http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49808
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-07-29
07:10:25 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jul 29 07:10:21 2011
New Revision: 176916
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176916
Log:
PR c++/49808
* pt.c (tsubst) [TEMPLATE_PARM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31067
--- Comment #46 from Tobias Burnus 2011-07-29
07:12:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #45)
[Commit to inline MINLOC/MAXLOC for a rank-1 array, which returns a
single-element rank-1 array.]
On my ~5 year old Athlon64 x2, I get with "-Ofast -march=
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49808
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49896
Summary: undefined reference to static const integral member
whose address is not used, for some values of the
constant
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49897
Summary: nesting lastprivate gives incorrect result
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49898
Summary: nested reduction on #pragma omp for gives incorrect
result
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49799
--- Comment #10 from carrot at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-29 08:36:11 UTC ---
Author: carrot
Date: Fri Jul 29 08:35:59 2011
New Revision: 176917
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176917
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/49799
* co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47407
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth 2011-07-29 09:29:14 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Jul 29 09:29:10 2011
New Revision: 176919
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176919
Log:
PR tree-optimization/47407
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49313
--- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-07-29
09:33:58 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Fri Jul 29 09:33:54 2011
New Revision: 176920
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176920
Log:
PR target/49313
* config/avr/libgcc.S (__
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47407
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49313
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49893
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-29
09:54:29 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 29 09:54:23 2011
New Revision: 176921
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176921
Log:
2011-07-29 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49893
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49896
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49894
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49891
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49894
--- Comment #3 from __vic 2011-07-29 10:13:16 UTC ---
> test.cpp:7:84: error: could not convert '{{0, 0}, 0, "", 0}' from
> '' to 'pthread_cond_t'
>
Initializer is:
{{0, 0}, 0, "", 0}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49894
--- Comment #4 from __vic 2011-07-29 10:17:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 24861
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24861
Preprocessor output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49899
Summary: ICE when redeclaring a static function as weak
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49896
--- Comment #2 from Matthieu Imbert 2011-07-29
10:37:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> You lack a definition of test::version.
C++ standard section 9.4.2 states:
If a 'static' data member is of 'const' integral or 'const' enumeral type,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47958
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x32
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49687
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-07-29
11:27:45 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Fri Jul 29 11:27:39 2011
New Revision: 176923
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176923
Log:
PR target/49687
* config/avr/avr.md (muls
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47908
--- Comment #7 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-07-29
11:44:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 24863
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24863
fix for gcc-4.5.3 and gcc-4.4.6
A patch for trunk and gcc-4.6.1 has been posted:
http://gcc.gnu.
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: ber...@codesourcery.com
Target: ia64-*-*
/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=GCJ --mode=compile
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20110729/Build/./gcc/gcj
-B/usr/local/gcc/gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49687
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-07-29
11:49:30 UTC ---
With this milestone the work for better support for widening multiplication is
finished -- fir the case when MUL instruction is available.
Similar work for the case when no hardwar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49900
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49806
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49900
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab 2011-07-29 12:21:12
UTC ---
I was waiting for an update.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47453
--- Comment #5 from Johannes Schaub
2011-07-29 12:23:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> struct A { int a[2]; A():a({1, 2}) { } };
>
> Should be valid. Example:
>
> class cond_variable
> {
> ::pthread_cond_t cond;
> public:
> constexp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49892
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at nitro dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49900
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49896
Matthieu Imbert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49901
Summary: gfortran.dg/debug/[pr35154-dwarf2.f/pr37738.f]
failures on darwin
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49887
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-07-29 12:58:25 UTC ---
> --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2011-07-28 14:52:35 UTC ---
>> --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-28
>> 14:45:1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49901
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2011-07-29
13:05:08 UTC ---
The first failure, which is an ICE,...
FAIL: gfortran.dg/debug/pr35154-dwarf2.f -gdwarf-2 -g3 (internal compiler
error)
appears as...
[MacPro:gcc/testsuite/gfortran] root#
/sw/src/fi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49887
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-29
13:06:13 UTC ---
Emit that in targetm.asm_out.file_end () instead?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7652
Daniel Marjamäki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.marjamaki at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49902
Summary: [C++0x] ICE in gimple_expand_cfg when initializer_list
constructed using constructor parameters.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Hello,
a compilation of the code below succeeds, but the linking fails with the
message:
undefined reference to `typeinfo for __int128'
Tested with (I got the same error with older versions of GCC):
gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-8)
Regards,
RK
// x.cxx
#include
#include
using namespace s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47715
--- Comment #16 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-29 13:48:45 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Jul 29 13:48:40 2011
New Revision: 176924
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176924
Log:
PR target/47715
* config/i386/i386.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47715
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x32
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49902
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49881
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-07-29
14:39:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Would one of you be so kind as to do a full test run?
> I don't have avr-libc et al set up on this machine...
Just running tests without regenerating li
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49629
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|avr |avr, powerpc
--- Comment #4 from Georg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49903
Summary: AVR: Redundant comparisons in binary-seach switch/case
expansion
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49903
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|AVR: Redundant comparisons |[avr] Redundant comparisons
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49897
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49898
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49897
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-29
15:40:20 UTC ---
*** Bug 49898 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49897
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-29
15:41:36 UTC ---
Created attachment 24865
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24865
gcc47-pr49897.patch
Fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49860
--- Comment #10 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-29
15:56:38 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jul 29 15:56:36 2011
New Revision: 176928
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176928
Log:
Rename gcc.target/i386/pr47446-3.c to gcc.t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49832
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-29
16:00:48 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jul 29 16:00:41 2011
New Revision: 176932
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176932
Log:
Rewrite x86 lea support for x32.
2011-07-26
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #22 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-29
16:00:48 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jul 29 16:00:41 2011
New Revision: 176932
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176932
Log:
Rewrite x86 lea support for x32.
2011-07-2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47381
--- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-29
16:00:45 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jul 29 16:00:41 2011
New Revision: 176932
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176932
Log:
Rewrite x86 lea support for x32.
2011-07-26
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49897
--- Comment #4 from markflorisson88
2011-07-29 16:05:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Created attachment 24865 [details]
> gcc47-pr49897.patch
>
> Fix.
Wow, thanks a lot for the quick fix!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49901
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49887
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-07-29 16:10:04 UTC ---
> --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-29
> 13:06:13 UTC ---
> Emit that in targetm.asm_out.file_end () instead?
Seems to work according to a quick test run
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49903
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-07-29
16:11:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Johann,
> Would some type of peephole optimization help out on this?
RTL peephole won't work because they operate just inside basic blocks.
Don't know t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47372
--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-29
16:43:28 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jul 29 16:43:25 2011
New Revision: 176937
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176937
Log:
Call simplify_gen_subreg with mode of x.
20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47715
--- Comment #18 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-29
16:44:11 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jul 29 16:44:07 2011
New Revision: 176938
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176938
Log:
Remove PTR64.
2011-07-28 H.J. Lu
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47715
--- Comment #19 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-29
16:56:03 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jul 29 16:55:59 2011
New Revision: 176940
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176940
Log:
Revert "Use ptr_mode instead of Pmode with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49885
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Kraft 2011-07-29 17:00:12
UTC ---
For the record, with the original test case and -fdump-tree-original, I get:
s (integer(kind=4) & restrict nb)
{
character(kind=1) bad_rec[1][1:.bad_rec];
integer(kind=4) .bad_rec;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49898
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-29
17:45:46 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jul 29 17:45:42 2011
New Revision: 176945
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176945
Log:
PR middle-end/49897
PR middle-end/49898
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49897
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-29
17:45:46 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jul 29 17:45:42 2011
New Revision: 176945
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176945
Log:
PR middle-end/49897
PR middle-end/49898
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49898
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-29
17:48:46 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jul 29 17:48:42 2011
New Revision: 176946
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176946
Log:
PR middle-end/49897
PR middle-end/49898
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49897
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-29
17:48:45 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jul 29 17:48:42 2011
New Revision: 176946
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176946
Log:
PR middle-end/49897
PR middle-end/49898
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49896
Harald van Dijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49897
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.2, 4.7.0
Summary|[4.5/4.6/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49749
--- Comment #15 from William J. Schmidt
2011-07-29 18:40:26 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Fri Jul 29 18:40:21 2011
New Revision: 176948
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176948
Log:
2011-07-29 Bill Schmidt
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49904
Summary: Internal error with multiplication and -msoft-float
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46468
Jacek Caban changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jacek at codeweavers dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49821
--- Comment #1 from Aurelien Jarno 2011-07-29
19:15:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 24866
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24866
Testcase
Here is a reduced testcase, the bug can be reproduced with:
g++ -c -fvisibility=hidden -g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49905
Summary: Better sanity checking on sprintf src & dest to
produce warning for dodgy code ?
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23286
--- Comment #33 from Andrew Pinski 2011-07-29
20:11:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> Created attachment 19634 [details]
> updated patch
This patch fails on the trunk now with:
/data/src/gcc-cavium/gcc-4.6-upgrade/src/libstdc++-v3/src/strstr
: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: jan.kratoch...@redhat.com
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
FAIL: gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20110729 (prerelease)
FAIL: gcc (GCC) 4.5.4 20110729 (prerelease)
FAIL: gcc (GCC) 4.6.2 20110729 (prerelease)
FAIL: gcc (GCC) 4.7.0 20110728 (experimental)
-g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49905
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49907
Summary: lto-plugin -Wall in stage1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49908
Summary: -lm missing after -lmpc
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49908
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-07-29
21:59:32 UTC ---
Normally most compilers inline cimag and creal. Seems weird that Sun's
compiler does not.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49908
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse 2011-07-29
22:09:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Normally most compilers inline cimag and creal. Seems weird that Sun's
> compiler does not.
It does on a trivial testcase. I'll try to see why it doesn't in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49908
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse 2011-07-29
22:18:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> > Normally most compilers inline cimag and creal. Seems weird that Sun's
> > compiler does not.
> It does on a trivial testcase. I'll try to see why it doesn'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49867
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49892
--- Comment #2 from Daniel E. Platt 2011-07-29
23:09:26 UTC ---
Thanks! This works.
Best,
Dan
On Jul 29, 2011, at 8:44 AM, howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49892
>
> Jack Howarth change
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49909
Summary: FSF gcc 4.6.1 fails to bootstrap on Core Solo/Core Duo
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49909
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-07-29
23:35:13 UTC ---
Use --disable-multilib.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49909
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2011-07-29
23:35:46 UTC ---
Created attachment 24867
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24867
config.log file from x86_64 multilib directory on Core Duo (non-EMT64)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49909
--- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth 2011-07-29
23:43:12 UTC ---
This section of configure appears unprepared for the possibility of compiling
on i386-apple-darwin* with a multilib that can't be executed on the non-EMT64
cpu...
# Check that the com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49910
Summary: "internal compiler error: in redirect_jump, at
jump.c:1485" when build ppl-0.11.2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49909
--- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth 2011-07-30
02:58:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Use --disable-multilib.
Not an option for us on fink since the same packaging script has to both list
the built shared libraries
and run on both non-EMT64 an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49867
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-07-30
06:22:09 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Jul 30 06:22:06 2011
New Revision: 176958
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176958
Log:
PR c++/49867
* parser.c (cp_parser_lambda_e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49867
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|AS
91 matches
Mail list logo
