http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50258
Bug #: 50258
Summary: -std=gnu++0x should allow in-class initialization of
static const floating types without constexpr
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37245
Arnaud Charlet charlet at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49533
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2011-09-01 06:44:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
has this been fixed?
No.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50259
Bug #: 50259
Summary: Internal Error at (1): gfc_resolve_expr(): Bad
expression type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50178
Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at il dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50252
--- Comment #3 from Arjen Markus arjen.markus895 at gmail dot com 2011-09-01
07:18:30 UTC ---
Hi Janus,
that seems quite to the point and it is much more straightforward than
my (minimal)
adjustment. Thanks.
The reason I brought this is that is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50260
Bug #: 50260
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault at
../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-live.c:88
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50259
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50261
Bug #: 50261
Summary: [c++0x] ICE on brace-initialize an array member
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50242
--- Comment #4 from congruwer at yahoo dot co.uk 2011-09-01 08:09:59 UTC ---
Doesn't work:
---(start)---
inline __attribute__((always_inline)) void foobar();
asm (.globl __6foobarv; .type __6foobarv, @function;\n
__6foobarv: ret; .size
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50242
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-01
08:12:30 UTC ---
Obviously it can't be inline...
You can't inline a naked function either.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949
congruwer at yahoo dot co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||congruwer at yahoo dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50178
--- Comment #6 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-01 08:29:41 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Thu Sep 1 08:29:33 2011
New Revision: 178396
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178396
Log:
PR tree-optimization/50178
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50255
Caolan McNamara caolanm at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||caolanm at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50256
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50254
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50255
--- Comment #4 from Stephan Bergmann stephan.bergmann.secondary at googlemail
dot com 2011-09-01 08:39:59 UTC ---
caolanm: will work on it, yes (wanted to clarify first whether looking at
those group name mismatches is actually looking in the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50178
--- Comment #7 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-01 08:47:05 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Thu Sep 1 08:46:59 2011
New Revision: 178397
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178397
Log:
PR tree-optimization/50178
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49804
--- Comment #2 from Anton Shterenlikht mexas at bristol dot ac.uk 2011-09-01
08:52:43 UTC ---
I haven't looked at it for a while.
It seems ia64 is indeed fixed, I've built gcc-4.7.0.20110730.
However sparc64 still gives this error.
Building
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50260
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50178
Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50257
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|unordered_map slow |[C++0x]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-01
09:10:11 UTC ---
It looks to me that the C++ FE could detect that the vtable pointer update
would adjust it to itself (I even can't construct a testcase that would
adjust
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50242
--- Comment #6 from congruwer at yahoo dot co.uk 2011-09-01 09:16:18 UTC ---
Why not? In any case, without inline it also doesn't work:
test.s: Assembler messages:
test.s:628: Warning: .type pseudo-op used outside of .def/.endef ignored.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50242
--- Comment #7 from congruwer at yahoo dot co.uk 2011-09-01 09:21:33 UTC ---
Answering my own question: because of the ret instruction. Duh.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50257
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-09-01
09:23:59 UTC ---
Created attachment 25156
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25156
Mainline patchlet optimizing for 10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50257
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-09-01
09:27:04 UTC ---
I just attached a patchlet (vs mainline, 4.6.x may require a bit of tweaking,
the patch is trivial anyway) implementing the straightforward optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50254
Vladimir Zapolskiy vzapolskiy at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25154|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50254
Vladimir Zapolskiy vzapolskiy at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49960
--- Comment #2 from razya at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-01 09:57:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Created attachment 24901 [details]
self dependence testcase
Another testcase failing due to a slightly different problem with the self data
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50262
Bug #: 50262
Summary: PTA doesn't disambiguate locally allocated heap
objects from pointed to by arguments
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50193
Andrew Stubbs ams at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50262
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50252
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-01 11:28:35 UTC ---
Unfortunately the patch in comment #2 did not survive the regression test. It
fails at least on:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/dynamic_dispatch_10.f03 -O0 (test for excess errors)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50257
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-09-01
11:31:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 25158
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25158
Alternate patchlet
Or we can do this, which optimizes 0 too, should
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50208
--- Comment #3 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-09-01 11:42:24 UTC
---
Created attachment 25159
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25159
patch
Right. The attached patch does the suggested checks also in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50208
Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at il dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50258
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-01
11:51:36 UTC ---
That extension has been deprecated for years:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Deprecated-Features.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50255
--- Comment #5 from Stephan Bergmann stephan.bergmann.secondary at googlemail
dot com 2011-09-01 12:10:54 UTC ---
By the way, the problem of the rodata section having a different GroupName than
the text section is also present when you compile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50263
Bug #: 50263
Summary: Constant integer in multidimensional array 'Range(X)
crashes GNAT
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.6
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50251
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-01 12:43:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 25161
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25161
testcase for -O2
To reproduce with O2:
i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc 20010209-1.c -O2 -c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50251
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-01 13:06:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 25162
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25162
optimized dump
1. The alloca in main is transformed into this declaration:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50264
Bug #: 50264
Summary: -Wdisabled-optimizations without -O generates strange
errors
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50251
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-01 13:25:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 25163
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25163
dump before ira
main contains references to frame:
(insn 29 28 30 6 (set (reg:SI 63 [
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50265
Bug #: 50265
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure
BufferedImage.java:336:0: internal compiler error:
Segmentation fault on *-apple-darwin*
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50266
Bug #: 50266
Summary: internal compiler error: in decode_addr_const, at
varasm.c:2638
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50266
bero at arklinux dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25164|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50116
bero at arklinux dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bero at arklinux dot org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50050
--- Comment #14 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-01
15:52:42 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Thu Sep 1 15:52:39 2011
New Revision: 178424
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178424
Log:
2011-09-01 Mikael Morin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50259
--- Comment #2 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
2011-09-01 16:03:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I get with 4.7.0 ([trunk revision 178394])
Internal Error at (1):
gfc_is_constant_expr(): Unknown expression type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50259
--- Comment #3 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
2011-09-01 16:15:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(strangely, I can't reproduce the exact error message I posted earlier )
actually could be due to this:
==30794==
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50259
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-01
16:20:06 UTC ---
With valgrind, I get now:
test.f90:4.19:
CHARACTER (len=default_path_length), DIMENSION(:,:), POINTER ::
1
Error: Expected another
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50251
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-01 16:29:16 UTC ---
Created attachment 25166
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25166
ira dump
and after ira, the reference to framereg is still there:
...
(insn 29 28 30 6 (set
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50192
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50257
--- Comment #5 from Justin SB justin at fathomdb dot com 2011-09-01 17:06:04
UTC ---
Created attachment 25167
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25167
Test case
Test case that stresses unordered_map construction
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50257
--- Comment #6 from Justin SB justin at fathomdb dot com 2011-09-01 17:33:32
UTC ---
Thanks so much for the help. I created a test case (attached) and tried out
the patch (the second version); it is a big improvement.
Here are the timings:
g++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50257
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50251
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||areg.melikadamyan at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46986
--- Comment #6 from Anders F Björklund afb at users dot sourceforge.net
2011-09-01 18:09:02 UTC ---
Created attachment 25168
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25168
updated patch for 4.6.1
hello world tests OK on Snow Leopard,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46986
Anders F Björklund afb at users dot sourceforge.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||afb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50050
--- Comment #15 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-01
19:20:05 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Thu Sep 1 19:19:55 2011
New Revision: 178427
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178427
Log:
2011-09-01 Mikael Morin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50268
Bug #: 50268
Summary: [C++0x] bitset doesn't sanitize input
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50268
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-09-01
19:23:37 UTC ---
Any idea where the problem is?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50251
--- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-01 19:26:48 UTC ---
fold_builtin_alloca_for_var should record stack alignment change
After expand_var for D.2129 with 128-bit alignment, x_rtl looks like this:
...
(gdb) p x_rtl
$20 = {expr =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50268
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-09-01
19:29:23 UTC ---
Urgh, I can't believe it's here:
#ifdef __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__
constexpr bitset(unsigned long long __val) noexcept
: _Base(__val) { }
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50260
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50251
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-09-01 19:32:54
UTC ---
alloca is special with stack alignment. We may need to take
the new change into account.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50269
Bug #: 50269
Summary: Wrongly rejects element of assumed-shape array in
C_LOC
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50268
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50267
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50050
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50270
Bug #: 50270
Summary: Some symbols are exported even when
-fvisibility=hidden is used
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50270
--- Comment #1 from Rafael Almeida almeidaraf at gmail dot com 2011-09-01
19:57:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 25170
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25170
Preprocessed file generated by -save-temps
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50270
--- Comment #2 from Rafael Almeida almeidaraf at gmail dot com 2011-09-01
19:57:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 25171
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25171
foo.s generated by -save-temps
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50270
--- Comment #3 from Rafael Almeida almeidaraf at gmail dot com 2011-09-01
19:58:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 25172
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25172
Output of -save-temps -v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50270
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-01
19:59:18 UTC ---
Small testcase:
template class a class __attribute__ ((visibility (default))) vector {
public:
vector(){t=2;};
void push_back(a){t++;};
int t;
};
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50269
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50260
--- Comment #3 from Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-01
20:34:00 UTC ---
This also shows up on PowerPC in the 3 cpu2000 benchmarks 178.galgel, 191.fma3d
and 200.sixtrack.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50269
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-01
21:10:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
This allows the code to compile, but one then gets a segfault
or the right answer depending on memory layout. I think
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50256
--- Comment #2 from NickParker at Eaton dot com 2011-09-01 21:30:41 UTC ---
I have the latest AVR GCC release from 2010-01-10 (4.3.3) and this is what I am
using.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50183
--- Comment #6 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-01
21:41:19 UTC ---
This PHI:
bb 43:
# err2.395_561 = PHI err2.395_219(41)
is removed by the second call to remove_phi in
translate_scalar_reduction_to_array
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50268
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-09-01
22:17:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 25173
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25173
Draft patch
Hi Marc. This is a patch I'm working on. Can you see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46986
Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50268
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25173|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50271
Bug #: 50271
Summary: [C++0x] G++ fails to handle combination of explicit
and deduced variadic template arguments
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50268
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-09-02
01:35:06 UTC ---
Created attachment 25174
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25174
Updated draft
This one is much better, and actually should lead to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50272
Bug #: 50272
Summary: A case that PRE optimization hurts performance
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50272
--- Comment #1 from Jiangning Liu jiangning.liu at arm dot com 2011-09-02
05:11:38 UTC ---
Richard gave some analysis at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-08/msg00037.html
89 matches
Mail list logo
