[Bug c++/41796] ambiguous subobject diagnostic given too early

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41796 --- Comment #10 from Johannes Schaub schaub.johannes at googlemail dot com 2011-09-29 06:10:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) Excellent, then could you possibly comment on the implication for this PR? (for you it's easy, I'm sure) Hi,

[Bug c++/41796] ambiguous subobject diagnostic given too early

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41796 --- Comment #11 from Johannes Schaub schaub.johannes at googlemail dot com 2011-09-29 06:14:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) (In reply to comment #9) Excellent, then could you possibly comment on the implication for this PR? (for you

[Bug fortran/50514] gfortran should check ISHFT ISHFTC aruments (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50514 --- Comment #4 from Vittorio Zecca zeccav at gmail dot com 2011-09-29 06:58:24 UTC --- About run time checking: I believe the bit size of k is known at compile time, and the overhead to check n against it is negligible as compared to computing

[Bug c++/50563] New: Weird syntax acceptance rules for non-static data members initialized in place (C++0x)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50563 Bug #: 50563 Summary: Weird syntax acceptance rules for non-static data members initialized in place (C++0x) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug c++/50563] Weird syntax acceptance rules for non-static data members initialized in place (C++0x)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50563 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/50564] New: [4.7 Regression] Front-end optimization - ICE with FORALL

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50564 Bug #: 50564 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Front-end optimization - ICE with FORALL Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/50564] [4.7 Regression] Front-end optimization - ICE with FORALL

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50564 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug c/50565] New: [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] initializer element is not computable at load time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50565 Bug #: 50565 Summary: [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] initializer element is not computable at load time Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status:

[Bug tree-optimization/50557] [4.7 Regression] Register pressure increase after reassociation (x86, 32 bits)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50557 --- Comment #3 from Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com 2011-09-29 08:34:45 UTC --- William, thanks for quick response! With -funroll-loops regression is still present. Do you want me to attach some dumps?

[Bug c++/41796] ambiguous subobject diagnostic given too early

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41796 --- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-09-29 09:23:36 UTC --- Ah, point taken about the irrelevance of the defect for this specific PR, sorry for bothering. Yesterday I didn't even try to reconstruct how the

[Bug middle-end/50565] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] initializer element is not computable at load time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50565 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |middle-end

[Bug middle-end/50561] [4.7 regression] ICE when compiling zlib with -O2 -floop-flatten -floop-strip-mine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50561 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug c++/50258] [C++0x] -std=gnu++0x should allow in-class initialization of static const floating types without constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50258 Carlos Becker bsys.com.ar at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bsys.com.ar

[Bug c++/40793] Error: no matching function for call to XYZ doesn't display function-template-arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40793 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org | ---

[Bug c++/40793] Error: no matching function for call to XYZ doesn't display function-template-arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40793 --- Comment #14 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-09-29 10:45:40 UTC --- Never mind, I don't think it's the same, but 39813 is also pretty weird, why error.c sees the member template as a friend it's a mystery to me...

[Bug target/50566] New: [avr]: Add support for better logging similar to -mdeb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50566 Bug #: 50566 Summary: [avr]: Add support for better logging similar to -mdeb Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug c++/15218] [DR 421] rvalue.field is not an lvalue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15218 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/50566] [avr]: Add support for better logging similar to -mdeb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50566 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5

[Bug c++/32350] Very high compile times for template code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32350 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/34996] Base class of explicitly instantiated class doesn't get instantiated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34996 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at

[Bug fortran/50547] dummy procedure argument of PURE shall be PURE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50547 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-29 11:23:52 UTC --- Here is a better version which is regression-free: Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c === ---

[Bug c++/50258] [C++0x] -std=gnu++0x should allow in-class initialization of static const floating types without constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50258 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-29 11:49:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) Even though the proposed patch seems to be a proper solution, to me it seems to be that using -fpermissive just to come around

[Bug target/50566] [avr]: Add support for better logging similar to -mdeb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50566 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-29 11:52:04 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Thu Sep 29 11:51:59 2011 New Revision: 179344 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179344 Log: PR target/50566 *

[Bug fortran/50553] statement function cannot be target (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50553 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-29 11:57:40 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Thu Sep 29 11:57:35 2011 New Revision: 179345 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179345 Log: 2011-09-29 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug fortran/50547] dummy procedure argument of PURE shall be PURE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50547 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-29 11:57:40 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Thu Sep 29 11:57:35 2011 New Revision: 179345 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179345 Log: 2011-09-29 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug fortran/50553] statement function cannot be target (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50553 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/40793] Error: no matching function for call to XYZ doesn't display function-template-arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40793 --- Comment #15 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-29 12:13:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) Never mind, I don't think it's the same, but 39813 is also pretty weird, why error.c sees the member template as a friend

[Bug fortran/50547] dummy procedure argument of PURE shall be PURE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50547 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-29 12:14:03 UTC --- Comment #0 is fixed with r179345. I noticed that in 'resolve_formal_arglist' there are two separate checks for procedure dummies in elemental procedures (for

[Bug tree-optimization/50557] [4.7 Regression] Register pressure increase after reassociation (x86, 32 bits)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50557 --- Comment #4 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-29 12:16:46 UTC --- No, that's OK. I should be able to reproduce this on a pool machine. It may be difficult to come up with a good heuristic here given that

[Bug c++/40793] Error: no matching function for call to XYZ doesn't display function-template-arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40793 --- Comment #16 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-09-29 12:20:51 UTC --- Thanks. Now in mainline we say this: 40793.C: In function ‘void f()’: 40793.C:5:31: error: no matching function for call to ‘staticPrint()’

[Bug c++/34996] Base class of explicitly instantiated class doesn't get instantiated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34996 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-29 12:25:00 UTC --- Derived1::X must be defined in every translation unit that needs it. An explicit instantiation is *required* to not instantiate members of base classes:

[Bug c++/34996] Base class of explicitly instantiated class doesn't get instantiated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34996 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/50262] PTA doesn't disambiguate locally allocated heap objects from pointed to by arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50262 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-29 12:35:32 UTC --- Not disambiguated because the HEAP tag of q escapes and thus the points-to set of q has vars_contains_global set, which then aliases with p which just has

[Bug fortran/50564] [4.7 Regression] Front-end optimization - ICE with FORALL

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50564 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-29 12:44:16 UTC --- The problem is that with front-end optimization, the forall body is changed from: timeSteps(iTime)=ratio**(dble(iTime)-0.5d0)-ratio**(dble(iTime)-1.5d0)

[Bug fortran/47023] [4.6/4.7 regression] C_Sizeof: Rejects valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-29 13:01:49 UTC --- Seemingly caused by the patch for PR 44649: 2010-07-08 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org PR fortran/44649 * check.c

[Bug ada/49944] [4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] Bootstrapping on x86_64-pc-kfreebsd-gnu fails with s-taprop.adb:856:10: pthread_attr_setaffinity_np is undefined (more references follow)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49944 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.4

[Bug bootstrap/50047] [4.7 Regression] Revision 177670 failed to bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50047 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug java/50045] [4.7 regression] ICE in gcc/java/lang.c:427 with -ftree-dump-all

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50045 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.4.7

[Bug target/50350] [4.6 Regression] ICE (segfault) in canonicalize_float_value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50350 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.2

[Bug target/50275] [4.6 regression] libgcc build failure on LM32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50275 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.2

[Bug libgcj/50421] [4.7 Regression] GC Warning: Out of Memory! Returning NIL!

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50421 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug bootstrap/50229] [4.7 Regression] Can't cross compile for i686-apple-darwin10 from x86_64-redhat_linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50229 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|

[Bug c++/50437] [C++0x] [4.7 regression] ICE for trivial use of lambda in template function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50437 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug fortran/47023] [4.6/4.7 regression] C_Sizeof: Rejects valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.2

[Bug fortran/47023] [4.6/4.7 regression] C_Sizeof: Rejects valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-29 13:17:46 UTC --- Argument. X shall be an interoperable data entity that is not an assumed-size array. It might be sufficient to test -- besides the obvious stuff (cf. SIZEOF)

[Bug fortran/50410] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in record_reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.2

[Bug bootstrap/50354] [4.7 regression] sparc64-linux gcc generates assembly code that gas rejects, breaking bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50354 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug libgcj/50057] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natObject.cc:58

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug c++/50458] [4.6 Regression] ICE when using brace-initializer for new array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50458 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.2

[Bug libgomp/50386] [4.7 Regression] libgomp.h:87:5: error: unnamed struct/union that defines no instances

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50386 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/47023] [4.6/4.7 regression] C_Sizeof: Rejects valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.2 |--- --- Comment #8 from janus

[Bug java/50045] [4.7 regression] ICE in gcc/java/lang.c:427 with -ftree-dump-all

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50045 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.4.7 |4.7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/50389] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in execute_todo, at passes.c:1730 with -O -freorder-blocks -ftracer and __builtin___memcpy_chk()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50389 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug middle-end/48660] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ARM ICE in expand_expr_real_1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48660 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.4

[Bug debug/50279] [4.7 Regression] ICE while building the go front-end with LTO enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50279 --- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-09-29 13:47:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) Peter, can you retest the failing lto-bootstrap building the go compiler under current gcc trunk? I believe honza's recent

[Bug tree-optimization/50183] ICE in verify_ssa for 416.gamess when optimizing using profile data

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50183 William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/46715] template constructor - Compiler Bus error under -O2/-Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46715 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/40793] Error: no matching function for call to XYZ doesn't display function-template-arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40793 --- Comment #17 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-29 14:35:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) Thanks. Now in mainline we say this: 40793.C: In function ‘void f()’: 40793.C:5:31: error: no matching function for call

[Bug target/43723] Some ARMs support unaligned

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43723 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/40793] Error: no matching function for call to XYZ doesn't display function-template-arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40793 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/50567] New: Reload pass generates sub-optimal spill code for registers in presence of a vec_concat insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50567 Bug #: 50567 Summary: Reload pass generates sub-optimal spill code for registers in presence of a vec_concat insn Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/50567] Reload pass generates sub-optimal spill code for registers in presence of a vec_concat insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50567 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-29 15:11:55 UTC --- I think this is because we prefer to do GR-sse register moves throuhg memory. -mtune=core2 should avoid this I think.

[Bug rtl-optimization/50567] Reload pass generates sub-optimal spill code for registers in presence of a vec_concat insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50567 --- Comment #2 from Siddhesh Poyarekar siddhesh.poyarekar at gmail dot com 2011-09-29 15:24:52 UTC --- Thanks, that eliminated the spill to stack. The extra xmm1 to xmm0 move still remains: process: .LFB0: .cfi_startproc movq

[Bug c++/49949] wrong sign for product of complexdouble and double with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49949 --- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-09-29 15:26:30 UTC --- Doesn't seem to make much sense, but thanks, anyway.

[Bug rtl-optimization/50567] Reload pass generates sub-optimal spill code for registers in presence of a vec_concat insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50567 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/49949] wrong sign for product of complexdouble and double with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49949 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at

[Bug c++/48914] #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored -Wc++0x-compat doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48914 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-09-29 15:31:03 UTC --- It seems, the warning is emitted *before* the pragma is actually processed in diagnostic_classify_diagnostic...

Re: [Bug c++/39813] [feature request] __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ addition

On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39813 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/39813] [feature request] __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ addition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39813 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-09-29 15:40:19 UTC --- On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39813 Paolo Carlini

[Bug c++/39813] [feature request] __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ addition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39813 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-09-29 15:45:44 UTC --- Are you aware that *all* the new bugs do *not* have it? Please explain that, if we want me to restore those CC (which I assumed were just bogus/legacy

Re: [Bug c++/39813] [feature request] __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ addition

Something is strange ... messages sent to bugs from which gcc-bugs was removed do in fact still go to gcc-bugs anyway. So maybe there is no real problem with messages not going to gcc-bugs - but an apparent removal of gcc-bugs should not appear in messages reporting a change that presumably

[Bug lto/50568] New: [4.7 Regression] Massive LTO failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50568 Bug #: 50568 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Massive LTO failures Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug c++/39813] [feature request] __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ addition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39813 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-09-29 15:48:40 UTC --- Something is strange ... messages sent to bugs from which gcc-bugs was removed do in fact still go to gcc-bugs anyway. So maybe there

[Bug fortran/47023] [4.6/4.7 regression] C_Sizeof: Rejects valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023 --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-29 15:49:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) This patch itself doesn't do anything wrong AFAICS, it rather seems to expose an underlying bug: Either we need to set the

[Bug lto/50568] [4.7 Regression] Massive LTO failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50568 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andi-gcc at

[Bug c++/39813] [feature request] __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ addition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39813 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-09-29 15:49:47 UTC --- (and as you can see, this PR now is missing the CC, and all the messages we are exchanging are sent to the gcc-bugs mailing list, no problem at all)

[Bug middle-end/50448] [4.3/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Missed optimization accessing struct component with integer address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50448 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |middle-end

[Bug lto/50568] [4.7 Regression] Massive LTO failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50568 --- Comment #2 from Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2011-09-29 15:58:26 UTC --- Looking...

[Bug lto/50568] [4.7 Regression] Massive LTO failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50568 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-09-29 15:59:54 UTC --- I got lto1: internal compiler error: resolution sub id not in object file^M Please submit a full bug report,^M with preprocessed source if appropriate.^M

[Bug lto/50568] [4.7 Regression] Massive LTO failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50568 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0 --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/40202] warning about passing non-POD objects through �...� should include name and location of declaration being called

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40202 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at

[Bug c++/40202] warning about passing non-POD objects through �...� should include name and location of declaration being called

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40202 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-29 16:16:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) In the meanwhile, the warning became an hard error, when it applies. It went from undefined to conditionally-supported behaviour

[Bug lto/45375] [meta-bug] Issues with building Mozilla with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375 --- Comment #113 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-29 16:24:56 UTC --- Even with PR47247 solved, -fprofile-generate -flto build fails at libbrowsercomps.so.ltrans23.ltrans.o:libbrowsercomps.so.ltrans23.o:function

[Bug target/50566] [avr]: Add support for better logging similar to -mdeb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50566 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-29 16:25:09 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Thu Sep 29 16:24:57 2011 New Revision: 179359 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=179359 Log: PR target/50566 *

[Bug target/50566] [avr]: Add support for better logging similar to -mdeb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50566 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/35831] [F95] Shape mismatch check missing for dummy procedure argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35831 --- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-29 16:41:13 UTC --- Here's a link to a c.l.f. thread where I asked about this: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/ae6a44043a3b1a95

[Bug c++/39813] [feature request] __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ addition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39813 --- Comment #7 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net 2011-09-29 16:46:08 UTC --- Our code doesn't CC gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org by default. This is useless as it already gets bugmails for all bugs in the gcc product thanks to our Bugzilla

[Bug c++/39813] [feature request] __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ addition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39813 --- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-09-29 16:51:28 UTC --- Thanks for the explanation. I don't think you need to do anything since the mails still get through - but seeing the address removed

[Bug c++/39813] [feature request] __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ addition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39813 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-29 16:53:28 UTC --- Arguably no more confusing than seeing it in the CC list on some bugs and not others

[Bug middle-end/50565] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] initializer element is not computable at load time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50565 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-29 17:03:28 UTC --- Anyreason Why ((int)( ((void *)(nmsgbuf.payload.part.ball.pos[0])) - ((void *)(nmsgbuf)) )) is being used instead of offsetof ?

[Bug c++/40202] warning about passing non-POD objects through �...� should include name and location of declaration being called

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40202 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org | ---

[Bug c++/40202] warning about passing non-POD objects through �...� should include name and location of declaration being called

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40202 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-29 17:26:57 UTC --- To the OP, you've probably fixed it by now, but you must have a varargs function with ... somewhere, or you wouldn't get the error. You could add a

[Bug c++/48867] Using the compilation flag -mfpmath=sse breaks Snes9x build.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48867 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/47987] ICE on legal code (when attempting to inline non-implicitly instantiated template member function)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47987 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/44620] gcc -fvisibility-ms-compat crash when throwing const char*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44620 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug lto/50568] [4.7 Regression] Massive LTO failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50568 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-09-29 17:56:25 UTC --- The problem is in Breakpoint 2, process_symtab (data=0xccc0, name=0x82041fe .gnu.lto_.symtab.f1d7150d3f9de9cb, offset=1325, length=56) at

[Bug lto/50568] [4.7 Regression] Massive LTO failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50568 --- Comment #6 from Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2011-09-29 18:03:21 UTC --- I don't see the problem on a 64bit bootstrap-lto. I guess i must have written some 32bit unsafe code.

[Bug lto/50568] [4.7 Regression] Massive LTO failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50568 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-09-29 18:11:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) I don't see the problem on a 64bit bootstrap-lto. I guess i must have written some 32bit unsafe code. We can't use 64bit random seed

[Bug lto/50568] [4.7 Regression] Massive LTO failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50568 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-09-29 18:16:03 UTC --- Created attachment 25380 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25380 A patch This patch works for me. But I don't think it is correct. We need a way

[Bug lto/50568] [4.7 Regression] Massive LTO failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50568 --- Comment #9 from Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2011-09-29 18:17:08 UTC --- Created attachment 25381 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25381 Use long long in lto-plugin Can you please test this patch? Thanks.

  1   2   >