http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50150
Bug #: 50150
Summary: misc vect.exp failures for target arm
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48722
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Summary|ICE in df_refs_v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49206
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50142
ZHAO Xiaogang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|trivial
--- Comment #4 from ZHAO Xiaogang
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50141
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50141
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49494
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50146
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-08-22
08:36:21 UTC ---
Patch has been posted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg01715.html
I don't have svn write access so I asked for help to commit it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50067
--- Comment #13 from Richard Guenther 2011-08-22
08:39:18 UTC ---
*sigh*, and when we fix it like
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg01582.html then
gcc.dg/torture/pr44913.c is vectorized bogously because
dr_may_alias_p returns false fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50151
Bug #: 50151
Summary: Function string::c_str() doesn't work propely after
running string::resize()
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50151
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50145
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50124
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50152
Bug #: 50152
Summary: gcc v4.5.1 installation error on ubuntu 11.04
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50133
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50067
--- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther 2011-08-22
09:38:43 UTC ---
Testcase which shows that mixing array and base access fns leads to bogus
results (obfuscated, SCEV doesn't handle ADDR_EXPRs well ...):
extern int memcmp(const void *, const void
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50146
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-22
09:38:18 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Aug 22 09:38:14 2011
New Revision: 177951
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177951
Log:
PR bootstrap/50146
* ira-color.c (assign_ha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50146
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50106
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Huber
2011-08-22 09:43:39 UTC ---
Yes, this patch fixes the problem.
It is still not clear to me why we save the volatile registers r0, r1, and r2
at all. Also we restore r1, r2, and r3. Does this make sense? I t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50152
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50133
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-22
09:59:51 UTC ---
Or, alternatively can't we use:
gimple_set_location (vec_stmt, gimple_location (stmt));
instead (and remove all the si handling stuff)?
It seems before PR37482 we were using the scal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50145
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50145
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-08-22
10:27:46 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Aug 22 10:27:42 2011
New Revision: 177952
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177952
Log:
2011-08-22 Richard Guenther
PR testsui
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46862
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50102
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49641
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Huber
2011-08-22 11:00:07 UTC ---
The patch from Bernd Schmidt fixes the problem in my case. What is the status
of this patch?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41780
Sebastian Huber changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50152
--- Comment #2 from ravish 2011-08-22
11:11:16 UTC ---
Hi,
I am trying to build
gcc version 4.5.1 on ubuntu machine i.e., 11.04 (x86_64) machine.
The config parameters are:-
./configure --prefix=/ravnay01/gcc-4.3.3-download/gcc_files
--bindi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47856
--- Comment #1 from Sebastian Huber
2011-08-22 11:20:08 UTC ---
This bug is still present in GCC 4.6.1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46862
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-22
11:26:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 25075
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25075
gcc47-pr46862.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47908
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47856
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Huber
2011-08-22 12:03:41 UTC ---
This bug is also present in GCC 4.7.0 20110820.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49119
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Huber
2011-08-22 12:19:24 UTC ---
This bug is not present in GCC 4.7.0 20110820. Does anyone know which commit
fixed this problem? Is it possible to integrate the fix in GCC 4.6?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50143
--- Comment #16 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-08-22 13:22:55 UTC ---
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011, giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl wrote:
> > Also, I don't know if you are an HTML expert, I'm not,
> > but I would not be **so** sure that all the vi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50149
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50149
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-08-22
13:51:46 UTC ---
> For instance, the following example works for me on Linux with no special
> options and with the options you used.
It works also for me on x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0 with 4.4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50050
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Morin 2011-08-22
14:07:34 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Mon Aug 22 14:07:30 2011
New Revision: 177956
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177956
Log:
2011-08-22 Mikael Morin
PR fortran/50050
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50143
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-08-22
14:27:13 UTC ---
reported upstream https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657081
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50143
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50153
Bug #: 50153
Summary: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/cstdlib:106:1
1: error: '::abs' has not been declared
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50153
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2011-08-22
14:54:36 UTC ---
-bash-3.2$ ./xgcc -B./ -v
Reading specs from ./specs
COLLECT_GCC=./xgcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=./lto-wrapper
Target: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --with-gnu-a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50141
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-22
15:00:13 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Aug 22 15:00:06 2011
New Revision: 177957
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177957
Log:
PR middle-end/50141
* expr.c (get_bit_range
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50133
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-22
15:01:47 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Aug 22 15:01:42 2011
New Revision: 177958
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177958
Log:
PR tree-optimization/50133
* tree-vect-stmt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50130
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig 2011-08-22
15:12:09 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Aug 22 15:12:04 2011
New Revision: 177961
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177961
Log:
2011-08-22 Thomas Koenig
Backport from tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50141
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50130
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49328
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50154
Bug #: 50154
Summary: attribute printf and scanf should imply attribute
nonnull
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50154
bruno at clisp dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25076|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49328
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49206
--- Comment #3 from Sergey Ostanevich 2011-08-22
16:37:54 UTC ---
is it right that while() is an infinite loop? at least some phases can rely on
this?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50155
Bug #: 50155
Summary: [4.7 Regression] AVX2 support broke -mavx
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49119
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49206
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-22
16:43:28 UTC ---
It is a conditional infinite loop (identical to if (g_339 % 0x23) for (;;);
).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49328
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-08-22
16:45:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Looks a bit similar to PR 47574 (= PR 32478)
Sorry for not looking properly. PR 32478 is wrong (bug was fixed 2007). And PR
47574's patch is actually in PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50155
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |kirill.yukhin at intel dot
|g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50153
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2011-08-22
18:18:34 UTC ---
I don't understand: is this *new*? Is it related to the recent commits for
libstdc++/1773? (note, some don't appear in the trail because Rainer typoed
libstdc++ as libstdc++-v3 in the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49901
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50153
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-08-22 18:34:02 UTC ---
It is new and probably caused by the commit for libstdc++/1773.
I'm investigating.
Dave
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46862
--- Comment #8 from Pat Haugen 2011-08-22
18:44:01 UTC ---
I've verified the proposed patch fixes the testcase from bug 50102.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50155
--- Comment #1 from Yukhin Kirill 2011-08-22
18:52:40 UTC ---
Hi,
thanks, for investigation.
Here is a patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg01808.html
K
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48722
--- Comment #4 from Pat Haugen 2011-08-22
18:55:49 UTC ---
The testcase from comment 1 no longer fails on trunk, so I'm unable to test the
patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50143
--- Comment #19 from Christopher Yeleighton
2011-08-22 19:03:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> HTML5 specifies exactly how invalid documents must be parsed (to avoid
> security issues with different user-agents parsing the same document
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50143
--- Comment #20 from Christopher Yeleighton
2011-08-22 19:04:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> the konqueror rendering problem is NOT caused by the invalid XHTML.
>
> Using the source code and doxygen config in my doxygen bug report, I chan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50156
Bug #: 50156
Summary: in-tree CLooG is not picked up by toplevel configure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50156
--- Comment #1 from Ruben Van Boxem
2011-08-22 19:07:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 25079
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25079
"make all-gcc" log where -lcloog and friends are missing for cc1
Attached build log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50143
--- Comment #21 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-08-22
19:08:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> The Doxygen output is in HTML4.
No, it's XHTML 1.0
(In reply to comment #20)
> Please publish your result (just one page will do).
I've deleted it now
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50157
Bug #: 50157
Summary: [C++0x] Non-silent SFINAE in new expression with
explicit conversion
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50158
Bug #: 50158
Summary: [4.7 Regression] invalid 'variable set but not used'
warning (boolean used as index to an array)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50158
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7 Regression] invalid|[4.7 Regression] invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50050
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Morin 2011-08-22
20:03:05 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Mon Aug 22 20:03:00 2011
New Revision: 177970
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177970
Log:
2011-08-22 Mikael Morin
PR fortran/50050
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50158
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50150
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50158
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50155
--- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-22 21:01:51 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Aug 22 21:01:46 2011
New Revision: 177974
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177974
Log:
PR target/50155
* config/i386/sse.md
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50159
Bug #: 50159
Summary: tuple_cat only accepts two arguments
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50155
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86-avx
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50159
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47436
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50153
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50153
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2011-08-22
23:19:45 UTC ---
Somebody knowledgeable of HPUX should see what needs to be done for that OS. I
suppose the changes figured out by Rainer & Marc for Solaris, a mix of
fixincludes + mangling changes via
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50153
--- Comment #6 from Steve Ellcey 2011-08-22 23:31:20
UTC ---
I am testing an inclhack.def header file fixup for abs. I am not sure if any
of the other header files checks on __cplusplus will be a problem but fixing
the abs problem should get us
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
Bug #: 50160
Summary: vector comparison very slow (no specialisation)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50150
--- Comment #2 from Carrot 2011-08-23 01:14:46 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> So how was this toolchain configured by default ?
>
> Ramana
My configuration is:
configured by /usr/local/google/home/carrot/trunk4/configure, generated by GN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50161
Bug #: 50161
Summary: [4.7 Regression] wrong code with -fno-tree-ter and
__builtin_popcountl
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIR
85 matches
Mail list logo