http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49732
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-14
13:33:41 UTC ---
> Ah, I see. Well, it looks it's -gnatafno option which triggers the error.
-gnatafno is -gnata -gnatf -gnatn -gnato. Can you further narrow it down?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49747
Summary: warning:dereferencing type-punned pointer will break
strict-aliasing rules
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49732
--- Comment #4 from Vorfeed Canal 2011-07-14
13:22:31 UTC ---
Ah, I see. Well, it looks it's -gnatafno option which triggers the error. And I
have no idea what it's supposed to do :-(
/localbuild/build/sysnative-prencurses-5.9/narrowc/Ada95/src$
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49651
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|4.7.0 |4.3.6
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49745
--- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini 2011-07-14
12:43:53 UTC ---
Thanks Jakub. Thus, seems a little more difficult than we hoped, but still
doable. We'll give a try to your scheme.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49651
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-14
12:36:23 UTC ---
C testcase that fails at -O2:
extern void abort (void);
struct X {
int *p;
int *q;
};
void __attribute__((noinline, noclone))
foo (struct X x) { *x.q = 0; }
volatile int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49745
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-14
12:34:32 UTC ---
BTW, really shouldn't be using __gthread_mutex_timedlock if it isn't
available...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49745
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-14
12:33:16 UTC ---
svn blame isn't hard to use.
You'll find out that the unistd.h include was added by
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-10/msg01666.html
There are still some of the unistd.h guard m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49745
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49651
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49745
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-07-14
12:13:27 UTC ---
I don't think there is a maintainer for gthreads
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49732
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-14
12:12:35 UTC ---
> Which compilation options?
-g -O2 -gnata -gnatf -gnatn -gnato -gnatVa
It's usually more convenient to change them for a particular file in the
project file than patching the source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49745
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2011-07-14
12:07:45 UTC ---
Before resolving as dup of 36231, let's add in CC Jakub too, it would be nice
if for 4.7 we could finally take the plunge and follow Jon's suggestion, or a
variant of it, but I don't k
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49732
--- Comment #2 from Vorfeed Canal 2011-07-14
12:07:01 UTC ---
Which compilation options? I'm not specifying anything strange and even if I
use -O0 the result is the same:
/localbuild/build/sysnative-prencurses-5.9/narrowc/Ada95/src$ gnatmake -O0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49745
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46350
--- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-07-14 11:57:34 UTC ---
On 14-Jul-11, at 4:44 AM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Can you submit the patch if it works?
It works. I will install later today after work if someone doesn't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49724
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-07-14 11:54:32 UTC ---
On 14-Jul-11, at 4:40 AM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Can you confirm that this also comes from Martin's patch on the 4.6
> branch?
No, it doesn't come from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49736
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-14 11:49:05 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu Jul 14 11:49:01 2011
New Revision: 176270
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176270
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/49736
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49745
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-07-14
11:13:13 UTC ---
Why does gthr-posix.h even include ?
--- gcc/gthr-posix.h.orig 2011-07-14 11:09:00.148778460 +
+++ gcc/gthr-posix.h2011-07-14 11:09:01.763786789 +
@@ -39,7 +39,6 @
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49746
--- Comment #1 from H.Merijn Brand 2011-07-14
11:09:18 UTC ---
FYI I completed building gcc-4.6.1 with
gcc (GCC) 4.2.4
GNU assembler (GNU Binutils) 2.18
gmp-5.0.2
mpfr-3.0.1
mpc-0.8.2
on HP-UX 11.23-ia64 and HP-UX 11.31-ia64 (both IPF/Itanium
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49745
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-07-14
11:01:26 UTC ---
the problem is actually in gthr-posix.h
no libstdc++ header includes except which
is a non-standard extension and so that's not a problem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49745
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-07-14
10:51:57 UTC ---
dup of PR 36231 ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49746
Summary: Generated PA-RISC2.0w code cannot be assembled by GNU
as-2.21.1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49745
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49736
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49736
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49745
Summary: error: ‘int truncate’ redeclared as different kind of
symbol
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49736
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49744
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48711
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48711
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-14
09:27:41 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Jul 14 09:27:39 2011
New Revision: 176266
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176266
Log:
PR ada/48711
* g-socthi-mingw.adb (Fill
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49744
Summary: Use of prev-gcc/xgcc as PLUGINCC breaks bootstap-lean
tests
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48711
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-14
09:27:25 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Jul 14 09:27:22 2011
New Revision: 176265
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176265
Log:
PR ada/48711
* g-socthi-mingw.adb (Fill
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49733
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2011-07-14
09:25:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Ah, so passing the non-aliasing-var to a function which takes a POINTER
> argument, returning that pointer and modifying it in the function that
> takes the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49739
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-07-14 09:18:14 UTC ---
>> It doesn't work and build failed much earlier:
>
> Patch is missing '}'.
Thanks for fixing this. That's what you get for providing an untested
patch minutes be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49724
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-14
09:13:19 UTC ---
Based on Martin's comment in the other PR, I wonder whether this isn't rather a
temporary failure because of a glitch on the host. Can you reproduce it?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49742
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-*-*
Component|tree-optimi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49740
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-*-*
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49743
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49739
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49735
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-14
09:05:32 UTC ---
It probably papers over a different issue though - even recursive inlining
should be limited by a --param, but appearantly that is not working here.
Honza?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49725
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49736
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49737
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49733
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-14
09:03:58 UTC ---
Ah, so passing the non-aliasing-var to a function which takes a POINTER
argument, returning that pointer and modifying it in the function that
takes the non-aliasing-var is ok then?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49725
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-14
08:58:42 UTC ---
> I will have a look at it next week (if it can be reproduced on the hppa in the
> compile farm).
A cross-compiler from your favorite linux box is sufficient.
> Nevertheless, the int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48757
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-14
08:50:48 UTC ---
Vlad, is the fix backportable to release branches, at least the 4.6 branch?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48727
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49452
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |4.7.0
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24491|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46350
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49725
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor 2011-07-14
08:41:36 UTC ---
I will have a look at it next week (if it can be reproduced on the hppa in the
compile farm). Nevertheless, the interesting thing is that the patch only
makes SRA to do less, never mo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49724
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49725
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49732
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48711
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49737
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48711
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anhvofrcaus at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49625
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48151
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48711
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ivansavvateev at yandex dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43746
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43746
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-07-14
07:49:19 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Jul 14 07:49:14 2011
New Revision: 176262
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176262
Log:
gcc/
PR target/43746
* config/avr/elf.h (T
101 - 163 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
