[Bug tree-optimization/50596] Problems in vectorization of condition expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50596 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-25 08:02:16 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Oct 25 08:02:08 2011 New Revision: 180424 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180424 Log: PR

[Bug debug/50816] [4.6.1] Discriminators are emitted in DWARF 2 format

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50816 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/50596] Problems in vectorization of condition expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50596 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/50861] ICE: internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘error_mark’ in tsubst_copy_and_build, at cp/pt.c:13526

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50861 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug bootstrap/50822] [4.7 regression] Solaris/SPARC bootstrap failure with Sun as: invalid assembler for ios_init.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50822 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/50858] [4.7 Regression] segfault at ../../gcc/libiberty/hashtab.c:981

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50858 --- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2011-10-25 09:19:16 UTC --- Thanks Paolo. The strange thing is, that I cannot reproduce the chromium build problem anymore with the latest gcc. So some commit must have fixed

[Bug c++/50858] [4.7 Regression] segfault at ../../gcc/libiberty/hashtab.c:981

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50858 --- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-10-25 09:22:19 UTC --- Well, good ;) This one cannot be it, but the fix is essentially ready.

[Bug other/50775] Register allocator sets up frame and frame pointer with low register pressure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50775 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/50858] [4.7 Regression] segfault at ../../gcc/libiberty/hashtab.c:981

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50858 --- Comment #11 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2011-10-25 09:48:54 UTC --- I spoke too soon. Unfortunately I've tested a wrong compiler. I get this new ICE with your patch applied:

[Bug c++/50858] [4.7 Regression] segfault at ../../gcc/libiberty/hashtab.c:981

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50858 --- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-10-25 09:50:51 UTC --- verify_gimple_stmt? Unlikely..

[Bug c++/50858] [4.7 Regression] segfault at ../../gcc/libiberty/hashtab.c:981

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50858 --- Comment #13 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2011-10-25 10:06:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) verify_gimple_stmt? Unlikely.. Yeah, it's unrelated. It's a dup of Bug 49996.

[Bug c++/49996] Internal error in verify_gimple_stmt: initializing struct in new-initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49996 Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus

[Bug c++/50858] [4.7 Regression] segfault at ../../gcc/libiberty/hashtab.c:981

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50858 --- Comment #14 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-10-25 10:10:09 UTC --- Thanks Markus, you are being helpful.

[Bug libstdc++/50862] New: deadlock in std::condition_variable_any

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862 Bug #: 50862 Summary: deadlock in std::condition_variable_any Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority:

[Bug libstdc++/50862] deadlock in std::condition_variable_any

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862 --- Comment #1 from basz bartosz.szurgot at pwr dot wroc.pl 2011-10-25 10:28:09 UTC --- Created attachment 25611 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25611 patch fixing the problem unlocking local mutex, before locking back user's

[Bug c++/50861] [4.7 Regression] ICE: internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘error_mark’ in tsubst_copy_and_build, at cp/pt.c:13526

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50861 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/50862] deadlock in std::condition_variable_any

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug c++/50863] New: [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] list-initialization with lambda fails to deduce constructor argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50863 Bug #: 50863 Summary: [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] list-initialization with lambda fails to deduce constructor argument Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug c++/49996] Internal error in verify_gimple_stmt: initializing struct in new-initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49996 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2011-10-25 12:54:16 UTC --- Created attachment 25612 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25612 chromium testcase Here is the delta reduced chromium testcase:

[Bug c++/49996] Internal error in verify_gimple_stmt: initializing struct in new-initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49996 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at

[Bug libstdc++/50862] deadlock in std::condition_variable_any

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.3 ---

[Bug c++/49996] Internal error in verify_gimple_stmt: initializing struct in new-initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49996 --- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2011-10-25 13:21:06 UTC --- Further reduced: % test.cpp #include string struct KeyParams { std::string hostname; std::string username; }; class SyncInternal { void

[Bug c++/50864] New: SFINAE bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50864 Bug #: 50864 Summary: SFINAE bug Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/50858] [4.7 Regression] segfault at ../../gcc/libiberty/hashtab.c:981

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50858 --- Comment #15 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-25 13:48:17 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Oct 25 13:48:10 2011 New Revision: 180430 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180430 Log: /cp 2011-10-25

[Bug c++/50858] [4.7 Regression] segfault at ../../gcc/libiberty/hashtab.c:981

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50858 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/50861] [4.7 Regression] ICE: internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘error_mark’ in tsubst_copy_and_build, at cp/pt.c:13526

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50861 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-25 13:48:17 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Oct 25 13:48:10 2011 New Revision: 180430 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180430 Log: /cp 2011-10-25

[Bug c++/50861] [4.7 Regression] ICE: internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘error_mark’ in tsubst_copy_and_build, at cp/pt.c:13526

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50861 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/50862] deadlock in std::condition_variable_any

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862 --- Comment #4 from basz bartosz.szurgot at pwr dot wroc.pl 2011-10-25 13:51:45 UTC --- the most recent document on C++0x i have is N3290. according to it it is so for condition_variable (30.5.1.9 and 30.5.1.10), but description for wait() of

[Bug libstdc++/50862] deadlock in std::condition_variable_any

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-25 14:09:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) condition_variable_any is a bit more confusing. it says that it must be called in 30.5.2.10, but 30.5.2.9 say it is undefined, if

[Bug c++/49996] Internal error in verify_gimple_stmt: initializing struct in new-initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49996 --- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2011-10-25 14:09:09 UTC --- Of course, my issue is totally independent from vituscze's problem. It just caused the same ICE. Should I open a new bug, or is it OK to continue

[Bug c/50865] New: Invalid code generation for INT64_MIN % -1 on x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50865 Bug #: 50865 Summary: Invalid code generation for INT64_MIN % -1 on x86_64 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker

[Bug driver/41844] lto1: warning: unknown register name: line-length-none

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41844 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/50864] SFINAE bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50864 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c++/50864] SFINAE bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50864 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug c/50865] Invalid code generation for INT64_MIN % 1 on x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50865 --- Comment #1 from Jaak Ristioja jaak at ristioja dot ee 2011-10-25 14:30:41 UTC --- Compiled with clang 2.9, the code runs correctly.

[Bug c++/49996] Internal error in verify_gimple_stmt: initializing struct in new-initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49996 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-25 14:44:02 UTC --- A new regression bug, please.

[Bug libstdc++/50862] deadlock in std::condition_variable_any

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862 --- Comment #6 from basz bartosz.szurgot at pwr dot wroc.pl 2011-10-25 14:45:29 UTC --- yes - you're right. i got this note all wrong. thanks for the clarifications and links!

[Bug c++/50866] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE in verify_gimple_stmt, at tree-cfg.c:4175

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50866 Bug #: 50866 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in verify_gimple_stmt, at tree-cfg.c:4175 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/49996] Internal error in verify_gimple_stmt: initializing struct in new-initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49996 --- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2011-10-25 14:48:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) A new regression bug, please. OK. Bug 50866.

[Bug c/50865] Invalid code generation for INT64_MIN % 1 on x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50865 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-10-25 14:56:55 UTC --- What do you think is wrong? C1X makes explicit what was intended before then: that both a/b and a%b have undefined behavior if the

[Bug c++/50864] SFINAE bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50864 --- Comment #3 from fate66260 at gmail dot com 2011-10-25 15:00:06 UTC --- Thank you for your response. wrong: allow_dereferencable right: allow_operable mpl::true_, mpl::false_ are included in boost/mpl/bool.hpp std::declval ... utility The

[Bug c++/50864] SFINAE bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50864 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug bootstrap/50822] [4.7 regression] Solaris/SPARC bootstrap failure with Sun as: invalid assembler for ios_init.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50822 --- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-25 15:04:19 UTC --- Even with .weakref disabled in gas, gcc emits symbol = nonexistant symbol which gas silently accepts, while Sun as does not. How is this supposed to work?

[Bug c/50865] Invalid code generation for INT64_MIN % 1 on x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50865 Jaak jaak.randmets at cyber dot ee changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jaak.randmets at

[Bug middle-end/50867] New: [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50867 Bug #: 50867 Summary: [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/50864] SFINAE bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50864 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-10-25 15:45:10 UTC --- To clarify: the reason why I'm asking a self-contained testcase from you is that the way I quickly hacked what you filed myself, I got the static_assert

[Bug middle-end/50868] New: [4.7 Regression] 1x176.gcc in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50868 Bug #: 50868 Summary: [4.7 Regression] 1x176.gcc in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build with LTO Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug c/50865] Invalid code generation for INT64_MIN % 1 on x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50865 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-10-25 15:52:38 UTC --- On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, jaak.randmets at cyber dot ee wrote: What do you think is wrong? C1X makes explicit what was intended before

[Bug c/50865] Invalid code generation for INT64_MIN % 1 on x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50865 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-10-25 15:55:28 UTC --- Ah, I see your point - this is % 1 not % -1, so there does indeed seem to be a bug here.

[Bug tree-optimization/50865] Invalid code generation for INT64_MIN % 1 on x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50865 Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug tree-optimization/50865] Invalid code generation for INT64_MIN % 1 on x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50865 --- Comment #7 from Jaak Ristioja jaak at ristioja dot ee 2011-10-25 16:08:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) /* X % -Y is the same as X % Y. */ (fold-const.c:fold_binary_loc) would probably be what's wrong here. On the other hand

[Bug middle-end/50868] [4.7 Regression] 1x176.gcc in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50868 Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus

[Bug tree-optimization/50865] Invalid code generation for INT64_MIN % 1 on x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50865 --- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-10-25 16:18:12 UTC --- On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, jaak at ristioja dot ee wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50865 --- Comment #7 from Jaak

[Bug tree-optimization/50865] Invalid code generation for INT64_MIN % 1 on x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50865 --- Comment #9 from Jaak Ristioja jaak at ristioja dot ee 2011-10-25 16:37:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) Well, they are equivalent where they are both defined, or if you apply C99 rules to infinite-precision integers. The problem here

[Bug c++/50864] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with decltype and declval from another namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50864 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug tree-optimization/50865] Invalid code generation for INT64_MIN % 1 on x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50865 --- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-10-25 17:13:51 UTC --- On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, jaak at ristioja dot ee wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50865 --- Comment #9 from Jaak

[Bug c++/50864] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with decltype and declval from another namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50864 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/50864] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with decltype and declval from another namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50864 --- Comment #8 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2011-10-25 18:08:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) The arrow operator (vs, eg, +) seems also essential. That makes sense to me, because the code could never be valid, so

[Bug c++/41449] Partial aggregate initialization not cleaned up on exception

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41449 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-25 18:24:32 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Oct 25 18:24:28 2011 New Revision: 180442 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180442 Log: PR c++/50866 PR

[Bug c++/50866] [4.7 Regression] ICE in verify_gimple_stmt, at tree-cfg.c:4175

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50866 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-25 18:24:32 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Oct 25 18:24:28 2011 New Revision: 180442 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180442 Log: PR c++/50866 PR

[Bug c++/49996] Internal error in verify_gimple_stmt: initializing struct in new-initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49996 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-25 18:24:22 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Oct 25 18:24:19 2011 New Revision: 180441 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180441 Log: PR c++/49996 *

[Bug c++/50864] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with decltype and declval from another namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50864 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c++/50864] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with decltype and declval from another namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50864 --- Comment #10 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2011-10-25 18:28:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) Now, however, in the light of the second half of your message, I guess we should have another PR for the ICE on valid

[Bug c/50869] New: ice in vt_expand_var_loc_chain

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50869 Bug #: 50869 Summary: ice in vt_expand_var_loc_chain Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/49996] Internal error in verify_gimple_stmt: initializing struct in new-initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49996 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/50866] [4.7 Regression] ICE in verify_gimple_stmt, at tree-cfg.c:4175

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50866 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug debug/50869] [4.7 Regression] ice in vt_expand_var_loc_chain

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50869 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c++/50870] New: [C++0x] ICE with decltype, operator-, and default template arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50870 Bug #: 50870 Summary: [C++0x] ICE with decltype, operator-, and default template arguments Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug c++/50864] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with decltype and declval from another namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50864 --- Comment #11 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2011-10-25 19:17:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) See bug 50870

[Bug bootstrap/50826] bootstrap on 64 bit pa broken by r180194, ICE in mem_loc_descriptor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826 --- Comment #7 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2011-10-25 19:53:31 UTC --- Bootstrapping and testing both look good with the patch.

[Bug tree-optimization/49316] ICE in in function_and_variable_visibility, at ipa.c:926 with g++.dg/tls/diag-1.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49316 Graham Reed greed at pobox dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||greed at pobox dot

[Bug lto/48851] lto-plugin.c:224:7: error: missing sentinel in function call [-Werror=format]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48851 --- Comment #25 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-25 20:07:26 UTC --- Author: mrs Date: Tue Oct 25 20:07:19 2011 New Revision: 180445 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180445 Log: PR

[Bug lto/48851] lto-plugin.c:224:7: error: missing sentinel in function call [-Werror=format]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48851 m...@gcc.gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/50862] deadlock in std::condition_variable_any

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-25 20:56:47 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Tue Oct 25 20:56:43 2011 New Revision: 180446 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180446 Log: PR libstdc++/50862 *

[Bug tree-optimization/50789] Gather vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50789 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/50867] [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50867 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tom at codesourcery

[Bug middle-end/50868] [4.7 Regression] 1x176.gcc in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50868 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/46603] gcc.dg/vect/slp-multitypes-2.c execution failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46603 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-25 22:26:25 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Tue Oct 25 22:26:20 2011 New Revision: 180457 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180457 Log: PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/46603] gcc.dg/vect/slp-multitypes-2.c execution failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46603 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/50871] New: [C++0x] G++ fails to reject explicitly-defaulted function definition with different exception spec

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50871 Bug #: 50871 Summary: [C++0x] G++ fails to reject explicitly-defaulted function definition with different exception spec Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1

[Bug libstdc++/50862] deadlock in std::condition_variable_any

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-25 22:29:41 UTC --- fixed on trunk so far, I'll wait until 4.6.2 is released then fix it for 4.6.3 too

[Bug middle-end/50770] limits-fndefn.c times out on ARM; runs 22 x faster with -fno-var-tracking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50770 Michael Hope michael.hope at linaro dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm ---

[Bug c++/50837] [c++0x] static_assert and constexpr in template class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50837 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/50763] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: missing PHI def with -ftree-tail-merge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50763 Serge Belyshev belyshev at depni dot sinp.msu.ru changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/50867] [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50867 Serge Belyshev belyshev at depni dot sinp.msu.ru changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug driver/46617] String concatenation fools extraction for translation.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46617 --- Comment #1 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-26 00:50:16 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Oct 26 00:50:11 2011 New Revision: 180466 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=180466 Log: 2011-10-25 Paolo

[Bug driver/46617] String concatenation fools extraction for translation.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46617 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/50872] New: internal compiler error: in inline_small_functions, at ipa-inline.c:1413

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50872 Bug #: 50872 Summary: internal compiler error: in inline_small_functions, at ipa-inline.c:1413 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: