[Bug libfortran/50016] [4.7 Regression] Drastic I/O performance regression on Windows

ch/libgfortran/io/unix.h Will the rev 180199 merge into gcc4.6.2 release? Because the first 4.6.2 RC doesn't contain the modify, gcc-4.6.2-RC-20111019 libgfortran build on mingw/mingw64 can cause: libtool: compile: i686-w64-mingw32-gcc -L/mingw/i686-w64-mingw32/lib -L/mingw/mingw/

[Bug other/50664] GDB rebuilt by i686-w64-mingw32-gcc4.6.2's "-Os" crashed when debugging, but "-O2" is OK.

||FIXED --- Comment #2 from xunxun 2011-10-20 06:39:50 UTC --- gcc-4.6.2-RC-20111019 has not the problem. May be solved.

[Bug other/50664] GDB rebuilt by i686-w64-mingw32-gcc4.6.2's "-Os" crashed when debugging, but "-O2" is OK.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50664 --- Comment #1 from xunxun 2011-10-20 06:39:17 UTC --- gcc-4.6.2-RC-20111019 has not the problem. May be solved.

[Bug tree-optimization/50644] ICE in set_is_used added today

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50644 --- Comment #7 from Andi Kleen 2011-10-20 05:53:49 UTC --- Can someone mark this as a regression please? This still keeps crashing and crashing. I don't see why I need to debug a clear regression when I already bisected it. IMHO this should be

[Bug c/50521] -fstrict-volatile-bitfields is not strict

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50521 --- Comment #4 from Tomohiro Kashiwada 2011-10-20 01:53:33 UTC --- Created attachment 25559 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25559 proposal patch fix generating wrong code. no longer volatile-bitfield breaks other field.

[Bug c++/45333] Include macros in instantiation backtraces

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45333 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |dodji at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug c++/45385] missing -Wconversion for method calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45385 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot |lopezibanez at gmail dot

[Bug c++/48818] Wrong copy constructor used when using std::pair in .so and app. -fvisibility=hidden does not work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48818 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-20 01:19:49 UTC --- I would be curious to know if you are seeing something else when you configure your build with --disable-visibility.

[Bug c++/49508] Bogus "control reaches end of non-void function" warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49508 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-20 01:16:23 UTC --- .. and I mus say, this specific issue is quite pervasive, I'm seeing it more and more while triaging recent issues with warnings enabled, hmpf!

[Bug target/49485] Performance problem with C++ code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49485 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski 2011-10-20 01:13:54 UTC --- Looks like vectorizer is causing the slow down at least for me on the trunk that is -mno-sse makes the slowdown go away.

[Bug target/49485] Performance problem with C++ code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49485 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2011-10-20 01:09:02 UTC --- apinski@apinskidesktop:~$ g++ t.cc -O3 -ffast-math apinski@apinskidesktop:~$ ./a.out apinski@apinskidesktop:~$ time ./a.out real0m0.329s user0m0.328s sys0m0.000s apinski@a

[Bug target/49485] Performance problem with C++ code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49485 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target|

[Bug c++/49485] Performance problem with C++ code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49485 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 f

[Bug c++/47828] [C++0x] GCC instantiates function template with "auto" type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47828 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/47658] -Os generates bigger code than -O2/3 for many small inline functions (objects)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47658 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/31789] odd roundoff behavior (may be due to 80-bit vs. 64-bit behavior?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31789 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug other/50636] GC in large LTO builds cause excessive fragmentation in memory map

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50636 Andi Kleen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50800] Internal compiler error in finish_member_declarations, possibly related to may_alias attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50800 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/50805] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-expect-[1-4].c scan-tree-dump-times gimple "builtin_expect[^\n]*, 0\);\n[^\n]*if" 2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50805 Bug #: 50805 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-expect-[1-4].c scan-tree-dump-times gimple "builtin_expect[^\n]*, 0\);\n[^\n]*if" 2 Classif

[Bug debug/50804] New: FAIL: invalid intermediate result for .

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50804 Bug #: 50804 Summary: FAIL: invalid intermediate result for . Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug tree-optimization/50803] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/inline-5.c scan-ipa-dump-times inline "Will be eliminated" 4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50803 Bug #: 50803 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/inline-5.c scan-ipa-dump-times inline "Will be eliminated" 4 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug middle-end/50802] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/arith-rand-ll.c execution at -O2 and -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50802 Bug #: 50802 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/arith-rand-ll.c execution at -O2 and -Os Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version:

[Bug c++/13657] Error message incorrectly describes return type as argument type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13657 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/13657] Error message incorrectly describes return type as argument type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13657 --- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-19 22:46:01 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Oct 19 22:45:58 2011 New Revision: 180228 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180228 Log: /cp 2011-10-19 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c/15495] Feature Request: optimization control at source level

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15495 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/7356] syntax errors immediately before an #include are reported for within the included file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7356 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org Known t

[Bug c++/50793] G++ doesn't value-initialize all members of non-trivial type in default argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50793 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50793] G++ doesn't value-initialize all members of non-trivial type in default argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50793 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-19 22:29:18 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Oct 19 22:29:15 2011 New Revision: 180227 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180227 Log: PR c++/50793 * tree.c (bot_manip): Propagat

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug c++/44906] g++ is giving error: parse error in template argument list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44906 --- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-10-19 22:24:12 UTC --- The problem seems to be the tentative parsing in cp_parse_template_id, which tries every crazy thing it can, and when nothing works, it just gives this catch all diagnostic. B

[Bug c++/50793] G++ doesn't value-initialize all members of non-trivial type in default argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50793 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-19 22:22:32 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Oct 19 22:22:25 2011 New Revision: 180226 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180226 Log: PR c++/50793 * tree.c (bot_manip): Propagat

[Bug c++/50787] [4.6 Regression] reference fails to bind directly to variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50787 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-19 22:21:38 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Oct 19 22:21:34 2011 New Revision: 180224 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180224 Log: PR c++/50787 * g++.dg/init/ref20.C: New. M

[Bug c++/50793] G++ doesn't value-initialize all members of non-trivial type in default argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50793 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-19 22:21:56 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Oct 19 22:21:52 2011 New Revision: 180225 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180225 Log: PR c++/50793 * tree.c (bot_manip): Propagat

[Bug c++/50793] G++ doesn't value-initialize all members of non-trivial type in default argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50793 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-19 22:21:22 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Oct 19 22:21:15 2011 New Revision: 180223 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180223 Log: PR c++/50793 * tree.c (bot_manip): Propagat

[Bug fortran/47023] C_Sizeof: Rejects valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023 --- Comment #25 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-19 22:10:40 UTC --- r180210 fixes comment #7 (rejecting proc-pointers as argument of SIZEOF). Left to do is only the original comment #0 at this point.

[Bug fortran/47023] C_Sizeof: Rejects valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023 --- Comment #24 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-19 22:05:26 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Wed Oct 19 22:05:23 2011 New Revision: 180210 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180210 Log: 2011-10-19 Janus Weil PR fortran/

[Bug c++/13657] Error message incorrectly describes return type as argument type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13657 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-19 22:06:56 UTC --- Ok, thanks, I'm doing that.

[Bug c++/31423] Improve upon "invalid use of member (did you forget the '&' ?)"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31423 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian at airs dot com --- Comment #9 from P

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48630 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/50749] SH Target: Post-increment addressing used only for first memory access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50749 --- Comment #4 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-10-19 21:36:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) USE_LOAD_POST_INCREMENT and USE_STORE_PRE_DECREMENT are used only in move_by_pieces which is for some block operations when MOVE_BY_PIECES_P says OK. They

[Bug bootstrap/50801] macro location tracking patch set breaks bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50801 Pat Haugen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug c++/50793] G++ doesn't value-initialize all members of non-trivial type in default argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50793 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/50796] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/plugin/plugindir[1234].c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50796 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED URL|

[Bug testsuite/50796] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/plugin/plugindir[1234].c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50796 --- Comment #1 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-19 21:05:28 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Wed Oct 19 21:05:23 2011 New Revision: 180207 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180207 Log: PR testsuite/50796 * gcc.dg/plugin/p

[Bug c++/13657] Error message incorrectly describes return type as argument type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13657 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-19 20:52:01 UTC --- I think just making the error message more general makes sense here, something along the lines of "cannot convert..."

[Bug c++/50787] [4.6 Regression] reference fails to bind directly to variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50787 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50787] [4.6 Regression] reference fails to bind directly to variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50787 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-19 20:42:55 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Oct 19 20:42:50 2011 New Revision: 180206 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180206 Log: PR c++/50787 * g++.dg/init/ref20.C: New. A

[Bug c++/50787] [4.6 Regression] reference fails to bind directly to variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50787 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-19 20:31:37 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Oct 19 20:31:21 2011 New Revision: 180205 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180205 Log: PR c++/50787 * g++.dg/init/ref20.C: New. A

[Bug c++/50787] [4.6 Regression] reference fails to bind directly to variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50787 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-19 20:31:14 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Oct 19 20:30:50 2011 New Revision: 180204 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180204 Log: PR c++/50787 * parser.c (cp_parser_initiali

[Bug bootstrap/50801] macro location tracking patch set breaks bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50801 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/50801] New: macro location tracking patch set breaks bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50801 Bug #: 50801 Summary: macro location tracking patch set breaks bootstrap Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/50754] [4.7 Regression] ICE in expand_debug_expr, at cfgexpand.c:3341

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50754 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-10-19 19:31:25 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Oct 19 19:31:14 2011 New Revision: 180201 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180201 Log: PR middle-end/50754 * cfgexpand.c (expand_d

[Bug tree-optimization/23855] loop header should also be pulled out of the inner loop too

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23855 --- Comment #23 from Andrew Pinski 2011-10-19 19:10:38 UTC --- The other way to handle this is to allow unswitch loops to handle non inner loops which from what I can tell is a two line patch.

[Bug c++/50800] Internal compiler error in finish_member_declarations, possibly related to may_alias attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50800 --- Comment #1 from Mathias Gaunard 2011-10-19 18:20:06 UTC --- Testcase is here (couldn't attach it due to bugzilla size restrictions): http://mathias.gaunard.com/data/ice_finish_member_declaration.cpp

[Bug c++/50800] New: Internal compiler error in finish_member_declarations, possibly related to may_alias attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50800 Bug #: 50800 Summary: Internal compiler error in finish_member_declarations, possibly related to may_alias attribute Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1

[Bug c++/13657] Error message incorrectly describes return type as argument type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13657 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/50790] ICE in copy_constant on divide by expression that evaluates to zero

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50790 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug debug/50799] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43177.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50799 Bug #: 50799 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43177.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug middle-end/50795] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-expect-[1234].c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50795 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/50795] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-expect-[1234].c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50795 --- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz 2011-10-19 17:44:39 UTC --- Author: ktietz Date: Wed Oct 19 17:44:35 2011 New Revision: 180200 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180200 Log: PR middle-end/50795 * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/

[Bug libfortran/50016] [4.7 Regression] Drastic I/O performance regression on Windows

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50016 --- Comment #17 from Tobias Burnus 2011-10-19 17:27:08 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Wed Oct 19 17:27:03 2011 New Revision: 180199 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180199 Log: 2011-10-19 Janne Blomqvist Kai Tie

[Bug c++/49508] Bogus "control reaches end of non-void function" warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49508 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/48087] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -Wall -Werror adds warnings over and above those generated by -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087 --- Comment #17 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-19 17:27:36 UTC --- Yeah, I was driving and it occurred to me too that we gonna need one more counter... First, let's reopen the other bug. Thanks again for now.

[Bug c++/47687] [C++0x] Crash on a lambda returning a lambda (using std::function)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47687 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yar at sibnet dot ru --- Comment #6 from

[Bug middle-end/48087] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -Wall -Werror adds warnings over and above those generated by -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087 --- Comment #16 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-10-19 17:21:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) > On this PR, removing the early return *works*, we have two non-bogus warnings > with -Wall and two errors with -Werror. Maybe we should really procee

[Bug c++/50791] [c++0x] internal compiler error in dependent_type_p_r

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50791 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50791] [c++0x] internal compiler error in dependent_type_p_r

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50791 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||artem.lab at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/50798] [c++ox] ICE in dependent_type_p_r with lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50798 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/50785] [C++0x] static constexpr double undefined reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50785 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-19 17:12:11 UTC --- N.B. we wrote a FAQ entry about this: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/VerboseDiagnostics#missing_static_const_definition

[Bug c++/50798] Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50798 --- Comment #1 from artem 2011-10-19 17:09:09 UTC --- Created attachment 25557 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25557 .ii file

[Bug c++/50798] New: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50798 Bug #: 50798 Summary: Segmentation fault Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug target/50797] New: [x32] Use 32bit Pmode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50797 Bug #: 50797 Summary: [x32] Use 32bit Pmode Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug debug/49459] attribute((mode(byte))) in a typedef produces wrong debug information

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49459 Paul Koning changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.1.2 --- Comment #2 from Paul Koning 2011

[Bug c++/50785] [C++0x] static constexpr double undefined reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50785 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-19 16:58:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > it will be possible to add better waring/error in this case? Not easily, the error you get is from the linker. This has been discussed MANY times in ot

[Bug bootstrap/50777] [4.7 regression] bootstrap fails on Solaris 10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50777 --- Comment #7 from Sean McGovern 2011-10-19 16:39:15 UTC --- Thanks for the fix, bootstrapping that revision now. -- Sean McG. --Original Message-- From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org To: McGovern, Sean Subject: [Bug bootstrap/50777] [4.7 regre

[Bug c++/50785] [C++0x] static constexpr double undefined reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50785 --- Comment #11 from trashyankes at wp dot pl 2011-10-19 16:35:06 UTC --- it will be possible to add better waring/error in this case? is complicity misleading when you use `static const` or `static constexpr` for long time and when you try get ref

[Bug tree-optimization/50769] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in phi_alternatives_equal, at tree-cfgcleanup.c:355 with -O2 -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -fno-guess-branch-probability -fipa-pta

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50769 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/50769] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in phi_alternatives_equal, at tree-cfgcleanup.c:355 with -O2 -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -fno-guess-branch-probability -fipa-pta

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50769 --- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-19 16:29:52 UTC --- Author: vries Date: Wed Oct 19 16:29:42 2011 New Revision: 180197 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180197 Log: 2011-10-19 Tom de Vries PR tree-op

[Bug bootstrap/50777] [4.7 regression] bootstrap fails on Solaris 10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50777 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/50795] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-expect-[1234].c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50795 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/50777] [4.7 regression] bootstrap fails on Solaris 10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50777 --- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth 2011-10-19 16:02:35 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Wed Oct 19 16:02:30 2011 New Revision: 180195 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180195 Log: Properly test for madvise on Solaris 10 (PR bootstrap/50

[Bug lto/50786] temporary files not cleaned up on LTO errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50786 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-19 15:55:22 UTC --- You would need to debug this then - generally the drivers clean up after them (and I remember testing this, at least for the non-failing case ...)

[Bug middle-end/48087] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -Wall -Werror adds warnings over and above those generated by -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087 --- Comment #15 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-19 15:53:01 UTC --- On this PR, removing the early return *works*, we have two non-bogus warnings with -Wall and two errors with -Werror. Maybe we should really proceed one PR at a time, re-open PR49508.

[Bug lto/50796] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/plugin/plugindir[1234].c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50796 Bug #: 50796 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/plugin/plugindir[1234].c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/50795] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-expect-[1234].c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50795 Bug #: 50795 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-expect-[1234].c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/49310] [4.7 Regression] Compile time hog in var-tracking emit

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49310 --- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-10-19 15:50:04 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Wed Oct 19 15:50:00 2011 New Revision: 180194 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180194 Log: PR debug/49310 * var-tracking.c (loc_exp_dep, o

[Bug tree-optimization/50763] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: missing PHI def with -ftree-tail-merge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50763 --- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-19 15:48:38 UTC --- Created attachment 25556 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25556 Updated patch, tries to keep dominance info up-to-date.

[Bug middle-end/48087] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -Wall -Werror adds warnings over and above those generated by -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087 --- Comment #14 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-19 15:39:08 UTC --- Thanks for explaining the seen_error mechanism, which I didn't know, but there is something I still don't understand here. Consider PR49508 (I'm interested because I opened it ;) : in

[Bug lto/50786] temporary files not cleaned up on LTO errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50786 --- Comment #4 from Andi Kleen 2011-10-19 15:28:07 UTC --- I'm not, this was a normal lto bootstrap without any special flags

[Bug middle-end/50790] ICE in copy_constant on divide by expression that evaluates to zero

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50790 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org Compon

[Bug lto/50786] temporary files not cleaned up on LTO errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50786 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-19 15:18:21 UTC --- cc*.o files are supposed to be cleaned up by the driver(s). Are you sure you are not using -save-temps? ;)

[Bug target/50733] avr-gcc 4.3.5 generates incorrect code when using PROGMEM macro

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50733 --- Comment #2 from marcos_vc at coel dot com.br 2011-10-19 15:02:10 UTC --- In that case avr-gcc should print an error/warning when one try to access variables that way. I'm newbie for this specific target and this code compiles without any error

[Bug bootstrap/50778] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-10-19 15:01:47 UTC --- > Could I have ssh access to one of the boxes that fail? I can give you access to my (slowww) G5 if you mail me your ssh key.

[Bug target/50447] [avr] Better support of AND, OR, XOR and PLUS with constant integers for 16- and 32-bit values

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50447 --- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-10-19 14:59:05 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Oct 19 14:59:00 2011 New Revision: 180193 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180193 Log: PR target/50447 * config/avr/avr.md (cc):

[Bug tree-optimization/50780] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: invalid operands in ternary operation with -ftree-vectorize -fnon-call-exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50780 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/50780] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: invalid operands in ternary operation with -ftree-vectorize -fnon-call-exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50780 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-19 14:54:41 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Oct 19 14:54:34 2011 New Revision: 180192 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180192 Log: 2011-10-19 Richard Guenther PR middle-

[Bug tree-optimization/50717] [4.7 Regression] Silent code gen fault with incorrect widening of multiply

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50717 Andrew Stubbs changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/50786] temporary files not cleaned up on LTO errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50786 --- Comment #2 from Andi Kleen 2011-10-19 14:40:53 UTC --- I'm not 100% sure which stage generates them, but I have lots of cc*.o and some others (.res etc.) left over after the LTRANS failure. After two failures in a row i always have a full /.

[Bug target/50794] New: [picochip] incorrect implementation of ashrsi3 for negative numbers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50794 Bug #: 50794 Summary: [picochip] incorrect implementation of ashrsi3 for negative numbers Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/50705] Wrong assembly generated for bitwise AND for ppc 476

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50705 --- Comment #11 from SK 2011-10-19 14:22:16 UTC --- FILE:: /mm/page_alloc.c:5363 flags -> 0x3 HASH_EARLY - > 0x1 CODE:: if (flags & HASH_EARLY) Assembly: 70307c44: fe 0f e0 54 rlwinm r0,r7,1,31,31 r7 = 0x3 =

  1   2   >