6.0, 4.5.1, and 4.4.3. struct S { typedef int iterato

[Bug c/49644] [4.5/4.6 Regression] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug c/49644] [ 4.5/4.6 Regression ] post-increment of promoted to complex operand is incorrect.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[ 4.5/4.6 Regression ] |[ 4.5/4.6 Regression ]

[Bug tree-optimization/49542] [4.7 regression] 2 failures in the vectorization testsuite in 64-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49542 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-05 15:42:55 UTC --- > You wrote (here http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-11/msg00508.html) > > They pass on SPARC 64-bit because the operations are > > transformed to use the word mode. > It doesn't

[Bug target/47715] [x32] TLS doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47715 --- Comment #12 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-05 15:47:44 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Tue Jul 5 15:47:40 2011 New Revision: 175864 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175864 Log: Promote the function argument before checki

[Bug c++/49637] template function overload incorrectly ambiguous

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49637 --- Comment #4 from Timothy J Giese 2011-07-05 16:04:29 UTC --- icpc (ICC) 11.1 20091130 compiles the original minimal test case without warning nor error.

[Bug regression/49498] [4.7 Regression]: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_b.c bogus warning line 20

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49498 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-07-05 16:05:21 UTC --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/30/11 14:37, xinliangli at gmail dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49498 > > --- Comment #4 from david

[Bug regression/49498] [4.7 Regression]: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_b.c bogus warning line 20

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49498 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-07-05 16:05:22 UTC --- Created attachment 24693 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24693 k.c.127t.uninit

[Bug c++/49637] template function overload incorrectly ambiguous

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49637 Johannes Schaub changed: What|Removed |Added CC||schaub.johannes at |

[Bug testsuite/49643] FAIL: g++.dg/rtti/anon-ns1.C scan-assembler "*N[^"]+1AE"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49643 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug testsuite/49643] FAIL: g++.dg/rtti/anon-ns1.C scan-assembler "*N[^"]+1AE"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49643 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target|hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 |*-

[Bug tree-optimization/49645] New: [4.7 regression] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr8781.C FAILs on Tru64 UNIX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49645 Summary: [4.7 regression] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr8781.C FAILs on Tru64 UNIX Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug tree-optimization/49645] [4.7 regression] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr8781.C FAILs on Tru64 UNIX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49645 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth 2011-07-05 16:53:42 UTC --- Created attachment 24694 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24694 -fdump-tree-fre1-details output

[Bug rtl-optimization/49646] New: gcc.dg/pr44194-1.c FAILs on Solaris/SPARC, Tru64 UNIX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49646 Summary: gcc.dg/pr44194-1.c FAILs on Solaris/SPARC, Tru64 UNIX Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization

[Bug rtl-optimization/49646] gcc.dg/pr44194-1.c FAILs on Solaris/SPARC, Tru64 UNIX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49646 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth 2011-07-05 17:00:00 UTC --- Created attachment 24695 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24695 -fdump-rtl-dse1 output

[Bug testsuite/49643] FAIL: g++.dg/rtti/anon-ns1.C scan-assembler "*N[^"]+1AE"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49643 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-07-05 17:00:41 UTC --- > I've checked in a tweak to the testcase that ought to fix it, let me know if > you still see the problem. This fixes the failure for x86_64-apple-darwin10 and powerpc-apple-d

[Bug tree-optimization/49647] New: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030807-7.c XPASSes everywhere

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49647 Summary: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030807-7.c XPASSes everywhere Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization As

[Bug fortran/49648] New: ICE(segfault) with MATHMUL and function-result actual argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49648 Summary: ICE(segfault) with MATHMUL and function-result actual argument Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: norma

[Bug driver/49631] Driver --help should use common help code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49631 --- Comment #1 from Joseph S. Myers 2011-07-05 17:05:41 UTC --- Also note that at least -shared and -pie are driver options that are currently marked as Common rather than Driver so as to have help text in common.opt; as part of fixing this issue

[Bug middle-end/48984] [4.7 Regression] Many testsuite failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48984 --- Comment #8 from Rainer Orth 2011-07-05 17:07:31 UTC --- It also fails on alpha-dec-osf5.1b, sparc-sun-solaris2.*, and i386-pc-solaris2.*.

[Bug fortran/49648] ICE(segfault) with MATHMUL and function-result actual argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49648 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-07-05 17:14:31 UTC --- At some point, the array spec seems to got lost: COMPLEX,SAVE,ALLOCATABLE::P(:) COMPLEX:: PM(SIZE(P),SIZE(P)) We have: (gdb) p expr->expr_type $1 = EXPR_VARIABLE (gdb) p e

[Bug c++/49637] template function overload incorrectly ambiguous

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49637 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-07-05 17:28:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > struct S { typedef int iterator; }; > template void F( T, U ) {} > template void F( T, int ) {} > int main() > { > S::iterator i(42); >

[Bug fortran/49648] ICE(segfault) with MATHMUL and function-result actual argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49648 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Bloc

[Bug c++/49637] template function overload incorrectly ambiguous

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49637 --- Comment #7 from Timothy J Giese 2011-07-05 17:34:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Created attachment 24686 [details] > > minimal test case > > IMO this is ambiguous. > When doing partial ordering, in both c

[Bug c++/49637] template function overload incorrectly ambiguous

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49637 --- Comment #8 from Timothy J Giese 2011-07-05 18:02:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #5) > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > Created attachment 24686 [details] > > > minimal test case > > > > IMO this is ambiguous. > >

[Bug c++/49519] [4.7 Regression] Revision 175272 miscompiled 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49519 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug testsuite/49643] FAIL: g++.dg/rtti/anon-ns1.C scan-assembler "*N[^"]+1AE"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49643 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-07-05 18:19:40 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jul 5 18:19:38 2011 New Revision: 175881 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175881 Log: PR testsuite/49643 * g++.dg/rtti/anon-ns1.C

[Bug testsuite/49643] FAIL: g++.dg/rtti/anon-ns1.C scan-assembler "*N[^"]+1AE"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49643 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/49618] When building uClibc with GCC 4.6.1 old_atexit is miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49618 --- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-05 18:43:07 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jul 5 18:43:04 2011 New Revision: 175884 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175884 Log: PR tree-optimization/49618 * tree-eh.c (tr

[Bug tree-optimization/49618] When building uClibc with GCC 4.6.1 old_atexit is miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49618 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-05 18:44:35 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jul 5 18:44:32 2011 New Revision: 175885 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175885 Log: PR tree-optimization/49618 * tree-eh.c (tr

[Bug fortran/49648] ICE(segfault) with MATHMUL and function-result actual argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49648 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2011-07-05 19:00:51 UTC --- Draft patch, which seems to fix some ref->u.ar->as issues for "p" - but not the one, I am looking for. At least the added assert now triggers. * * * Debugging shows that when resolv

[Bug tree-optimization/49618] When building uClibc with GCC 4.6.1 old_atexit is miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49618 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/49649] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49649 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-1.c Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug target/49650] New: MIPS should not use target_flags_explicit in insn conditions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49650 Summary: MIPS should not use target_flags_explicit in insn conditions Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug fortran/49648] ICE(segfault) with MATHMUL and function-result actual argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49648 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2011-07-05 19:46:45 UTC --- Draft patch, which should also save some memory, .mod file-size and should slightly speed the program. It fixes the test case in comment 0 and comment 2, but I have not yet regtested

[Bug c/49644] [4.5/4.6 Regression] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 f

[Bug c++/49637] template function overload incorrectly ambiguous

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49637 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2011-07-05 19:48:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > OH. I think I see what you are saying here. I now think that you're saying > "the partial ordering will try to deduce the arguments regardless of whether

[Bug c++/49637] template function overload incorrectly ambiguous

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49637 --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2011-07-05 19:51:02 UTC --- This is related to http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/cwg_defects.html#214

[Bug c++/49598] [C++0x] Ice on lambda with implicit capture by value.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49598 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/49644] [4.5/4.6 Regression] post-increment of promoted operand is incorrect.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644 --- Comment #4 from Orion Poplawski 2011-07-05 20:01:27 UTC --- Yeah, I screwed that up. But it doesn't make any difference to the problem. This should be correct though. #include #include int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { double data[6]

[Bug c++/49651] New: [C++0x] nested lambdas and -O3 produced incorrect integer variable increments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49651 Summary: [C++0x] nested lambdas and -O3 produced incorrect integer variable increments Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3

[Bug c/49652] New: SIGFPE in vector_alignment_reachable_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49652 Summary: SIGFPE in vector_alignment_reachable_p Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.

[Bug c++/49651] [C++0x] nested lambdas and -O3 produced incorrect integer variable increments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49651 --- Comment #1 from Pedro Larroy 2011-07-05 20:30:13 UTC --- I think I'm able to reproduce with the following: the output spotted is: run.for_each.a: 20633 run.a: 20634 1 for_each.a: 20631 1 for_each.a: 20632 Compiled with: g++ -Wall -std=c++

[Bug c++/49353] C++ frontend should not declare function EXTERN when it forces them to stay

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49353 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-07-05 20:41:17 UTC --- The C++ linkage scheme has been to set DECL_EXTERN on comdat stuff until EOF, at which point we decide whether or not to emit them and whether they should be public or not. We need to

[Bug c++/49637] template function overload incorrectly ambiguous

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49637 Timothy J Giese changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/49649] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49649 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from H.J

[Bug c++/49651] [C++0x] nested lambdas and -O3 produced incorrect integer variable increments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49651 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |normal --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wak

[Bug c/49653] New: Undefined reference to inlined function with -O0,-std=c99

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49653 Summary: Undefined reference to inlined function with -O0,-std=c99 Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug c/49653] Undefined reference to inlined function with -O0,-std=c99

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49653 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-07-05 22:15:54 UTC --- This is correct for C99. inline alone in C99 is the same GNU's C90's extern inline.

[Bug c++/49651] [C++0x] nested lambdas and -O3 produced incorrect integer variable increments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49651 --- Comment #3 from Pedro Larroy 2011-07-05 22:24:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Can you produce a testcase that aborts/fails if the problem occurs? Otherwise > I > seem to need to inspect thousands of lines to look for non-consecutive va

[Bug libffi/49594] bootstrap failure in libffi:darwin_closure for powerpc-darwin8

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49594 --- Comment #9 from David Fang 2011-07-05 22:34:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > I tested the patch on darwin 8 on a G5 and with crosses from darwin 9 - > > darwin 8. Using Iain's patch ( http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24655

[Bug c/49654] New: Linear search through options in handle_pragma_diagnostic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49654 Summary: Linear search through options in handle_pragma_diagnostic Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug fortran/49648] ICE(segfault) with MATHMUL and function-result actual argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49648 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-07-05 22:52:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Draft patch, which should also save some memory, .mod file-size and should > slightly speed the program. The patch fails for procedure pointers - as the fun

[Bug regression/49498] [4.7 Regression]: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_b.c bogus warning line 20

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49498 --- Comment #7 from davidxl 2011-07-05 22:51:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Created attachment 24693 [details] > k.c.127t.uninit 1) is the complicated control flow generated by if-merging + jump-threading? 2) On the targets that have the

[Bug c/49655] New: diagnostic pragma accepts non-warning options

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49655 Summary: diagnostic pragma accepts non-warning options Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: accepts-invalid Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug rtl-optimization/49474] [4.7 Regression] GCC 4.7-20110618 fails to bootstrap on stage 2: gcc/fortran/resolve.c:5360:1: internal compiler error: vector VEC(edge,base) index domain error, in find_i

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49474 Douglas Mencken changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.1 --- Comment #1 from Douglas Menck

[Bug c/49656] New: internal compiler error on Mac OS 10.7.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49656 Summary: internal compiler error on Mac OS 10.7.0 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassig...@gc

[Bug c++/49651] [C++0x] nested lambdas and -O3 produced incorrect integer variable increments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49651 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug c++/48157] Unable to match function call to member function template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48157 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-07-06 04:20:46 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jul 6 04:20:39 2011 New Revision: 175904 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175904 Log: PR c++/48157 * pt.c (tsubst_qualified_id):

[Bug tree-optimization/49657] New: array subscript warnings when building gcc with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49657 Summary: array subscript warnings when building gcc with -O2 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/49657] array subscript warnings when building gcc with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49657 --- Comment #1 from Ryan Hill 2011-07-06 04:54:56 UTC --- Created attachment 24699 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24699 build log

[Bug c/49653] Undefined reference to inlined function with -O0,-std=c99

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49653 Johannes Schaub changed: What|Removed |Added CC||schaub.johannes at |

[Bug tree-optimization/49542] [4.7 regression] 2 failures in the vectorization testsuite in 64-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49542 --- Comment #4 from Ira Rosen 2011-07-06 06:20:06 UTC --- In that case they should fail. The vf in 4.7 is correct. In 4.6 it is updated after stmts analysis, which may cause inconsistency. This patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg0

[Bug target/49641] [ARM] Wrong code for ARMv4T and stmia

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49641 Sebastian Huber changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.4.6 Known to fail|

[Bug fortran/49648] ICE(segfault) with MATMUL and function-result actual argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49648 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 f

  1   2   >