http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48417
--- Comment #6 from licheng.1212 at gmail dot com 2011-08-27 06:12:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > still hava this problem,please see the latest commit
>
> See PR43700, which I suspect was fixed by r172616 on tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50207
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-08-27
04:48:41 UTC ---
Related to Bug 46862.
y: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: berg...@gcc.gnu.org
A G++ from today's trunk (20110826) segv's on a reduced test case (using delta)
like so:
bergner@igoo:~> cat minimal.ii
typedef long unsigned int size_t;
namespace
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50206
--- Comment #1 from David H Thornley 2011-08-27
03:06:05 UTC ---
Created attachment 25116
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25116
Terminal output from the crash
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50206
Bug #: 50206
Summary: Internal compiler error in xgcc while trying to
bootstrap 4.6.1
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48582
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50205
Bug #: 50205
Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in code_motion_path_driver,
at sel-sched.c:6581 with -fselective-scheduling2 and
custom flags
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50050
--- Comment #12 from Mikael Morin 2011-08-26
22:17:13 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Fri Aug 26 22:17:09 2011
New Revision: 178125
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178125
Log:
2011-08-26 Mikael Morin
PR fortran/50050
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50204
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50204
Bug #: 50204
Summary: [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Missed fully redundant load
found in crafty (SPEC 2k)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50203
Bug #: 50203
Summary: ICE: in output_loc_list, at dwarf2out.c:8188 with
--param max-vartrack-expr-depth=140
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50176
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50201
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl
2011-08-26 21:29:41 UTC ---
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 09:09:42PM +, sgk at troutmask dot
apl.washington.edu wrote:
>
> ==4791== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
> ==4791==at 0x43F6D
% cpu 1:09.76 total
3. GCC 4.7.0 20110826:
./0826 64.30s user 0.02s system 99% cpu 1:04.33 total
Has this problem been fixed?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50201
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl
2011-08-26 21:09:42 UTC ---
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 09:00:04PM +, longb at cray dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50201
>
> --- Comment #2 from Bill Long 2011-08-26 21:00:04 UTC
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50201
--- Comment #2 from Bill Long 2011-08-26 21:00:04 UTC
---
OS is Linux SLES 11.
>From the output in the test, it looks like you tried only the scalar case,
which I agree works. The array case (second test code) is the one the fails.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50201
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50116
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50202
Bug #: 50202
Summary: ICE: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2709 (could not
split insn) with __builtin_ia32_pcmpistri128
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50201
Bug #: 50201
Summary: gfortran with -static causes seg fault at runtime for
writing double prec array with precision increased to
kind=16
Classification: Unclassified
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50200
Bug #: 50200
Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in df_insn_refs_collect (df-scan.c:3405)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170
--- Comment #25 from Hans-Werner Boschmann 2011-08-26 19:44:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> Looking at your code in comment #17, one can easily find
> a trivial change to make it work.
Thank you, I was not aware of this. I was always wond
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50199
Bug #: 50199
Summary: [4.7 Regression] wrong code with -flto
-fno-merge-constants
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170
--- Comment #24 from Steve Kargl
2011-08-26 17:23:11 UTC ---
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:05:32AM +, boschmann at tp1 dot
physik.uni-siegen.de wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170
>
> --- Comment #23 from Hans-Werner Bosc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50198
Bug #: 50198
Summary: New test gcc.c-torture/execute/scal-to-vec1.c fails on
many targets
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50179
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50191
--- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner 2011-08-26
16:27:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 25110
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25110
Bill's auto-host.h
I _think_ this is Bill's auto-host.h file.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50165
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50083
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50083
--- Comment #9 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-26 16:10:50 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Aug 26 16:10:45 2011
New Revision: 178119
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178119
Log:
PR middle-end/50083
* convert.c (con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50196
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-08-26
16:06:00 UTC ---
It would be possible to define _GLIBCXX_HAS_GTHREADS without _POSIX_TIMEOUTS,
so that is available, and most of too. I think only the Timed
Mutex types require _POSIX_TIMEOUTS, so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50191
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-26
16:02:41 UTC ---
Still can't reproduce.
With
./f951 -g -ffast-math -O3 -mveclibabi=mass -mcpu=power7 -mrecip=rsqrt
-fpeel-loops -funroll-loops -ftree-vectorize -fvect-cost-model -O3 -mvsx
-maltivec -mp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50197
Bug #: 50197
Summary: Assert_Failure sinfo.adb:2738 with default generic
formal parameters
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50165
--- Comment #11 from Michael Matz 2011-08-26 16:02:21
UTC ---
Author: matz
Date: Fri Aug 26 16:02:17 2011
New Revision: 178118
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178118
Log:
PR lto/50165
* lto-streamer-in.c (canon_file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50166
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth 2011-08-26 15:17:45 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Aug 26 15:17:42 2011
New Revision: 178116
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178116
Log:
Disable .init_array/.fini_array support on Solaris (PR t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50196
Bug #: 50196
Summary: std::thread can not use under macos.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50179
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-26
14:48:13 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Aug 26 14:48:10 2011
New Revision: 178112
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178112
Log:
PR c/50179
* c-typeck.c (c_process_expr_stm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50179
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-26
14:37:25 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Aug 26 14:37:22 2011
New Revision: 178110
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178110
Log:
PR c/50179
* c-typeck.c (c_process_expr_stm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50103
--- Comment #4 from Sri 2011-08-26 14:35:45 UTC ---
Hi Richard:
I came across this URL that seems to address the issue I am dealing with:
http://code.redbrain.co.uk/cgit.cgi/gcc-dev/tree/gcc/ChangeLog?h=documentation&id=168023c94f697cb34b098b371
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50166
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Version|unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50191
--- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner 2011-08-26
14:01:27 UTC ---
Bill is out this morning, but dogging through his build log he mentioned to me,
he was using -mcpu=power7 -mtume=power7. His full compile command was:
/home/wschmidt/gcc/install/gcc-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50186
SK changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50165
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-08-26 13:25:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Try this:
>
> Index: lto-streamer-in.c
> ===
> --- lto-streamer-in.c (revision 1780
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50195
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50195
Bug #: 50195
Summary: Linking time eroor with -fast-math -O0
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50185
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-08-26
12:38:44 UTC ---
This pr is fixed by the updated patch. Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50165
--- Comment #9 from dnovillo at google dot com
2011-08-26 12:21:33 UTC ---
I will be with limited e-mail access until 7-Sep-2011. I will read
your message when I get back.
Diego.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50165
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50185
--- Comment #4 from Yukhin Kirill 2011-08-26
12:04:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I don't think using -dp and matching insn names is a good approach, any time
> you macroize the insns or rename you'll need to adjust the tests.
> You can tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50191
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-26
12:00:24 UTC ---
What -mcpu/-mtune? Can't reproduce...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50185
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50185
Yukhin Kirill changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50192
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50188
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49864
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170
--- Comment #23 from Hans-Werner Boschmann 2011-08-26 10:05:32 UTC ---
Is there any chance that gfortran 4.7.0 will support allocatable character
lengths? Using fortran for text processing has been painful since time
immemorial and this little fea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50194
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50192
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45835
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-26
08:46:48 UTC ---
As measurements show, it is indeed significantly slower. So if we want to do
it, we'd need a switch to disable that.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50090
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-26 08:32:12 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Fri Aug 26 08:32:06 2011
New Revision: 178097
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178097
Log:
gcc/
PR target/50090
* con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|4.6.1 |4.7.0
Summary|[4.5 Regressi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50190
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86-64 |x86_64-*-*
Component|rtl-opti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50194
Bug #: 50194
Summary: wrong tail call optimization for mixed arm/thumb mode
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
65 matches
Mail list logo
